1
|
Palavecino CC, Cuervo PF, Fantozzi MC, Bontempi IA, Ruiz MF, Marengo RE, Beldomenico PM, Racca AL. Environmental Challenges and Co-Infection Modulate Resistance and Tolerance Against Trypanosoma Cruzi and Trichinella Spiralis in Rats. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY. PART A, ECOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY 2025; 343:438-451. [PMID: 39831643 DOI: 10.1002/jez.2902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 11/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
To overcome infection, hosts employ two defense strategies: resistance (which limits pathogen fitness), and tolerance (which reduces infection damage). These strategies may be influenced by environmental challenges such as food shortage, social conflict, and co-infections. Here, our objective was to assess defense strategies in rats infected with Trichinella spiralis and/or Trypanosoma cruzi under environmental challenges. After four weeks of treatment with environmental challenges (food restriction [0/1] and/or social conflict [0/1]), rats were exposed to Tri. spiralis [0/1] and/or Try. cruzi [0/1]. Six weeks postinoculation, we measured parasite intensity and several indicators of health or pathology. Tolerance to Try. cruzi increased in the presence of social conflict and food restriction. Coinfected animals showed reduced tolerance compared to mono-infected. However, food-restricted mono-infected rats had lower tolerance than other groups. No significant differences were found in resistance to Try. cruzi. Tolerance to Tri. spiralis was higher in food-restricted rats and Coinfected rats. Moreover, we found a potential shift in defense strategy: rats that are mono-infected and exposed to social conflict may be more resistant but less tolerant to Tri. spiralis than all other experimental groups. Overall, our findings highlight that defense strategies are context-dependent in the nematode-protozoan infection model studied, and provide evidence of a shift in the defense strategy to accommodate during environmental challenges. Given that rodents play a key role as reservoirs of zoonotic pathogens, understanding the range and variability of defense strategies in these animals is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cintia C Palavecino
- Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (ICIVET LITORAL), Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Pablo F Cuervo
- Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (ICIVET LITORAL), Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
- Departamento de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Carlos IIII, CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - María C Fantozzi
- Departamento de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Carlos IIII, CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan A Bontempi
- Laboratorio de Tecnología Inmunológica, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológica, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Marcelo F Ruiz
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Rafael E Marengo
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Pablo M Beldomenico
- Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (ICIVET LITORAL), Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Andrea L Racca
- Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (ICIVET LITORAL), Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
- Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Günay-Esiyok Ö, Gupta N. Eimeria falciformis. Trends Parasitol 2024; 40:1197-1198. [PMID: 39362799 PMCID: PMC7616687 DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2024.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
Eimeria species (>1700) are widespread causative agents of coccidiosis in animals. Most species reproduce in the intestinal epithelial cells of distinct hosts. Eimeria falciformis infects the cecum of Mus musculus for its asexual and sexual reproduction. Parasite infection results in diarrhea and weight loss, and pathogenicity depends on the dose of infection as well as the age and immune status of the host. The short, monoxenous life cycle of E. falciformis in a model host (i.e ., mouse) enables in vivo research on poorly studied coccidian stages. Several parasite-specific biological phenomena, such as schizogony, gametogenesis, oocyst formation, sporulation. and mucosal immunity can be examined in significant detail. The Eimeria –mouse model is valuable for deciphering the network design principles and molecular determinants of intracellular parasitism, and thereby developing novel antiparasitic intervention strategies against poultry and livestock coccidiosis caused by host-specific Eimeria species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Özlem Günay-Esiyok
- Vaccine Development Application and Research Center, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye; Intracellular Parasite Education and Research Labs (iPEARL), Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Science and Technology, Pilani (BITS-P), Hyderabad Campus, India; Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nishith Gupta
- Intracellular Parasite Education and Research Labs (iPEARL), Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Science and Technology, Pilani (BITS-P), Hyderabad Campus, India; Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernández Miyakawa ME, Casanova NA, Kogut MH. How did antibiotic growth promoters increase growth and feed efficiency in poultry? Poult Sci 2024; 103:103278. [PMID: 38052127 PMCID: PMC10746532 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that reducing the bioenergetic costs of gut inflammation as an explanation for the effect of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) on animal efficiency, framing some observations but not explaining the increase in growth rate or the prevention of infectious diseases. The host's ability to adapt to alterations in environmental conditions and to maintain health involves managing all physiological interactions that regulate homeostasis. Thus, metabolic pathways are vital in regulating physiological health as the energetic demands of the host guides most biological functions. Mitochondria are not only the metabolic heart of the cell because of their role in energy metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation, but also a central hub of signal transduction pathways that receive messages about the health and nutritional states of cells and tissues. In response, mitochondria direct cellular and tissue physiological alterations throughout the host. The endosymbiotic theory suggests that mitochondria evolved from prokaryotes, emphasizing the idea that these organelles can be affected by some antibiotics. Indeed, therapeutic levels of several antibiotics can be toxic to mitochondria, but subtherapeutic levels may improve mitochondrial function and defense mechanisms by inducing an adaptive response of the cell, resulting in mitokine production which coordinates an array of adaptive responses of the host to the stressor(s). This adaptive stress response is also observed in several bacteria species, suggesting that this protective mechanism has been preserved during evolution. Concordantly, gut microbiome modulation by subinhibitory concentration of AGPs could be the result of direct stimulation rather than inhibition of determined microbial species. In eukaryotes, these adaptive responses of the mitochondria to internal and external environmental conditions, can promote growth rate of the organism as an evolutionary strategy to overcome potential negative conditions. We hypothesize that direct and indirect subtherapeutic AGP regulation of mitochondria functional output can regulate homeostatic control mechanisms in a manner similar to those involved with disease tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Enrique Fernández Miyakawa
- Institute of Pathobiology, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina..
