1
|
Franco FB, Leeman JE, Fedorov A, Vangel M, Fennessy FM. Early change in apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and external beam radiation therapy for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e607-e615. [PMID: 38302377 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
AIM To determine the role of serial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a biomarker for response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, institutional review board (IRB)-approved prospective study included 12 patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients prior to nADT and EBRT, who underwent serial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at baseline (BL), 8-weeks after nADT initiation (time point [TP]1), 6-weeks into EBRT delivery (TP2), and 6-months after nADT initiation (TP3). Tumour volume (tVOL) and tumour and normal tissue ADC (tADC and nlADC) were determined at all TPs. tADC and nlADC dynamics were correlated with post-treatment PSA using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Paired t-tests compared pre/post-treatment ADC. RESULTS There was a sequential decrease in PSA at all TPs, reaching their lowest values at TP3 post-treatment completion. Mean tADC increased significantly from baseline to TP1 (917.8 ± 107.7 × 10-6 versus 1033.8 ± 139.3 × 10-6 mm2/s; p<0.01), with no subsequent change at TP2 or TP3. Both percentage and absolute change in tADC from BL to TP1 correlated with post-treatment PSA (r=-0.666, r=-0.674; p=0.02). Post-treatment PSA in good responders (<0.1 ng/ml) versus poor responders (≥ 0.1 ng/ml) was associated with a greater increase in tADC from BL to TP1 (169.2 ± 122.4 × 10-6 versus 22.9 ± 75.5 × 10-6 mm2/s, p=0.03). CONCLUSION This pilot study demonstrates the potential for early ADC metrics as a biomarker of response to nADT and EBRT in intermediate to high-risk PCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F B Franco
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - J E Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - A Fedorov
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - M Vangel
- Statistician, General Clinical Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02214, USA
| | - F M Fennessy
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kwak L, Ravi P, Armstrong JG, Beckendorf V, Chin JL, D'Amico AV, Dearnaley DP, Di Stasi SM, Gillessen S, Lukka H, Mottet N, Pommier P, Seiferheld W, Sydes MR, Tombal B, Zapatero A, Regan MM, Xie W, Sweeney CJ. Prognostic Impact of Prostate-Specific Antigen at 6 Months After Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2300762. [PMID: 38471051 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at 6 months after completion of radiotherapy (RT) in patients treated with RT alone, RT plus short-term (st; 3-6 months), and RT plus long-term (lt; 24-36 months) androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient data were obtained from 16 randomized trials evaluating RT ± ADT for localized prostate cancer (PCa) between 1987 and 2011. The lowest PSA recorded within 6 months after RT completion was identified and categorized as < or ≥0.1 ng/mL. The primary outcomes were metastasis-free survival (MFS), PCa-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS), from 12 months after random assignment. RESULTS Ninety-eight percent (n = 2,339/2,376) of patients allocated to RT alone, 84% (n = 4,756/5,658) allocated to RT + stADT, and 77% (n = 1,258/1,626) allocated to RT + ltADT had PSA ≥0.1 ng/mL within 6 months after completing RT. PSA ≥0.1 ng/mL was associated with lower MFS and OS and higher PCSM among patients allocated to RT ± ADT (RT - MFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.24 [95% CI, 1.21 to 4.16]; PCSM: subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.82 [0.51 to 6.49]; OS: HR, 1.72 [0.97 to 3.05]; RT + stADT - MFS: HR, 1.27 [1.12 to 1.44]; PCSM: sHR, 2.10 [1.52 to 2.92]; OS: HR, 1.26 [1.11 to 1.44]; RT + ltADT - MFS: HR, 1.58 [1.27 to 1.96]; PCSM: sHR, 1.97 [1.11 to 3.49]; OS: HR, 1.59 [1.27 to 1.99]). Five-year MFS rates among patients allocated to RT, RT + stADT, and RT + ltADT were 91% versus 79%, 83% versus 76%, and 87% versus 74%, respectively, based on PSA < or ≥0.1 ng/mL. CONCLUSION PSA ≥0.1 ng/mL within 6 months after RT completion was prognostic for lt outcomes in patients treated with RT ± ADT for localized PCa. This can be used to counsel patients treated with RT ± ADT and in guiding clinical trial design evaluating novel systemic therapies with RT + ADT as well as (de)intensification strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Kwak
- Department of Urology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Praful Ravi
- Department of Urology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - John G Armstrong
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Himanshu Lukka
- McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, La Princesa University Hospital, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Urology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- 6South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang H, Mendez L, Morton G, Loblaw A, Chung HT, Cheung P, Mesci A, Escueta V, Petchiny TN, Huang X, White SD, Downes M, Vesprini D, Liu SK. Brachytherapy for high grade prostate cancer induces distinct changes in circulating CD4 and CD8 T cells - Implications for systemic control. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110077. [PMID: 38176656 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
This exploratory study is a follow up to our previous investigation of immune response in the circulation of high-grade Gleason 9 prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + BT compared to EBRT alone. Notably, EBRT + BT demonstrates the potential to elicit an effect on CD4/CD8 ratio which may have attributed to improved clinical response to therapy. Our findings show promise for leveraging circulating immune cells as predictive biomarkers for radiotherapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wang
