1
|
Yang NN, Zhao J, Zheng Z, Yabroff KR, Han X. COVID-19 vaccination, infection, and symptoms among cancer survivors in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae029. [PMID: 38400782 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The experiences of cancer survivors with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States during 2021 and 2022, when vaccinations became widely available, are largely undocumented. Using nationally representative survey data in 2021 and 2022, we found that compared with adults without a cancer history, cancer survivors were more likely to have at least 2 COVID-19 vaccines (2021: 66.6% vs 62.3%, P = .003; 2022: 77.0% vs 72.4%, P < .001) and as likely to have a COVID-19 infection history (2021: 14.1% vs 14.2%, P = .93; 2022: 39.9% vs 39.3%, P = .55) but, once infected, were more likely to develop moderate to severe symptoms (2021: 62.5% vs 54.2%, P = .02; 54.5% vs 61.3%; P = .13). Among cancer survivors, younger age, lower educational attainment, lack of health insurance, and more comorbidities were statistically significantly associated with lower vaccination rates (P < .001). Among infected cancer survivors, being female and younger were associated with higher likelihood of developing moderate to severe symptoms (P < .001). Our findings suggest tailored efforts to prevent and control COVID-19 infections for cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuo Nova Yang
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jingxuan Zhao
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Zheng
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kasputytė G, Jenciūtė G, Šakinis N, Bunevičienė I, Korobeinikova E, Vaitiekus D, Inčiūra A, Jaruševičius L, Bunevičius R, Krikštolaitis R, Krilavičius T, Juozaitytė E, Bunevičius A. Smartphone sensors for evaluating COVID-19 fear in patients with cancer: a prospective study. Front Public Health 2024; 11:1308003. [PMID: 38249398 PMCID: PMC10797074 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1308003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to analyze the association between the behavior of cancer patients, measured using passively and continuously generated data streams from smartphone sensors (as in digital phenotyping), and perceived fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination status. Methods A total of 202 patients with different cancer types and undergoing various treatments completed the COVID-19 Fears Questionnaire for Chronic Medical Conditions, and their vaccination status was evaluated. Patients' behaviors were monitored using a smartphone application that passively and continuously captures high-resolution data from personal smartphone sensors. In all, 107 patients were monitored for at least 2 weeks. The study was conducted between August 2022 and August 2023. Distributions of clinical and demographical parameters between fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated patients were compared using the Chi-squared test. The fear of COVID-19 among the groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney and the Kruskal-Wallis criteria. Trajectories of passively generated data were compared as a function of fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination status using local polynomial regression. Results In total, 202 patients were included in the study. Most patients were fully (71%) or partially (13%) vaccinated and 16% of the patients were unvaccinated for COVID-19. Fully vaccinated or unvaccinated patients reported greater fear of COVID-19 than partially vaccinated patients. Fear of COVID-19 was higher in patients being treated with biological therapy. Patients who reported a higher fear of COVID-19 spent more time at home, visited places at shorter distances from home, and visited fewer places of interest (POI). Fully or partially vaccinated patients visited more POI than unvaccinated patients. Local polynomial regression using passively generated smartphone sensor data showed that, although at the beginning of the study, all patients had a similar number of POI, after 1 week, partially vaccinated patients had an increased number of POI, which later remained, on average, around four POI per day. Meanwhile, fully vaccinated or unvaccinated patients had a similar trend of POI and it did not exceed three visits per day during the entire treatment period. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have an impact on the behavior of cancer patients even after the termination of the global pandemic. A higher perceived fear of COVID-19 was associated with less movement, more time spent at home, less time spent outside of home, and a lower number of visited places. Unvaccinated patients visited fewer places and were moving less overall during a 14-week follow-up as compared to vaccinated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabrielė Jenciūtė
- Faculty of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Nerijus Šakinis
