The utility of H2 receptor antagonists in preventing infusion-related reactions to paclitaxel chemotherapy

Personalized Risk Assessment for Taxane-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are widely used in cancer treatment but frequently cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), disrupting treatment continuity. This meta-analysis aimed to identify consistent risk factors for taxane-induced HSRs to support personalized risk assessments and optimize therapeutic outcomes. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023476738). Comprehensive literature searches were conducted up to 30 June 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using fixed or random effects models. Results: A total of 18 studies of moderate or higher quality were included, involving 8333 patients. The incidence of HSRs ranged from 3.0% to 33.1%. Risk factors assessed included history of allergy, obesity, postmenopausal state, ovarian cancer, and H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) premedication. A history of allergy was identified as a potential risk factor with marginal significance (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.97-3.54, p = 0.06), while H2RA premedication, ovarian cancer, and female sex were not significantly associated with HSR risk. Substantial heterogeneity was observed for obesity (I2 = 57.71%, p = 0.069) and postmenopausal status (I2 = 78.98%). Conclusions: This study highlights the complex nature of taxane-induced HSRs and emphasizes the need for personalized risk assessments. While a history of allergy is a potential risk factor, heterogeneity across other factors underscores the importance of individualized approaches. Clinicians should tailor strategies to balance the benefits of taxane therapy with patient-specific risks to improve clinical outcomes.

Exclusion of ranitidine from premedication regimen during paclitaxel treatment: A retrospective single-center analysis

INTRODUCTION

To minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) caused by paclitaxel infusion, premedication with corticosteroid, H1-antagonist and H2 antagonist (ranitidine) was standard of care. Discontinuation of ranitidine in 2020 led to adjustments in premedication regimens and a new regimen without ranitidine was implemented in our center. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel treatment of a standard premedication regimen including ranitidine with a new premedication regimen without ranitidine and with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis was performed on two cohorts of adult patients with solid tumors who started treatment with paclitaxel and received a premedication regimen with and without ranitidine over the years 2021 and 2023 respectively (before and after ranitidine withdrawal). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate any associations with H2 antagonist treatment adjusting for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were included. 158 patients received the standard premedication regimen with ranitidine compared to 161 patients who did not received ranitidine. HSRs were observed in 10 of 1101 administrations of paclitaxel (0,90%) in ranitidine group compared to 2 of 899 (0,22%) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.048). Analysis incidence per patient also found results with statistically significant differences: 5.7% (9 of 158 patients) in the ranitidine cohort compared to 1.2% (2 of 161 patients) in the ranitidine-free cohort (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study show the effectiveness of a premedication regimen including only dexchlorpherinamine and dexamethasone, along with a titrated infusion rate during the first two administrations, in reducing the incidence of paclitaxed-induced HSRs.

Effect of Switching the Histamine-1 Receptor Antagonist Clemastine to Cetirizine in Paclitaxel Premedication Regimens: The H1-Switch Study

PURPOSE

Premedication, including a histamine-1 receptor (H1) antagonist, is recommended to all patients treated with paclitaxel chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). However, the scientific basis for this premedication is not robust, which provides opportunities for optimization. Substitution of intravenously administered first-generation H1 antagonist for orally administered second-generation H1 antagonist could reduce side effects, and improve efficiency and sustainability. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of substituting intravenous clemastine for oral cetirizine as prophylaxis for paclitaxel-induced HSRs.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, noninferiority study compares a historic cohort receiving a premedication regimen with intravenous clemastine to a prospective cohort receiving oral cetirizine. Primary end point of the study is HSR grade ≥3. The difference in incidence was calculated together with the 90% CI. We determined that the two-sided 90% CI of HSR grade ≥3 incidence in the oral cetirizine cohort should not be more than 4% higher (ie, the noninferiority margin) compared with the intravenous clemastine cohort.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twelve patients were included in the oral cetirizine cohort (June 2022 and May 2023) and 183 in the intravenous clemastine cohort. HSR grade ≥3 incidence was 1.6% (n = 3) in the intravenous clemastine cohort and 0.5% (n = 1) in the oral cetirizine cohort, resulting in a difference of -1.2% (90% CI, -3.4 to 1.1).

CONCLUSION

Premedication containing oral cetirizine is as safe as premedication containing intravenous clemastine in preventing paclitaxel-induced HSR grade ≥3. These findings could contribute to optimization of care for patients and improve efficiency and sustainability.

H2 antihistamines: May be useful for combination therapies in cancer?

Cancer morbimortality is still a great concern despite advances in research and therapies. Histamine and its receptors' ligands can modulate different biological responses according to the cell type and the receptor subtype involved. Besides the wide variety of histamine functions in normal tissues, diverse roles in the acquisition of hallmarks of cancer such as sustained proliferative signaling, resistance to cell death, angiogenesis, metastasis, altered immunity and modified microenvironment have been described. This review summarizes the present knowledge of the various roles of histamine H2 receptor (H2R) ligands in neoplasias. A bioinformatic analysis of human tumors showed dissimilar results in the expression of the H2R gene according to tumor type when comparing malignant versus normal tissues. As well, the relationship between patients' survival parameters and H2R gene expression levels also varied, signaling important divergences in the role of H2R in neoplastic progression in different cancer types. Revised experimental evidence showed multiple effects of H2R antihistamines on several of the cited hallmarks of cancer. Interventional and retrospective clinical studies evaluated different H2R antihistamines in cancer patients with two main adjuvant uses: improving antitumor efficacy (which includes regulation of immune response) and preventing toxic adverse effects produced by chemo or radiotherapy. While there is a long path to go, research on H2R antihistamines may provide new opportunities for developing more refined combination therapeutic strategies for certain cancer types to improve patients' survival and health-related quality of life.