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - G Morton
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P Cheung
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Mesci
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - V Escueta
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - T N Petchiny
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - X Huang
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S D White
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S K Liu
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Francolini G, Detti B, Di Cataldo V, Garlatti P, Aquilano M, Allegra A, Lucidi S, Cerbai C, Ciccone LP, Salvestrini V, Stocchi G, Guerrieri B, Visani L, Loi M, Desideri I, Mangoni M, Meattini I, Livi L. Study protocol and preliminary results from a mono-centric cohort within a trial testing stereotactic body radiotherapy and abiraterone (ARTO-NCT03449719). Radiol Med 2022; 127:912-918. [PMID: 35763249 PMCID: PMC9349091 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01511-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background ARTO trial was designed to evaluate the difference in terms of outcomes between patients affected by oligo metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with Abiraterone acetate and randomized to receive or not SBRT on all sites of disease. Here, we present a preliminary analysis conducted on patients enrolled at promoting institution. Objective To present a preliminary overview about population features, clinical outcomes, adverse events, quality of life and explorative translational research. Design, setting, and participants ARTO (NCT03449719) is a phase II trial including patients affected by oligo mCRPC, randomized to receive standard of care (GnRH agonist or antagonist plus abiraterone acetate 1000 mg and oral prednisone 10 mg daily) with or without SBRT on all metastatic sites of disease. All subjects have < 3 bone or nodal metastases. All patients are treated in I line mCRPC setting, no previous lines of treatment for mCRPC are allowed. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Data about a mono-centric cohort of 42 patients enrolled are presented in the current analysis, with focus on baseline population features, PSA drop at 3 months, biochemical response, and quality of life outcomes. Descriptive statistics regarding translational research are also presented. Results and limitation Significant difference in terms of PSA drop at three months was not detected (p = 0.68). Biochemical response (PSA reduction > 50%) was reported in 73.7 versus 76.5% of patients in control vs SBRT arm, respectively (p = 0.84). All patients are alive. Progression occurred in 1 versus 0 patients in the control versus SBRT arm, respectively. After 3 months, an average decrease of 13 points in terms of Global Health Score was reported for the overall population. However, complete recovery was noticed at 6 months. Circulating tumor cells detection rate was 40%. Conclusions SBRT + Abiraterone treatment was safe and well tolerated, non-significant trend in terms of PSA drop and biochemical response at 3 months was detected in SBRT arm. Interestingly, CTCs detection in this selected cohort of oligo-mCRPC was lower if compared to historical data of unselected mCRPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Garlatti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Aquilano
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Allegra
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Lucidi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Cecilia Cerbai
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Pia Ciccone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Stocchi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Guerrieri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Biomarker-Based Evaluation of Treatment Response and Surveillance of HPV-Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-021-00386-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
6
|
Bryant AK, Nelson TJ, McKay RR, Kader AK, Parsons JK, Einck JP, Kane CJ, Sandhu AP, Mundt AJ, Murphy JD, Rose BS. Impact of age on treatment response in men with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. BJUI COMPASS 2021; 3:243-250. [PMID: 35492227 PMCID: PMC9045578 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyse the effect of age at diagnosis on clinical outcomes of localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiation therapy. Subjects and methods We identified 12 784 patients with intermediate‐ or high‐risk localized PCa treated with radiation therapy (RT) and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2000 and 2015 from nationwide Veterans Affairs data. Patients were grouped into three age categories (≤59, 60–69, and ≥70 years old). Outcomes included immediate PSA response (3‐month post‐RT PSA and 2‐year PSA nadir, grouped into <0.10 ng/ml, 0.10–0.49 ng/ml, and ≥0.50 ng/ml), biochemical recurrence, and PCa‐specific mortality. Multivariable regression models included ordinal logistic regression for short‐term PSA outcomes, Cox regression for biochemical recurrence, and Fine‐Gray competing risks regression for PCa‐specific mortality. Results A total of 2136 patients (17%) were ≤59 years old at diagnosis, 6107 (48%) were 60–69 years old, and 4541 (36%) were ≥70 years old. Median follow‐up was 6.3 years. Younger age was associated with greater odds of higher 3‐month PSA group (≤59 vs. ≥70: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.64–2.20; p < 0.001) and higher 2‐year PSA nadir group (≤59 vs. ≥70: aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.62–2.19, p < 0.001). Younger age was associated with greater risk of biochemical recurrence (≤59 vs. ≥70: adjusted hazard ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.26–1.67, p < 0.001) but not PCa‐specific mortality (p = 0.16). Conclusion In a large nationwide sample of US veterans treated with ADT and RT for localized PCa, younger age was associated with inferior short‐term PSA response and higher risk of biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex K. Bryant
