1
|
Hird MA, Sandoe CH. Migraine Management in Medically Complex Patients: a Narrative Review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2024; 24:423-438. [PMID: 39073754 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-024-01361-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current review aims to provide an overview of migraine treatment strategies in medically complex patients, including those with renal, liver, and cardiovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS In cardiovascular disease, gepants are likely safe for acute therapy; NSAIDs, ergotamines, and triptans are not recommended. Beta-blockers, ACEi/ARBs, and verapamil have potential cardiovascular benefits in addition to migraine preventive benefit. Frovatriptan requires no dose adjustments in kidney disease or in mild to moderate liver disease. Gepants are safe acute and preventive treatment options in mild and moderate renal and hepatic disease. TCAs and valproic acid require no dose adjustments in renal disease. OnabotulinumtoxinA is likely safe in cardiac, renal, and hepatic impairment. Although CGRP monoclonal antibodies are likely safe in renal and hepatic disease, further study is needed in these conditions as well as in cardiac disease, and no dosing recommendations are available. Effective options are available for those with complex medical comorbidities. Further research is required on the safety of newer migraine-specific therapies in these complex populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Hird
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Claire H Sandoe
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Centre for Headache, Women's College Hospital, 3rd Floor, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boucherie DM, Dammers R, Vincent A, Danser AHJ, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Comparison of gepant effects at therapeutic plasma concentrations: connecting pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:141. [PMID: 39198753 PMCID: PMC11351853 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01846-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orally administered second-generation gepants are effective for the treatment of migraine. The intranasal administration of the third-generation gepant zavegepant might have additional benefits including a rapid onset of action, but it is not clear yet to which extent this has clinical relevance. METHODS We examined the effect of zavegepant on the relaxations induced by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in human isolated middle meningeal arteries. Furthermore, we connected the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of gepants by combining data from clinical and basic research. RESULTS We showed that 10 nM zavegepant potently antagonized the functional response to CGRP. We also showed that all gepants are effective at inhibiting functional responses to CGRP at their therapeutic plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS The relatively low predicted potency of zavegepant to inhibit CGRP-induced relaxation at therapeutic systemic plasma concentrations may point to the relevance of local delivery to the trigeminovascular system through intranasal administration. This approach may have additional benefits for various groups of patients, including overweight patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre M Boucherie
- Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ruben Dammers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Vincent
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A H Jan Danser
- Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boinpally R, Borbridge L, Wangsadipura V. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Atogepant Co-administered with Quinidine Gluconate in Healthy Participants: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Drug-Drug Interaction Study. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2024; 13:930-937. [PMID: 38702918 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. Atogepant is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein, organic anion transporting polypeptide transporters, and cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and 2D6. Quinidine is a strong P-gp and CYP2D6 inhibitor. A phase 1 open-label study evaluated the effect of P-gp and CYP2D6 inhibition by quinidine on the pharmacokinetics of atogepant, and the safety and tolerability of atogepant and quinidine gluconate (QG) when co-administered and when given alone in 33 healthy adults. There was no significant change in the atogepant maximum plasma concentration with QG co-administration. The overall systemic exposure, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (from time 0 to time t or to infinity), of atogepant increased by 25% when co-administered with QG. However, such an increase was not considered clinically relevant. Atogepant did not alter the mean plasma concentration of quinidine at steady state. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest when QG was administered alone (42.4%), which was primarily due to QT prolongation. Most TEAEs reported were mild in severity and resolved within 1-2 days. Co-administration of atogepant with QG did not result in any unexpected tolerability findings in this phase 1 study in healthy participants. The increase in atogepant exposure during QG co-administration could be due to inhibition of CYP2D6 (a minor contributor to atogepant clearance) as well as inhibition of P-gp.
