A positive HPV test with positive p16/Ki-67 double staining in self-sampled vaginal material is an accurate tool to detect women at risk for cervical cancer

p16/ki-67 dual stain triage of individuals positive for HPV to detect cervical precancerous lesions

p16/Ki-67 dual stain is a biomarker-based test that can identify oncogenic transformation in cervical cells with higher sensitivity than cervical cytology, using the same samples taken for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and liquid-based cytology. Dual stain is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for triage of women with positive results by primary HPV testing or by HPV/cytology co-testing and has recently been incorporated into management guidelines. In this review, we summarize the data showing the utility of dual stain in detecting precancers, reducing the number of unnecessary colposcopies, and reassuring women who test negative. We also discuss the implications of dual stain for future treatment practice and health economics.

Assessment of HPV screening modalities within primary care: a systematic review

Introduction

Most cervical cancer precancerous lesions are associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes. Early detection through screening is crucial for preventing and managing HPV-related diseases. HPV Self-sample screening is a proposed method that can mitigate socioeconomic disparities, reduce embarrassment and costs of screening. This can possibly reduce the overall disease burden.

Methods

A search strategy was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase. Data extraction was performed using a standardized form to collect detailed information on study characteristics, participant demographics, and various outcomes. The quality and risk of bias in the articles were assessed using the Critical Appraisal skills programme (CASP) checklist, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool.

Results

Our review consistently found that HPV self-sampling is comparable to clinician-collected samples in terms of HPV detection rates and sensitivity, supporting the idea that HPV self-sampling can be a viable alternative for cervical cancer screening. Across the studies, self-sampling showed comparable or greater effectiveness to clinician-collected samples in detecting HPV in individuals. Specificity was comparable between both methods, with clinician-collected sampling slightly outperforming HPV self-sampling in some cases. Moreover when analyzing the negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) across the studies, it was evident that there was little difference between clinician-collected sampling and HPV self-sampling. 64.3% favored self-sampling over clinician-collected sampling due to increased comfort and privacy. Overall, the evidence suggests that self-sampling is an effective, patient-preferred, and cost-efficient alternative to clinician-collected sampling, particularly in under-screened populations.

Gynecologic health care for LGBTQIA+ people

Gender relations are a set of socially determined norms and rules that assign values, characteristics, and expectations to individuals based on their biological sex. These aspects also influence the clinician-patient relationship, since it has been for a long time based on cisheteronormativity. However, this attitude alienated the LGBTQIA+ community from health services. Global and specific gynecologic care needs to be offered to the LGBTQIA+ population, which has demands for sexual and reproductive health care. In this narrative review, we bring conceptual aspects, gender identity and expression, sexual history, screening for cancer and other care to the community.

Triage options for positive high-risk HPV results from HPV-based cervical cancer screening: a review of the potential alternatives to Papanicolaou test cytology

The American Cancer Society has recommended high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the primary screening method for cervical cancer since 2020. Up to this point, the transition from Pap test cytology-based screening or co-testing with cytology and HPV testing has been slow and limited. However, more health systems in the United States are in the process of implementing this change. The transition to HPV-based screening requires a triage strategy for positive results. Genotyping to specifically detect HPV types 16 and 18 in conjunction with reflex cytology for the remaining high-risk HPV genotypes has been the recommended method. Testing options including Dual Stain for p16/Ki-67 and extended HPV genotyping are currently being incorporated into treatment algorithms as alternatives. Methylation testing is another promising method extensively investigated around the world. This review, performed by members of the Clinical Practice Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology, examines the rationale behind the switch away from reliance on Pap test cytology in the cervical cancer screening algorithm and the opportunities and problems associated with the most promising alternative approaches. Published studies that give insight into the performance characteristics of these newer tests are reviewed. At the present time, Pap test cytology remains a viable triage option for positive HPV screening results, but alternative tests have significant appeal and should be considered in tandem with the decision to offer primary HPV screening.

Ongoing Challenges in Maintaining the Diagnostic Quality of Cervical Cytopathology: Is It Possible to Minimize Differences in Morphological Interpretations?

BACKGROUND

The efficiency of the cytological test largely depends on the control and quality assurance of laboratory procedures, to avoid false results. The objectives of this descriptive review were to point out and discuss the main mechanisms for controlling and ensuring the quality of cytological diagnosis.

SUMMARY

A critical revision was performed to identify the principal challenges involved in the processes of all the main issues related to the morphological alterations that characterize a true-related lesion in the daily routine of the Pap test examination. Principles of QC and QA are already being implemented worldwide, and the positive aspects and limitations of these are discussed as well as proposing alternatives when pertinent. Most of the articles evaluated highlighted the necessity of implementing audit mechanisms to control the performance of the professionals involved with the cytology evaluation.

