1
|
Ramalingam N, Coury J, Barnes C, Kenzie ES, Petrik AF, Mummadi RR, Coronado G, Davis MM. Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity. J Rural Health 2024; 40:272-281. [PMID: 37676061 PMCID: PMC10918036 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colonoscopy can prevent morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) and is the most commonly used screening method in the United States. Barriers to colonoscopy at multiple levels can contribute to disparities. Yet, in rural settings, little is known about who delivers colonoscopy and facilitators and barriers to colonoscopy access through screening completion. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study with providers in rural Oregon who worked in endoscopy centers or primary care clinics. Semistructured interviews, conducted in July and August, 2021, focused on clinician experiences providing colonoscopy to rural Medicaid patients, including workflows, barriers, and access. We used thematic analysis, through immersion crystallization, to analyze interview transcripts and develop emergent themes. FINDINGS We interviewed 19 providers. We found two categories of colonoscopy providers: primary care providers (PCPs) doing colonoscopy on their own patients (n = 9; 47%) and general surgeons providing colonoscopy to patients referred to their services (n = 10; 53%). Providers described barriers to colonoscopy at the provider, community, and patient levels and suggested patient supports could help overcome them. Providers found current colonoscopy capacity sufficient, but noted PCPs trained to perform colonoscopy would be key to continued accessibility. Finally, providers shared concerns about the shrinking number of PCP endoscopists, especially with anticipated increased screening demand related to the CRC screening guideline shift. CONCLUSIONS These themes reflect opportunities to address multilevel barriers to improve access, colonoscopy capacity, and patient education approaches. Our results highlight that PCPs are an essential part of the workforce that provides colonoscopy in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NithyaPriya Ramalingam
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
| | - Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
| | - Chrystal Barnes
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
| | - Erin S. Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
- Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098
| | - Amanda F. Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227
| | - Rajasekhara R Mummadi
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227
| | - Gloria Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227
| | - Melinda M. Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
- Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanchez JI, Doose M, Zeruto C, Chollette V, Gasca N, Verhoeven D, Weaver SJ. Multilevel factors associated with inequities in multidisciplinary cancer consultation. Health Serv Res 2022; 57 Suppl 2:222-234. [PMID: 35491756 PMCID: PMC9670237 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess changes in the prevalence of multidisciplinary cancer consultations (MDCc) over the last decade and examine patient, surgeon, hospital, and neighborhood factors associated with receipt of MDCc among individuals diagnosed with cancer. DATA SOURCE Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2006 to 2016. STUDY DESIGN We used time-series analysis to assess change in MDCc prevalence from 2007 to 2015. We also conducted multilevel logistic regression with random surgeon- and hospital-level effects to assess associations between patient, surgeon, neighborhood, and health care organization-level factors and receipt of MDCc during the cancer treatment planning phase, defined as the 2 months following cancer diagnosis. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We identified Medicare beneficiaries >65 years of age with surgically resected breast, colorectal (CRC), or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I-III (n = 103,250). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS From 2007 to 2015, the prevalence of MDCc increased from 35.0% to 61.2%. Overall, MDCc was most common among patients with breast cancer compared to CRC and NSCLC. Cancer patients who were Black, had comorbidities, had dual Medicare-Medicaid coverage, were residing in rural areas or in areas with higher Black and Hispanic neighborhood composition were significantly less likely to have received MDCc. Patients receiving surgery at disproportionate payment-sharing or rural-designated hospitals had 2% (95% CI: -3.55, 0.58) and 17.6% (95% CI: -21.45, 13.70), respectively, less probability of receiving MDCc. Surgeon- and hospital-level effects accounted for 15% of the variance in receipt of MDCc. CONCLUSIONS The practice of MDCc has increased over the last decade, but significant geographical and health care organizational barriers continue to impede equitable access to and delivery of quality care across cancer patient populations. Multilevel and multicomponent interventions that target care coordination, health system, and policy changes may enhance equitable access to and receipt of MDCc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janeth I. Sanchez
- Health Systems and Interventions Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Michelle Doose
- Division of Clinical and Health Services ResearchNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Chris Zeruto
- Information Management Services, Inc.CalvertonMarylandUSA
| | - Veronica Chollette
- Health Systems and Interventions Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Natalie Gasca
- School of Public Health, Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Dana Verhoeven