Collapse
|
4
|
Goadsby PJ, Friedman DI, Holle-Lee D, Demarquay G, Ashina S, Sakai F, Neel B, Gandhi P, Dabruzzo B, Smith JH, Liu Y, Trugman JM. Efficacy of Atogepant in Chronic Migraine With and Without Acute Medication Overuse in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 PROGRESS Trial. Neurology 2024; 103:e209584. [PMID: 38924724 PMCID: PMC11254449 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Atogepant is an oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) in participants with and without acute medication overuse. METHODS This subgroup analysis of the phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROGRESS trial evaluated adults with a ≥1-year history of CM, ≥15 monthly headache days (MHDs), and ≥8 monthly migraine days (MMDs) during the 4-week baseline period. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, atogepant 30 mg twice daily (BID), or atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks and were analyzed by acute medication overuse status (triptans/ergots for ≥10 days per month, simple analgesics for ≥15 days per month, or combinations of triptans/ergots/simple analgesics for ≥10 days per month). Outcomes included change from baseline in mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days; ≥50% reduction in mean MMDs across 12 weeks; and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. RESULTS Of 755 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, 500 (66.2%) met baseline acute medication overuse criteria (placebo, n = 169 [68.7%]; atogepant 30 mg BID, n = 161 [63.6%]; atogepant 60 mg QD, n = 170 [66.4%]). The least squares mean difference (LSMD) (95% CI) from placebo in MMDs was -2.7 (-4.0 to -1.4) with atogepant 30 mg BID and -1.9 (-3.2 to -0.6) with atogepant 60 mg QD. Mean MHDs (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.0 to -1.5] and -2.1 [-3.3 to -0.8]) and mean acute medication use days (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.1 to -1.6] and -2.6 [-3.9 to -1.3]) were reduced and a higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.5 [1.5-4.0] and 2.3 [1.4-3.7]) with atogepant 30 mg BID and atogepant 60 mg QD. There was a 52.1%-61.9% reduction in the proportion of atogepant-treated participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria over 12 weeks. Atogepant improved PRO measures. Similar results were observed in the subgroup without acute medication overuse. DISCUSSION Atogepant was effective in participants with CM, with and without acute medication overuse, as evidenced by reductions in mean MMDs, MHDs, and acute medication use days; reductions in the proportion of participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria; and improvements in PROs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03855137. Submitted: February 25, 2019; first patient enrolled: March 11, 2019. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03855137. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that atogepant reduces mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days in adult patients with or without medication overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Goadsby
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Deborah I Friedman
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Dagny Holle-Lee
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Genevieve Demarquay
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Sait Ashina
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Fumihiko Sakai
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Brian Neel
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Pranav Gandhi
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Brett Dabruzzo
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Jonathan H Smith
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Yingyi Liu
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| | - Joel M Trugman
- From the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Key-Whitman Eye Center (D.I.F.), Dallas, TX; Department of Neurology (D.H.-L.), West German Headache and Vertigo Center Essen, University of Essen, Germany; Department of Neurology (G.D.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, France; BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center (S.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (S.A.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; International Headache Society Global Patient Advocacy Coalition Executive Committee (F.S.), Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Japan; AbbVie (B.N.), Irvine, CA; AbbVie (P.G., B.D., J.M.T.), Madison, NJ; and AbbVie (J.H.S., Y.L.), North Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boinpally RR, Trugman JM. Effect of a High-Fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of an Immediate Release Atogepant Tablet. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2024. [PMID: 38993134 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. A phase 1, open-label, single-dose, 2-period crossover study evaluated the effect of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics and safety of atogepant in 20 healthy adults. Administration of atogepant 60 mg immediate-release (IR) tablets under fed conditions reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to time t and from 0 to time infinity by approximately 18% and reduced the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 22%. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC were not contained within the bioequivalence limits of 80%-125%. There was no change in the median time to maximum plasma concentration in the fed versus fasted state. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between fed and fasted conditions. Four TEAEs were considered related to study intervention and were reported after participants received atogepant under fasted conditions (3 participants). A single-dose atogepant 60 mg IR tablet was safe and tolerated under both fed and fasted states. Due to the wide effective dose range of 10-60 mg/day for atogepant for the preventive treatment of migraine, the food effect on its pharmacokinetics is not considered clinically relevant.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wen H, Ding Y, Chen F. A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for atogepant. