Accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is routinely performed to confirm a lung cancer diagnosis and/or to clinically stage disease. EBUS-TBNA findings may be used to determine whether patients can be offered potentially curative surgery. In this study, we evaluated the reporting in our service of EBUS-TBNA cytology for early-stage (operable) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on diagnostic accuracy and analyzing cases with discordant cytologic and post-surgical histopathologic conclusions.

METHODS

Cytology slides and cytopathology reports of 120 NSCLC patients who had undergone EBUS-TBNA and lobectomy in our hospital system between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 290 lymph nodes (110 cases) able to be reviewed, interpretation of 48 lymph nodes was discordant with the original cytopathology report. This included 31 lymph nodes originally reported as adequate, which were found to be non-diagnostic on review. The diagnostic accuracy (benign/malignant) of lymph nodes that were sampled at EBUS-TBNA and excised at surgery was 89%. Specific examination of cases where EBUS-TBNA cytology did not reflect post-surgical findings illustrated important features and limitations of the procedure. These included potential misclassification of lymph node stations, the presence of multiple, variably involved nodes at lymph node stations, and the failure to detect small volume disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous evaluation of EBUS-TBNA performance identifies technical limitations and areas of improvement for cytopathology reporting. This is increasingly important in an era where lung cancer screening is expected to increase diagnosis of early-stage disease and with the advent of novel treatments, including non-surgical management options.

Diagnostic yield and accuracy of paediatric image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of deep organ tumours

Background

Paediatric tumour cytological diagnosis by image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has not gained wide acceptance despite increasing publications advocating the procedure.

Objective

The primary aim was an audit of the diagnostic yield and accuracy of paediatric image-guided FNAB with ROSE at a single institution. Evaluation of safety was a secondary aim.

Method

Details of consecutive cases of paediatric image-guided FNAB with ROSE for suspected non-benign deep-seated lesions performed from 01 January 2014 to 30 April 2020 were retrieved from the institutional radiology and laboratory databases. Diagnostic yield and accuracy were evaluated using clinico-pathological-radiological correlation and/or subsequent histological specimen diagnosis correlation. Complications and the frequency of key radiological features potentially affecting yield and accuracy were described.

Results

Of 65 cases retrieved, cytology showed malignancy in 52, benign features in five and one indeterminate diagnosis; seven samples were insufficient for cytological assessment. Of the 65 cases, 58 had subsequent formal histological diagnosis. The overall diagnostic yield was 98.5%, with 94.5% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% positive predictive value, 75.0% negative predictive value and 95.3% diagnostic accuracy. All cases (n = 26) demonstrating restricted diffusion on MRI yielded adequate samples and cyto-histopathological correlation.

Conclusion

Paediatric image-guided FNAB with ROSE has a relatively high diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy in the diagnosis of deep-seated tumours. The relatively low negative predictive value may reflect insufficient samples obtained from cystic and/or benign lesions. Sampling from areas of restricted MRI diffusion may enhance diagnostic yield.

Adding the "US" in FNA: Pearls for starting a pathologist-performed ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration service (USG FNA)

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (USG-FNA) biopsies have traditionally been performed in the radiology department, with radiologists performing the procurement with or without on-site cytotechnologists or pathologists to provide adequacy or diagnostic evaluation of the specimen. However, more recently, these image-guided biopsies have been performed by endocrinologists and now cytopathologists. Starting an USG-FNA service is a big task that requires consideration of multiple factors, including training, certification, privileges, equipment, documentation, information technology (IT) issues, and the overall business plan or financial component. In this review, the issues confronted when bringing on an USG-FNA service are discussed in detail in an effort to highlight the issues and challenges that many cytopathology laboratories are facing when implementing this new service.

Immunohistochemistry Applied to Breast Cytological Material

Fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) of the breast are minimally invasive procedures enabling the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. Unfortunately, they are often perceived as inferior to core-needle biopsies, namely because they are supposedly unable to differentiate between high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma or provide material for ancillary testing. Several studies have shown, however, that FNAB samples, when handled properly, are indeed capable of providing sufficient and adequate material for ancillary testing, namely immunocytochemistry (ICC). We reviewed the published literature regarding the use of ICC for both diagnostic and theranostic uses in the different types of cytological samples obtained from FNABs of the breast, including smears, liquid-based cytology samples, and cellblocks. We found that p63 and 34βE12 show promise in aiding in the differential diagnosis between in situ and invasive lesions and that most other diagnostic markers may be used as in tissue. Regarding theranostic ICC markers, results vary between publications, but with care, these can successfully be performed in cytological samples. Air-dried smears should be avoided, and cellblocks are overall more versatile than cytology slides, enabling the evaluation of not only hormonal receptors and HER2 by ICC, but also of Ki-67. Particular attention should be paid to fixation and antigen retrieval procedures in all cases. We recommend that laboratories without experience perform short validation runs before adopting these techniques into clinical practice.

Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Practice in 2019: Results of a College of American Pathologists National Survey

CONTEXT.—

The College of American Pathologists surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice for laboratories.

OBJECTIVE.—

To investigate breast fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2019.

DESIGN.—

We analyzed data from the College of American Pathologists Breast FNA Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2019 College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology Education Program.

RESULTS.—

Sixty-one percent (499 of 816) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated breast FNAs. Cystic lesions were the most common indication, and radiologists primarily performed FNAs in most settings. Forty-five percent (220 of 491) of laboratories performed ancillary studies on breast FNA samples, but 33.8% (70 of 207) did not report fixation time for breast biomarker studies. Only 54.5% (271 of 497) of laboratories had a standardized reporting system and only 16.8% (82 of 488) were aware of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama Breast FNA Biopsy Cytology Reporting System. There were significant differences among different types of institutions in several aspects of breast FNA practice, including frequency of concurrent FNA and core needle biopsy for the same lesion, primary personnel who performed the FNA, etc. Significant differences existed between domestic and international laboratories in slide preparation, ancillary studies, fixation time reporting, standardized/descriptive diagnosis, and International Academy of Cytology Yokohama Reporting System awareness.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This is the first survey from the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee to investigate breast FNA practices. The data reveal significant differences in breast FNA practice among different types of institutions and between domestic and international laboratories, and provide a baseline for future breast FNA studies in a variety of practice settings.

Small core needle biopsies in cytology practice: a survey of members of the American Society of Cytopathology

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of a new generation of core needle biopsies (CNBs) for endoscopic procedures has prompted reconsideration of the role of cytopathologists in the handling of small biopsies. The American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) has therefore conducted a survey with the intention of elucidating current practices regarding the handling of small CNBs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The membership of the ASC was invited by email to participate in an online survey over a 2-month period. The survey consisted of 20 multiple choice questions with 2-8 possible responses per question.

RESULTS

Of 2651 members contacted by e-mail, 282 (10.6%) responded to the survey questions, including 196 pathologists (69.5%) and 86 cytotechnologists (30.5%). Of these, 265 respondents were from the US/Canada (94.0%), with 156 from academic institutions (58.9%) and 109 from non-academic practices (41.1%); 17 were from other countries (6.0%). In 18.8% of all practices, cytopathologists sign out >90% of small CNBs from endoscopic and radiologically guided procedures; in 36.5% of practices >90% are signed out by surgical pathologists; the remainder have such cases divided more evenly between cytopathologists and surgical pathologists. Responses show that 78.0% of all respondents are interested in signing out more small biopsies in the future, and 80.5% desire increased small biopsy-related resources from the ASC.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey responses indicate that practices currently vary widely across institutions. Most indicated an interest in greater incorporation of small biopsies into the practice of cytopathology.

Small but powerful: the promising role of small specimens for biomarker testing

Emphasis on the use of small specimens for biomarker testing to provide prognostic and predictive information for guiding clinical management for patients with advanced-stage cancer has been increasing. These biomarker tests include molecular analysis, cytogenetic tests, and immunohistochemical assays. Owing to the limited nature of the cellular material procured in these small specimens, which are collected using minimally invasive techniques (ie, fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy), pathologists have been required to triage these samples judiciously and provide the clinically relevant genomic information required for patient care. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of these specimen preparations and the specific preanalytic requirements for the testing methods will help pathologists to develop optimal strategies to maximize the chances of effectively using these samples for comprehensive diagnostic and relevant biomarker testing.

Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology: the potential impact of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology and the use of rapid on-site evaluation

The present report reviews the current problems associated with the routine use of breast fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and discusses the potential impact that the new International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama Reporting System and the use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) should have on reducing these problems to optimize breast care for patients. The recently reported IAC System aims to establish the best practice guidelines for breast FNAB, emphasizing the importance of the FNAB technique and the skillful preparation of direct smears. The IAC System proposes a standardized report and established clear terminology for defined reporting categories, each of which has a risk of malignancy and is linked to management options. The FNAB techniques that will optimize the biopsy specimen and reduce poor quality smears are reviewed and the benefits of ROSE are discussed. FNAB can diagnose accurately the vast majority of breast lesions, and ROSE has been recommended whenever possible to reduce the rate of insufficient/inadequate cases and increase the number of specific benign and malignant diagnoses. ROSE performed by a cytopathologist provides a provisional diagnosis, reducing patient anxiety and facilitating management through cost-effective immediate triage and patient selection for ancillary testing. Thus, patients can be selected for immediate core needle biopsy, as required.