- Health Systems and Interventions Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteRockvilleMarylandUSA
| | - Sallie J. Weaver
- Health Systems and Interventions Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteRockvilleMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanchez JI, Shankaran V, Unger JM, Madeleine MM, Espinoza N, Thompson B. Disparities in post-operative surveillance testing for metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2022; 16:638-649. [PMID: 34031803 PMCID: PMC10424733 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01057-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, treatment for metastatic recurrence is most effective when malignancies are detected early through surveillance with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level test and computer tomography (CT) imaging. However, utilization of these tests is low, and many survivors fail to meet the recommended guidelines. This population-based study assesses individual- and neighborhood-level factors associated with receipt of CEA and CT surveillance testing. METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data to identify Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with CRC stages II-III between 2010 and 2013. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to estimate the effect of individual and neighborhood factors on receipt of CEA and CT tests within 18 months post-surgery. RESULTS Overall, 78% and 58% of CRC survivors received CEA and CT testing, respectively. We found significant within racial/ethnic differences in receipt of these surveillance tests. Medicare-Medicaid dual coverage was associated with 39% lower odds of receipt of CEA tests among non-Hispanic Whites, and Blacks with dual coverage had almost two times the odds of receiving CEA tests compared to Blacks without dual coverage. CONCLUSIONS Although this study did not find significant differences in receipt of initial CEA and CT surveillance testing across racial/ethnic groups, the assessment of the factors that measure access to care suggests differences in access to these procedures within racial/ethnic groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Our findings have implications for developing targeted interventions focused on promoting surveillance for the early detection of metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors and improve their health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janeth I Sanchez
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA.
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA
| | - Joseph M Unger
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA
| | - Margaret M Madeleine
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA
- School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Box 357236, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Noah Espinoza
- Clinical Analytics, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Beti Thompson
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Jensen ET, Kim HP, Egberg MD, Lund JL, Moon AM, Pate V, Barnes EL, Schlusser CL, Baron TH, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:621-644. [PMID: 34678215 PMCID: PMC10756322 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 118.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Gastrointestinal diseases account for considerable health care use and expenditures. We estimated the annual burden, costs, and research funding associated with gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. METHODS We generated estimates using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; Nationwide Emergency Department Sample; National Inpatient Sample; Kids' Inpatient Database; Nationwide Readmissions Database; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; National Vital Statistics System; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research; MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data; MarketScan Medicare Supplemental data; United Network for Organ Sharing registry; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; and National Institutes of Health (NIH). RESULTS Gastrointestinal health care expenditures totaled $119.6 billion in 2018. Annually, there were more than 36.8 million ambulatory visits for gastrointestinal symptoms and 43.4 million ambulatory visits with a primary gastrointestinal diagnosis. Hospitalizations for a principal gastrointestinal diagnosis accounted for more than 3.8 million admissions, with 403,699 readmissions. A total of 22.2 million gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed, and 284,844 new gastrointestinal cancers were diagnosed. Gastrointestinal diseases and cancers caused 255,407 deaths. The NIH supported $3.1 billion (7.5% of the NIH budget) for gastrointestinal research in 2020. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal diseases are responsible for millions of health care encounters and hundreds of thousands of deaths that annually costs billions of dollars in the United States. To reduce the high burden of gastrointestinal diseases, focused clinical and public health efforts, supported by additional research funding, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Peery
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Hannah P Kim
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew D Egberg
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Andrew M Moon
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Virginia Pate
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Courtney L Schlusser
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Todd H Baron
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Robert S Sandler
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|