1
|
Belasen AM, Peek RA, Adams AJ, Russell ID, De León ME, Adams MJ, Bettaso J, Breedveld KGH, Catenazzi A, Dillingham CP, Grear DA, Halstead BJ, Johnson PG, Kleeman PM, Koo MS, Koppl CW, Lauder JD, Padgett-Flohr G, Piovia-Scott J, Pope KL, Vredenburg V, Westphal M, Wiseman K, Kupferberg SJ. Chytrid infections exhibit historical spread and contemporary seasonality in a declining stream-breeding frog. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2024; 11:231270. [PMID: 38298390 PMCID: PMC10827429 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Species with extensive geographical ranges pose special challenges to assessing drivers of wildlife disease, necessitating collaborative and large-scale analyses. The imperilled foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) inhabits a wide geographical range and variable conditions in rivers of California and Oregon (USA), and is considered threatened by the pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). To assess drivers of Bd infections over time and space, we compiled over 2000 datapoints from R. boylii museum specimens (collected 1897-2005) and field samples (2005-2021) spanning 9° of latitude. We observed a south-to-north spread of Bd detections beginning in the 1940s and increase in prevalence from the 1940s to 1970s, coinciding with extirpation from southern latitudes. We detected eight high-prevalence geographical clusters through time that span the species' geographical range. Field-sampled male R. boylii exhibited the highest prevalence, and juveniles sampled in autumn exhibited the highest loads. Bd infection risk was highest in lower elevation rain-dominated watersheds, and with cool temperatures and low stream-flow conditions at the end of the dry season. Through a holistic assessment of relationships between infection risk, geographical context and time, we identify the locations and time periods where Bd mitigation and monitoring will be critical for conservation of this imperilled species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. M. Belasen
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - R. A. Peek
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife, West Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - A. J. Adams
- Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - I. D. Russell
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - M. E. De León
- Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - M. J. Adams
- U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - J. Bettaso
- Six Rivers National Forest, Lower Trinity Ranger District, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 68, Willow Creek, CA, USA
| | | | - A. Catenazzi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - D. A. Grear
- U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - B. J. Halstead
- Point Reyes Field Station, U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Point Reyes Station, CA, USA
| | - P. G. Johnson
- Pinnacles National Park, National Park Service, Paicines, CA, USA
| | - P. M. Kleeman
- Point Reyes Field Station, U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Point Reyes Station, CA, USA
| | - M. S. Koo
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - C. W. Koppl
- Plumas National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Quincy, CA, USA
| | | | | | - J. Piovia-Scott
- School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, USA
| | - K. L. Pope
- Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Arcata, CA, USA
| | - V. Vredenburg
- Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - M. Westphal
- Central Coast Field Office, United States Bureau of Land Management, Marina, CA, USA
| | - K. Wiseman
- Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S. J. Kupferberg
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hemstrom W, Dauwalter D, Peacock MM, Leasure D, Wenger S, Miller MR, Neville H. Population genomic monitoring provides insight into conservation status but no correlation with demographic estimates of extinction risk in a threatened trout. Evol Appl 2022; 15:1449-1468. [PMID: 36187186 PMCID: PMC9488680 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The current extinction crisis requires effective assessment and monitoring tools. Genetic approaches are appealing given the relative ease of field sampling required to estimate genetic diversity characteristics assumed related to population size, evolutionary potential, and extinction risk, and to evaluate hybridization with non-native species simultaneously. However, linkages between population genetic metrics of diversity from survey-style field collections and demographic estimates of population size and extinction risk are still in need of empirical examples, especially for remotely distributed species of conservation concern where the approach might be most beneficial. We capitalized on an exceptional opportunity to evaluate congruence between genetic diversity metrics and demographic-based estimates of abundance and extinction risk from a comprehensive Multiple Population Viability Analysis (MPVA) in a threatened fish, the Lahontan cutthroat trout (LCT). We sequenced non-native trout reference samples and recently collected and archived tissue samples of most remaining populations of LCT (N = 60) and estimated common genetic assessment metrics, predicting minimal hybridization with non-native trout, low diversity, and declining diversity over time. We further hypothesized genetic metrics would correlate positively with MPVA-estimated abundance and negatively with extinction probability. We uncovered several instances of hybridization that pointed to immediate management needs. After removing hybridized individuals, cautious interpretation of low effective population sizes (2-63) suggested reduced evolutionary potential for many LCT populations. Other genetic metrics did not decline over time nor correlate with MPVA-based estimates of harmonic mean abundance or 30-year extinction probability. Our results demonstrate benefits of genetic monitoring for efficiently detecting hybridization and, though genetic results were disconnected from demographic assessment of conservation status, they suggest reduced evolutionary potential and likely a higher conservation risk than currently recognized for this threatened fish. We emphasize that genetic information provides essential complementary insight, in addition to demographic information, for evaluating species status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Hemstrom
- Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Douglas Leasure
- WorldPop, Geography and Environmental ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Seth Wenger
- Odum School of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensGeorgiaUSA
| | - Michael R. Miller
- Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|