Large reduction in opioid prescribing by a multipronged behavioral intervention after major urologic surgery

Design and Implementation of an Opioid Scorecard for Hospital System-Wide Peer Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Habits: Observational Study

Background

Reductions in opioid prescribing by health care providers can lead to a decreased risk of opioid dependence in patients. Peer comparison has been demonstrated to impact providers' prescribing habits, though its effect on opioid prescribing has predominantly been studied in the emergency department setting.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to describe the development of an enterprise-wide opioid scorecard, the architecture of its implementation, and plans for future research on its effects.

Methods

Using data generated by the author's enterprise vendor-based electronic health record, the enterprise analytics software, and expertise from a dedicated group of informaticists, physicians, and analysts, the authors developed an opioid scorecard that was released on a quarterly basis via email to all opioid prescribers at our institution. These scorecards compare providers' opioid prescribing habits on the basis of established metrics to those of their peers within their specialty throughout the enterprise.

Results

At the time of this study's completion, 2034 providers have received at least 1 scorecard over a 5-quarter period ending in September 2021. Poisson regression demonstrated a 1.6% quarterly reduction in opioid prescribing, and chi-square analysis demonstrated pre-post reductions in the proportion of prescriptions longer than 5 days' duration and a morphine equivalent daily dose of >50.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first peer comparison effort with high-quality evidence-based metrics of this scale published in the literature. By sharing this process for designing the metrics and the process of distribution, the authors hope to influence other health systems to attempt to curb the opioid pandemic through peer comparison. Future research examining the effects of this intervention could demonstrate significant reductions in opioid prescribing, thus potentially reducing the progression of individual patients to opioid use disorder and the associated increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

The prevalence and predictors of discharge opioid overprescribing in opioid-naïve patients after breast, gynecologic, and head and neck cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The management of pain following cancer-related surgeries involves the use of opioid analgesics. Nevertheless, there is little evidence characterizing the utility and prescription patterns of opioids after these procedures. Our primary aim was to identify patients from three types of cancer surgery who were overprescribed with opioids. The secondary aim was to determine the potential predictors of overprescribing in the same period.

METHODS

We conducted the study at a single cancer referral hospital. Opioid-naïve patients with breast, gynecologic, or head and neck cancer were studied. Patients were considered opioid-naïve if they had a history of opioid use ≤ 30 mg oral morphine equivalent daily dose for less than seven days in the preceding three months before surgery. We recruited eligible participants by convenience sampling on the wards until at least 102 patients were included in the final analysis. After discharge, we followed up on the participants on day 7 via telephone using a structured proforma including questions to identify the last date and amount of opioid dose taken. The equivalent days of opioid use were calculated by their 24-hr use before discharge and the number of doses prescribed for discharge. Our primary outcome was the prevalence of overprescribing in the three surgical specialties defined as the number of patients taking less than 50% of discharge opioids within the first seven days after discharge. We examined the predictors on incidents of overprescribing using multivariable Poisson regression as the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

We recruited 119 patients, and 107 patients were included in the final analysis. There were 59/107 (55%) patients found to be overprescribed with opioids. At discharge, they exhibited lower mean numerical rating scale pain scores, lower mean pain severity scores, higher equivalent days of opioids prescribed, and not used opioids in the last 24 hr before discharge. The incidence of overprescribing was 2.4 times greater for patients prescribed with opioids without 24-hr opioid use (relative risk [RR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 4.35; P = 0.005). Similarly, the incidence of overprescribing was 1.7 times greater for patients who had opioids 24 hr before discharge and were supplied with opioids for five equivalent days or more at the time of discharge (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.56; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the majority of recruited patients undergoing breast, gynecologic, or head and neck cancer surgery were overprescribed opioids. Individualized assessments on patients' 24-hr opioid requirements before discharge and supplying for less than five days are important considerations to reduce overprescribing in opioid-naïve patients after cancer surgery.

Decoding behaviour change techniques in opioid deprescribing strategies following major surgery: a systematic review of interventions to reduce postoperative opioid use

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

METHODS: A structured search strategy encompassing databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library was implemented from inception to October 2023. Included studies focused on interventions targeting opioid reduction in adults following major surgeries. The risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool V.2 (RoB 2) and non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tools, and Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated. BCTs were identified using a validated taxonomy.