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyVeterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Tyler J. Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - A. Karim Kader
- Department of UrologyUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - J. Kellogg Parsons
- Department of UrologyUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - John P. Einck
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Christopher J. Kane
- Department of UrologyUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ajay P. Sandhu
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Arno J. Mundt
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - James D. Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare SystemLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jasu J, Tolonen T, Antonarakis ES, Beltran H, Halabi S, Eisenberger MA, Carducci MA, Loriot Y, Van der Eecken K, Lolkema M, Ryan CJ, Taavitsainen S, Gillessen S, Högnäs G, Talvitie T, Taylor RJ, Koskenalho A, Ost P, Murtola TJ, Rinta-Kiikka I, Tammela T, Auvinen A, Kujala P, Smith TJ, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Isaacs WB, Nykter M, Kesseli J, Bova GS. Combined Longitudinal Clinical and Autopsy Phenomic Assessment in Lethal Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Recommendations for Advancing Precision Medicine. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 30:47-62. [PMID: 34337548 PMCID: PMC8317817 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic identification of data essential for outcome prediction in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) would accelerate development of precision oncology. OBJECTIVE To identify novel phenotypes and features associated with mPC outcome, and to identify biomarker and data requirements to be tested in future precision oncology trials. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed deep longitudinal clinical, neuroendocrine expression, and autopsy data of 33 men who died from mPC between 1995 and 2004 (PELICAN33), and related findings to mPC biomarkers reported in the literature. INTERVENTION Thirty-three men prospectively consented to participate in an integrated clinical-molecular rapid autopsy study of mPC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data exploration with correction for multiple testing and survival analysis from the time of diagnosis to time to death and time to first occurrence of severe pain as outcomes were carried out. The effect of seven complications on the modeled probability of dying within 2 yr after presenting with the complication was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Feature exploration revealed novel phenotypes related to mPC outcome. Four complications (pleural effusion, severe anemia, severe or controlled pain, and bone fracture) predict the likelihood of death within 2 yr. Men with Gleason grade group 5 cancers developed severe pain sooner than those with lower-grade tumors. Surprisingly, neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation was frequently observed in the setting of high serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (≥30 ng/ml). In 4/33 patients, no controlled (requiring analgesics) or severe pain was detected, and strikingly, 14/15 metastatic sites studied in these men did not express NE markers, suggesting an inverse relationship between NE differentiation and pain in mPC. Intracranial subdural metastasis is common (36%) and is usually clinically undetected. Categorization of "skeletal-related events" complications used in recent studies likely obscures the understanding of spinal cord compression and fracture. Early death from prostate cancer was identified in a subgroup of men with a low longitudinal PSA bandwidth. Cachexia is common (body mass index <0.89 in 24/31 patients) but limited to the last year of life. Biomarker review identified 30 categories of mPC biomarkers in need of winnowing in future trials. All findings require validation in larger cohorts, preferably alongside data from this study. CONCLUSIONS The study identified novel outcome subgroups for future validation and provides "vision for mPC precision oncology 2020-2050" draft recommendations for future data collection and biomarker studies. PATIENT SUMMARY To better understand variation in metastatic prostate cancer behavior, we assembled and analyzed longitudinal clinical and autopsy records in 33 men. We identified novel outcomes, phenotypes, and aspects of disease burden to be tested and refined in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juho Jasu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Teemu Tolonen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
- Fimlab Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | | | - Susan Halabi
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mario A. Eisenberger
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Michael A. Carducci
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Medical and Forensic Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Martijn Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charles J. Ryan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Institute of Oncology of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biosciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Cancer Science, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Gunilla Högnäs
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Timo Talvitie
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | | | - Antti Koskenalho
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Teemu J. Murtola
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
- TAYS Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Irina Rinta-Kiikka
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
- TAYS Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Teuvo Tammela
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
- TAYS Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Unit of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Paula Kujala
