The role of therapeutic alliance in therapy for adults with problematic aggression and associated disorders

Treatment adherence, therapeutic alliance, and clinical outcomes during an exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric irritability

BACKGROUND

This study explores changes in treatment adherence and alliance during a novel parent- and child-psychotherapy for pediatric irritability. Associations between in-session therapeutic processes and symptom change were examined.

METHODS

Forty participants (Mean age = 11.23, SD = 1.85; 37.5% female, 77.5% white) with severe irritability, and their parents, received 12 sessions of exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with parent management training (PMT). Measures included clinician-rated adherence to the manual, alliance scales (Alliance Scale for Children-revised; TASC-r, and Working Alliance Inventory; WAI, respectively), and clinician-, parent- and child-reported irritability scales (Affective Reactivity Index; ARI). Linear mixed models examined session-by-session changes and associations between adherence/alliance and subsequent irritability, and vice versa.

RESULTS

First, adherence to standard treatment elements decreased over time (Bs ≥ - 0.03, ps ≤ 0.010), while the focus on specific treatment components increased (i.e., exposure: B = 0.15, p = 0.001; PMT: B = 0.07, p = 0.002). Second, adherence to standard treatment elements were associated with decreased clinician-reported irritability (Bs ≥ - 2.23, p ≤ 0.042). For the alliance measures, parent-reported alliance increased over time (Bs ≥ 0.10, p ≤ 0.01); child-reported alliance did not change. Bidirectional associations were found between alliance and symptoms; specifically, child-reported alliance predicted clinician-rated irritability at next session (Bs ≥ - 0.66, p ≤ 0.053), and decreases in clinician- (Bs ≥ - 0.02, ps ≤ 0.043) and parent- (B = - 0.15, p = 0.024) reported irritability predicted increased alliance at next session.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings underscore the predictive role of treatment adherence and therapeutic alliance on outcomes, in exposure-based CBT for pediatric irritability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02531893; date of registration: 25/08/2015.

Effects of two treatments on interpersonal, affective, and lifestyle features of psychopathy and emotion dysregulation

This study investigated the relative efficacy of Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) and United Protocol (UP) in reducing symptoms of psychopathy and emotion dysregulation in a sample of Iranian community residents with concurrent diagnoses of antisocial and borderline personality disorders (PDs). Interpersonal, affective, and lifestyle features of psychopathy were measured post-treatment and at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, and 36-months follow-up using the 13-item version of the Psychopathy Revised-Checklist (PCL-R), which excluded, by design, criminal history features. Emotion dysregulation was measured using the Deficits in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) developed by Gratz and Roemer (2004). After treatment, both UP- and MBT-treated individuals showed significantly fewer features of psychopathy and significantly less emotion dysregulation. Compared with those treated with MBT, UP-treated individuals showed significantly less emotion dysregulation in all DERS subscales and a greater reduction in psychopathy features, particularly affective features. It is suggested that this likely reflected the particular emphasis placed by UP on improving emotional self-regulation and facilitating the therapeutic alliance. These results suggest that, despite the traditional pessimism that surrounds psychopathic individuals' treatability, they can be successfully treated.

Establishing an optimal working relationship with patients with an antisocial personality disorder. Aspects and processes in the therapeutic alliance

OBJECTIVE

Developing good interpersonal relationships is one of the main impediments for people with an antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). However, in treatment of psychiatric disorders, establishing a strong therapeutic alliance (TA) is important for effective treatment. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge on how to establish this TA with this challenging patient group. This study investigates which factors are important in TA development.

METHOD

For this study, a qualitative research methodology is applied. In-depth interviews with therapists experienced in treating ASPD were conducted and analysed through thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed six themes important in alliance formation: the patient's needs, regulating interpersonal dynamics, connective attitude, connective skills, treatment process and treatment goals. Each theme is defined including aspects of the recommended therapeutic attitude and required skills for therapists working with patients with ASPD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study determined that, for therapists working with patients with ASPD, several key factors are essential in establishing a strong TA. These factors include the ability to be firm, authentic, non-judgmental and genuinely involved. An attentive presence is crucial, in which the therapist takes initiative in establishing contact and makes the patient feel that he is truly seen as an autonomous and equal person. In doing so, the therapist needs to provide clarity and structure while remaining perceptive to boundary violations. The therapist must be able to set limits using a clear yet kind tone of voice. Furthermore, it was notable that an intensive appeal is made to the therapist's reflective capacity in these treatments.

Do Changes in Emotional States Predict Therapy Alliance in Dutch Male Offenders in Mandated Clinical Care?

Therapy alliance has been studied largely in voluntary psychotherapy but less is known about its predictive factors for positive alliance and treatment outcome in forensic populations. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between offenders' emotional states and therapy alliance. Moreover, we were interested in the predictive impact of emotional states early in treatment on alliance at 18 months into treatment. Self-ratings of emotional states and alliance by 103 male offenders, and therapist-ratings for therapy alliance were examined using hierarchical multiple regression analyses. Participants were primarily convicted for violent of sexual offenses, and were diagnosed with antisocial, borderline or narcissistic personality disorders. Healthy emotional states were predictive of mid-treatment agreement on therapy goals and therapist ratings on tasks within the therapy. Unhealthy emotional states were predictive of patient-rated agreement on tasks. Emotional states were not predictive for the reported therapist/patient bond or global alliance ratings. This study emphasizes the importance of healthy emotional states in treatment of offenders with personality disorders.

Early Treatment Change in Perpetrators of Sexual Versus Non-Sexual Violence

The purpose of this study is to assess treatment change at both a group and individual level in a sample of 81 Dutch male patients who received mandated care for either violent (non-sexual) behavior or sexual violent behavior. Psychiatric nurses rated patients' social skills, insight, hostility, physical violence with the BEST-Index every 6 months over the course of 2 years after patients were admitted to hospital. Mixed analysis of covariances and the reliable change index indicated that patients, irrespective of offense type, showed treatment change over time with exception of physical violence. This study shows that general treatment may be useful in the first 18 month for risk factors common to different types of offenses, but that specialized treatment is needed to establish further change.

Personality Assessment Inventory Clinical Scales in Relation to Patient and Therapist Rated Alliance Early in Treatment

We examined relationships between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) clinical scales (e.g., Somatic Complaints [SOM]) and subscales (e.g., Conversion [SOM-C]) with patient- and therapist-rated alliance early in treatment (third or fourth session). We also replicated and extended findings from a previous study examining PAI treatment scales (Treatment Rejection, Treatment Process Index) and early session therapist-rated alliance. We used PAI protocols from a clinical outpatient sample (N = 84). Data were analyzed using stepwise linear regressions. Results suggest that patients who report lower early session alliance also report more antisocial features (β = -.219, p = .050, f² = 0.05) specifically more antisocial behaviors (β = -.315, p = .004, f² = 0.11). Additionally, therapists report higher early session alliance with patients who report more anxiety-related disorders (β = .274, p = .012, f² = 0.08), specifically traumatic stress (β = .325, p = .003, f² = 0.12). No significant relationships were found between patient- or therapist-rated alliance and Treatment Rejection and Treatment Process Index, consistent with prior findings. Clinical implications are discussed.