Relationship between Joint National Committee-VI classification of hypertension and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension diagnosed by casual blood pressure

Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement

DESCRIPTION

Update of the 2007 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) reaffirmation recommendation statement on screening for high blood pressure in adults.

METHODS

The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of different methods for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension after initial screening and the optimal rescreening interval for diagnosing hypertension.

POPULATION

This recommendation applies to adults aged 18 years or older without known hypertension.

RECOMMENDATION

The USPSTF recommends screening for high blood pressure in adults aged 18 years or older. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends obtaining measurements outside of the clinical setting for diagnostic confirmation before starting treatment.

Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of blood pressure screening methods with consideration of rescreening intervals: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

BACKGROUND

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is the largest contributing risk factor to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

PURPOSE

To update a systematic review on the benefits and harms of screening for high BP in adults and to summarize evidence on rescreening intervals and diagnostic and predictive accuracy of different BP methods for cardiovascular events.

DATA SOURCES

Selected databases searched through 24 February 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Fair- and good-quality trials and diagnostic accuracy and cohort studies conducted in adults and published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

One investigator abstracted data, and a second checked for accuracy. Study quality was dual-reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) predicted long-term cardiovascular outcomes independently of office BP (hazard ratio range, 1.28 to 1.40, in 11 studies). Across 27 studies, 35% to 95% of persons with an elevated BP at screening remained hypertensive after nonoffice confirmatory testing. Cardiovascular outcomes in persons who were normotensive after confirmatory testing (isolated clinic hypertension) were similar to outcomes in those who were normotensive at screening. In 40 studies, hypertension incidence after rescreening varied considerably at each yearly interval up to 6 years. Intrastudy comparisons showed at least 2-fold higher incidence in older adults, those with high-normal BP, overweight and obese persons, and African Americans.

LIMITATION

Few diagnostic accuracy studies of office BP methods and protocols in untreated adults.

CONCLUSION

Evidence supports ABPM as the reference standard for confirming elevated office BP screening results to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment of persons with isolated clinic hypertension. Persons with BP in the high-normal range, older persons, those with an above-normal body mass index, and African Americans are at higher risk for hypertension on rescreening within 6 years than are persons without these risk factors.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension.

METHODS

Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF.

RESULTS

In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives.

CONCLUSION

This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect.