C-MYC-positive relapsed and refractory, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Impact of additional "hits" and outcomes with subsequent therapy

Novel Immune-Based treatments for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The Post-CAR T Cell Era

Prognosis for patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Immune-based therapeutic treatments such as CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for R/R DLBCL leading to durable remissions in ~ 50% of patients. However, there remains an unmet need for developing novel therapies to improve clinical outcomes of patients not responding or relapsing after CAR T cell therapies. Lack of suitable immunotherapeutic targets and disease heterogeneity represent the foremost challenges in this emerging field. In this review, we discuss the recently approved and emerging novel immunotherapies for patients with R/R DLBCL in the post-CAR T era and the cell surface targets currently used.

Defining and Treating High-grade B-cell lymphoma, NOS

High-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBL, NOS) is a recently introduced diagnostic category for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. It includes tumors with Burkitt-like or blastoid morphology that do not have double-hit cytogenetics and that cannot be classified as other well-defined lymphoma subtypes. HBCL, NOS are rare and heterogeneous; most have germinal center B-cell phenotype, and up to 45% carry a single-hit MYC rearrangement, but otherwise they have no unifying immunophenotypic or cytogenetic characteristics. Recent analyses utilizing gene expression profiling (GEP) revealed that up to 15% of tumors currently classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma display a HGBL-like GEP signature, indicating a potential to significantly expand the HGBL category using more objective molecular criteria. Optimal treatment of HGBL, NOS is poorly defined due to its rarity and inconsistent diagnostic patterns. A minority of patients have early-stage disease which can be managed with standard RCHOP-based approaches with or without radiation. For advanced-stage HGBL, NOS, which often presents with aggressive, disseminated disease, high lactate dehydrogenase, and involvement of extranodal organs (including the central nervous system [CNS]), intensified Burkitt lymphoma-like regimens with CNS prophylaxis may be appropriate. However, many patients diagnosed at age > 60 years are not eligible for intensive immunochemotherapy. An improved, GEP and/or genomic-based pathologic classification that could facilitate HGBL-specific trials is needed to improve outcomes for all patients. In this review, we discuss the current clinicopathologic concept of HGBL, NOS, existing data on its prognosis and treatment, and delineate potential future taxonomy enrichments based on emerging molecular diagnostics.

Is autologous transplant in relapsed DLBCL patients achieving only a PET+ PR appropriate in the CAR T-cell era?

For relapsed chemosensitive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), consolidation with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is a standard option. With the approval of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in 2017, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) reported a 45% decrease in the number of auto-HCTs for DLBCL in the United States. Using the CIBMTR database, we identified 249 relapsed DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HCT from 2003 to 2013 with a positive positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)+ partial response prior to transplant were identified. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: early chemoimmunotherapy failure (ECF), defined as patients with primary refractory disease (PRefD) or relapse within 12 months of diagnosis and late chemoimmunotherapy failure, defined as patients relapsing after ≥12 months. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and relapse. A total of 182 patients had ECF, whereas 67 did not. Among ECF cohort, 79% had PRefD. The adjusted 5-year probabilities for PFS and OS (ECF vs no ECF) were not different: 41% vs 41% (P = .93) and 51% vs 63% (P = .09), respectively. On multivariate analysis, ECF patients had an increased risk for death (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.46; P = .03) but not for PFS or relapse. In conclusion, for relapsed chemosensitive DLBCL patients with residual PET/CT+ disease prior to auto-HCT, the adjusted 5-year PFS (41%) was comparable, irrespective of time to relapse. These data support ongoing application of auto-HCT in chemosensitive DLBCL.

Immunotherapies Old and New: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells, and Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is curable in a majority of patients; however, a significant portion of patients develop relapsed or refractory disease. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant is the standard approach in appropriately selected patients. Many patients are not candidates for transplant and many who do receive autologous transplant relapse. Therapies which harness T cells including chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies are active in this chemotherapy-resistant population. We review the role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplant, CAR-T therapy, and bispecific antibodies in the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phase I studies of bispecific antibodies directed against CD20 × CD3 have shown activity in heavily pre-treated DLBCL including in patients who have progressed following autologous transplant and/or CAR-T therapy. Two CAR-T products have received regulatory approval in relapsed or refractory DLBCL, with other products in clinical trials. CAR-T treatment has resulted in durable remissions and trials are ongoing to determine if CAR-T should replace autologous transplant as second-line therapy for DLBCL. The development of multiple T cell-directed therapies for DLBCL offers new treatment options for chemotherapy-resistant disease. We discuss our approach to relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients and the open question of optimal sequencing of autologous transplant (a current standard treatment), CAR-T therapy (FDA approved), and bispecific antibodies (in clinical trials).

