Cardiovascular happenings in Europe

Application of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in elderly patients

This study aims to analyze the factors that affect the prognosis of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in elderly patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Data obtained from 41 elderly patients with AKI who underwent CRRT in our department between January 2001 and December 2010 was retrospectively evaluated in this study. The enrolled patients were 80 to 100 years old, with a mortality of 60.98%. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 27.8±5.6 points, and the mean risk coefficient was 0.80±0.10. The APACHE II score of the survival group was significantly higher than that of the death group. The comparisons of therapeutic dosages between <25 mL/(kg⋅h) and 25-50 mL/(kg⋅h), and between 25-50 mL/(kg⋅h) and >50 mL/(kg⋅h) all had no statistical significance. The prognosis of CRRT and the number of involved organs were related to the APACHE II score. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of involved organ, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, and hypoalbuminemia were the major risk coefficients that affected the prognosis of patients with bedside hemofiltration. The turnover of elderly CRRT patients was related to the number of involved organs, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, hypoalbuminemia, and other factors. The APACHE II score was the important reference index of CRRT starting time and could predict mortality risk.

Clearance and safety of the radiocontrast medium iopamidol in peritoneal dialysis patients

Although the characteristics and safety of radiocontrast media in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are not yet well defined, their use in PD patients is considered generally safe. In this study, we evaluated clearance and adverse events of iopamidol in PD patients. We measured the iopamidol concentration in the plasma, dialysate, and urine of 11 patients. Iopamidol clearance from patient plasma was delayed with a half-life of 33.3 h, and the elimination ratio was 83.6% for 96 h. We retrospectively investigated adverse events occurring in a total of 50 stable PD patients who underwent a total of 64 angiographic computed tomography (CT) scans. In 64 angiographic CT scans, two cases of adverse events were observed. Our results suggest that iopamidol can be eliminated by regular PD and careful observation for adverse events are necessary for the safe use of radiocontrast media.

Extracorporeal blood purification therapies for prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RCIN) causes acute kidney injury and increases mortality. Studies have examined the capacity of various forms of extracorporeal blood purification therapies for the prevention of RCIN, with conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review of published trials to determine whether periprocedural extracorporeal blood purification prevents RCIN.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Collaboration Database, EMBASE, and CINAHL through January 2006 and bibliographies of retrieved articles and consulted with experts to identify relevant studies. Published studies of extracorporeal blood purification for the prevention of RCIN in patients receiving radiocontrast were included. Two authors reviewed all citations. The primary end point is the incidence of RCIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration (>or=0.5 mg/dL [>or=44 micromol/L]). Results were combined on the risk ratio scale. Random-effects models were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of extracorporeal blood purification modality, study design, and sample size.

RESULTS

Eight trials (6 randomized controlled trials, 2 nonrandomized trials) were included in the analysis (pooled sample size, 412). Six trials assessed hemodialysis, whereas 1 trial each assessed continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. The incidence of RCIN was 35.2% in the standard-medical-therapy group and 27.8% in the extracorporeal-blood-purification group. Extracorporeal blood purification did not decrease the incidence of RCIN significantly compared with standard medical therapy (risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 2.14); however, intertrial heterogeneity was high. Limiting analysis to only randomized trials did not eliminate heterogeneity, but limiting analysis to only hemodialysis trials did. Periprocedural hemodialysis did not decrease the incidence of RCIN.

CONCLUSION

This critical analysis of the published literature suggests that periprocedural extracorporeal blood purification does not decrease the incidence of RCIN compared with standard medical therapy.