- Fimlab Laboratories, Department of Pathology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Thomas J. Smith
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - William B. Isaacs
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Matti Nykter
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - Juha Kesseli
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| | - G. Steven Bova
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Prostate Cancer Research Center, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, FI-33014, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Milonas D, Venclovas Z, Sasnauskas G, Ruzgas T. The Significance of Prostate Specific Antigen Persistence in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102453. [PMID: 34070052 PMCID: PMC8158093 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The current prostate cancer guidelines recommend performing the first prostate-specific antigen measurement at three months after radical prostatectomy. However, at an earlier measurement, persistence (≥0.1 ng/mL) of this biomarker could be found in up to 30% of cases, depending on the prostate cancer risk factors. Recent reports have demonstrated an increasing interest in prostate-specific antigen persistence as a possible additional predictor of disease progression and cancer-specific survival. However, the data remain scant, with weak evidence. We assessed the relationship between prostate-specific antigen persistence and long-term oncological outcomes within prostate cancer risk groups. We found that persistence of this biomarker could be used as an independent predictor of worse long-term outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients, while in intermediate-risk patients, this parameter significantly predicts only biochemical recurrence and has no impact on the outcomes in low-risk patients. Abstract Objective: To assess the significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence at the first measurement after radical prostatectomy (RP) on long-term outcomes in different prostate cancer risk groups. Methods: Persistent PSA was defined as ≥0.1 ng/mL at 4–8 weeks after RP. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, according to the preoperative PSA, pathological stage, grade group and lymph nodes status. The ten-year cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) were calculated in patients with undetectable and persistent PSA in different PCa-risk groups. Multivariate regression analyses depicted the significance of PSA persistence on each study endpoint. Results: Of all 1225 men, in 246 (20.1%), PSA persistence was detected. These men had an increased risk of BCR (hazard ratio (HR) 4.2, p < 0.0001), metastases (HR: 2.7, p = 0.002), CRM (HR: 5.5, p = 0.002) and OM (HR: 1.8, p = 0.01) compared to the men with undetectable PSA. The same significance of PSA persistence on each study endpoint was found in the high-risk group (HR: 2.5 to 6.2, p = 0.02 to p < 0.0001). In the intermediate-risk group, PSA persistence was found as a predictor of BCR (HR: 3.9, p < 0.0001), while, in the low-risk group, PSA persistence was not detected as a significant predictor of outcomes after RP. Conclusions: Persistent PSA could be used as an independent predictor of worse long-term outcomes in high-risk PCa patients, while, in intermediate-risk patients, this parameter significantly predicts only biochemical recurrence and has no impact on the outcomes in low-risk PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daimantas Milonas
- Medical Academy, Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania; (Z.V.); (G.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Zilvinas Venclovas
- Medical Academy, Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania; (Z.V.); (G.S.)
| | - Gustas Sasnauskas
- Medical Academy, Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania; (Z.V.); (G.S.)
| | - Tomas Ruzgas
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee S, Song H, Ahn H, Kim S, Choi JR, Kim K. Fiber-Optic Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors Based on Nanomaterials. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21030819. [PMID: 33530416 PMCID: PMC7865415 DOI: 10.3390/s21030819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Applying fiber-optics on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors is aimed at practical usability over conventional SPR sensors. Recently, field localization techniques using nanostructures or nanoparticles have been investigated on optical fibers for further sensitivity enhancement and significant target selectivity. In this review article, we explored varied recent research approaches of fiber-optics based localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensors. The article contains interesting experimental results using fiber-optic LSPR sensors for three different application categories: (1) chemical reactions measurements, (2) physical properties measurements, and (3) biological events monitoring. In addition, novel techniques which can create synergy combined with fiber-optic LSPR sensors were introduced. The review article suggests fiber-optic LSPR sensors have lots of potential for measurements of varied targets with high sensitivity. Moreover, the previous results show that the sensitivity enhancements which can be applied with creative varied plasmonic nanomaterials make it possible to detect minute changes including quick chemical reactions and tiny molecular activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seunghun Lee
- Departments of Congo-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea; (S.L.); (H.S.); (H.A.); (S.K.)
| | - Hyerin Song
- Departments of Congo-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea; (S.L.); (H.S.); (H.A.); (S.K.)
| | - Heesang Ahn
- Departments of Congo-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea; (S.L.); (H.S.); (H.A.); (S.K.)
| | - Seungchul Kim
- Departments of Congo-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea; (S.L.); (H.S.); (H.A.); (S.K.)