ADCs, BiTEs, CARs, and Small Molecules: A New Era of Targeted Therapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Novel immunotherapies and small molecular inhibitors are transforming our approach to previously treated and newly diagnosed patients across the spectrum of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Anti-CD19 CAR T cells are now indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas after at least two previous lines of therapy in which durable remissions are achieved in approximately 40% of previously incurable patients. Second-line chemoimmunotherapy remains the standard of care at first relapse, but poor outcomes with conventional treatment in this setting creates an appealing rationale for earlier use of CAR T cells, which is currently under investigation, along with even earlier use in selected high-risk patients in the frontline setting. Other emerging immunotherapies include antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), such as polatuzumab vedotin for multiple-relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in combination with bendamustine-rituximab. Multiple bispecific antibodies that bring malignant B cells in contact with effector T cells appear promising in early clinical trials and will likely emerge as off-the-shelf immunotherapy options. Chemotherapy-free small molecule-based regimens are increasingly available for mantle cell (MCLs) and follicular lymphomas (FLs). Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) now represent standard second-line therapy for MCL and are being investigated in combination and as initial therapy. Lenalidomide-rituximab is an active regimen in both FL and MCL and may be used in either relapsed/refractory or previously untreated disease. Three PI3K inhibitors are approved for multiple-relapsed FL and can induce durable remissions in patients with chemotherapy- and rituximab-refractory disease. Additional emerging targeted therapies include BCL2 inhibition in MCL and EZH2 inhibition in FL.

Molecular Genetics of Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Insight into Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance

The majority of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be treated successfully with a combination of chemotherapy and the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Nonetheless, approximately one-third of the patients with DLBCL still experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line immunochemotherapy. Whole-exome sequencing on large cohorts of primary DLBCL has revealed the mutational landscape of DLBCL, which has provided a framework to define novel prognostic subtypes in DLBCL. Several studies have investigated the genetic alterations specifically associated with R/R DLBCL, thereby uncovering molecular pathways linked to therapy resistance. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the genetic alterations that are enriched in R/R DLBCL, and the corresponding pathways affected by these gene mutations. Furthermore, we elaborate on their potential role in mediating therapy resistance, also in connection with findings in other B-cell malignancies, and discuss alternative treatment options. Hence, this review provides a comprehensive overview on the gene lesions and molecular mechanisms underlying R/R DLBCL, which are considered valuable parameters to guide treatment.

Signal Pathways and Therapeutic Prospects of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma which is heterogeneous both clinically and morphologically. Over the past decades, significant advances have been made in the understanding of the molecular genesis, leading to the identification of multiple pathways and molecules that can be targeted for clinical benefit.

OBJECTIVE

The current review aims to present a brief overview of signal pathways of DLBCL, which mainly focus on B-cell antigen Receptor (BCR), Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB), Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K) - protein kinase B (Akt) - mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR), Janus Kinase (JAK) - Signal Transducer and Activator (STAT), Wnt/β-catenin, and P53 pathways.

METHODS

Activation of signal pathways may contribute to the generation, development, chemotherapy sensitivity of DLBCL, and expression of pathway molecules is associated with the prognosis of DLBCL. Some agents targeting these pathways have been proved effective and relevant clinical trials are in progress. These agents used single or combined with chemotherapy/each other might raise the possibility of improving clinical outcomes in DLBCL.

CONCLUSION

This review presents several signal pathways of DLBCL and targeted agents had a tendency to improve the curative effect, especially in high-risk or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

