Symptom burden in cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis

The Effect of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Managing Symptom Clusters Among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients often experience multiple concurrent and related symptoms, or symptom clusters. Research increasingly indicates that targeting a symptom cluster as an overall entity instead of individual symptoms could be more effective and efficient in improving patients' quality of life. Various nonpharmacological interventions are used to manage symptom clusters in cancer patients during and after treatment, but the effect of such interventions is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a summary of such interventions and evaluate their effects in terms of symptom cluster severity, quality of life, and functional ability of patients with cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of 5 English and 2 Chinese electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CNKI, and Wanfang) was combined with hand searching, to identify eligible research studies from 2001 to January 2018. Two reviewers carried out data selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal independently. A narrative approach was used to summarize data.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials, involving 1490 patients, were included in the review. The methodological quality of the studies was generally fair. Nonpharmacological interventions can reduce the severity of symptom clusters, especially the pain-fatigue-sleep disturbance, cognitive, and gastrointestinal clusters, and improve both quality of life and functional ability.

CONCLUSIONS

While symptom cluster interventions are potentially useful in cancer care, further well-designed research is needed to test them rigorously on various types of cancer symptom clusters.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nonpharmacological interventions are shown to be effective in managing cancer-associated symptom clusters and could be considered as part of the existing healthcare services for cancer patients.

Acupuncture for chronic cancer-related pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Chronic cancer-related pain is one of the most common excruciating symptom that can be caused by the cancer (by the primary tumour or by metastases) or by its treatment (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Although multiple clinical trials and systematic reviews have suggested that acupuncture could be effective in treating chronic cancer-related pain, the comparative efficacy and safety of these acupuncture methods remains unclear. We, therefore, performed this study to evaluate and rank the efficacy and safety of different acupuncture methods for chronic cancer-related pain.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Seven databases will be searched, including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, the Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) from their inception to March 2020. The primary outcome is the change of pain intensity. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be conducted using software R3.5.1. Finally, we will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System (GRADE) to assess the quality of evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for literature-based studies. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020165747.

Who Is a Cancer Survivor? A Systematic Review of Published Definitions

The term "cancer survivor" is commonly used by different persons, clinical institutions, academic bodies, and political organizations although it lacks of a unanimous and detailed definition. The objective of the study is to make a systematic review of published and proposed definitions of "cancer survivor." Utilizing a systematic search strategy with different strings of "cancer survivor," we searched the following databases: Medline (June 1975-June 2015), Scopus (all the years), Web of Science (all the years), Google Scholar (all the years), ERIC (all the years). This review suggests that there is not a unique definition of who is a "cancer survivor" and what is "cancer survivorship." However, the most widely used definition sees cancer survivorship as a process that begins at the moment of diagnosis and continues through the balance of life. This definition highlights psychological and legal patient's needs-as well as medical ones-to receive care and assistance from the beginning and, at the same time, it establishes valid criteria for making scientific and statistical sampling research. The extensive use of the term "cancer survivor" indicates that it is a significant term. This review has been written to outline the state of the art and it invites to reflect on a shared definition that could satisfy both clinical and research aspects. Implication for cancer survivors: this compendium of proposed definitions may improve communication among the many patients and patient organizations that use and work with this term.

Psychological interventions to improve the quality of life in Indian lung cancer patients: A neglected area

The incidence of lung cancer is very high and evidence suggests that patients experience imbalanced emotional capabilities due to less survival rate compared to other cancers. Direct and indirect psychological interventions are mandatory to improve the outcome of lung cancer treatment. Although such interventions are being practiced in developed nations, the effects of psychological interventions on the treatment outcome in the Indian context are lacking. Since there is a definite correlation between treatment outcome and psychological issues, it is high time that clinicians in developing countries including India adopt practices to enhance the quality of life of lung cancer patients.