RESULTS

22 studies, comprising 7 clinical trials and 15 cohort studies, were included, with varying risks of bias. Educational (n=12), guideline-focused (n=3), multifaceted (n=5) and pharmacist-led (n=2) interventions demonstrated diverse effect sizes (small-medium n=10, large n=12). A total of 23 unique BCTs were identified across studies, occurring 140 times. No significant association was observed between the number of BCTs and effect size, and interventions with large effect sizes predominantly targeted healthcare professionals. Key BCTs in interventions with the largest effect sizes included behaviour instructions, behaviour substitution, goal setting (outcome), social support (practical), social support (unspecified), pharmacological support, prompts/cues, feedback on behaviour, environmental modification, graded tasks, outcome goal review, health consequences information, action planning, social comparison, credible source, outcome feedback and social reward.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the dominant BCTs in highly effective interventions provides valuable insights for future opioid tapering strategy implementations. Further research and validation are necessary to establish associations between BCTs and effectiveness, considering additional influencing factors.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022290060.

Evaluation of an Opioid-free Pathway for Perineal Reconstructive Surgery: A 1-year Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a standardized perioperative pain management pathway on postoperative opioid prescribing practices following male perineal reconstructive surgery at our institution.

METHODS

Patients undergoing perineal reconstructive surgery (urethroplasty, artificial urinary sphincter, urethral sling) by a single surgeon from July 2022 to June 2023 were prospectively followed. A standardized nonopioid pathway was implemented in the perioperative period. Intraoperative local anesthetic included liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 0.25% bupivacaine. Opioids are administered in the recovery room at the discretion of anesthesiology providers. As of July 2022, our standard practice does not include a postoperative opioid prescription unless pain is poorly controlled in the recovery area. Postoperative communication encounters and opioid prescriptions were tracked through the electronic health record (EHR) in order to assess the efficacy of an opioid-free pathway.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients met the criteria during the study period, 64/67 performed in an outpatient setting. 6/67 (9%) patients were prescribed an opioid postoperatively; 4 related to post-surgical pain, and 2 related to chronic pain. No refills were prescribed. Of the 26 patients who received an opioid in the recovery area, 2 (7.6%) were prescribed an opioid at discharge. 15/67 (22%) patients had a communication encounter related to pain within 30 days, most commonly related to bladder spasm management. Only 2 of these encounters resulted in an electronic opioid prescription.

CONCLUSION

An opioid-free pathway is appropriate for opioid naive men undergoing perineal reconstructive surgery. When necessary, electronic opioid prescribing should be employed following discharge for breakthrough pain.

Predictors of persistent opioid use in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: A SEER-Medicare analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient and provider characteristics that predict persistent opioid use following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer including non-opioid naïve patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing cystectomy between July 2007 and December 2015 were identified using the SEER-Medicare database. Opioid exposure was identified before and after cystectomy using Medicare Part D data. Multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of the primary outcomes: persistent opioid use (prescription 3-6 months after surgery) and postoperative opioid prescriptions (within 30 days of surgery). Secondary outcomes included physician prescribing practices and rates of persistent opioid use in their patient cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1,774 patients were included; 29% had prior opioid exposure. Compared to opioid-naïve patients, non-opioid naïve patients were more frequently younger, Black, and living in less educated communities. The percentage of persistent postoperative use was 10% overall and 24% in non-opioid naïve patients. Adjusting for patient factors, opioid naïve individuals were less likely to develop persistent use (OR 0.23) while a 50-unit increase in oral morphine equivalent per day prescribed following surgery nearly doubled the likelihood of persistent use (OR 1.98). Practice factors such as hospital size, teaching affiliation, and hospital ownership failed to predict persistent use. 29% of patients filled an opioid prescription postoperatively. Opioid naïve patients (OR 0.13) and those cared for at government hospitals (OR 0.59) were less likely to fill an opioid script along with those residing in the Northeast. Variability between physicians was seen in prescribing practices and rates of persistent use.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid naïve patients have higher rates of post-operative opioid prescription than opioid-naïve patients. Physician prescribing practices play a role in persistent use, as initial prescription amount predicts persistent use even in non-opioid naïve patients. Significant physician variation in both prescribing practices and rates of persistent use suggest a role for standardizing practices.

Oxycodone prescription after inflatable penile prosthesis has risks of persistent use: a TriNetX analysis

We sought to evaluate the impact of Oxycodone prescriptions on short-term patient outcomes and long-term Oxycodone use following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. We queried the TriNetX research database for all adult patients undergoing IPP. Cohorts included opioid naïve patients prescribed postoperative Oxycodone against propensity score-matched patients without a prescription. We compared return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 14 and 90 days of surgery, a diagnosis of opioid abuse or dependence disorder 6 months or later after surgery and persistent Oxycodone use 9-15 months after surgery. After matching, there were 2433 patients in each group. There was an increase in 90-day ED visits based on receipt of Oxycodone (6.8% of patients vs 5.0%, risk ratio (RR) 1.4 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.1, 1.7]). Groups had similar 14-day ED visits (3.7% of patients vs 2.9%, RR 1.3, 95% CI [0.95, 1.7]). Patients prescribed Oxycodone (5.1% of patients vs 2.7%, RR 1.9, 95% CI [1.4, 2.6]) were more likely to have persistent Oxycodone use at 9-15 months. There were low instances of diagnosis of opioid dependence or abuse for both groups limiting comparison. Oxycodone prescription after IPP has risks of persistent use and withholding Oxycodone does not appear to increase postoperative healthcare utilization.

