Associations of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus

Calcium-Phosphorus Product Is Associated with Adverse Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease

It has been reported that high levels of calcium-phosphorus (Ca-P) product are an indicator of coronary calcification and mortality risk in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the significance of Ca-P product to predict the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a prospective observational study of 793 patients with decompensated HF and CKD, and measured the value of Ca-P product. The cut-off value was obtained from the survival classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to predict post-discharge all-cause mortality and/or worsening HF, and the patients were divided into 2 groups: a high group (Ca-P product > 28, n = 594) and a low group (Ca-P product ≤ 28, n = 199). We compared the patient baseline characteristics and post-discharge prognosis between the 2 groups. The age as well as the prevalence of male sex, ischemic etiology, and anemia were significantly higher in the low group than in the high group. In contrast, there was no difference in echocardiographic parameters between the 2 groups. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis (mean follow-up 1089 days), all-cause mortality and/or worsening HF event rates were higher in the low group than in the high group (log-rank P = 0.001). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, lower Ca-P product was found to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and/or worsening HF (hazard ratio 0.981, P = 0.031). Lower Ca-P product predicts adverse prognosis in patients with HF and CKD.

Re-evaluation of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

The question of whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) should be preferred as new glucose-lowering agents in heart failure is controversial. This studyaimed to evaluate the effects of DPP-4i treatment on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

We searched for available studies of DPP-4i therapy in heart failure and performed a pooled analysis. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), acute coronary syndrome, and acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Treatment with DPP-4i did not reduce the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization for heart failure. Subgroup analyses showed that DPP-4i significantly reduced all-cause mortality in trials with >40% female patients (OR 0.30, 95% CI [0.16, 0.58], P=0.0003) and in trials with >20% patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (OR 0.34, 95% CI [0.19, 0.60], P=0.0003). Changes in LVEF and LVEDV showed no statistical differences between the 2 groups. Accordingly, DPP-4i did not alter the risk of acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4i may reduce all-cause mortality in heart failure patients in subgroups of women and HFpEF and has a high coronary safety profile.

Beneficial Effects of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors on Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have been shown to exert pleiotropic effects on heart failure (HF) in animal experiments.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the impact of DPP-4 inhibitors on HF patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

We analyzed hospitalized patients with HF and DM enrolled in the JROADHF (Japanese Registry Of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) registry, a nationwide registry of acute decompensated HF. Primary exposure was the use of a DPP-4 inhibitor. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization during the median follow-up of 3.6 years according to left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

Out of 2,999 eligible patients, 1,130 had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 572 had heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and 1,297 had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In each cohort, 444, 232, and 574 patients received a DPP-4 inhibitor, respectively. A multivariable Cox regression model showed that DPP-4 inhibitor use was associated with a lower composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in HFpEF (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55-0.87; P = 0.002) but not in HFmrEF and HFrEF. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated that DPP-4 inhibitors were beneficial in patients with higher left ventricular ejection fraction. In HFpEF cohort, propensity score matching yielded 263 pairs. DPP-4 inhibitor use was associated with a lower incidence rate of the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (19.2 vs 25.9 events per 100 patient-years; rate ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.97; P = 0.027) in matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitor use was associated with better long-term outcomes in HFpEF patients with DM.

Impact of DPP-4 inhibitors on plasma levels of BNP and NT-pro-BNP in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) decrease glucose levels by regulating incretin peptides in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to determine the modulatory effect of DPP-4i on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of DPP-4i on BNP or NT-pro-BNP. A fixed- or random-effects model was used for quantitative analysis, according to the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed using standard methods.

RESULTS

Nine trials with 3056 patients with T2DM were included. Meta-analysis revealed that DPP-4i did not significantly modulate the BNP (0.21 pg/mL, 95% CI - 2.36-2.79) or NT-pro-BNP level (- 7.34 pg/mL, 95% CI - 24.27-9.59). DPP-4i demonstrated no stronger effect on modulating BNP (5.17 pg/mL, 95% CI - 7.48-17.82) or NT-pro-BNP (- 9.95 pg/mL, 95% CI - 44.61-24.71) than active comparators. Pooled analysis was robust and stable after sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4i exhibits no significant effect on modulating BNP or NT-pro-BNP and shows no stronger effect than traditional antidiabetic agents in T2DM.