- Department of Optics and Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
| | - Jong-ryul Choi
- Medical Device Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation (DGMIF), Daegu 41061, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.-r.C.); (K.K.)
| | - Kyujung Kim
- Departments of Congo-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea; (S.L.); (H.S.); (H.A.); (S.K.)
- Department of Optics and Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
- Correspondence: (J.-r.C.); (K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Koontz BF, Hoffman KE, Halabi S, Healy P, Anand M, George DJ, Harrison MR, Zhang T, Berry WR, Corn PG, Lee WR, Armstrong AJ. Combination of Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen Blockade With Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for Men With High- and Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1271-1278. [PMID: 33259932 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC), despite substantial toxicity from the resulting hypogonadism. We hypothesized that a combination of more potent but shorter-term androgen inhibition in men with intermediate- or high-risk localized PC would synergize with definitive RT to provide short-term testosterone recovery and improve disease control. METHODS AND MATERIALS This prospective phase 2 single-arm trial enrolled men with low-volume unfavorable intermediate or high-risk localized PC. Treatment included 6 months of ADT concurrent with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) once daily and RT to prostate and seminal vesicles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of men with an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at 12-months; secondary objectives included biochemical progression-free survival (PFS), testosterone recovery, toxicity, and sexual and hormonal quality of life. RESULTS We enrolled 37 men between January 2014 and August 2016, 45% of whom were high risk. All patients had T1-2 disease and PSA < 20 ng/mL. Median follow-up is 37 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.7-39.1). Treatment noted 32% grade 3 toxicities related to AAP, predominantly hypertension, with no toxicities ≥G4. The rate of undetectable PSA at 12 months was 55% (95% CI, 36%-72%). With 46 months of median follow-up, 2 of 37 patients developed PSA progression (36-month PFS = 96%; 95% CI, 76%-99%), and 81% of patients recovered testosterone with a median time to recovery of 9.2 months. Hormonal or sexual function declined at 6 months with subsequent improvement by 24 months. CONCLUSIONS The combination of RT and 6 months of ADT and AAP demonstrated acceptable toxicity and a high rate of testosterone recovery with restoration of quality of life and excellent disease control in men with low-volume, intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Prospective comparative studies are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget F Koontz
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan Halabi
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Patrick Healy
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Monika Anand
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel J George
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael R Harrison
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tian Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William R Berry
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul G Corn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - W Robert Lee
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang H, Mendez LC, Morton G, Loblaw A, Mesci A, Chung HT, Chan S, Huang X, Downes MR, Vesprini D, Liu SK. Immune cell profiling in Gleason 9 prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy versus external beam radiotherapy: An exploratory study. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:80-85. [PMID: 33172830 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This exploratory study evaluates immunological changes in high-risk Gleason 9 prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT+BT compared to EBRT alone. Notably, BT demonstrates the potential to elicit a T cell response which may support further investigation using circulating immune cells as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for radiotherapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wang
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - L C Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada
| | - G Morton
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Mesci
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - H T Chung
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - S Chan
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - X Huang
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - M R Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - D Vesprini
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - S K Liu
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu FJ, Li IH, Chien WC, Shih JH, Lin YC, Chuang CM, Cheng YD, Kao LT. Androgen deprivation therapy and the risk of iron-deficiency anaemia among patients with prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034202. [PMID: 32213519 PMCID: PMC7170598 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The administration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to patients with metastatic prostate cancer might be associated with some adverse effects such as anaemia; however, few studies have been performed in East Asian populations. This study aimed to investigate the association between ADT and iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) among patients with prostate cancer in a population-based nationwide cohort. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS Data for the cohort study were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Propensity score matching was used to select 7262 patients with prostate cancer who received ADT as the study group and 3631 patients who did not receive ADT as the control group. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES This study individually tracked patients over a 3-year study period and identified those who were subsequently diagnosed with IDA following the index date. RESULTS The incidence rates of IDA in the study and control groups were 1.66 (95% CI CI 1.45 to 1.86) and 1.01 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.78 to 1.25), respectively. Furthermore, proportional Cox regression revealed an HR of 1.62 (95% CI 1.24 to 2.12) for IDA in the study group after adjusting for patients' age, monthly income, geographic location, residential urbanisation level and incidence of hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, inflammatory bowel disease, other cancers and gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSION Compared with its non-use among patients with prostate cancer, ADT use was associated with a higher risk of IDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Jen Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, West Garden Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsun Li