KEY MESSAGE

Promising data from the new image-based technological arsenal appear to be a remarkable tool for improving cytological evaluation, reducing errors of interpretation and serving as a powerful arm for cytology teaching.

Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening: Review of p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining as a Promising Triage Strategy

Cervical cancer, primarily caused by high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) types 16 and 18, is a major global health concern. Persistent HR-HPV infection can progress from reversible precancerous lesions to invasive cervical cancer, which is driven by the oncogenic activity of human papillomavirus (HPV) genes, particularly E6 and E7. Traditional screening methods, including cytology and HPV testing, have limited sensitivity and specificity. This review explores the application of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining cytology for cervical cancer screening. This advanced immunocytochemical method allows for simultaneously detecting p16 and Ki-67 proteins within cervical epithelial cells, offering a more specific approach for triaging HPV-positive women. Dual staining and traditional methods are compared, demonstrating their high sensitivity and negative predictive value but low specificity. The increased sensitivity of dual staining results in higher detection rates of CIN2+ lesions, which is crucial for preventing cervical cancer progression. However, its low specificity may lead to increased false-positive results and unnecessary biopsies. The implications of integrating dual staining into contemporary screening strategies, particularly considering the evolving landscape of HPV vaccination and changes in HPV genotype prevalence, are also discussed. New guidelines and further research are necessary to elucidate the long-term effects of integrating dual staining into screening protocols.

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping

The introduction of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening requires the implementation of an appropriate triage strategy that will be effective in detecting high-grade cervical disease without losing diagnostic specificity. From the 30.066 screening tests results, a total of 1086 with available high-risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) with limited genotyping, cytology, and p16/Ki67 dual-stain were selected. Two triage strategies for primary HPV screening were analyzed retrospectively based on the study group. Performance characteristics for p16/Ki67 and cytology triage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) were calculated, detected in colposcopic biopsy. In HPV16/18-positive cases, primary HPV with p16/Ki67 triage was significantly more specific than cytology (53.1%/16.8% for CIN2+; p < 0.0001; 45.9%/17.0% for CIN3+; p < 0.0001), with yielded sensitivity (95.7%/84.8% for CIN2+; p = 0.0955; 100.0%/87.5% for CIN3+; p = 0.0832). In other HRHPV-positive cases (N16/N18), p16/Ki67 triage was also significantly higher specific (51.3%/15.3% for CIN2+; p < 0.0001; 44.5%/16.5% for CIN3+; p < 0.0001), with sensitivity (92.3%/74.4% for CIN2+; p = 0.0522; 90.9%/81.8% for CIN3+; p = 0.5637). Diagnostic predictive values were significantly higher for p16/Ki67 triage with the highest PPV in HPV16/18-positive cases for CIN2+ (45.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.2-55.8; p < 0.0001) and very high NPV in all HPV-positive cases regardless of detected genotype (96.3%-100.0%). The risk (1-NPV) for CIN3+ in HRHPV16/18-positive/p16/Ki67-negative women was 0.0%. Superior diagnostic performance compared to cytology for detecting cervical cancer precursors indicates that p16/Ki67 dual-immunostain may be a highly effective tool of triage in primary HPV screening with limited HPV 16/18 genotyping in secondary cervical cancer prevention.

Significance of Triple Detection of p16/ki-67 Dual-Staining, Liquid-Based Cytology and HR HPV Testing in Screening of Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study

In addition to liquid-based cytology (LBC) and HR HPV testing, p16/ki-67 dual-staining is another method for cervical cancer screening. The combination of any two methods can improve the accuracy of screening, but some cervical lesions are still missed or misdiagnosed. In this retrospective study, the significance of LBC, HR HPV testing and especially p16/ki-67 dual-staining in cervical lesion screening was evaluated with reference to histological diagnosis. At the same time, we tried to explore the value of p16/ki-67 dual-staining combined with LBC and HR HPV testing (triple detection) in improving the diagnostic specificity of CIN2+ and reducing the missed diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions. We found that p16/ki-67 dual-staining was valuable in identifying cervical CIN2+ lesions and reducing the missed diagnosis of CIN2+ in HPV negative patients. More than 96% of CIN2+ patients were positive for two or three tests of triple detection. Whole positive triple detection can effectively predict high grade cervical lesions. In conclusion, the triple detection can distinguish almost all cervical CIN2+ lesions. Our data put forward and highlight the feasibility and significance of triple detection in cervical lesion screening.