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38970172 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2377347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atogepant, an orally administered, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is being investigated for the treatment of migraine. METHODS We collected data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Four algorithms (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM) were used as measures to detect signals of atogepant-associated adverse events (AEs) in real-world data. RESULT Of the 3,552,072 reports, 2876 expressly stated the use of atogepant. Women accounted for the majority of adverse events (AEs), with a notable age concentration of 45-65 years. The percentage of reported adverse events was the highest in the United States. Significant system organ categories (SOC) included nervous system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, nervous system disorders, surgical and medical procedures, ear and labyrinth disorders. Notably, preferred terms (PTs) related to atogepant include migraine, constipation, nausea, vertigo, somnolence, decreased appetite, dizziness and fatigue. Unexpected adverse events such as abnormal dreams, self-injurious ideation, brain fog, tension headache, nightmare, brain neoplasm, feeling abnormal, euphoric mood, hyperacusis and post concussion syndrome were also identified. CONCLUSIONS The present investigation has detected new and unexpected signals of atogepant-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In order to confirm these solve safety issues that were previously overlooked, more research is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heli Wen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China
| | - Yitian Ding
- Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China
| | - Feichi Chen
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baraldi C, Beier D, Martelletti P, Pellesi L. The preclinical discovery and development of atogepant for migraine prophylaxis. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2024; 19:783-788. [PMID: 38856039 DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2024.2365379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atogepant is a selective calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist that is utilized in adults for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. Cumulative findings support the involvement of CGRP in migraine pathophysiology, and atogepant functions by competitively antagonizing CGRP receptors, which results in the inhibition of trigeminovascular nociception. The mechanism of action addresses the cause of migraine pain, providing an effective preventive treatment option. AREAS COVERED The key milestones in its development, including preclinical achievements, phase I, II, and III clinical trials, and regulatory approvals are reviewed. Additionally, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and tolerability of atogepant are discussed. The literature review is based on a comprehensive search of English peer-reviewed articles from various electronic databases, including PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION The development of atogepant represents a significant breakthrough in migraine prevention, particularly due to its improved safety profile that reduces the risk of liver injury, which was a major limitation of first-generation gepants. Drug-drug interaction studies with atogepant highlight the necessity for more inclusive study populations. Given that migraine disproportionately affects females, future clinical development programs should include diverse patient demographics to ensure the findings are generalizable to all individuals suffering from migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Baraldi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Dagmar Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Lanfranco Pellesi
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alabbad S, Figueredo N, Yuan H, Silberstein S. Developments in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:477-485. [PMID: 38557226 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2332754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapy has revolutionized migraine treatment since its first approval in 2018. CGRP-targeted therapy includes monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gepants, which modulate trigeminal nociceptive and inflammatory responses, alleviating pain sensitization involved in migraine pathogenesis. CGRP-targeted therapy is effective not only for migraine but also for other chronic headache disorders that share the CGRP pathway. AREAS COVERED The authors review the latest developments and evidence for CGRP-targeted therapy for episodic migraine and chronic migraine. In addition, the authors discuss the emerging evidence on response prediction, menstrual migraine, vestibular migraine, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, post-traumatic headache, and the relationship between selected migraine comorbidities and CGRP. EXPERT OPINION Since the launch of CGRP-targeted therapy, many practical issues have been raised. Generally, it's safe to combine CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants; this is an excellent option for patients with partial response. When considering stopping CGRP-targeted therapy, although a disease-modifying effect is likely, the optimal time for discontinuation remains unknown. Finally, beyond migraine, CGRP-targeted therapy may be used for other chronic pain disorders and psychological comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sawsan Alabbad
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nathalia Figueredo
