Eating disorders in the U.S. Medicare population

Global and Regional Economic Burden of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Critique of Methods

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to comprehensively examine up-to-date evidence on the economic burden of eating disorders (EDs), both globally and by region.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search within five electronic databases, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EconLit, retrieved studies published from August 1, 2013, to June 30, 2024. Cost of illness (COI) studies, burden of disease, and other cost studies that reported costs in monetary values were included, and cost-effectiveness analysis studies were excluded. The quality of COI studies was assessed using Schnitzler's checklist. All cost estimates were converted into 2024 USD purchasing power parity (PPP). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022358136.

FINDINGS

Twenty-six studies were identified for inclusion in this review, with 11 COI studies. The nationwide annual financial cost of EDs is estimated at PPP-USD 70.5 billion. Indirect costs contributed 70%-93% of total financial costs in the reviewed studies. Intangible costs (burden of disease) were estimated to be PPP-USD 355.6 billion. About half of the COI studies met 60% of the elements of Schnitzler's checklist, either completely or partly.

DISCUSSION

The number of COI studies has more than doubled in the last 10 years. Findings can inform healthcare administrators/policymakers to understand the magnitude of this burden when setting healthcare priorities and allocating resources to maximize social welfare. However, there are variations in the methods (thus quality) and perspectives used to assess this economic burden. Findings suggest that there is potential for enhancing the methodological rigor of future research.

Eating Disorder Treatment Access in the United States: Perceived Inequities Among Treatment Seekers

OBJECTIVE

Although eating disorders are associated with high rates of psychological and physical impairments and mortality, only about 20% of individuals with eating disorders receive treatment. No study has comprehensively assessed treatment access for those with these disorders in the United States. The authors examined access to eating disorder treatments and how it might vary among some populations.

METHODS

Seekers of treatment for eating disorders (N=1,995) completed an online assessment of clinical demographic and anthropometric characteristics, barriers to eating disorder treatment access, and eating disorder symptomatology. Analyses were conducted to identify treatment access barriers, compare barriers to treatment access across demographic groups, and investigate relationships between barriers to treatment access and eating disorder symptoms.

RESULTS

Financial barriers (e.g., lack of insurance coverage) were the most frequently reported barrier to treatment access. Participants with historically underrepresented identities and with a diagnosis of other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) reported more barriers related to financial challenges, geographic location, eating disorder identification, sociocultural factors, and treatment quality compared with those with historically represented identities (e.g., White and cisgender persons). Higher frequencies of reported barriers to treatment access were associated with more severe eating disorder symptoms and poorer illness trajectories.

CONCLUSIONS

Financial barriers were the most significant impediment to accessing treatment among individuals seeking eating disorder treatment. Barriers to treatment access disproportionally affected underrepresented groups and those with an OSFED diagnosis.

"Maze Out": a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial using a mix methods approach exploring the potential and examining the effectiveness of a serious game in the treatment of eating disorders

BACKGROUND

Eating Disorders (ED) are severe and costly mental health disorders. The effects of existing treatment approaches are limited and there is a need to develop novel interventions, including digital strategies that can increase engagement and effectiveness. Maze Out is a new serious game coproduced by patients and ED therapists, which allows patients to "play" with the reality of an ED and reflect on associated challenges.

OBJECTIVES

The present study has two main objectives: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of adding Maze Out to treatment as usual (TAU) in a randomised controlled trial (RCT); and (2) to examine in depth the potential of Maze Out by examining how it is perceived and used in the context of an RCT.

METHODS

Participants will be recruited from mental health care services, endocrinology departments or Community Centres offering treatment for ED. Patients suffering from ED (N = 94) will be randomised to either TAU or TAU plus Maze Out. Primary outcome will be measured in terms of changes in self-efficacy, measured by a 5-item self-efficacy questionnaire (5-item SE_ED). Secondary outcome measures will include feelings of ineffectiveness and self-image, as measured by Eating Disorder Inventory, version 3 (EDI-3), Brief INSPIRE-O and Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour Intrex Questionnaire (SAS-B). Data will be collected at baseline (enrolment in the study), and subsequently 8 and 15 weeks after inclusion. Experiences of playing Maze Out will be examined in a sub-sample of participants, utilising both quantitative user analytics and qualitative interview data of patients, interview data of significant others, and healthcare professionals to explore the possible impact of Maze Out on disorder insight, communication patterns between patients and therapists and understanding of their disorder.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge Maze Out is the first serious game coproduced by patients and therapists. It is a novel and theoretically grounded intervention that may significantly contribute to the healing process of ED. If found effective, the potential for wide-spread impact and scalability is considerable. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05621018.

