A correlation study on diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes with histological and clinical diagnoses, the UCLA Medical Center experience

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: It is difficult to diagnose the cause of abdominal lymphadenopathy without determining the primary lesions. With the advent of curved ultrasound endoscopy, EUS-FNA can sample lymph nodes safely, accurately and conveniently. Due to the lack of formal quantitative and comprehensive literature review to determine the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of enlarged intra-abdominal lymph nodes of unknown origin, we conducted this study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in the enlarged intra-abdominal lymph nodes.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to collect related studies and diagnostic performance data. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup and meta-regression analysis.Results: Twelve eligible studies involved 774 patients were identified. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of all studies is 94% (95% CI: 91% to 96%) and 98% (95% CI: 96% to 99%), respectively. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios are 17.44 (95% CI, 6.50 to 46.79) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.14). The pooled DOR is 277.82 (95% CI, 97.65 to 790.46).Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a safe and feasible technique with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of abdominal lymph node enlargement. Considering the limitations and heterogeneity, high-quality studies are needed to further explore the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA.

Predictive Factors for Inaccurate Diagnosis of Swollen Lymph Nodes in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

Background/Aims

This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for inaccurate endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes without rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation.

Methods

Eighty-three consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for abdominal or mediastinal lymph nodes from January 2008 to June 2017 were included from a prospectively maintained EUS-FNA database and retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for the detection of neoplastic diseases were calculated. Candidate factors for inaccurate diagnosis (lymph node size and location, needle type, puncture route, number of passes, and causative disease) were evaluated by comparison between accurately diagnosed cases and others.

Results

The final diagnosis of the punctured lymph node was classified as neoplastic (65 cases: a metastatic lymph node, malignant lymphoma, or Crow-Fukase syndrome) or non-neoplastic (18 cases: a reactive node or amyloidosis). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. On multivariate analyses, small size of the lymph node was the sole predictive factor for inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis with a significant difference (odds ratios, 19.8; 95% confidence intervals, 3.15–124; p=0.0015).

Conclusions

The lymph node size of <16 mm was the only independent factor associated with inaccurate EUS-FNA diagnosis of swollen lymph nodes.

Impact of EUS-FNA for preoperative para-aortic lymph node staging in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In patients with pancreatobiliary cancer, para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is considered to be the involvement beyond the regional lymph nodes, namely, distant metastasis. Effective methods for preoperative PALN staging, however, are not established. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capability for PALN metastasis between EUS-FNA and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT).

METHODS

We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center trial. Between December 2010 and March 2014, 208 patients with pancreatobiliary cancer without apparent distant metastasis except for PALNs were assessed for study eligibility before surgery. Among them, 52 consecutive patients with PALN enlargement were enrolled in the study. (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and EUS-FNA were performed sequentially as a single combined procedure to evaluate PALN metastases. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnostic capability of EUS-FNA and PET/CT for PALN metastasis.

RESULTS

Of 71 enlarged PALNs in the 52 patients, 30 (42.3%) were finally diagnosed as metastases in 21 patients (40.4%). Of the 21 patients with PALN metastases, preoperative EUS-FNA or PET/CT made a correct diagnosis in 20 (95.2%) or 12 (57.1%), respectively. EUS-FNA had higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PALN metastasis (sensitivity, 96.7% [29/30]; 95% confidence interval, 82.2%-99.9%; specificity, 100% [39/39]; 95% confidence interval, 91.0%-100%) than PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is superior to PET/CT for preoperative PALN staging in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. Because of the clinical benefit of EUS-FNA to reduce unnecessary surgery, it should be part of the standard preoperative examination for patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. (UMIN clinical trials registry number: 000006408.).

Lymphatics and colorectal liver metastases: the case for sentinel node mapping

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection remains the treatment of choice for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Indications for hepatic resection have been extended to include extrahepatic lymph node groups, resulting in increased survival benefits. The identification of specific lymph pathways and involved nodes is necessary to support the development of guidelines for a more focused approach to the management of this disease. The feasibility of sentinel node mapping should be investigated to define specific lymphatic groups involved in CLM.

METHODS

Scientific papers published from 1950 to 2012 were sought and extracted from the MEDLINE, PubMed and University of Melbourne databases.

RESULTS

Several studies have reported microscopic lymph node involvement in 10-15% of patients undergoing hepatic resection for CLM in which no macroscopic involvement was evident. In retrospect, over 80% of lymphadenectomies are proven unnecessary. Traditional imaging modalities have limited predictive value in detecting lymph node involvement. Sentinel node mapping has proved an extremely accurate tool in detecting lymph node involvement and can identify patients in whom lymphadenectomy may be beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

Current imaging techniques are inadequate to detect microscopic lymph node involvement in patients with resectable CLM. The use of sentinel node mapping is proposed to identify nodal groups involved and provide management strategies.

Evolving role of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in tumor staging and treatment of patients with carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract

INTRODUCTION

Treatments such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endoscopic mucosal resection for upper gastrointestinal carcinomas (UGC) necessitates preoperative staging evaluation of lymph nodes. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of lymph nodes provides more accurate staging than EUS alone. Our study investigates the role of EUS-FNA in the staging/treatment of patients with UGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched our database for patients who had EUS-FNA staging of lymph nodes for UGC over 1 year. The cytologic diagnoses were compared with clinical, radiographic, EUS-determined staging, and patient follow-up data. All EUS/EUS-FNA procedures used a standard radial and/or linear echo endoscope. Direct smears from the aspirated material were stained by Papanicolaou and Diff-Quik methods.