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Pharmacology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wu-Chien Chien
- Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Hu Shih
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Lin
- Research Center of Biostatistics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Min Chuang
- Emergency Department, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Dih Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ting Kao
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wark L, Quon H, Ong A, Drachenberg D, Rangel-Pozzo A, Mai S. Long-Term Dynamics of Three Dimensional Telomere Profiles in Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation and Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11081165. [PMID: 31416141 PMCID: PMC6721586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-specific assessment, disease monitoring, and the development of an accurate early surrogate of the therapeutic efficacy of locally advanced prostate cancer still remain a clinical challenge. Contrary to prostate biopsies, circulating tumor cell (CTC) collection from blood is a less-invasive method and has potential as a real-time liquid biopsy and as a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy. In this study, we used size-based filtration to isolate CTCs from the blood of 100 prostate cancer patients with high-risk localized disease. CTCs from five time points: +0, +2, +6, +12 and +24 months were analyzed. Consenting treatment-naïve patients with cT3, Gleason 8-10, or prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL and non-metastatic prostate cancer were included. For all time points, we performed 3D telomere-specific quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization on a minimum of thirty isolated CTCs. The patients were divided into five groups based on the changes of number of telomeres vs. telomere lengths over time and into three clusters based on all telomere parameters found on diagnosis. Group 2 was classified as non-respondent to treatment and the Cluster 3 presented more aggressive phenotype. Additionally, we compared our telomere results with the PSA levels for each patient at 6 months of ADT, at 6 months of completed RT, and at 36 months post-initial therapy. CTCs of patients with PSA levels above or equal to 0.1 ng/mL presented significant increases of nuclear volume, number of telomeres, and telomere aggregates. The 3D telomere analysis of CTCs identified disease heterogeneity among a clinically homogeneous group of patients, which suggests differences in therapeutic responses. Our finding suggests a new opportunity for better treatment monitoring of patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Landon Wark
- Cell Biology, Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| | - Harvey Quon
- Manitoba Prostate Center, Cancer Care Manitoba, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| | - Aldrich Ong
- Manitoba Prostate Center, Cancer Care Manitoba, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| | - Darrel Drachenberg
- Manitoba Prostate Center, Cancer Care Manitoba, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| | - Aline Rangel-Pozzo
- Cell Biology, Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
| | - Sabine Mai
- Cell Biology, Research Institute of Oncology and Hematology, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pike LRG, Wu J, Chen MH, Loffredo M, Renshaw AA, Pfail J, Kantoff PW, D'Amico AV. Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir and the Risk of Death From Prostate Cancer Following Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Urology 2019; 126:145-151. [PMID: 30664895 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether the time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (TTN) has differential prognostic value in men who reach an undetectable vs detectable PSA nadir. METHODS Two hundred and four men from a prospective randomized controlled trial involving radiation therapy with or without 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy in unfavorable risk Prostate cancer (CaP) at academic or community based centers in Massachusetts, enrolled between 1995 and 2001. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) of the risk of CaP-specific mortality calculated using Fine and Gray competing risk regression. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 18.17years, 160 men died; 30 (18.75%) of CaP. Among men with a PSA nadir ≥ 0.2ng/ml, a TTN < median (12 months) was significantly associated with an increased CaP-specific mortality-risk vs the median or more (AHR 5.07, 95% CI 2.10-12.23, P <.001); whereas this association was not observed among men with a PSA nadir of < 0.2ng/mL, (AHR 9.9, 95% CI 0.23-433.8, P = .23). CONCLUSION Men with both a short TTN and detectable PSA nadir could be considered for entry on randomized controlled trials at a novel entry point prior to PSA failure at the time of PSA nadir to completeplanned conventional androgen deprivation therapy vs that plus agent(s) shown to improve outcomes in men with or at high risk of having castrate-resistant CaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke R G Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Jing Wu
- Department of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island, South Kingstown, RI
| | - Ming-Hui Chen
- Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
| | - Marian Loffredo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew A Renshaw
- Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital and Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - John Pfail
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anthony V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|