Systematic review: Exploring the monitoring and reporting of unwanted events in psychotherapy trials for anorexia nervosa

Effectiveness and predictors of psychotherapy in eating disorders: state-of-the-art and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Psychotherapy is the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary treatment approach for eating disorders. This review examines recent evidence regarding effectiveness, predictors, and mechanisms of change of psychotherapy in eating disorders, providing a road map for clinicians and researchers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Family-based treatments (FBT) are effective in adolescents with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Evidence-based psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa have no evidence of superiority compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in adults with anorexia nervosa. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the first-choice psychotherapy recommended for adults with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder (BED). Self-help interventions have some evidence of effectiveness in nonunderweight individuals with eating disorders. Early symptom improvement and adolescent age predict more favourable outcomes.

SUMMARY

Evidence-based psychotherapies can be suggested for eating disorders, although follow-up data are needed. Beyond anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and BED, there is no evidence of psychotherapy effectiveness in other eating disorders. The effectiveness of novel (e.g. 'third-wave') psychotherapies, treatment delivery modality (e.g. internet-delivered), and adjunctive interventions (e.g. virtual reality) needs to be further explored. A broader definition of recovery is recommended, including behavioural, physical, and psychological criteria. Predictors and mechanisms of changes have not been studied enough: quantitative and qualitative studies are needed to promote more tailored and individualized psychotherapy interventions.

Structural connectivity modifications following deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate and nucleus accumbens in severe anorexia nervosa

PURPOSE

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a mental health disorder characterized by significant weight loss and associated medical and psychological comorbidities. Conventional treatments for severe AN have shown limited effectiveness, leading to the exploration of novel interventional strategies, including deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, the neural mechanisms driving DBS interventions, particularly in psychiatric conditions, remain uncertain. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by examining changes in structural connectivity in patients with severe AN before and after DBS.

METHODS

Sixteen participants, including eight patients with AN and eight controls, underwent baseline T1-weigthed and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisitions. Patients received DBS targeting either the subcallosal cingulate (DBS-SCC, N = 4) or the nucleus accumbens (DBS-NAcc, N = 4) based on psychiatric comorbidities and AN subtype. Post-DBS neuroimaging evaluation was conducted in four patients. Data analyses were performed to compare structural connectivity between patients and controls and to assess connectivity changes after DBS intervention.

RESULTS

Baseline findings revealed that structural connectivity is significantly reduced in patients with AN compared to controls, mainly regarding callosal and subcallosal white matter (WM) tracts. Furthermore, pre- vs. post-DBS analyses in AN identified a specific increase after the intervention in two WM tracts: the anterior thalamic radiation and the superior longitudinal fasciculus-parietal bundle.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports that structural connectivity is highly compromised in severe AN. Moreover, this investigation preliminarily reveals that after DBS of the SCC and NAcc in severe AN, there are WM modifications. These microstructural plasticity adaptations may signify a mechanistic underpinning of DBS in this psychiatric disorder.

Adverse Events of Psychological Interventions: Definitions, Assessment, Current State of the Research and Implications for Research and Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of psychological interventions is undisputed. But while in other fields of health care the safety of interventions is studied alongside effectiveness, adverse events (AEs) have only recently been assessed in clinical studies of psychological interventions. This critical review summarizes the definition, assessment and current research status of AEs of psychological interventions.

SUMMARY

AEs are defined as any untoward event or unfavorable change that occurs in the course of a psychological intervention. AEs that are caused by the intervention can be classified into side effects of correctly applied treatment, malpractice (i.e., incorrectly applied treatment) and unethical conduct (e.g., sexual abuse). Ideally, they are assessed by independent raters or alternatively by self-report questionnaires that should also cover serious adverse events (SAEs, e.g., suicide attempts or self-injurious behaviors). About 1 to 2 in 3 patients report at least 1 AE and results of meta-analyses suggest that treatments might differ in frequency and/or severity of AE and in treatment acceptability (measured as dropout rates).

KEY MESSAGES

Measures of AEs and SAEs as well as more nuanced descriptions of dropout should be included in all clinical studies of psychological interventions. If this happens, we might learn that psychological interventions differ with respect to AEs, SAEs and acceptability. As many psychological interventions are about equally effective, they might one day be chosen based on differences in their safety profile rather than their differential effectiveness. Ideally, reducing AEs might also lead to more effective interventions.

Adapting dose-response methodology to improve clinical trial design for psychotherapies

OBJECTIVE

Conventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long served as the foundation of research in clinical psychology; however, most treatments for eating disorders show only modest effects on reduction of symptoms and maintenance of long-term remission. New options for psychotherapy treatment development research, beyond continuing to pursue additive or subpopulation approaches, are needed.

METHODS

One option is to apply dose-response designs, which are commonplace in studies of pharmacology, toxicology, and medical research, and characterized by the evaluation of the amount of exposure (dose) to an intervention, and the resulting changes in body function or health (response).

RESULTS

Eating disorder interventions are particularly well-suited for dose-response treatment designs. The deadly nature of eating disorders makes it imperative that patients are not turned away for not being "ready" to engage with treatment. By identifying optimal doses, research will likely yield a more parsimonious course of treatment, which will lend itself to reduced costs, greater uptake, and reduced drop-out.

DISCUSSION

Limited use of within-subject designs in trials for patients with eating disorders has produced fast-track efficacy studies and omitted key elements in the treatment development pathway. To decrease reliance on RCT's, dose-response methods should be applied as an alternative study design.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Eating disorders are associated with medical and psychiatric comorbidities, poor quality of life, and high mortality. Access to evidence-based services for patients with eating disorders is limited, and identifying additional effective treatment options can be difficult because of challenges inherent to randomized-controlled trials. This manuscript describes an alternative trial methodology to maximize the information that can be gathered prior to utilizing a standard large-scale efficacy design.