Prospective evaluation of postoperative pain and opioid use after minor urologic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Filling an opioid prescription after a minor urologic procedure increases patient risk of overdose and misuse. Strategies to reduce the number of opioids reaching the community are critical. This study evaluates opioid use after minor urologic procedures at a Canadian academic center and guides future prescribing recommendations.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patients over 18 years old undergoing minor urologic procedures (penile, scrotal, urethral, etc.) from September 2020 to May 2022. Consenting participants were given a pain diary and postoperative pain questionnaire. Patients on chronic pain medications or those who had major surgery within six months were excluded. Response rate, pain on visual analog scale, pain control satisfaction, quantity of opioids prescribed, and consumption of opioid and non-opioid medication were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 61.7 years (range 20- 87) and 96% of patients identified as male. The response rate for the opioid diary and pain questionnaire was 57%. Forty-two patients (78%) were offered an opioid prescription following their surgery, but only 12 of those patients (22%) filled and consumed any opioids analgesics. Forty-two patients (78%) used no postoperative opioids, and the mean oral morphine equivalents (OME) consumed was 5.87 (standard deviation 16.7). There was a total of 259 OME unused from post-procedure prescriptions. The mean overall pain score for patients who did and did not fill opioid prescriptions were 3.18/10 and 1.79/10 (p<0.01), respectively, with mean overall pain management satisfaction score of 8.63/10 and 8.58/10 (p=0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients undergoing minor urologic procedures do not require opioids to manage postoperative pain. Based on our data, we suggest that a prescription for 39 OME would adequately treat postoperative pain in 95% of patients undergoing minor urologic procedures. Education around pain management with non-narcotic modalities is imperative, and practice changes are warranted to address the opioid crisis within our specialty.

Re: Implementation and Assessment of No Opioid Prescription Strategy at Discharge After Major Urologic Cancer Surgery

The authors prospectively evaluated the implementation of a prespecified protocol to eliminate post-discharge opioid prescription after major urologic cancer surgery at a single center among a predominantly opioid naïve population. The intervention included both provider and patient education along with a standardized regimen for non-opioid analgesia during the inpatient stay and after discharge. Use of a standardized protocol nearly eliminated opioid prescriptions after major urologic cancer surgery without adversely impacting patient reported pain control and satisfaction, unplanned visits, and complications.

Implementation and Assessment of No Opioid Prescription Strategy at Discharge After Major Urologic Cancer Surgery

Importance

Postoperative opioid prescriptions are associated with delayed recovery, perioperative complications, opioid use disorder, and diversion of overprescribed opioids, which places the community at risk of opioid misuse or addiction.

Objective

To assess a protocol for eliminating postdischarge opioid prescriptions after major urologic cancer surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study of the no opioid prescriptions at discharge after surgery (NOPIOIDS) protocol was conducted between May 2017 and June 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Patients undergoing open or minimally invasive radical cystectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, and radical prostatectomy were sorted into the control group (usual opioids), the lead-in group (reduced opioids), and the NOPIOIDS group (no opioid prescriptions).

Interventions

The NOPIOIDS group received a preadmission educational handout, postdischarge instructions for using nonopioid analgesics, and no routine opioid prescriptions. The lead-in group received a postdischarge instruction sheet and reduced opioid prescriptions at prescribers' discretion. The control group received opioid prescriptions at prescribers' discretion.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome measures included rate and dose of opioid prescriptions at discharge and for 30 days postdischarge. Additional outcome measures included patient-reported pain and satisfaction level, unplanned health care utilization, and postoperative complications.

