A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Edaravone on QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects

Secondary Brain Injury by Oxidative Stress After Cerebral Hemorrhage: Recent Advances

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a clinical syndrome in which blood accumulates in the brain parenchyma because of a nontraumatic rupture of a blood vessel. Because of its high morbidity and mortality rate and the lack of effective therapy, the treatment of ICH has become a hot research topic. Meanwhile, Oxidative stress is one of the main causes of secondary brain injury(SBI) after ICH. Therefore, there is a need for an in-depth study of oxidative stress after ICH. This review will discuss the pathway and effects of oxidative stress after ICH and its relationship with inflammation and autophagy, as well as the current antioxidant therapy for ICH with a view to deriving better therapeutic tools or targets for ICH.

Bioequivalence Study of Oral Suspension and Intravenous Formulation of Edaravone in Healthy Adult Subjects

The neuroprotective agent edaravone is an intravenous treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. As intravenous administration burdens patients, orally administered treatments are needed. This phase 1, open‐label, single‐dose crossover study in 42 healthy adults evaluated bioequivalence of a 105‐mg edaravone oral suspension and intravenous edaravone (60 mg/60 min). The evaluation was whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point and to infinity of unchanged edaravone were between the bioequivalence limit of 0.80 and 1.25. Metabolic profiles and elimination pathways were also compared between the 2 routes. Geometric mean ratios and 90%CIs of area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable time point and to infinity for unchanged edaravone satisfied bioequivalence limits. The geometric mean ratio and its lower limit of 90%CI of C_max of the 105‐mg oral suspension compared with 60‐mg intravenous formulations for unchanged edaravone fell within bioequivalence limits. Both formulations showed triphasic plasma concentration–time profiles of unchanged edaravone after reaching C_max. Plasma concentrations of edaravone inactive metabolites after oral administration were higher than with intravenous administration. Edaravone in both routes underwent urinary excretion, mainly as the glucuronide conjugate and, to a lesser extent, as the sulfate conjugate. Urinary excretion of unchanged edaravone was low, and urinary relative composition ratios of unchanged edaravone and metabolites were similar for both formulations. These findings showed equivalent exposure of the 105‐mg oral suspension of edaravone to the 60‐mg intravenous formulation, supporting further investigation of the oral suspension for treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Drug-Drug Interactions of an Oral Suspension of Edaravone in Healthy Adults

Intravenous (IV) edaravone is approved as an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) treatment. Because IV administration places a burden on patients, development of orally administered ALS treatments is needed. Therefore, 2 phase 1 studies of oral formulations of edaravone in healthy subjects examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, racial differences, and drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) and investigated the dose of the oral formulation considered to be bioequivalent to the approved dose of the IV formulation. Study 1 was a placebo‐controlled, randomized, single‐blind study of single‐ascending‐dose oral edaravone with the dose range of 30 to 300 mg (n = 56). Study 2 was conducted in 2 cohorts (n = 84); the first assessed DDIs with multiple‐dose edaravone 120 mg/day given over 5 or 8 days (coadministered with single‐dose rosuvastatin, sildenafil, or furosemide), and the second evaluated PK and racial (Japanese/White) differences in PK parameters with doses of 100‐mg edaravone. The oral formulation of edaravone was well absorbed, and plasma concentrations of unchanged edaravone increased more than dose proportionally within the dose range of 30 to 300 mg. No effect of race on oral edaravone PK and no notable DDI effects possibly caused by orally administered edaravone were observed. The oral edaravone formulations were safe and tolerable under the assessed conditions. Mathematical modeling determined that equivalent exposures in plasma with the approved dose of the IV edaravone formulation, as reported previously, could be achieved when the oral edaravone formulation was administered at a dose of  ≈100 mg, with an absolute bioavailability of ≈60%.

An Open-label, Single-dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Variables of Edaravone in Subjects with Mild, Moderate, or No Renal Impairment

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare edaravone pharmacokinetic (PK) variables and tolerability after a single intravenous (IV) infusion of 30 mg over 60 min in subjects with mild renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m²), moderate renal impairment (30-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), or normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²).

METHODS

This open-label, single-dose study was conducted in Japan. After a screening period of up to 3 weeks, all subjects received a single IV dose of edaravone 30 mg/h on day 1. Blood samples were collected for PK analysis of edaravone and its sulfate conjugate for up to 48 h postdose.

FINDINGS

Edaravone was administered to 30 subjects: 11 with mild (Group 1), 8 with moderate (Group 2), and 11 with no (Group 3) renal impairment. Although geometric least-squares mean values for C_max and AUC_0-∞ for unchanged edaravone were 1.15- and 1.20-fold greater in Group 1 than in Group 3, and were 1.25- and 1.30-fold greater in Group 2 than in Group 3, no statistically significant differences in exposure (C_max and AUC) to edaravone were noted between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The geometric least-squares mean values for C_max and AUC_0-∞ for the sulfate conjugate were 1.41- and 1.50-fold greater in Group 1 than in Group 3, and 1.41- and 1.97-fold greater in Group 2 than in Group 3. Differences in exposure (C_max and AUC) to the sulfate conjugate of edaravone were statistically significant between the 3 study groups (P < 0.0001). A total of 5 treatment-emergent adverse events in 3 subjects in Group 1 were considered by the investigator to be reasonably related to edaravone: headache (2 events/2 subjects), vomiting (2 events/1 subjects), and increased blood bilirubin level (n = 1). These treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and recovered without sequelae.

IMPLICATIONS

Mild to moderate renal impairment had no clinically significant effects on the PK profile of edaravone in Japanese subjects, relative to individuals with normal renal function, and there were no significant safety concerns. Thus, edaravone dosage adjustments are unlikely to be needed in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03289208.