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moore E, Bell IM, Fraley ME, Burgey CS, White RB, Li CC, Regan CP, Danziger A, McGaraughty SP, Naseri Kouzehgarani G, Salvatore C, Banerjee P. Pharmacologic characterization of atogepant: A potent and selective calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024231226186. [PMID: 38215228 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231226186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The trigeminal sensory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is identified as an essential element in migraine pathogenesis. METHODS In vitro and in vivo studies evaluated pharmacologic properties of the CGRP receptor antagonist atogepant. Radioligand binding using 125I-CGRP and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation assays were conducted in human embryonic kidney 293 cells to assess affinity, functional potency and selectivity. Atogepant in vivo potency was assessed in the rat nitroglycerine model of facial allodynia and primate capsaicin-induced dermal vasodilation (CIDV) pharmacodynamic model. Cerebrospinal fluid/brain penetration and behavioral effects of chronic dosing and upon withdrawal were evaluated in rats. RESULTS Atogepant exhibited high human CGRP receptor-binding affinity and potently inhibited human α-CGRP-stimulated cAMP responses. Atogepant exhibited significant affinity for the amylin1 receptor but lacked appreciable affinities for adrenomedullin, calcitonin and other known neurotransmitter receptor targets. Atogepant dose-dependently inhibited facial allodynia in the rat nitroglycerine model and produced significant CIDV inhibition in primates. Brain penetration and behavioral/physical signs during chronic dosing and abrupt withdrawal were minimal in rats. CONCLUSIONS Atogepant is a competitive antagonist with high affinity, potency and selectivity for the human CGRP receptor. Atogepant demonstrated a potent, concentration-dependent exposure/efficacy relationship between atogepant plasma concentrations and inhibition of CGRP-dependent effects.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tana C, Cipollone F, Giamberardino MA, Martelletti P. New drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide for the management of migraines. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2023; 28:233-240. [PMID: 37996401 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2023.2288334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Significant advances in migraine research have contributed to the development of new drugs for the treatment of migraine. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) or its receptor and CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) have been associated with a good safety profile and resulted in an overall efficacy in reducing the number of monthly migraine days both in episodic and chronic forms of migraine. AREAS COVERED The results from main investigation studies (phase 2 or 3) of CGRP-targeting drugs (both anti-CGRP mAbs and gepants) are reported in this expert-opinion review. EXPERT OPINION The introduction of new drugs targeting CGRP is a significant breakthrough in the migraine field, and represents a new generation of therapeutic agents that are available to manage migraine. The evaluation of efficacy and safety in the long-term follow-up and the development of trials comparing the available drugs could improve the current knowledge. The economic sustainability of these drugs remains to be clarified, and a cost-cutting campaign should be promoted based on the high burden of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Tana
- Headache Center, Geriatrics Clinic, SS Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Cipollone
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, Medical Clinic, SS. Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria Adele Giamberardino
- Headache Center, Geriatrics Clinic, SS Annunziata Hospital of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging and CAST, G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Boinpally R, Chen W, McGeeney D, Trugman JM. Effects of CYP3A4 inhibition/induction and OATP inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of atogepant in healthy adults. Pain Manag 2023. [PMID: 37650778 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Atogepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is a substrate of OATP and metabolized by CYP3A4. Effect of multiple-dose itraconazole (strong CYP3A4 inhibitor), single-dose rifampin (strong OATP inhibitor) and multiple-dose rifampin (strong CYP3A4 inducer) on single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of atogepant were assessed. Methods: Two phase I, open-label, single-center, crossover trials enrolled healthy adults. Results: Cmax and AUC of atogepant increased when co-administered with itraconazole. Atogepant systemic exposure increased following co-administration with single-dose rifampin. Atogepant systemic exposure decreased with co-administration of multiple-dose rifampin. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were predominantly mild or moderate, and included constipation, dizziness, headache and nauseas. Conclusion: Systemic exposure of atogepant increased significantly when co-administered with a strong CYP3A4 or OATP inhibitor and decreased significantly when co-administered with a strong CYP3A4 inducer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wayne Chen
- Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie, Inc, Madison, NJ 07940, USA
| | | | - Joel M Trugman
- Neuroscience Development, AbbVie, Inc, Madison, NJ 07940, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boinpally R, Butler M, Rojo J, Borbridge L, Wangsadipura V, Papinska A. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions and safety of atogepant coadministered with esomeprazole. Pain Manag 2023; 13:351-361. [PMID: 37424270 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between atogepant and esomeprazole. Methods: Atogepant, esomeprazole, or both were administered to 32 healthy adults in an open-label, nonrandomized, crossover study. Systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] and peak plasma concentration [Cmax]) for atogepant administered in combination versus alone were compared using a linear mixed effects model. Results: Coadministration with esomeprazole delayed atogepant time to Cmax by ∼1.5 h and reduced Cmax by ∼23% with no statistically significant change in AUC compared with atogepant alone. Administration of atogepant 60 mg alone or in combination with esomeprazole 40 mg was well tolerated in healthy adults. Conclusion: Esomeprazole had no clinically meaningful effect on atogepant pharmacokinetics. Clinical Trial Registration: unregistered phase I study.