Results

Of 647 opioid-naive patients (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.0] years; 478 [73.9%] male; 586 [90.6%] White), the rate of opioid prescriptions at discharge for the control, the lead-in, and the NOPIOIDS groups was 80.9% (157 of 194), 57.9% (55 of 95), and 2.2% (8 of 358) (Kruskal-Wallis test of medians: P < .001), and the overall median (IQR) tablets prescribed was 14 (10-20), 4 (0-5.3), and 0 (0-0) per patient in the control, lead-in, and NOPIOIDS groups, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test of medians: P < .001). In the NOPIOIDS group, median and mean opioid dose was 0 tablets for all procedure types, with the exception of kidney procedures (mean [SD], 0.5 [1.7] tablets). Patient-reported pain surveys were received from 358 patients (72.6%) in the NOPIOIDS group, demonstrating low pain scores (mean [SD], 2.5 [0.86]) and high satisfaction scores (mean [SD], 86.6 [3.8]). There was no increase in postoperative complications in the group with no opioid prescriptions.

Conclusions and Relevance

This perioperative protocol, with emphasis on nonopioid alternatives and patient instructions, may be safe and effective in nearly eliminating the need for opioid prescriptions after major abdominopelvic cancer surgery without adversely affecting pain control, complications, or recovery.

Evaluation of Policies Limiting Opioid Exposure on Opioid Prescribing and Patient Pain in Opioid-Naive Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery in a Large American Health System

OBJECTIVES

Overprescribing to opioid-naive surgical patients substantially contributes to opioid use disorders, which have become increasingly prevalent. Opioid stewardship programs (OSPs) within healthcare settings provide an avenue for introducing interventions to regulate prescribing. This study examined the association of OSP policies limiting exposure on changes in surgery-related opioid prescriptions and patient pain.

METHODS

We evaluated policies implemented by an OSP in a large American healthcare system between 2016 and 2018: nonopioid medication during surgery, decrease of available opioid dosage vials in operating rooms, standardization of opioid in-patient practices through electronic health record alerts, and limit to postsurgery opioid supply. Generalized linear mixed effects models examined the association of interventions with outcome changes in 9262 opioid-naive patients undergoing elective surgery. Outcomes were discharge pain, morphine milligram equivalent in the first prescription postsurgery, and opioid prescription refills.

RESULTS

Decreases in all prescription outcomes and discharge pain were observed following onset of OSP interventions ( P 's < 0.001). Among individual policies, standardization of in-patient prescribing practices was associated with the strongest decrease in prescribed morphine milligram equivalent. Importantly, there was no evidence of an increase in discharge pain related to any intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This study promotes the potential of OSP formation and policies to reduce opioid prescribing without compromising patient pain. The most effective policy, standardization of in-patient prescribing practices through alerts, suggests that reminding prescribers to re-evaluate the patient's need is effective in changing behavior. The findings offer considerations for OSP formation and policy implementation across health systems to improve quality and safety in opioid prescribing.

The Association of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions with Patient Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after surgery between patients who were not prescribed opioids and patients who were prescribed opioids.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative opioid prescriptions carry significant risks. Understanding outcomes among patients who receive no opioids after surgery may inform efforts to reduce these risks.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the composite incidence of an emergency department visit, readmission, or reoperation within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, satisfaction, quality of life, and regret collected via postoperative survey. A multilevel, mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to evaluate differences between groups.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 22,345 patients, mean age (standard deviation) was 52.1 (16.5) years and 13,269 (59.4%) patients were female. About 3175 (14.2%) patients were not prescribed opioids, of whom 422 (13.3%) met the composite adverse event endpoint compared to 2255 (11.8%) of patients not prescribed opioids ( P = 0.015). Patients not prescribed opioids had a similar probability of adverse events {11.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.2%-13.2%] vs 11.9% (95% CI 10.6%-13.3%]}. Among 12,872 survey respondents, patients who were not prescribed an opioid had a similar rate of high satisfaction [81.7% (95% CI 77.3%-86.1%) vs 81.7% (95% CI 77.7%- 85.7%)] and no regret [(93.0% (95% CI 90.8%-95.2%) vs 92.6% (95% CI 90.4%-94.7%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were not prescribed opioids after surgery had similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes as patients who were prescribed opioids. This suggests that minimizing opioids as part of routine postoperative care is unlikely to adversely affect patients.