The clinicopathological and genetic features of ovarian diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Ovarian lymphoma, whether a primary or secondary condition, is very rare. Little is known about its genetic aberrations. Here, we reviewed the clinical, morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of nine ovarian diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cases and performed fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis to detect MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 translocations. We also performed whole exome sequencing analysis to determine their genomic features compared with those of conventional extranodal DLBCL. The results showed that six of nine cases were bilateral and three cases were left-sided. Histologically, the tumour cells were homogeneous and a starry-sky pattern was very common in ovarian DLBCL (Burkitt-like). Immunohistochemically, most of the cases (7/9) were germinal centre B-cell-like (GCB) subtype, and dual expression of MYC and BCL2 was found in three cases of ovarian DLBCL. A double-hit (involving MYC and BCL6) phenotype was found in one case of ovarian DLBCL (GCB subtype). Sequencing analysis revealed that NOTCH4, NCOR2, BCL10 and CARD11 were frequently mutated both in ovarian DLBCL and conventional extranodal DLBCL. COL27A1, PRKCB, HLA-A, NOTCH3 and HDAC4 mutations were found only in ovarian DLBCL but not in conventional DLBCL, and NOTCH3 and HDAC4 mutations were only identified in the GCB subtype. Furthermore, several signalling pathways including the B-cell receptor, Epstein-Barr virus infection, HTLV-1 infection, Notch, PI3K-AKT and mTOR were found to be involved in ovarian DLBCL. Our results broaden the understanding of the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of ovarian DLBCL and compare their genetic features to those of conventional extranodal DLBCL for the first time.

The Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Era of CAR-T Cell Therapy

For many years now and based on the results of the PARMA trial, relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is treated with salvage combination cytotoxic chemotherapy (most often platinum-based) followed by high dose myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). This approach has resulted in long-term disease free survival in about half of the patients. With the incorporation of rituximab in the upfront treatment (RCHOP), more patients with DLBCL are cured but there has been a signal of inferior outcomes with auto-HCT if DLBCL relapses. Nevertheless, a careful review of the literature still shows very good outcomes with auto-HCT for DLBCL with complete remission to salvage chemotherapy. For those who do not respond well to classic salvage other approaches are reviewed here including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and treatment with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) as well as bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs). The outcome of auto-HCT after successful treatment with ADCs or BITEs is unknown. It is also unknown if CAR-T cell therapy should be reserved for those who have failed 2 lines of chemotherapy or it should be moved earlier. Finally, we review here the effects of Myc and bcl2 amplifications or translocations to the outcome of the auto-HCT. Some attempts to improve the salvage or conditioning regimens are mentioned. We also discuss the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in the paradigm of treatment for relapsed DLBCL.

Current perspectives on the treatment of double hit lymphoma

Introduction: Double hit lymphoma (DHL) represents a new diagnostic category with genetic, immunohistochemical and clinical characteristics intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma. Patients with DHL usually experience poor survival after frontline R-CHOP treatment and require alternative therapies. However, the ideal therapeutic options remain undefined. Areas covered: Traditional therapies for the treatment of DHL are discussed, including intensive induction, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), methotrexate CNS-directed prophylaxis, and radiation therapy. The authors further introduce small-molecule inhibitors targeting myc or bcl-2 signaling pathways, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody and immunomodulatory drugs as novel approaches. Expert opinion: No standard treatment exists for DHL. At present, DA-EPOCH-R exhibits an upfront induction option. Central nervous system prophylaxis with methotrexate is recommended as part of the induction therapy. For those who do not obtain complete remission, HSCT or clinical trials should be considered. Targeted approaches, especially chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and small-molecule inhibitors targeting myc or bcl-2, exhibit the potential of improving outcomes for patients with DHL. High-throughput sequencing is a promising technique both at diagnosis and relapse, in order to predict outcomes and potential novel therapies.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma originating from the germinal center, and it represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with variable outcomes that are differentially characterized by clinical features, cell of origin (COO), molecular features, and most recently, frequently recurring mutations.

DIAGNOSIS

DLBCL is ideally diagnosed from an excisional biopsy of a suspicious lymph node, which shows sheets of large cells that disrupt the underlying structural integrity of the follicle center and stain positive for pan-B-cell antigens, such as CD20 and CD79a. COO is determined by immunohistochemical stains, while molecular features such as double-hit or triple-hit disease are determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. Commercial tests for frequently recurring mutations are currently not routinely used to inform treatment.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Clinical prognostic systems for DLBCL, including the rituximab International Prognostic Index, age-adjusted IPI, and NCCN-IPI, use clinical factors for the risk stratification of patients, although this does not affect the treatment approach. Furthermore, DLBCL patients with non-germinal center B-cell (GCB)-like DLBCL (activated B-cell like and unclassifiable) have a poorer response to up-front chemoimmunotherapy (CI) compared to patients with GCB-like DLBCL. Those with c-MYC-altered disease alone and in combination with translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (particularly when the MYC translocation partner is immunoglobulin) respond poorly to up-front CI and salvage autologous stem cell transplant at relapse.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

This review will focus on differential treatment of DLBCL up-front and at the time of relapse by COO and molecular features.

