Absolute Bioavailability, Mass Balance, and Metabolic Profiling Assessment of [14 C]-Belumosudil in Healthy Men: A Phase 1, Open-Label, 2-Part Study

Two-Part Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Taste Profile of Novel Belumosudil Oral Suspensions and Assess the Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of the Selected Belumosudil Oral Suspension Compared With Oral Tablet Reference in Healthy Male Participants

Belumosudil is a selective rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 2 inhibitor in clinical use for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The current tablet formulation may be inappropriate for children or adults with dysphagia and/or upper gastrointestinal manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease. This study (NCT04735822) assessed the taste and palatability of oral suspensions of belumosudil, evaluated the relative bioavailability of an oral suspension versus the tablet formulation, and characterized the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of an oral suspension. Addition of sweetener and/or flavor vehicle improved the taste. Relative bioavailability of 200-mg doses of the oral suspension and tablet in the fed state was similar for belumosudil and its metabolites (KD025m1 and KD025m2), but absorption was faster with the oral suspension (median time to maximum concentration: 2 vs 3 hours). Administration of the oral suspension with food increased exposure compared with fasted administration, with maximum observed concentration being increased by 16% and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-last) by 19%. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the known safety profile of belumosudil. These results may support administration of a 200-mg belumosudil oral suspension with or without food.

The application of Phase 0 and microtracer approaches in early clinical development: past, present, and future

Phase 0 microdosing studies were introduced to the drug development community approximately 20 years ago. A microdose is defined as less than 1/100th of the dose calculated based on animal data to yield a pharmacological effect in humans, with a maximum of 100 μg, or 30 nmoles for protein products. In our experience, Phase 0 microdose studies have not been fully embraced by the pharmaceutical industry. This notion is based on the number of Phase 0 studies that we have been involved in. Thus, we conducted at least 17 Phase 0 microdose studies in the Zero's (on average, two per year), but in the years beyond this, it was only 15 studies (1.4 per year); in these latter years, we did conduct a total of 23 studies which employed an intravenous (i.v.) microdose for absolute bioavailability (ABA) assessments (two per year on average), which are the most used and potentially informative type of clinical study using a microdose, albeit they are formally not microdose studies. In the current review, we summarize the past use of and experience with Phase 0 microdose designs in early clinical development, including intravenous 14C microdose ABA studies, and assess what is needed to increase the adoption of useful applications of Phase 0/microdose studies in the near future.

A Phase 1 Thorough QT/QTc Study of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Belumosudil in Healthy Subjects

Belumosudil is a selective Rho-associated, coiled-coil-containing protein kinase-2 inhibitor. In this crossover design thorough QT/QTc study, single therapeutic (200 mg) and supratherapeutic (1000 mg) oral doses of belumosudil, moxifloxacin (positive control), and placebo were administered to 34 subjects. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms and serial pharmacokinetic sampling were acquired. The effect of belumosudil on the placebo-corrected, change-from-baseline QTcF was small, and an effect exceeding 10 ms could be excluded across all time points with both doses. Using concentration-QTc analysis, an effect on ΔΔQTcF >10 ms can be excluded up to belumosudil concentrations of ≈12 080 ng/mL, more than 2-fold above mean C_max after the supratherapeutic dose. There was no clinically relevant effect on heart rate or cardiac conduction (ie, the PR and QRS intervals) for belumosudil. No differences in safety were noted between belumosudil and placebo treatment. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by moxifloxacin's effect on the QTc interval. In conclusion, belumosudil at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses did not have a clinically meaningful effect on electrocardiogram parameters.