Evaluating the effectiveness of email-based nudges to reduce postoperative opioid prescribing: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Surgical patients are commonly prescribed more opioids at discharge than needed to manage their postoperative pain. These excess opioids increase the risks of new persistent opioid use, opioid-induced ventilatory impairment and opioid diversion. This study tests the effectiveness of two behavioural nudges, one based on peer behaviour and one based on best practice guidelines, in reducing excessive postoperative opioid prescriptions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study will be conducted at 19 hospitals within a large healthcare delivery system in northern California, USA. Three surgical specialties (general surgery, orthopaedic surgery and obstetric/gynaecological surgery) at each hospital will be randomised either to a control group or to one of two active intervention arms. One intervention is grounded in the theory of injunctive norms, and provides feedback to surgeons on their postoperative opioid prescribing relative to prescribing guidelines endorsed by their institution. The other intervention draws from the theory of descriptive norms, and provides feedback similar to the first intervention but using peers' behaviour rather than guidelines as the benchmark for the surgeon's prescribing behaviour. The interventions will be delivered by a monthly email. Both interventions will be active for twelve months. The effects of each intervention relative to the control group and to each other will be tested using a four-level hierarchical model adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Using behavioural nudges rather than rigid policy changes allows us to target excessive prescribing without preventing clinicians from using their clinical judgement to address patient pain. All study activities have been approved by the RAND Human Subjects Protection Committee (ID 2018-0988). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and social media accounts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05070338.

Opioid-Free Ureteroscopy: Are Academic Urologists Lagging Behind Private Practice?

OBJECTIVE

To examine overall trends in opioid prescribing after ureteroscopy and compared opioid use between private and academic practice settings. We also analyzed the potential for spillover effect from an unrelated opioid-reduction initiative for major oncologic surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all ureteroscopies performed within our system at four distinct time points from 2016-2019. We recorded the type and number of opioid pills prescribed and calculated oral morphine equivalents. Analysis included comparison between community and academic hospitals as well as pre- and post-initiative.

RESULTS

555 patients undergoing ureteroscopy and 29 attending surgeons were included in the analysis. The median prescription size per ureteroscopy decreased throughout the study period in both the private and academic settings. From 2016-2017, median oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) decreased from 60 to 0 in the private setting and remained at 0 for the duration of the study period. Opioid reduction in the academic setting lagged behind private practitioners but median OMEs did steadily decrease to 0 in 2019. No significant spillover effect was observed.

CONCLUSION

Since 2016, opioid prescribing following ureteroscopy has decreased in both the private and academic practice settings. Notably, private practice urologists achieved a median of 0 opioids 2 years prior to academic urologists. These data suggest that, in some circumstances, academic institutions may have been slower to respond to the opioid epidemic.

Discharge Opioids are Unnecessary Following Radical Cystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To show that zero-opioid discharges after both open and robotic cystectomy are feasible and to examine the impact of zero-opioid discharges on patient interaction with the physician's office.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

107 patients who underwent either open or robotic radical cystectomy from March 1, 2020 to December 30, 2020 were identified. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and 30 day pain related outcomes including phone calls, office visits, requests for pain medication, emergency department visits, and readmissions were abstracted from the chart. We then examined variables associated with a zero-opioid discharge.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were discharged with an opioid prescription (Median Oral Morphine Equivalents Prescribed = 90) and seventy-five were discharged without an opioid prescription. On regression analysis, age (OR 1.07, 95% CI [1.02-1.12]) and pathology (OR 0.36, 95% CI[0.14-0.9]) remained significantly associated with postoperative opioid prescriptions. There were no differences in the percent of patients presenting to the emergency department, being readmitted, calling the office, calling the office regarding pain, or requesting opioid prescriptions within thirty days of discharge, or the number of post-operative office visits (p> 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients can safely be discharged home without opioids following cystectomy, regardless of robotic or open approach. Age and pathology are predictors of the need for an opioid prescription on discharge. These patients did not have increased follow-up visits, phone calls, or requests for pain medication.

The impact of opioid prescribing report cards in Medicaid

BACKGROUND: Performance feedback has been used for decades to improve health care quality and safety, with varying degrees of success. One example is the use of customized report cards that target inappropriate prescribing of high-risk medications, including opioids. Randomized controlled trials suggest that report cards are an effective tool to change opioid prescribing behavior, but their effectiveness in community settings is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of opioid prescribing report cards, which were mailed to Medicaid providers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental approach, we compared trends in opioid prescribing by Medicaid providers in Philadelphia, who received a report card in late 2017, with Medicaid providers in surrounding counties, who did not receive report cards. First, we used propensity score matching to balance observed differences in the treatment and comparison groups; matching variables included provider specialty, sex, and selected characteristics of providers' Medicaid patient panels. We then estimated a difference-in-differences model to isolate the impact of report cards on opioid prescribing. RESULTS: The analytical sample included 1,598 providers in Philadelphia and 2,117 providers in surrounding counties, who prescribed opioids to 99,548 Medicaid patients during the study period. Although the number of Medicaid patients receiving opioids and the days supplied of opioids declined in both Philadelphia and surrounding counties during the study period, there was a larger reduction in Philadelphia Medicaid than in surrounding counties after the report cards were mailed. In the 6 months after the report cards were mailed (January 2018 to June 2018) compared with the 6 months before they were mailed (July 2017 to December 2017), we estimate that the reduction in opioid prescribing in Philadelphia Medicaid amounted to nearly 3 fewer Medicaid patients with an opioid prescription per month. CONCLUSIONS: After customized opioid prescribing report cards were mailed to Medicaid providers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, there was a statistically significant reduction in opioid prescribing to Medicaid patients relative to surrounding counties. Our findings suggest that opioid prescribing report cards with peer comparison are an effective way to influence opioid prescribing behavior among Medicaid providers. Report cards can complement other initiatives that target inappropriate opioid prescribing, such as prescription drug monitoring programs and prior authorization. DISCLOSURES: Drs Candon and Rothbard and Ms Shen received funding from Community Behavioral Health in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Drs Xue, Cole, and Donohue received funding from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services. Neither Community Behavioral Health nor the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services was involved in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Opioid Use after Nephrectomy for Kidney Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the odds of early and prolonged post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open surgery for nephrectomy.