Collapse
|
13
|
Puledda F, Silva EM, Suwanlaong K, Goadsby PJ. Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment. J Neurol 2023:10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1. [PMID: 37029836 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is an extremely disabling, common neurological disorder characterized by a complex neurobiology, involving a series of central and peripheral nervous system areas and networks. A growing increase in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology in recent years has facilitated translation of that knowledge into novel treatments, which are currently becoming available to patients in many parts of the world and are substantially changing the clinical approach to the disease. In the first part of this review, we will provide an up to date overview of migraine pathophysiology by analyzing the anatomy and function of the main regions involved in the disease, focusing on how these give rise to the plethora of symptoms characterizing the attacks and overall disease. The second part of the paper will discuss the novel therapeutic agents that have emerged for the treatment of migraine, including molecules targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (gepants and monoclonal antibodies), serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists (ditans) and non-invasive neuromodulation, as well as providing a brief overview of new evidence for classic migraine treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) SLaM Clinical Research Facility at King's, Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | | | - Kanokrat Suwanlaong
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Songkhla Medical Education Center, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) SLaM Clinical Research Facility at King's, Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stern JI, Datta S, Chiang CC, Garza I, Vieira DL, Robertson CE. Narrative review of migraine management in patients with renal or hepatic disease. Headache 2023; 63:9-24. [PMID: 36709407 DOI: 10.1111/head.14437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND Treatment of migraine in the setting of either renal or hepatic disease can be daunting for clinicians. Not only does the method of metabolism have to be considered, but also the method of elimination/excretion of the parent drug and any active or toxic metabolites. Furthermore, it is difficult to think about liver or kidney disease in isolation, as liver disease can sometimes contribute to impaired renal function and renal disease can sometimes impair hepatic metabolism, through the cytochrome P450 system. METHODS A detailed search for terms related to liver disease, renal disease, and migraine management was performed in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.For each medication, product labels were retrieved and reviewed using the US FDA website, with additional review of IBM Micromedex, LiverTox, and the Renal Drug Handbook. RESULTS This manuscript provides an overview of migraine drug metabolism and how it can be affected by liver and renal impairment. It reviews the standard terminology recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration for the different stages of hepatic and renal failure. The available evidence regarding the use of abortive and preventative medicines in the setting of organ failure is discussed in detail, including more recent therapies such as lasmiditan, gepants, and calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies. CONCLUSIONS For acute therapy, the use of NSAIDS should be limited, as these carry risk for both severe hepatic and renal disease. Triptans can be selectively used, often with dose guideline adjustments. Ubrogepant may be used in severe hepatic disease with dose adjustment and lasmiditan can be used in end stage renal disease. Though non-medicine strategies may be the most reasonable initial approach, many preventative medications can be used in the setting of hepatic and renal disease, often with dose adjustment. This review provides tables of guidelines, including reduced dosing recommendations, for the use of abortive and preventative migraine medications in hepatic and renal failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shae Datta
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Ivan Garza
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dorice L Vieira
- New York University Health Sciences Library, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Switzer MP, Robinson JE, Joyner KR, Morgan KW. Atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults. SAGE Open Med 2022; 10:20503121221128688. [PMID: 36226229 PMCID: PMC9549103 DOI: 10.1177/20503121221128688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Atogepant is a newly approved medication for the prevention of migraine. This review aims to discuss the efficacy, safety, cost, and place in therapy of atogepant. Methods The authors performed a systematic search for sources, including articles, abstracts, and poster presentations. Queried databases were the National Institute of Health, US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials, PubMed, European PMC, and the Cochrane Library. Search terms included atogepant, QULIPTA™, AGN-241689, MK-803, and N02CD07. Full-text, English language, randomized-controlled trials from 1 February 2012 to 1 February 2022 were included in the review. Additional relevant prescribing information, abstracts, and articles identified through the search were considered for inclusion in this review. A total of 193 database entries were evaluated for inclusion in this narrative review. Three articles representing two randomized controlled trials were reviewed. Results and conclusions Atogepant, a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is a daily oral treatment for migraine prevention. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, atogepant decreased mean monthly migraine days (MMD) over 12 weeks in patients with episodic migraine. Major treatment-related adverse effects include nausea and constipation. Long-term placebo-controlled efficacy and safety studies, chronic migraine studies, and studies in patients that failed more than two classes of preventive therapies are still pending. Atogepant represents one of many novel therapies for the prevention of migraine. To date, no head-to-head comparisons of atogepant versus other agents indicated for migraine prevention have been published. Atogepant offers patients an alternative therapy to injectable or infusion monoclonal antibody treatments and offers an alternative to non-specific migraine medications that are associated with poor tolerability. Due to its high cost and narrower therapeutic indications, atogepant may be reserved for a small subset of migraineurs who prefer oral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kayla Rena Joyner
