Absence of early mood improvement as a robust predictor of rTMS nonresponse in major depressive disorder

Predictors of remission after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of late-life depression

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment in patients with depression, yet treatment response remains variable. While previous work has identified predictors of remission in younger adults, relatively little data exists in late-life depression (LLD). To address this gap, data from 164 participants with LLD from a randomized non-inferiority treatment trial comparing standard bilateral rTMS to bilateral theta burst stimulation (TBS) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02998580) were analyzed using binary logistic regression and conditional inference tree (CIT) modeling. Lower baseline depression symptom severity, fewer prior antidepressant treatment failures, and higher global cognition predicted remission following rTMS treatment. The CIT predicted a higher likelihood of achieving remission for patients with a total score of 19 or lower on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 1 or fewer prior antidepressant treatment failures, and a total score of 23 or higher on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Our results indicate that older adults with lower severity of depression, fewer antidepressant treatment failures, and higher global cognition benefit more from current forms of rTMS. The results suggest that there is potentially higher value in using rTMS earlier in the treatment pathway for depression in older adults.

When to hold and when to fold: Early prediction of nonresponse to transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Determining when to recommend a change in treatment regimen due to insufficient improvement is a common challenge in therapeutics.

METHODS

In a sample of 7215 patients with major depressive disorder treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and with PHQ-9 scores before, during and after the course, 3 groups were identified based on number of acute course sessions: exactly 36 sessions (N = 3591), more than 36 sessions (N = 975), and less than 36 sessions (N = 2649). Two techniques were used to determine thresholds for percentage change in PHQ-9 scores at assessments after 10, 20, and 30 sessions that optimized prediction of endpoint response status: the Youden index and fixing the false positive rate at 10%. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the accuracy of identifying final nonresponders and responders, respectively.

RESULTS

There was greater accuracy in predicting final response than nonresponse, especially in the groups that had at least 36 sessions. Substantial proportions of patients with low levels of early improvement were classified as responders at the end of treatment.

LIMITATIONS

The findings should be validated with clinician ratings using a more comprehensive depression severity scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Manifesting clinical improvement early in the TMS course is strongly predictive of final status as a responder, while lack of early improvement is a relatively poor indicator of final nonresponse status. The predictive value of lack of early symptomatic improvement is too low to make reliable recommendations regarding changes in treatment regimen.

Sequential Multilocus Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Tinnitus With and Without Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising treatment for tinnitus, although outcomes are highly variable. We previously described a multilocus sequential rTMS treatment protocol for tinnitus involving stimulation of both prefrontal and auditory targets. In this study, we report results using this approach in an open-label treatment study of tinnitus with and without comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with chronic tinnitus (mean age 56 years, ten female) and with (n = 17) or without (n = 23) MDD received multilocus rTMS administered sequentially to 1) left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, followed by 2) auditory cortex (Heschel's gyrus). Patients completed weekly self-report ratings using the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, and patients with MDD completed the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report 30-item.

RESULTS

Patients showed significant mean improvement in tinnitus at sessions 5 (mean TFI improvement 6.8 points ± 12.2, p = 0.002) and 10 (mean improvement 9.2 points ± 14.1, p = 0.002), with 48% of patients responding within ten treatment sessions. Responders were significantly older than nonresponders (61.5 ± 15 years vs 51.3 ± 16 years), and there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of response in subjects with comorbid MDD compared with subjects without comorbidity (odds ratio = 0.28, p = 0.06). Patients with comorbid MDD reported significantly less improvement after ten sessions than did those with tinnitus alone (4.3 ± 10.3 vs 14.7 ± 15.0 points, p = 0.04). Post hoc analyses suggested that the comorbid group achieved improvement comparable to that of the tinnitus-only group after 30 treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients showed significant improvement in tinnitus from multilocus sequential rTMS treatment, and those with tinnitus alone improved more quickly. Those with depression who continued rTMS through a full 30-session course further improved, indicating that tinnitus with comorbid MDD may respond with extended treatment.