Serum TRACP5b, a Marker of Bone Resorption, Is Associated With Adverse Cardiac Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure

Background

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRACP5b) is derived from osteoclasts, and has been used as a marker of osteoporosis (bone resorption). Although heart failure (HF) is associated with catabolic bone remodelling, serum TRACP5b levels have not been rigourously examined in patients with HF.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of 688 decompensated HF patients who had been discharged and whose TRACP5b had been measured. These patients were divided into tertiles on the basis of serum TRACP5b levels: first (TRACP5b < 316 mU/dL, n = 229), second (TRACP5b 316-489 mU/dL, n = 229), and third (TRACP5b ≥ 490 mU/dL, n = 230). We compared the patient baseline characteristics, exercise capacity, and their postdischarge prognosis, including cardiac mortality and cardiac events such as cardiac death and worsening HF.

Results

Age was significantly higher, and prevalence of female sex and anemia was significantly higher in the third tertile than in the first and second tertiles (P < 0.05, respectively). Circulating TRACP5b levels were correlated with peak breath-by-breath oxygen consumption, but not with left ventricular ejection fraction. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis (mean follow-up, 426 days), cardiac mortality and cardiac event rates progressively increased from the first to the third tertiles (P < 0.05, respectively). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the third tertile was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality and cardiac events (cardiac mortality hazard ratio, 2.493; P = 0.040; cardiac events hazard ratio, 1.687; P = 0.030).

Conclusions

High serum levels of TRACP5b, a marker of bone resorption, are associated with high cardiac mortality and cardiac events, accompanied by impaired exercise capacity.

Concurrent diabetes and heart failure: interplay and novel therapeutic approaches

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of developing heart failure, and the co-existence of both diseases worsens cardiovascular outcomes, hospitalization and the progression of heart failure. Despite current advancements on therapeutic strategies to manage hyperglycemia, the likelihood of developing diabetes-induced heart failure is still significant, especially with the accelerating global prevalence of diabetes and an ageing population. This raises the likelihood of other contributing mechanisms beyond hyperglycemia in predisposing diabetic patients to cardiovascular disease risk. There has been considerable interest in understanding the alterations in cardiac structure and function in the diabetic patients, collectively termed as "diabetic cardiomyopathy". However, the factors that contribute to the development of diabetic cardiomyopathies is not fully understood. This review summarizes the main characteristics of diabetic cardiomyopathies, and the basic mechanisms that contribute to its occurrence. This includes perturbations in insulin resistance, fuel preference, reactive oxygen species generation, inflammation, cell death pathways, neurohormonal mechanisms, advanced glycated end-products accumulation, lipotoxicity, glucotoxicity, and posttranslational modifications in the heart of the diabetic. This review also discusses the impact of antihyperglycemic therapies on the development of heart failure, as well as how current heart failure therapies influence glycemic control in diabetic patients. We also highlight the current knowledge gaps in understanding how diabetes induces heart failure.

Soluble fibrin monomer complex is associated with cardio- and cerebrovascular events in patients with heart failure

•

The soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC), is a marker of fibrin formation.

•

SFMC is abnormally elevated in a variety of clinical situations of hypercoagulability.

•

SFMC is an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure.

Background

A biomarker of fibrin formation, the soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC), is abnormally elevated in a variety of clinical situations of hypercoagulability. The aim of the present study was to examine the prognostic impact of SFMC, with regard to increased risk of major cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality, on patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods and Results

We conducted a prospective observational study where we analyzed data of 723 hospitalized patients with decompensated HF who were discharged alive and whose SFMC had been measured in a stable condition prior to discharge. The patients were divided into tertiles based on SFMC levels: the first (SFMC < 1.7 μg/ml, n = 250), second (≤1.8 SFMC < 2.9 μg/ml, n = 233), and third (3.0 μg/ml ≤ SFMC, n = 240) tertiles. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease and anemia was significantly higher in the third tertile than in the first and second tertiles. In contrast, age, sex, CHADS₂-Vasc score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and atrial fibrillation did not differ among the tertiles. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, accumulated event rates of both MACCE and all-cause mortality progressively increased from the first to third tertiles (log-rank P < 0.05, respectively). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the third tertile was found to be an independent predictor of MACCE (HR 2.014, P = 0.046) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.792, P = 0.036).