Update on the epidemiology and treatment of eating disorders among older people

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed the recent literature on the epidemiology and treatment of eating disorders among middle-aged and older women and men.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies show that among older female persons, the prevalence rates with full diagnoses of eating disorders based on DSM-IV or DSM-5 criteria are between 2.1 and 7.7%, and among older men less than 1%. These studies show that the prevalence of eating disorders decreases by age in women, but it does not get towards zero even in very high age. Middle age, with a peak around 50, is also a critical time for the occurrence of eating disorders in men. Women who reported severe menopausal symptoms showed more eating disorder pathology compared with those with low symptoms during menopausal transition.

SUMMARY

Eating disorders do occur in middle and older age of both sexes. Shame and stigmatization have decreased, and medical awareness and explicit assessment of eating behavior in all age groups have developed. What puberty is for eating disorders in adolescence and young age is menopausal transition for midlife women. Also in men, associations with hormonal disturbances are possible. Treatment approaches should consider treatment strategies tailored to older women and men, addressing the context of midlife and aging.

Eating Disorder Screening and Treatment in a Medically Underserved Southern State: Data Collected by a Legislative Eating Disorder Council and Implications for Statewide Assessment

Healthcare providers play a key role in early identification of eating disorders (EDs), especially in underserved states where ED treatment resources are lacking. Currently, there is little known about ED screening and treatment practices in underserved states. The current study assessed current ED screening and treatment practices among healthcare providers in an underserved state using data collected by a government-formed state ED council. Healthcare providers (N = 242; n = 209 behavioral health providers; n = 33 medical providers) practicing in Kentucky completed a brief, anonymous survey on ED screening and treatment practices, comfort with screening for EDs, and interest in continued education. Over half of healthcare providers indicated screening for EDs, with the majority using a clinical interview. After identification of ED symptoms, providers reported a combination of treating in-house, referring out, or seeking consultation. In bivariate analyses, medical providers were significantly more likely than behavioral health providers to use a screening tool specifically designed for EDs. The majority of medical providers indicated that they received education about EDs and feel knowledgeable about ED screening tools, though most reported infrequent use of these screening tools in their practice. Nearly all behavioral health and medical providers expressed interest in continuing education on ED screening and treatment. These findings indicate a need for, and interest in, education on evidence-based ED screening and treatment resources in underserved states and demonstrate the utility of a state ED council to collect these data to inform future education and treatment strategies.

Intensive community and home-based treatments for eating disorders: a scoping review study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Institutionally based intensive treatment modalities (inpatient, day patient and residential treatments) for eating disorders (EDs) are associated with high treatment costs and significant challenges for patients and carers, including access difficulties and disruption to daily routines. Intensive community and home-based treatments have been suggested as alternatives to institutionally based intensive treatments for other severe mental illnesses, with promising clinical, social and health economic outcomes. The possible advantages of these treatments have been proposed for EDs, but this emerging area of research has not yet been systematically investigated. This scoping review aims to map the available literature on intensive community and home treatments for EDs, focusing on their conceptualisation, implementation and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This proposed scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. This review will include any peer-reviewed study concerning intensive community and home-based treatments for any EDs, with no restrictions on geographical context or study design. Grey literature will also be considered. The literature search will be conducted in four databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Two researchers will independently screen the titles, abstracts and text of the returned articles for eligibility. Data charting and analysis will consist of a narrative description of the included studies, quantitative and qualitative findings relative to the aims of this scoping review. Gaps in the literature will be highlighted to inform future research, clinical practice, and policy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as all data are available from public sources. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation, and social media.