METHODS

For opioid-naïve patients in Ontario who underwent nephrectomy for kidney cancer (1994-2017, n=7900), post-discharge opioid use was determined by prescriptions in the Ontario Drug Benefit database (age ≥65 years) and the Narcotics Monitoring System (all patients from 2012). Early opioid use was defined as ≥ 1 prescription 1-90 days after surgery. Two separate definitions of prolonged opioid use were examined: (1) prescription(s) for ≥ 60 days during post-operative days 90-365; (2) ≥ 1 prescriptions between both of: 1-90 days AND 91-180 days after surgery. Predictors of opioid use were assessed using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression, accounting for surgeon clustering.

RESULTS

Overall, 67.4% of patients received early opioid prescriptions; however, prolonged use was low, ranging from 1.6 to 4.4% of patients depending on the definition. In multivariable analysis, open nephrectomy was associated with higher odds of early opioid use compared to MIS nephrectomy (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.19-1.55). Surgery type was not significantly associated with prolonged opioid use for either definition (OR 1.22, CI 0.79 1.89 and OR 1.06, CI 0.83, 1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-level study of patients undergoing nephrectomy for kidney cancer, patients who received open surgery were at increased odds of receiving early post-operative opioids compared to MIS. Prolonged opioid use was low overall and was not significantly with associated with type of surgery.

Harnessing choice architecture in urologic practice: Implementation of an opioid-sparing protocol grounded in cognitive behavioral theory

PURPOSE

Opioids are prescribed excessively following surgery. As many urologic oncology procedures are performed minimally invasively, an opportunity exists to push forward initiatives to minimize postoperative opioid use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A quality improvement initiative to reduce inpatient opioid prescribing was launched at a tertiary cancer center. In Phase I (December 2019-July 2020), providers were instructed to start standing acetaminophen. In Phase II (beginning August 2020), education was provided to the entire care team and ordersets were modified to an opioid sparing protocol (OSP). We analyzed the proportion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients that adhered to an OSP during each phase and compared them to controls from the preceding 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 303, 153, and 839 patients underwent MIS during the Phase I, Phase II, and control periods respectively. The proportion of patients adhering to an OSP increased from 16% at the beginning of Phase I to 76% at the end of Phase II (p-trend < 0.001). The median total oral morphine equivalents for oral opioids declined from 20 mg and 40 mg at baseline for prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients respectively to 0 mg for both groups (p-trends < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found that patients received 22% and 81% less oral morphine equivalents during Phase I and II respectively compared to the control period (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to an OSP is most effective when initiatives incorporate the entire team and are supported by nudge theory-based structural changes. Using these strategies, most patients following urologic MIS can dramatically reduce opioid use postoperatively.

Patient and in-hospital predictors of post-discharge opioid utilization: Individualizing prescribing after radical prostatectomy based on the ORIOLES initiative

OBJECTIVE

Judicious opioid stewardship would match each patient's prescription to their true medical necessity. However, most prescribing paradigms apply preset quantities and clinical judgment without objective data to predict individual use. We evaluated individual patient and in-hospital parameters as predictors of post-discharge opioid utilization after radical prostatectomy (RP) to provide evidence-based guidance for individualized prescribing.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients who underwent open or robotic RP were followed in the Opioid Reduction Intervention for Open, Laparoscopic, and Endoscopic Surgery (ORIOLES) initiative. Baseline demographics, in-hospital parameters, and inpatient and post-discharge pain medication utilization were tabulated. Opioid medications were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEQ). Predictive factors for post-discharge opioid utilization were analyzed by univariable and multivariable linear regression, adjusting for opioid reduction interventions performed in ORIOLES.