The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology

The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) gathered together a group of cytopathologists expert in breast cytology who, working with clinicians expert in breast diagnostics and management, have developed the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytology. The project was initiated with the first cytopathology group meeting in Yokohama at the 2016 International Congress of Cytology. This IAC Yokohama System defines five categories for reporting breast cytology, each with a clear descriptive term for the category, a definition, a risk of malignancy (ROM) and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathology features of each of the lesions within each category will be presented more fully in a subsequent atlas. The System emphasizes that the crucial requirements for diagnostic breast FNAB cytology are a high standard for the performance of the FNAB and for the making of direct smears, and well-trained experienced cytopathologists to interpret the material. The performance indicators of breast FNAB, including specificity and sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and ROM stated in this article have been derived from the recent literature. The current practice of breast FNAB has evolved with the increasing use of ultrasound guidance and rapid on-site evaluation. Two recent publications have shown a range of ROM for the insufficient/inadequate category of 2.6-4.8%, benign 1.4-2.3%, atypical 13-15.7%, suspicious of malignancy 84.6-97.1%, and malignant 99.0-100%. The management algorithm in the System provides options because there are variations in the management of breast lesions using FNAB and core-needle biopsy in those countries utilizing the "triple test" of clinical, imaging, and FNAB assessment, and also variations in the availability of CNB and imaging in low- and middle-income countries. The System will stimulate further discussion and research, particularly in the cytological diagnostic features of specific lesions within each category and in management recommendations. This will lead to continuing improvements in the care of patients with breast lesions and possible modifications to the IAC Yokohama System.

The utilization of cytologic and small biopsy samples for ancillary molecular testing

There has recently been an increased emphasis on the utilization of cytologic samples and small biopsies for not only diagnostic purposes but also for ancillary testing. In some instances, the ancillary tests contribute to the diagnosis and in other scenarios, they provide prognostic and theranostic information for the management of patients with advanced stage cancer. These ancillary tests include immunohistochemical biomarker analysis, molecular mutation analysis, and cytogenetic tests. Despite the finite nature of the cellular material procured in cytologic and small tissue biopsies, pathologists are tasked with ordering an increasing number of tests using these limited samples. This requires the pathologists to utilize and triage these samples in an optimal fashion so that as much information can be gleaned from a given specimen. This review will focus on the pre-analytic requirements for ancillary molecular and cytogenetic tests in the context of a discussion of the various preparation methods for cytologic and small biopsy specimens. The goal will be to provide the reader with the necessary concepts that can be utilized to develop optimal specimen selection and triage strategies to maximize the chances of effectively utilizing these samples for comprehensive diagnostic and relevant ancillary testing purposes.

Ovarian needle aspiration in the diagnosis and management of ovarian masses

Objective

Ovarian needle aspiration and biopsy (ONAB) may be employed for pretreatment diagnosis of ovarian malignancies or intraoperatively to facilitate removal of ovarian masses. However, there is reluctance to utilize this procedure due to potential cyst rupture or seeding of malignant cells. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of ONAB over a 13-year period at our institution.

Methods

Between 2000 and 2013, all ONAB specimens were identified from the Queen's Medical Center Pathology Department database. All cytologic specimens were reviewed and correlated with histopathologic findings. A retrospective chart review was conducted to retrieve data on clinical course and treatment.

Results

This study identified 144 cases of ovarian masses sampled by aspiration or needle biopsy between 2000 and 2013. Ninety-two (64%) cases had corresponding histopathology, 84 (91%) of which were obtained concomitantly. On histology, 12 (13%) cases were malignant and 80 (87%) benign. Three false negative cases were noted; 2 serous borderline tumors and 1 mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. These were sampling errors; no diagnostic tumor cells were present in the aspirates. Sensitivity and specificity of ONAB in the detection of malignancy were 75% and 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 96%, respectively.

Conclusion

ONAB represents a valuable tool in the diagnosis of malignancy and treatment of ovarian masses. In our study, it was highly specific, with excellent positive and negative predictive value.