RESULTS

We studied 84 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinomas and 15 patients with gastric carcinomas. EUS-FNA confirmed N0 status for 100% of patients with T1 and T2 tumors and for 93% of patients with T3 tumors. Patients with T1N0 carcinomas confirmed by EUS were selected for endoscopic mucosal resection. All patients with gastric carcinomas had EUS-determined stage T3 and above tumors. Based on primary tumor stage, all patients with gastric carcinomas received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytologic diagnosis by EUS-FNA agreed with EUS nodal staging in 77% of the patients with UGC. EUS-FNA was useful to select patients with T1N0 esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinomas for endoscopic mucosal resection. EUS-FNA did not contribute significantly in treatment of patients with higher stage tumors whose disease was down-staged to N0 by EUS-FNA. These patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on the status of the primary tumor.

The yield of EUS-FNA in undiagnosed upper abdominal adenopathy is very high

PURPOSE

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows sampling of abdominal adenopathy easily and safely from locations that were previously deemed too risky and inaccessible. The efficacy of EUS-FNA in a large cohort of patients with abdominal adenopathy has not been previously described in the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a large retrospective study at a tertiary referral center. Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for only abdominal adenopathy between 2004 through August 2009 were included in our study. Patient demographics, indications, EUS findings, and final cytologic diagnoses were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 230 lymph nodes were biopsied in 225 patients. Common locations of nodes included peripancreatic (19%), porta hepatis (18%), and celiac axis (18%). Adequate specimens were obtained in 200/230 nodes (87%) and the most common diagnoses based on cytology were: benign/reactive (50%), adenocarcinoma (20%), lymphoma (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 71%, 99%, 99%, 78%, and 85%, respectively, for EUS-FNA. Based on EUS imaging alone, malignant nodes were more likely to be larger in diameter (17 mm versus 26 mm, p < 0.001), have a round shape (p = 0.002), well-defined borders (p = 0.04), and hypoechic echotexture (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA allows for excellent tissue acquisition in abdominal lymphadenopathy. Our study supports the use of traditional EUS imaging criteria to identify suspected malignant adenopathy. The results from our large cohort of patients show that EUS-FNA should be considered as a first-line diagnostic modality for ascertaining the etiology of abdominal lymphadenopathy.

Preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in biliary and pancreatic carcinomas: evaluation of the combination of multi-detector CT and serum CA19-9 level

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to diagnose lymph node metastasis in biliary and pancreas carcinomas before surgery.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the combination of multi-detector computed tomographic (MDCT) findings and serum carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 level in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in biliary and pancreas carcinomas.

METHODS

The subjects were 139 patients with biliary and pancreas carcinomas who underwent surgical resection. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPV), sensitivities, specificities, positive likelihood ratios (PLR) and accuracies of diagnosis by MDCT alone, serum CA19-9 level alone, and their combination.

RESULTS

The PPV and sensitivity were higher for node metastasis in hepatoduodenal ligament than in common hepatic artery (CHA) or para-aortic region (PAR). Specificity, accuracy and PLR were highest for CHA in biliary carcinoma. With pancreatic carcinoma, PLR was slightly higher in PAR compared to other regions. The sensitivity of CA19-9 for node metastasis was higher than that of MDCT, while the PPV, specificity, accuracy and PLR were low for both biliary and pancreas carcinoma. The combination of positive CT findings and high CA19-9 level had the highest positive rate for node metastasis for both types of carcinomas. Nodes around the supra-mesenteric vein could not be fully observed on CT.

CONCLUSION

The combination of high-resolution MDCT and CA19-9 is useful for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in biliary and pancreas carcinomas.

The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis and classification of lymphoproliferative disorders on fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has been used in the evaluation of lymphadenopathy for a long time and is highly reliable in the identification of metastatic malignancies. However, the role of FNA in the assessment of new lymphoproliferative disorders continues to be a subject of debate. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the role of molecular cytogenetic studies in FNA diagnoses of lymphoproliferative disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective, computer-based search for lymph node FNAs from 2006 to 2007 was performed. Cases with either fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies were subjected to further analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 243 lymph node FNAs were performed during the period, including 104 that were positive/suspicious for metastatic malignancies, 16 that were positive/suspicious for lymphomas, 15 that demonstrated atypical lymphoid proliferation, 73 that were reactive, 14 that were deemed granulomas, and 21 that were determined to be nondiagnostic. Molecular analysis included combined FISH/PCR in 4 cases, FISH only in 7 cases, and PCR only in 4 cases. By using multiplex PCR, 6 cases with atypical/negative flow cytometry results were diagnosed as 4 B-cell lymphomas, 1 T-cell lymphoma, and 1 reactive lymph node; and 4 cases that had atypical T cells determined by flow cytometry were diagnosed as reactive. One CD10-negative follicular lymphoma and 2 cases with suspicious flow cytometry results were positive for t(14;18)(q32;q21) by FISH. Forty-five cases had follow-up histology with 3 false-negative findings and no false-positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, multiplex PCR studies for immunoglobulin heavy-chain or T-cell receptor gene rearrangements were useful for demonstrating clonality, and FISH studies were able to detect translocations or gene rearrangements that allowed for the subclassification of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.