RESULTS

Of 443 patients, 102 underwent open and 341 underwent robotic RP. The factors most strongly associated with post-discharge opioid utilization included inpatient opioid utilization in the final 12 hours before discharge (+39.6 post-discharge OMEQ if inpatient OMEQ was >15 vs. 0), maximum patient-reported pain score (range 0-10) in the 12 hours before discharge (+27.6 OMEQ for pain score ≥6 vs. ≤1), preoperative opioid use (+76.2 OMEQ), and body mass index (BMI; +1.4 OMEQ per 1 kg/m²). A final predictive calculator to guide post-discharge opioid prescribing was constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

Following RP, inpatient opioid use, patient-reported pain scores, prior opioid use, and BMI are correlated with post-discharge opioid utilization. These data can help guide individualized opioid prescribing to reduce risks of both overprescribing and underprescribing.

Large Variation in International Prescribing Rates of Opioids After Robotic Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare international opioid prescribing patterns for patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess international opioid prescribing trends among urologists.

METHODS

An anonymous Web-based survey assessing the frequency and quantity of opioid prescriptions for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy was designed using Qualtrics software. The survey was distributed to urologists internationally via Twitter and email in early 2021. Prescribing patterns were analyzed based on country of practice in three groups: United States, Canada, and all other countries.

RESULTS

160 participants from 26 countries completed the survey including the United States (51%), Greece (19%), Canada (9%), Israel (3.1%). The percentage of providers prescribing post-discharge opioids significantly differed between Canada, the United States, and other countries (86%, 63%, and 11%, respectively, P <.0001). There was a significant difference between years of experience in those who provide opioids compared to those who do not (8 years vs 5 years, P = .0004). The average morphine milligram equivalents (MME) provided in those who did prescribe opioids was greatest in the United States but was not significantly different between groups (mean MME: United States 58 mg, Canada 46 mg, all others 54 mg; P = .63). Attending physicians prescribed more MME than trainees (residents, fellows) on average (attending mean MME = 75 mg, trainee mean MME = 40 mg, P = .017).

CONCLUSION

Opioid prescriptions after robotic assisted prostatectomy are common in North America and used sparingly in the rest of the world.

Institutional Opioid Prescription Guidelines are Effective in Reducing Post-Operative Prescriptions Following Urologic Surgery: Results From the American Urologic Association 2018 Census

OBJECTIVE

To assess provider and practice characteristics that drive opioid prescription behavior using the American Urological Association census data.

METHODS

Stratified weighted analysis using 1,157 census samples was performed to represent 12,660 urologists who practiced in the United States in 2018. We compared urologists according to their opioid prescription patterns to evaluate factors and motivations behind opioid use in the post-operative setting.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,205 (88.5%) urologists prescribe opioids in the post-operative setting. The presence of procedure-specific institutional prescribing guidelines was associated with a greater tendency to prescribe ≤10 pills, and lesser tendency to prescribe 11 to 49 and ≥50 tablets following open abdominal (P = .003), laparoscopic (P < .001), scrotal (P < .001), and endoscopic surgeries (P < .001). The presence of institutional prescribing guidelines was associated with decreasing opioid prescriptions over a three-year period whereas not having guidelines was associated with an unchanged prescription practice over time. Basing current prescriptions on what was given to prior patients was reported by 85% and was more likely to result in an unchanged amount of prescriptions over time (29.2% vs 13.3%, P = .007). Motivations to avoid patient phone calls were reported by 23.8% and were more likely to increase the opioids provided within the next 3 years (3.2% vs 0.1%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Practitioners who endorsed using institutional guidelines prescribed fewer opioids following all types of surgery and were more likely to decrease their prescription behavior over time. This data supports continued efforts to provide urologists with more evidence-based guidance on best practice opioid prescribing in the future.

Reducing postoperative opioid pill prescribing via a quality improvement approach

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic has been fueled by prescribing unnecessary quantities of opioid pills for postoperative use. While evidence mounts that postoperative opioids can be reduced or eliminated, implementing such changes within various institutions can be met with many barriers to adoption.