Conclusion

SFMC is an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in patients with HF.

The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar

AIMS

How often a medical article is cited is important for many people because it is used to calculate different variables such as the h-index and the journal impact factor. The aim of this analysis was to assess how the citation count varies between Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and Google Scholar in the current literature.

METHODS

We included the top 50 cited articles of four journals ESC Heart Failure; Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle; European Journal of Preventive Cardiology; and European Journal of Heart Failure in our analysis that were published between 1 January 2016 and 10 October 2019. We recorded the number of citations of these articles according to WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar on 10 October 2019.

RESULTS

The top 50 articles in ESC Heart Failure were on average cited 12 (WoS), 13 (Scopus), and 17 times (Google Scholar); in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 37 (WoS), 43 (Scopus), and 60 times (Google Scholar); in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 41 (WoS), 56 (Scopus), and 67 times (Google Scholar); and in European Journal of Heart Failure 76 (WoS), 108 (Scopus), and 230 times (Google Scholar). On average, the top 50 articles in all four journals were cited 41 (WoS), 52 (Scopus, 26% higher citations count than WoS, range 8-42% in the different journals), and 93 times (Google Scholar, 116% higher citation count than WoS, range 42-203%).

CONCLUSION

Scopus and Google Scholar on average have a higher citation count than WoS, whereas the difference is much larger between Google Scholar and WoS.

Open access efforts begin to bloom: ESC Heart Failure gets full attention and first impact factor

In 2014, the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) founded the first open access journal focusing on heart failure, called ESC Heart Failure (ESC‐HF). In the first 5 years, in ESC‐HF we published more than 450 articles. Through ESC‐HF, the HFA gives room for heart failure research output from around the world. A transfer process from the European Journal of Heart Failure to ESC‐HF has also been installed. As a consequence, in 2018 ESC‐HF received 289 submissions, and published 148 items (acceptance rate 51%). The journal is listed in Scopus since 2014 and on the PubMed website since 2015. In 2019, we received our first impact factor from ISI Web of Knowledge / Thomson‐Reuters, which is 3.407 for 2018. This report reviews which papers get best cited. Not surprisingly, many of the best cited papers are reviews and facts & numbers mini reviews, but original research is also well cited.

Cardiovascular risk of sitagliptin in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a very high risk of cardiovascular related events, and reducing complications is an important evaluation criterion of efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic drugs. Previous studies have shown that the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (DPP4i), such as sitagliptin, might reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin remains controversial, especially the safety for cardiovascular related events. Here, a systematic review was conducted to assess the cardiovascular safety of sitagliptin in T2DM patients. The literature research dating up to October 2018 was performed in the electronic database. The clinical trials about sitagliptin for T2DM patients were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the MACE, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Finally, 32 clinical trials composed of 16082 T2DM patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that: there was no significant difference between sitagliptin group and the control group on MACE (odds ratio (OR) = 0.85, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.63–1.15), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.38–1.16), stroke (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.44–1.54) and mortality (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.26–1.07). These results demonstrated that sitagliptin did not increase the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM.

Regional differences in heart failure hospitalizations, mortality, and readmissions in Slovenia 2004-2012

Aims

Heart failure (HF) burden is displaying significant inter‐regional differences within Europe and within countries. Due to limited data focusing on regional differences, our aim was to evaluate HF hospitalizations, readmissions, and mortality burden in Slovenian statistical regions.

Methods and results

The Slovenian National Hospitalization Discharge Registry was searched for HF hospitalizations in patients 20 years or over in the period 2004–12. Annual sex and age‐standardized HF hospitalizations, mortality, and HF readmissions rates were calculated for Slovenia and for each Slovenian statistical region. Trends were evaluated using ANOVA. Multiple mixed effect logistic regression models, which included statistical region, admission year, sex, age, intensive care unit treatment, and co‐morbidities as a fixed effect and hospital identifier as a random effect, were calculated for mortality and readmissions. Overall, 156 859 HF hospitalizations (55 522 where HF was coded as a main diagnosis and 43 606 as first HF hospitalizations) were recorded. Annual standardized rates varied considerably between statistical regions for main (220–511) and first HF hospitalization (392–721), 30 day (12.6–27.1) and 1 year mortality (66–117), and 30 day (31–80.8) and 1 year readmission (99–24) (per 100 000 patient years in 2012). Yearly decline in HF hospitalization rates was seen for national main (3.6; 0.001) and first (8.4; 0.083) HF hospitalizations, while individual regional main and first HF hospitalization trends mostly did not reach statistical significance. No relevant differences in mortality and readmission endpoints for statistical regions were seen when adjusted for patient demographics and specific co‐morbidities.