- Faculty of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Inesa Bunevičienė
- Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Erika Korobeinikova
- Oncology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Domas Vaitiekus
- Oncology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Arturas Inčiūra
- Oncology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | | | | | - Tomas Krilavičius
- Faculty of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Elona Juozaitytė
- Oncology Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Adomas Bunevičius
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ezeamii VC, Ofochukwu VC, Iheagwara C, Asibu T, Ayo-Farai O, Gebeyehu YH, Kaglo EO, Odoeke MC, Adeyemi OM, Shittu HO, Okobi OE. COVID-19 Vaccination Rates and Predictors of Uptake Among Adults With Coronary Heart Disease: Insight From the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Cureus 2024; 16:e52480. [PMID: 38371067 PMCID: PMC10873900 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COVID-19 has become a burden to all nations across the globe, and vaccination currently remains the most effective means of fighting the SARS-COV-2 pandemic. From the time of approval and subsequent distribution of the various COVID-19 vaccines, nearly 72.3% (5.5 billion) of the globe's population have been vaccinated, leaving slightly more than a quarter of the globe's population at risk. With the approval and availability of booster vaccine dosages to individuals with chronic conditions, including coronary heart disease (CHD), it is vital to comprehend the factors underlying the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in such subgroups. Further, the American Heart Association recommends vaccination against COVID-19 in populations with coronary heart disease (CHD). This is because they are more likely to experience severe outcomes due to COVID-19 infection. This study assesses the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines as well as predictors of its uptake. METHODS Using the 2022 survey data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 1,708 adults ≥ 40 years with CHD who responded yes/no to whether they had received the vaccine were identified. A Pearson's chi-square test was used to ascertain differences among those who had received the vaccine and those who had not. A logistic regression (multivariate regression) was used to evaluate predictors of COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS About 1,491/1,708 (86.8%) adults ≥ 40 years reported being vaccinated against COVID-19. Among them, 1,065/1,491 (68.4%) had received more than two vaccination doses. The predictors of COVID-19 vaccination were older age (odds ratio (OR): 2.01 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-2.89), p < 0.001), ratio of family income to poverty threshold of 1 and above (OR: 2.40 (95% CI: 1.58-3.64), p < 0.001), having a college degree (OR: 3.09 (95% CI: 1.85-5.14), p < 0.001), and being insured (OR: 3.26 (95% CI: 1.03-10.26), p = 0.044). CONCLUSION The findings of the study have indicated that 68.4% of adults 40 years and above with CHD have been vaccinated against COVID-19 and have received more than two doses of vaccines. More than half have followed recommendations and have received booster doses of the vaccine. Old age (above 40 years) and a higher socioeconomic class are associated with being more likely to follow COVID-19 vaccination guidelines. Despite the higher vaccination rate of 68.4% in the adults with heart diseases group, strategies for improving booster vaccine awareness alongside accessibility are needed to enhance additional dosage uptake, protect them against novel COVID-19 variants, and ensure the development of sustained immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor C Ezeamii
- Public Health, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, USA
| | - Victor C Ofochukwu
- Medicine, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, NGA
- Medicine and Surgery, Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Hospital Pearland, Pearland, USA
| | | | - Tracy Asibu
- Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Oluwatoyin Ayo-Farai
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, USA
| | | | - Eunice O Kaglo
- General Practice, Southwestern University School of Medicine, Calgary, CAN
| | - Moses C Odoeke
- Internal Medicine, Al Ruwaydah General Hospital, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Olaoluwa M Adeyemi
- Internal Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado, NGA
- Internal Medicine/Nephrology, William Osler Health System - Etobicoke General Hospital, Toronto, CAN
- Internal Medicine, Richmond Gabriel University, Kingstown, VCT
| | | | - Okelue E Okobi
- Family Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital Palm Springs Campus, Miami, USA
- Family Medicine, Medficient Health Systems, Laurel, USA
- Family Medicine, Lakeside Medical Center, Belle Glade, USA
| |
Collapse
|