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
- Valley Health Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, VA, USA
| | - Kelsey Woods Morgan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
- Valley Health Winchester Medical Center, Winchester, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cohen F, Yuan H, Silberstein SD. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies and Antagonists in Migraine: Current Evidence and Rationale. BioDrugs 2022; 36:341-358. [PMID: 35476215 PMCID: PMC9043885 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00530-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37 amino-acid neuropeptide found mostly in peptidergic sensory C-fibers, has been suggested to be implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine, which is one of the most common neurological disorders seen in medical practice, affecting almost 16% of the US population. While previously thought to be a vascular condition, migraine attacks are the result of neurogenic inflammation and peripheral/central sensitization through dysfunctional activation of the trigeminovascular system. To date, two classes of therapeutic agents have been developed to interrupt the function of CGRP: CGRP-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small-molecule antagonists (gepants). There are currently four CGRP-targeted mAbs and three gepants that are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of migraine. Multiple phase II and III studies have established the efficacies and tolerability of these treatments. Previously, we reviewed the fundamental role of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Here, we discuss in depth the clinical evidence (randomized controlled trials and real-world studies), safety, and tolerability of CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants for treating migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cohen F, Yuan H. Role of Atogepant in the Treatment of Episodic Migraines: Clinical Perspectives and Considerations. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2022; 18:447-456. [PMID: 35493707 PMCID: PMC9043257 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s348724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular biology and neuroscience have led to the discovery of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37 amino-acid neuropeptide that plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of migraine. CGRP receptor antagonist, also known as gepant, is an oral medication that inhibits the CGRP-related nociceptive signaling pathway. To date, three gepants are approved by the FDA for migraine treatment. Atogepant is a 2nd-generation gepant that non-competitively antagonizes CGRP receptors inhibiting neurogenic inflammation and pain sensitization. With its long half-life and minimal cardiovascular or liver toxicity, it is the first in its class approved primarily for migraine prevention. This article will discuss the evidence, safety, and rationale of atogepant for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred Cohen
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
- Correspondence: Hsiangkuo Yuan, Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, 900 Walnut St. Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA, Tel +1 215-955-2243, Fax +1 215-955-2060, Email
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rustichelli C, Avallone R, Ferrari A. Atogepant: an emerging treatment for migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:653-662. [PMID: 35319319 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2057221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Until recently, only nonspecific and not always well-tolerated medications were available for migraine prophylaxis. Currently, specific drugs such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and second-generation gepants are marketed for migraine treatment. Atogepant, an orally active small molecule, is a potent, selective antagonist of the CGRP receptor and is the only gepant authorized exclusively for episodic migraine prophylaxis in adults. AREAS COVERED Using literature obtained from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov (up to February 13rd, 2022), the authors summarize and evaluate the available data on atogepant for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine. EXPERT OPINION From pivotal trials, the efficacy and tolerability of atogepant in episodic migraine prophylaxis seem comparable to those of CGRP monoclonal antibodies, even if comparative studies have not been conducted. To date, limited information is available on atogepant, including the optimal dose and duration of therapy; hence, it is difficult to establish whether it could be a first-line drug for migraine prophylaxis. Furthermore, it is important to evaluate if atogepant use is associated with the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, which could result from potent and persistent blockade of vasodilation by CGRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Rustichelli
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Campi, Modena, Italy
| | - Rossella Avallone
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via Campi, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna Ferrari
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moreno-Ajona D, Villar-Martínez MD, Goadsby PJ. New Generation Gepants: Migraine Acute and Preventive Medications. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1656. [PMID: 35329982 PMCID: PMC8953732 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a debilitating disease whose clinical and social impact is out of debate. Tolerability issues, interactions, contraindications, and inefficacy of the available medications make new options necessary. The calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway has shown its importance in migraine pathophysiology and specific medications targeting this have become available. The first-generation CGRP receptor antagonists or gepants, have undergone clinical trials but their development was stopped because of hepatotoxicity. The new generation of gepants, however, are efficacious, safe, and well tolerated as per recent clinical trials. This led to the FDA-approval of rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant. The clinical trials of the available gepants and some of the newer CGRP-antagonists are reviewed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moreno-Ajona
- Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; (D.M.-A.); (M.D.V.-M.)