Prognostic analysis of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy

Objectives

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is routinely used in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for staging, assessment of remission and recurrence, and estimation of therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of an early interim PET/computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of response in DLBCL.

Methods

Sixty primary DLBCL patients (31 females) were analyzed. Baseline and follow-up ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was performed in patients after one cycle (n = 30) and two cycles (n = 30) of chemotherapy. The ΔSUVmax% was calculated. Patients were additionally evaluated using the conventional Deauville five-point scale (D-5PS) system. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was employed to characterize the MYC gene status. We determined the optimum cutoff value of ΔSUVmax% using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to test for the influence of prognostic values.

Results

The optimal cutoff for the prediction of treatment outcome was a ΔSUVmax% of 57% (after one cycle) and 63% (after two cycles); we could not detect a difference in accuracy with respect to a PET scan performed after one cycle and two cycles of chemotherapy (P  > 0.05). The ΔSUVmax% and the D-5PS (score 5) showed the highest prognostic value compared to a score of 3 and/or 4 (both after one cycle and two cycles). No significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or the area of under the curve (AUC) of ΔSUVmax% and D-5PS (score 5) was observed between PETs performed after one cycle or two cycles of therapy (P  > 0.05). ΔSUVmax%, D-5PS (score 5), and MYC gene rearrangement correlated significantly (P  < 0.001).

Conclusion

Interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT after one cycle of chemotherapy is feasible and yields similar predictive results as compared to an interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT after two cycles of chemotherapy in patients suffering from DLBCL. The combination of interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT with the MYC gene diagnosis might provide increased prognostic value for DLBCL.

Characterization of two new high-grade B-cell lymphoma cell lines with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements that are suitable for in vitro drug sensitivity studies

High-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangements are highly aggressive B-cell lymphomas called double-hit lymphomas (HGBL-DH). They are particularly refractory to standard treatments and carry a poor prognosis. Fragments of resected tumoral lymph nodes from two HGBL-DH patients were put in culture. Continuously proliferating cells were characterized and compared with the original tumors. In both cases, the proliferating cells and the tumor displayed MYC and BCL2 rearrangements. Both cell lines (called LB5848-LYMP and LB5871-LYMP) presented a high proliferation rate and were maintained in culture for more than one year. Upon injection in immunodeficient mice, LB5848-LYMP gave rise to lymphoid tumors. In vitro treatment of these cell lines with a BCL2-inhibitory drug (ABT-199) selectively stopped their proliferation. These new cell lines represent valuable tools for studying HGBL-DH and for the in vitro testing of candidate therapies targeting HGBL-DH. LB5848-LYMP is also suitable for similar experiments in vivo.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide, representing approximately 30-40% of all cases in different geographic regions. Patients most often present with a rapidly growing tumour mass in single or multiple, nodal or extranodal sites. The most common type of DLBCL, designated as not otherwise specified, represents 80-85% of all cases and is the focus of this review. There are also rare types of lymphoma composed of large B-cells, in aggregate about 15-20% of all neoplasms that are sufficiently distinctive to recognise separately. DLBCL not otherwise specified (referred to henceforth as DLBCL) is a heterogeneous entity in terms of clinical presentation, genetic findings, response to therapy, and prognosis. A major advance was the application of gene expression profiling (GEP) to the study of DLBCL which further clarified this heterogeneity and provided a rationale for subdividing cases into groups. The most popular system divides cases of DLBCL according to cell-of-origin into germinal centre B-cell like (GCB) and activated B-cell like (ABC) subtypes, with about 10-15% of cases being unclassifiable. Patients with the GCB subtype usually have better prognosis than patients with the ABC subtype. Although cell-of-origin is useful for predicting outcome, the GCB and ABC subtypes remain heterogeneous, with better and worse prognostic subsets within each group. Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of DLBCL has facilitated global identification of numerous and diverse genetic abnormalities in these neoplasms and has shown that GCB and ABC tumours have different mutation profiles. Although the therapy of patients with DLBCL is an active area of research, the current 5-year overall survival rate is 60-70% using standard-of-care frontline therapy. A precision medicine approach for the design of new therapies based on molecular findings in DLBCL is likely the best path forward. As pathologists, our role has expanded beyond diagnosis. We must perform a complete work-up of DLBCL cases. In addition to our traditional role in establishing the diagnosis, we need to analyse markers that provide information regarding prognosis and potential therapeutic targets. We also must ensure that adequate tissue is triaged for molecular studies which are essential for designing therapy regimens, particularly in the setting of disease relapse.