A comparison of self- and observer-rated scales for detecting clinical improvement during repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) treatment of depression

Clinical outcomes of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) vary widely, and no single mood rating scale is standard for assessing rTMS outcomes. This study of 708 subjects undergoing clinical rTMS compared the performance of four scales in measuring symptom change during rTMS treatment. Self-report and observer ratings were examined weekly with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology 30-item (IDS), Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ), Profile of Mood States 30-item (POMS), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS). While all scales were correlated and detected significant improvement, the degree of improvement over time as well as response (33-50%) and remission (20-24%) rates varied significantly. Higher baseline severity was associated with lower likelihood of remission, and greater improvement by sessions 5 and 10 predicted response across all scales. Use of only a single scale to assess outcome conferred 14-36% risk of failing to detect response/remission indicated by another scale. The PHQ was most likely to indicate improvement and least likely to miss response or remission. These findings indicate that assessment of symptom burden during rTMS treatment may be most accurately assessed through use of multiple instruments.

Pretreatment pupillary reactivity is associated with differential early response to 10 Hz and intermittent theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD)

BACKGROUND

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Two common rTMS protocols, 10 Hz and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), have comparable rates of efficacy in groups of patients. Recent evidence suggests that some individuals may be more likely to benefit from one form of stimulation than the other. The pretreatment pupillary light reflex (PLR) is significantly associated with response to a full course of rTMS using heterogeneous stimulation protocols.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether the relationship between pretreatment PLR and early symptom improvement differed between subjects treated with iTBS or 10 Hz stimulation.

METHODS

PLR was measured in 52 subjects who received solely 10 Hz (n = 35) or iTBS (n = 17) to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for the first ten sessions of their treatment course. Primary outcome measure was the percent change of Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR) from session 1 to session 10.

RESULTS

There was a positive association between normalized maximum constriction velocity (nMCV) and early improvement in subjects receiving 10 Hz stimulation (R = 0.48, p = 0.004) and a negative association in subjects receiving iTBS (R = -0.52, p = 0.03). ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between nMCV and the type of initial stimulation (p = 0.001). Among subjects with low nMCV, those initially treated with iTBS showed 2.6 times greater improvement after 10 sessions (p = 0.01) than subjects initially receiving 10 Hz stimulation.

CONCLUSION

nMCV may detect physiologic differences between those likely to benefit from 10 Hz or iTBS treatment. Future studies should examine whether PLR could guide prospective treatment selection.

Rumination symptoms in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, and outcomes of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment

Rumination is a maladaptive style of regulating thoughts and emotions. It is a common symptom of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and more severe rumination is associated with poorer medication and psychotherapy treatment outcomes, particularly among women. It is unclear to what extent rumination may influence the outcomes of, or be responsive to, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment of MDD. We retrospectively examined data collected during rTMS treatment of 155 patients (age 42.52 ± 14.22, 79 female) with moderately severe treatment-resistant MDD. The severity of rumination and depression was assessed before and during a course of 30 sessions of measurement-based rTMS treatment using the Ruminative Responses Scale (RSS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), respectively. Relationships among baseline levels of rumination, depression, and treatment outcome were assessed using a series of repeated measures linear mixed effects models. Both depression and rumination symptoms significantly improved after treatment, but improvement in depression was not a significant mediator of rumination improvement. Higher baseline rumination (but not depression severity) was associated with poorer depression outcomes independently of depression severity. Female gender was a significant predictor of worse outcomes for all RRS subscales. Both depressive and ruminative symptoms in MDD improved following rTMS treatment. These improvements were correlated, but improvement in rumination was not fully explained by reduction in depressive symptoms. These findings suggest that while improvement in rumination and depression severity during rTMS treatment are correlated, they are partly independent processes. Future studies should examine whether rumination symptoms should be specifically targeted with different rTMS treatment parameters.

Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Add-On Therapy to a Standard Treatment in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis and Concomitant Symptoms of Depression—Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial and Pilot Study

Background: Compared to the general population, persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at increased risk of suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) was used successfully to treat individuals with MDD. Here, we conducted a randomized clinical trial and pilot study, and tested the effectiveness of rTMS adjuvant to a standard pharmacological treatment among persons with MS, compared to a sham condition. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 persons with MS (mean age: 32 years; 42.5% females; median EDSS score: 4) and with moderate to severe symptoms of depression were randomly assigned to the rTMS or to the rTMS sham condition, always as adjuvant intervention to the standard treatment with sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). rTMS consisted of 10 sessions each of 37.5 min; the sham condition was identical to the active condition except for the absence of rTMS stimuli. At the beginning and two weeks after the end of the study, participants reported on their fatigue, while experts rated the severity of participants’ depressive symptoms (Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MADRS), cognitive performance (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA), and degree of disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS). Results: Data were analyzed per intent-to-treat. Scores for depression, fatigue, and EDSS declined significantly over time (large effect sizes), but more so in the rTMS condition than in the sham condition (large effect sizes for the time by group-interactions). Compared to the sham condition, scores for depression were significantly lower in the rTMS condition. Scores for cognition improved over time in both study conditions (large effect size). Conclusion: Compared to a sham condition, adjuvant rTMS to a standard pharmacological treatment ameliorated typical MS-related symptoms (depression; fatigue; EDSS scores). Results from this pilot study suggested that rTMS might be routinely applied in persons with MS displaying symptoms of depression and fatigue.

Pursuing personalized medicine for depression by targeting the lateral or medial prefrontal cortex with Deep TMS

BACKGROUNDMajor depressive disorder (MDD) can benefit from novel interventions and personalization. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) targeting the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) using the H1 coil was FDA cleared for treatment of MDD. However, recent preliminary data indicate that targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) using the H7 coil might induce outcomes that are as good or even better. Here, we explored whether Deep TMS targeting the MPFC is noninferior to targeting the LPFC and whether electrophysiological or clinical markers for patient selection can be identified.METHODSThe present prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled 169 patients with MDD for whom antidepressants failed in the current episode. Patients were randomized to receive 24 Deep TMS sessions over 6 weeks, using either the H1 coil or the H7 coil. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 6 in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores.RESULTSClinical efficacy and safety profiles were similar and not significantly different between groups, with response rates of 60.9% for the H1 coil and 64.2% for the H7 coil. Moreover, brain activity measured by EEG during the first treatment session correlated with clinical outcomes in a coil-specific manner, and a cluster of baseline clinical symptoms was found to potentially distinguish between patients who can benefit from each Deep TMS target.CONCLUSIONThis study provides a treatment option for MDD, using the H7 coil, and initial guidance to differentiate between patients likely to respond to LPFC versus MPFC stimulation targets, which require further validation studies.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03012724.FUNDINGBrainsWay Ltd.

Prognostic factors in major depressive disorder: comparing responders and non-responders to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), a naturalistic retrospective chart review

AIM

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely utilized as an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with varying response rates. Factors associated with better treatment outcome remain scarce. This naturalistic retrospective chart review hopes to shed light on easily obtainable and measurable predictive factors for patients referred to rTMS.

METHODS

Protocol parameters, medication, rated scales, rTMS protocols, and treatment outcomes were reviewed for 196 patients with MDD who received rTMS at Saint Boniface Hospital between 2013 and 2019. Logistic regression and marginal effects were used to assess the different predictor variables for response (50% reduction or more on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D)) and remission (Ham-D of ≤7 by the last session).

RESULTS

HamD at 10 sessions was predictive of remission, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at 10 sessions was predictive of response to rTMS. Ham-D, SDS, and Beck Anxiety Inventory were predictive of remission and response by Beck Anxiety Inventory 20 sessions. High frequency rTMS had a similar response and remission rate to low frequency, but higher response rate to intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation with no difference in remission rate. Positive predictive factors of response were lower age and bupropion use. Negative predictive factors were antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, or benzodiazepine use. For remission, antipsychotics or anticonvulsants use were negative predictors; bupropion use and higher resting motor threshold were positive predictors. Severity of depression as measured by baseline HamD was not associated with different probabilities of treatment success.