Disparities in curative treatments and outcomes for early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States

Radiation Segmentectomy and Modified Radiation Lobectomy for Unresectable Early-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To validate the safety and effectiveness of radiation segmentectomy (RS) and modified radiation lobectomy (mRL) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients with unresectable, early-stage iCCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective study of patients with unresectable, solitary iCCA without extrahepatic disease or vascular involvement (Stage I) treated with RS and mRL was performed. Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria (median age, 65.5 years), including 11 (73%) with T1a disease and 4 (27%) with T1b disease. Outcomes included biochemical and clinical toxicities, tumor response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), time to progression, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median treatment dose was 308.2 Gy (range, 194.2-879.3 Gy). There were no cases of periprocedural mortality or hepatic deterioration. Grade 3+ clinical toxicities occurred in 1 patient (7%). The 3-month and best objective response rates by RECIST were 47% and 60%, respectively. Three patients went on to surgery with explant pathology revealing complete pathologic necrosis. Target lesion progression occurred in 4 patients at a median of 43.4 months. Median OS was 72 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 73.3%, and 50.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RS and mRL were safe and effective in treating unresectable, early-stage iCCA. Overall progression of 47% and 5-year OS of 50% were comparable with those of surgical resection. RS and mRL may represent viable therapeutic options for patients with early-stage disease deemed surgically unresectable.

Care Patterns and Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Rurality of Patient Residence in a Midwestern State

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common malignancy of the liver and has the worst prognosis of any tumor arising from the liver, with a 5-year survival as low as 10%. However, whether the rurality of a patient's residence impacts care received and survival has not been well studied. We aimed to assess differences in care patterns associated with the rurality of patient's residences and their impact on survival outcomes, hypothesizing that patients in rural areas would experience lower survival.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with ICC between 2010 and 2020 were identified in the Iowa Cancer Registry. Chi-square tests were used to compare values categorical variables by rural/urban status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine associations with cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Of 672 patients diagnosed with ICC during the study period, 53%, 27%, and 21% resided in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas, respectively. There were no significant differences in age, sex, stage at diagnosis, the proportion receiving chemotherapy within 12 weeks of diagnosis, and undergoing surgery across all groups. Additionally, the proportion receiving definitive care at a National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated center was comparable across the three groups (37% metro vs. 43% micro vs. 35% rural). However, rural residents had the highest proportion of traveling ≥ 50 miles for definitive care (22% metro vs. 41% micro vs. 56% rural). In multivariable analysis of patients with Stage 1-3 disease, younger age, receipt of chemotherapy, surgery, and definitive care at an NCI center were independently associated with decreased mortality risk. However, rural residence was not significantly associated with survival (HR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.38-1.06]).

CONCLUSION

Similar to other complex cancer diagnoses, we found that definitive care at an NCI center was associated with decreased mortality risk for patients with ICC. Although rural residence was not independently associated with survival in this cohort, rural residents traveled significantly longer distances to access definitive care. This highlights a crucial need to improve access to specialized centers for complex cancer care.

Utility of methylated DNA markers for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort.

APPROACH

Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.  Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology.

RESULTS

Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%-95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

CONCLUSIONS

The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.

Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Past, present, and future directions

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare biliary tract cancer with high mortality rate. Complete resection of the iCCA lesion is the first choice of treatment, with good prognosis after margin-negative resection. Unfortunately, only 12%-40% of patients are eligible for resection at presentation due to cirrhosis, portal hypertension, or large tumor size. Liver transplantation (LT) offers margin-negative iCCA extirpation for patients with unresectable tumors. Initially, iCCA was a contraindication for LT until size-based selection criteria were introduced to identify patients with satisfied post-LT outcomes. Recent studies have shown that tumor biology-based selection can yield high post-LT survival in patients with locally advanced iCCA. Another selection criterion is the tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with response to neoadjuvant therapy have better outcomes after LT compared with those without tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Another index that helps predict the treatment outcome is the biomarker. Improved survival outcomes have also opened the door for living donor LT for iCCA. Patients undergoing LT for iCCA now have statistically similar survival rates as patients undergoing resection. The combination of surgery and locoregional and systemic therapies improves the prognosis of iCCA patients.

Survival analysis of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a nomogram for clinical and MRI features

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish a predictive model to estimate the postoperative prognosis of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) based on preoperative clinical and MRI features.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients with ECC confirmed by surgery and pathology were enrolled from January 2013 to July 2021, whose preoperative clinical, laboratory, and MRI data were retrospectively collected and examined, and the effects of clinical and imaging characteristics on overall survival (OS) were analyzed by constructing Cox proportional hazard regression models. A nomogram was constructed to predict OS, and calibration curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess OS accuracy.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analyses revealed that gender, DBIL, ALT, GGT, tumor size, lesion's position, the signal intensity ratio of liver to paraspinal muscle (SIRLiver/Muscle), and the signal intensity ratio of spleen to paraspinal muscle (SIRSpleen/Muscle) on T2WI sequences were significantly associated with OS, and these variables were included in a nomogram. The concordance index of nomogram for predicting OS was 0.766, and the AUC values of the nomogram predicting 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 0.838 and 0.863, respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed OS. 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation show good stability of nomogram predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nomogram based on clinical, laboratory, and MRI features well predicted OS of ECC patients, and could be considered as a convenient and personalized prediction tool for clinicians to make decisions.

Survival Benefit Relative to Treatment Modalities Among Patients with Very Early Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: an Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) has been considered a potential curative treatment for patients with very early intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and cirrhosis, yet the survival benefit of LT has not been well defined. This study aimed to compare the long-term survival outcomes of patients who underwent LT with that of individuals who received resection and non-curative intent treatment (non-CIT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent LT, hepatectomy, and non-CIT between 2004 and 2018 were included in the National Cancer Database. Survival benefits of LT over resection and non-CIT were analyzed relative to overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 863 patients, 54 (6.3%) underwent LT, while 342 (39.6%) underwent surgical resection, and 467 (54.1%) received non-CIT, respectively. While the rates of non-CIT increased over time, the percentages of LT remained consistent during the study period. LT patients had similar 5-year OS to individuals who underwent resection (referent, resection: LT, HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.84-1.58, p=0.84). In contrast, 5-year OS was better among patients who underwent LT versus individuals who had non-CIT after controlling other variables using propensity score overlapping weighting (5-year OS, LT 57.1% vs. LR 25.8%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of very early ICC patients who underwent LT were similar to individuals who underwent hepatectomy, but better than patients treated with non-CIT. LT should be may be a consideration as a treatment option for patients with early stage ICC who are unsuitable candidates for resection.