| | - Natalia Andrea Casanova
- Institute of Pathobiology, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Argentina; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael H Kogut
- Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferreira SCM, Jarquín-Díaz VH, Heitlinger E. Amplicon sequencing allows differential quantification of closely related parasite species: an example from rodent Coccidia (Eimeria). Parasit Vectors 2023; 16:204. [PMID: 37330545 PMCID: PMC10276917 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-05800-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantifying infection intensity is a common goal in parasitological studies. We have previously shown that the amount of parasite DNA in faecal samples can be a biologically meaningful measure of infection intensity, even if it does not agree well with complementary counts of transmission stages (oocysts in the case of Coccidia). Parasite DNA can be quantified at relatively high throughput using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), but amplification needs a high specificity and does not simultaneously distinguish between parasite species. Counting of amplified sequence variants (ASVs) from high-throughput marker gene sequencing using a relatively universal primer pair has the potential to distinguish between closely related co-infecting taxa and to uncover the community diversity, thus being both more specific and more open-ended. METHODS We here compare qPCR to the sequencing-based amplification using standard PCR and a microfluidics-based PCR to quantify the unicellular parasite Eimeria in experimentally infected mice. We use multiple amplicons to differentially quantify Eimeria spp. in a natural house mouse population. RESULTS We show that sequencing-based quantification has high accuracy. Using a combination of phylogenetic analysis and the co-occurrence network, we distinguish three Eimeria species in naturally infected mice based on multiple marker regions and genes. We investigate geographical and host-related effects on Eimeria spp. community composition and find, as expected, prevalence to be largely explained by sampling locality (farm). Controlling for this effect, the novel approach allowed us to find body condition of mice to be negatively associated with Eimeria spp. abundance. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that amplicon sequencing provides the underused potential for species distinction and simultaneous quantification of parasites in faecal material. The method allowed us to detect a negative effect of Eimeria infection on the body condition of mice in the natural environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana C. M. Ferreira
- Division of Computational Systems Biology, Center for Microbiology and Ecological Systems Science, University of Vienna, Djerassipl. 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Biology. Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Víctor Hugo Jarquín-Díaz
- Institute for Biology. Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115 Berlin, Germany
- Leibniz-Institut Für Zoo- Und Wildtierforschung (IZW) im Forschungsverbund Berlin E.V., Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125 Berlin, Germany
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Emanuel Heitlinger
- Institute for Biology. Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115 Berlin, Germany
- Leibniz-Institut Für Zoo- Und Wildtierforschung (IZW) im Forschungsverbund Berlin E.V., Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Balard A, Heitlinger E. Shifting focus from resistance to disease tolerance: A review on hybrid house mice. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e8889. [PMID: 35571751 PMCID: PMC9077717 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Parasites have been proposed to modulate the fitness of hybridizing hosts in part based on observations in the European house mouse hybrid zone (HMHZ), a tension zone in which hybrids show reduced fitness. We here review evidence (1) for parasite load differences in hybrid versus parental mice and (2) for health and fitness effects of parasites promoting or preventing introgression and hybridization. The question of relative resistance or susceptibility of hybrids to parasites in the HMHZ has long been controversial. Recent field studies found hybrids to be more resistant than mice from parental subspecies against infections with pinworms and protozoans (Eimeria spp.). We argue that the field studies underlying the contradictory impression of hybrid susceptibility have limitations in sample size, statistical analysis and scope, focusing only on macroparasites. We suggest that weighted evidence from field studies indicate hybrid resistance. Health is a fitness component through which resistance can modulate overall fitness. Resistance, however, should not be extrapolated directly to a fitness effect, as the relationship between resistance and health can be modulated by tolerance. In our own recent work, we found that the relationship between health and resistance (tolerance) differs between infections with the related species E. falciformis and E. ferrisi. Health and tolerance need to be assessed directly and the choice of parasite has made this difficult in previous experimental studies of house mice. We discuss how experimental Eimeria spp. infections in hybrid house mice can address resistance, health and tolerance in conjunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Balard
- Department of Molecular ParasitologyInstitute for BiologyHumboldt University Berlin (HU)BerlinGermany
- Research Group Ecology and Evolution of Molecular Parasite‐Host InteractionsLeibniz‐Institut for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V.BerlinGermany
| | - Emanuel Heitlinger
- Department of Molecular ParasitologyInstitute for BiologyHumboldt University Berlin (HU)BerlinGermany