OBJECTIVE

To address excess opioid prescribing within our institutions, we applied a plan-do-study-act (PDSA)-like quality improvement strategy to assess local opioid prescribing and use, modify our institutional protocols, and assess the impacts of the change. The opioid epidemic has been fueled by prescribing unnecessary quantities of opioid pills for postoperative use. While evidence mounts that postoperative opioids can be reduced or eliminated, implementing such changes within various institutions can be met with many barriers to adoption. We describe our approach, findings, and lessons learned from our quality improvement approach.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded home pain pill usage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at two academic institutions from July 2016 to July 2019. Patients prospectively recorded their home pain pill use on a take-home log. Other factors, including numeric pain rating scale on the day of discharge, were extracted from patient records. We analyzed our data and modified opioid prescription protocols to meet the reported use data of 80% of patients. We continued collecting data after the protocol change. We also used our prospectively collected data to assess the accuracy of a retrospective phone survey designed to measure postdischarge opioid use. Our primary outcomes were the proportion of patients taking zero opioid pills postdischarge, median pills taken after discharge and the number of excess pills prescribed but not taken. We compared these outcomes before and after protocol change.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients (193 RALP, 73 RAPN) were included. Reducing the standard number of prescribed pills did not increase the percentage of patients taking zero pills postdischarge in either group (RALP: 47% vs. 41%; RAPN 48% vs. 34%). The patients in either group reporting postoperative Day 1 pain score of 0 or 1 were much more likely to use zero postdischarge opioid pills. Our reduction in prescribing protocol resulted in an estimated reduction in excess pills from 1555 excess pills in the prior protocol to just 155 excess pills in the new protocol.

CONCLUSION

Our PDSA-like approach led to an acceptable protocol revision resulting in significant reductions in excess pills released into the community. Reducing the quantity of opioids prescribed postoperatively does not increase the percentage of patients taking zero pills postdischarge. To eliminate opioid use may require no-opioid pathways. Our approach can be used in implementing zero opioid discharge plans and can be applied to opioid reduction interventions at other institutions where barriers to reduced prescribing exist.

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Procedure-specific guidelines for postsurgical opioid use can decrease overprescribing and facilitate opioid stewardship. Initial recommendations were based on feasibility data from limited pilot studies. This study aims to refine opioid prescribing recommendations for endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures by integrating emerging clinical evidence with a panel consensus.

METHODS

A multistakeholder panel was convened with broad subspecialty expertise. Primary literature on opioid prescribing after 16 urological procedures was systematically assessed. Using a modified Delphi technique, the panel reviewed and revised procedure-specific recommendations and opioid stewardship strategies based on additional evidence. All recommendations were developed for opioid-naïve adult patients after uncomplicated procedures.

RESULTS

Seven relevant studies on postsurgical opioid prescribing were identified: four studies on ureteroscopy, two studies on robotic prostatectomy including a combined study on robotic nephrectomy, and one study on transurethral prostate surgery. The panel affirmed prescribing ranges to allow tailoring quantities to anticipated need. The panel noted that zero opioid tablets would be potentially appropriate for all procedures. Following evidence review, the panel reduced the maximum recommended quantities for 11 of the 16 procedures; the other 5 procedures were unchanged. Opioids were no longer recommended following diagnostic endoscopy and transurethral resection procedures. Finally, data on prescribing decisions supported expanded stewardship strategies for first-time prescribing and ongoing quality improvement.

CONCLUSION

Reductions in initial opioid prescribing recommendations are supported by evidence for most endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. Shared decision-making prior to prescribing and periodic reevaluation of individual prescribing patterns are strongly recommended to strengthen opioid stewardship.

Implementation of a nonopioid protocol following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion

PURPOSE

The implementation of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) for management of patients with muscle-invasive or high-risk noninvasive bladder cancer has increased in utilization over the last decade. Here, we seek to describe institutional opioid prescription and utilization patterns following implementation of a nonopioid (NOP) perioperative pain management protocol in patients who received RARC with ICUD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of all patients who underwent RARC that utilized a NOP perioperative pain management protocol at a single academic institution from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. For comparison, we included 74 consecutive patients who received the same NOP protocol with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD).

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients who received ICUD were included in our analysis. The median operation time for the ICUD group was 305 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 262-352). 12.1% (n = 14) of patients who underwent ICUD required narcotics during inpatient hospitalization. For these patients, the median morphine milligram equivalent requirement was 52.0 (IQR: 7.62-157). Additionally, only 12.1% (n = 14) of patients were prescribed opioids postoperatively at discharge. We identified that within 6 months of surgery only 5 (4.3%) patients required a second narcotic prescription. Furthermore, of patients who did not use mu-opioid blockers, a minority experienced postoperative ileus (15.7%, n = 16). 30- and 90-day all Clavien complication rates for patients were 44.8% (n = 52) and 49.1% (n = 57), respectively. Nineteen (16.4%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, of which none were pain related. When compared to ECUD, patients who received ICUD experienced similar complication and readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a NOP protocol for patients undergoing RARC with ICUD allows for both decreased postoperative narcotic use and reduced need for narcotic prescriptions at discharge with acceptable complication and readmission rates.