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - María Dolores Villar-Martínez
- Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; (D.M.-A.); (M.D.V.-M.)
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Peter J. Goadsby
- Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; (D.M.-A.); (M.D.V.-M.)
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ribeiro dos Santos JB, Ribeiro da Silva MR. Small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists for the preventive treatment of migraine: A review. Eur J Pharmacol 2022; 922:174902. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
21
|
Kumar HMS, Chandrasekhar K. Determination of atogepant using RP-HPLC in bulk and tablets: A stability-indicating analytical method. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND HEALTH CARE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_4_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
22
|
Al-Hassany L, Goadsby PJ, Danser AHJ, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting drugs for migraine: how pharmacology might inform treatment decisions. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:284-294. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00409-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
23
|
Boinpally R, Jakate A, Butler M, Periclou A. Atogepant and sumatriptan: no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in a randomized, open-label, crossover trial. Pain Manag 2021; 12:499-508. [PMID: 34898273 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions of atogepant with sumatriptan, an open-label, randomized, crossover study was conducted. Patients & methods: Thirty healthy adults received atogepant 60 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or coadministered drugs. Primary end point was geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs of interventions for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to t (AUC0-t) or infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). Results: Atogepant GMRs for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ versus with sumatriptan were within 90% CI 0.80-1.25, indicating no interaction; atogepant Cmax was reduced by 22% (GMR: 0.78; 90% CI: 0.69-0.89) with sumatriptan. Sumatriptan GMRs for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax versus with atogepant were within 90% CI 0.80-1.25. Conclusion: Atogepant with sumatriptan had no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Atogepant (Qulipta™) is an orally administered, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist being developed by AbbVie for the prophylaxis of migraine. In September 2021, atogepant was approved in the USA for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. The drug is also in phase 3 clinical development for the preventive treatment of migraine in various other countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of atogepant leading to this first approval for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma D Deeks
- Springer Nature, Mairangi Bay, Private Bag 65901, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Towards Drug Repurposing in Cancer Cachexia: Potential Targets and Candidates. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14111084. [PMID: 34832866 PMCID: PMC8618795 DOI: 10.3390/ph14111084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
As a multifactorial and multiorgan syndrome, cancer cachexia is associated with decreased tolerance to antitumor treatments and increased morbidity and mortality rates. The current approaches for the treatment of this syndrome are not always effective and well established. Drug repurposing or repositioning consists of the investigation of pharmacological components that are already available or in clinical trials for certain diseases and explores if they can be used for new indications. Its advantages comparing to de novo drugs development are the reduced amount of time spent and costs. In this paper, we selected drugs already available or in clinical trials for non-cachexia indications and that are related to the pathways and molecular components involved in the different phenotypes of cancer cachexia syndrome. Thus, we introduce known drugs as possible candidates for drug repurposing in the treatment of cancer-induced cachexia.
Collapse
|
26
|
Garelja ML, Walker CS, Hay DL. CGRP receptor antagonists for migraine. Are they also AMY 1 receptor antagonists? Br J Pharmacol 2021; 179:454-459. [PMID: 34076887 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of several drugs that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system has been a major breakthrough in the pharmacological management of migraine. These are divided into two major classes, antibodies which bind to the CGRP peptide, preventing it from activating CGRP receptors and receptor antagonists. Within the receptor antagonist class, there are two mechanisms of action, small molecule receptor antagonists and an antibody antagonist. This mini-review considers the pharmacology of these receptor targeted antagonist drugs at the CGRP receptor and closely related AMY1 receptor, at which CGRP may also act. The antagonists are most potent at the CGRP receptor but can also show antagonism of the AMY1 receptor. However, important data are missing and selectivity parameters cannot be provided for all antagonists. The clinical implications of AMY1 receptor antagonism are unknown, but we urge consideration of this receptor as a potential contributing factor to CGRP and antagonist drug actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Garelja
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Christopher S Walker
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Debbie L Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|