- Research Group Ecology and Evolution of Molecular Parasite‐Host InteractionsLeibniz‐Institut for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V.BerlinGermany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paraskevopoulou S, Gattis S, Ben-Ami F. Parasite resistance and parasite tolerance: insights into transgenerational immune priming in an invertebrate host. Biol Lett 2022; 18:20220018. [PMID: 35382587 PMCID: PMC8984330 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Parasites impose different selection regimes on their hosts, which respond by increasing their resistance and/or tolerance. Parental challenge with parasites can enhance the immune response of their offspring, a phenomenon documented in invertebrates and termed transgenerational immune priming. We exposed two parental generations of the model organism Daphnia magna to the horizontally transmitted parasitic yeast Metschnikowia bicuspidata and recorded resistance- and tolerance-related traits in the offspring generation. We hypothesized that parentally primed offspring will increase either their resistance or their tolerance to the parasite. Our susceptibility assays revealed no impact of parental exposure on offspring resistance. Nonetheless, different fitness-related traits, which are indicative of tolerance, were altered. Specifically, maternal priming increased offspring production and decreased survival. Grandmaternal priming positively affected age at first reproduction and negatively affected brood size at first reproduction. Interestingly, both maternal and grandmaternal priming significantly reduced within-host-parasite proliferation. Nevertheless, Daphnia primed for two consecutive generations had no competitive advantage in comparison to unprimed ones, implying additive maternal and grandmaternal effects. Our findings do not support evidence of transgenerational immune priming from bacterial infections in the same host species, thus, emphasizing that transgenerational immune responses may not be consistent even within the same host species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Paraskevopoulou
- School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
| | - Sabrina Gattis
- School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
| | - Frida Ben-Ami
- School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jarquín-Díaz VH, Balard A, Ferreira SCM, Mittné V, Murata JM, Heitlinger E. DNA-based quantification and counting of transmission stages provides different but complementary parasite load estimates: an example from rodent coccidia (Eimeria). Parasit Vectors 2022; 15:45. [PMID: 35120561 PMCID: PMC8815199 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-05119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Counting parasite transmission stages in faeces is the classical measurement to quantify “parasite load”. DNA-based quantifications of parasite intensities from faecal samples are relatively novel and often validated against such counts. When microscopic and molecular quantifications do not correlate, it is unclear whether oocyst counts or DNA-based intensity better reflects biologically meaningful concepts. Here, we investigate this issue using the example of Eimeria ferrisi (Coccidia), an intracellular parasite of house mice (Mus musculus). Methods We performed an infection experiment of house mice with E. ferrisi, in which the intensity of infection correlates with increased health impact on the host, measured as temporary weight loss during infection. We recorded the number of parasite transmissive stages (oocysts) per gram of faeces (OPG) and, as a DNA-based measurement, the number of Eimeria genome copies per gram of faeces for 10 days post-infection (dpi). We assessed weight loss relative to the day of experimental infection as a proxy of host health and evaluated whether DNA or oocyst counts are better predictors of host health. Results Absolute quantification of Eimeria DNA and oocyst counts showed similar but slightly diverging temporal patterns during 10 dpi. We detected Eimeria DNA earlier than the first appearance of oocysts in faeces. Additionally, Eimeria OPGs within each dpi did not explain parasite DNA intensity. Early dpi were characterized by high DNA intensity with low oocyst counts, while late infections showed the opposite pattern. The intensity of Eimeria DNA was consistently a stronger predictor of either maximal weight loss (1 value per animal during the infection course) or weight loss on each day during the experiment when controlling for between-dpi and between-individual variance. Conclusions Eimeria ferrisi oocyst counts correlate weakly with parasite intensity assessed through DNA quantification. DNA is likely partially derived from life-cycle stages other than transmissive oocysts. DNA-based intensities predict health outcomes of infection for the host more robustly than counts of transmissive stages. We conclude that DNA-based quantifications should not necessarily require validation against counts of transmissive stages. Instead, DNA-based load estimates should be evaluated as complementary sources of information with potential specific biological relevance for each host-parasite system. Graphical Abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-021-05119-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Hugo Jarquín-Díaz
- Institute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany. .,Leibniz-Institut Für Zoo- Und Wildtierforschung (IZW), im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V., Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany. .,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, jointly operated by Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Charité Campus Berlin Buch, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Alice Balard
- Institute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.,Leibniz-Institut Für Zoo- Und Wildtierforschung (IZW), im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V., Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susana Carolina Martins Ferreira
- Institute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.,Division of Computational Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090, Wien, Austria
| | - Vivian Mittné
- Institute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Mari Murata
- Institute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emanuel Heitlinger
- Institute for Biology, Department of Molecular Parasitology, Humboldt University Berlin (HU), Philippstr. 13, Haus 14, 10115, Berlin, Germany.,Leibniz-Institut Für Zoo- Und Wildtierforschung (IZW), im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V., Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|