Conclusions

Significant regional differences in standardized HF hospitalization, mortality, and readmissions between the regions were seen. There were no differences in mortality and readmissions between statistical regions for individual similar patients.

Improvement in Mortality and End-Stage Renal Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Acute Kidney Injury Who Are Prescribed Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To focus on the potential beneficial effects of the pleiotropic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) on attenuating progression of diabetic kidney disease in reducing the long-term effect of the acute kidney injury (AKI) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) transition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the National Health Insurance Research Database from January 1, 1999, to July 31, 2011, were analyzed, and patients with diabetes weaning from dialysis-requiring AKI were identified. Cox proportional hazards models and inverse-weighted estimates of the probability of treatment were used to adjust for treatment selection bias. The outcomes were incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and hospitalized heart failure.

RESULTS

Of a total of 6165 patients with diabetes weaning from dialysis-requiring AKI identified, 5635 (91.4%) patients were DPP4i nonusers and 530 (8.6%) patients were DPP4i users. Compared with DPP4i nonusers, DPP4i users had a lower risk of ESRD (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94; P=.04) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.23-0.34; P<.001) after adjustments for CKD, advanced CKD, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker use. In contrast, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalized heart failure did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor users had a lower risk of ESRD and mortality than did nonusers among patients with diabetes after weaning from dialysis-requiring AKI. Therefore, a prospective study of AKI to CKD transitions after episodes of AKI is needed to optimally target DPP4i interventions.

Impact of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors on cardiovascular diseases

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is a novel group of medicine employed in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM),which improves meal stimulated insulin secretion by protecting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) from enzymatic degradation. Cardiovascular diseases are serious complications and leading causes of mortality among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Glycemic control per se seems to fail in preventing the progression of diabetic cardiovascular complications. DPP-4 has the capability to inactivate not only incretins, but also a series of cytokines, chemokines, and neuropeptides involved in inflammation, immunity, and vascular function. Pre-clinical studies suggested that DPP-4 inhibitors may have potential cardiovascular protective effects in addition to their antidiabetic actions. In recent years, a number of clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the effect of different DPP-4 inhibitors on the cardiovascular system. We herein review the available clinical studies in cardiovascular effects played by each DPP-4 inhibitor and discuss the prospective application of DPP-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular diseases.

Synthesis, secretion, function, metabolism and application of natriuretic peptides in heart failure

As a family of hormones with pleiotropic effects, natriuretic peptide (NP) system includes atrial NP (ANP), B-type NP (BNP), C-type NP (CNP), dendroaspis NP and urodilatin, with NP receptor-A (guanylate cyclase-A), NP receptor-B (guanylate cyclase-B) and NP receptor-C (clearance receptor). These peptides are genetically distinct, but structurally and functionally related for regulating circulatory homeostasis in vertebrates. In humans, ANP and BNP are encoded by NP precursor A (NPPA) and NPPB genes on chromosome 1, whereas CNP is encoded by NPPC on chromosome 2. NPs are synthesized and secreted through certain mechanisms by cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endotheliocytes, immune cells (neutrophils, T-cells and macrophages) and immature cells (embryonic stem cells, muscle satellite cells and cardiac precursor cells). They are mainly produced by cardiovascular, brain and renal tissues in response to wall stretch and other causes. NPs provide natriuresis, diuresis, vasodilation, antiproliferation, antihypertrophy, antifibrosis and other cardiometabolic protection. NPs represent body's own antihypertensive system, and provide compensatory protection to counterbalance vasoconstrictor-mitogenic-sodium retaining hormones, released by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and sympathetic nervous system (SNS). NPs play central roles in regulation of heart failure (HF), and are inactivated through not only NP receptor-C, but also neutral endopeptidase (NEP), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and insulin degrading enzyme. Both BNP and N-terminal proBNP are useful biomarkers to not only make the diagnosis and assess the severity of HF, but also guide the therapy and predict the prognosis in patients with HF. Current NP-augmenting strategies include the synthesis of NPs or agonists to increase NP bioactivity and inhibition of NEP to reduce NP breakdown. Nesiritide has been established as an available therapy, and angiotensin receptor blocker NEP inhibitor (ARNI, LCZ696) has obtained extremely encouraging results with decreased morbidity and mortality. Novel pharmacological approaches based on NPs may promote a therapeutic shift from suppressing the RAAS and SNS to re-balancing neuroendocrine dysregulation in patients with HF. The current review discussed the synthesis, secretion, function and metabolism of NPs, and their diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic values in HF.

Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure

Epidemiologic and clinical data from the last 2 decades have shown that the prevalence of heart failure in diabetes is very high, and the prognosis for patients with heart failure is worse in those with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Experimental data suggest that various mechanisms contribute to the impairment in systolic and diastolic function in patients with diabetes, and there is an increased recognition that these patients develop heart failure independent of the presence of coronary artery disease or its associated risk factors. In addition, current clinical data demonstrated that treatment with the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk. This review article summarizes recent data on the prevalence, prognosis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic strategies to treat patients with diabetes and heart failure.

Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure

Epidemiologic and clinical data from the last 2 decades have shown that the prevalence of heart failure in diabetes is very high, and the prognosis for patients with heart failure is worse in those with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Experimental data suggest that various mechanisms contribute to the impairment in systolic and diastolic function in patients with diabetes, and there is an increased recognition that these patients develop heart failure independent of the presence of coronary artery disease or its associated risk factors. In addition, current clinical data demonstrated that treatment with the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk. This review article summarizes recent data on the prevalence, prognosis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic strategies to treat patients with diabetes and heart failure.

DPP-4 inhibition has no acute effect on BNP and its N-terminal pro-hormone measured by commercial immune-assays. A randomized cross-over trial in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

Use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-i) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with a possible increase in the risk for heart failure (HF). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which is both a biomarker of HF and a hemodynamically active hormone, is a substrate of DPP-4. We herein tested the acute effects of the DPP-4i linagliptin on BNP and NT-proBNP in a cross-over placebo-controlled trial in patients with T2D with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

B-type natriuretic peptide and NT-proBNP were measured using commercially available clinical-grade immune-assays at baseline and at the end of a 4-day treatment with placebo and linagliptin. Changes from baseline during each treatment arm, as well as placebo-subtracted effects of linagliptin on BNP and NT-proBNP were calculated.

Results

46 patients completed the study, 18 of whom were affected by CKD. Baseline BNP and NT-proBNP levels increased with age, were elevated in CKD patients, and inversely correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate. No significant change was detected in BNP and NT-proBNP levels after treatment with linagliptin or placebo in patients with or without CKD. Only in CKD patients the placebo-subtracted effect of linagliptin indicated a significant reduction in NT-proBNP levels, but this finding was not statistically robust.

Conclusions

Acute treatment with a DPP-4i exerts no clinically-meaningful effects on BNP and NT-proBNP. As routinely used immunoassays do not discriminate between intact/active and cleaved BNP, these data cannot rule out an effect of DPP-4i on HF pathophysiology.

Trial registration NCT01617824

Associations of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with mortality in hospitalized heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) often co-exist. Treatment of DM in HF patients is challenging because some therapies for DM are contraindicated in HF. Although previous experimental studies have reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors improve cardiovascular function, whether DPP-4 inhibition improves mortality of HF patients with DM remains unclear. Therefore, we examined the impact of DPP-4 inhibition on mortality in hospitalized HF patients using propensity score analyses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed observational study analysed by propensity score method with 962 hospitalized HF patients. Of these patients, 293 (30.5%) had DM, and 122 of these DM patients were treated with DPP-4 inhibitors. Propensity scores for treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors were estimated for each patient by logistic regression with clinically relevant baseline variables. The propensity-matched 1:1 cohorts were assessed based on propensity scores (DPP-4 inhibitors, n = 83, and non-DPP-4 inhibitors, n = 83). Kaplan-Meier analysis in the propensity score-matched cohort demonstrated that cardiac and all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DPP-4 inhibitor group than in the non-DPP-4 inhibitor group (cardiac mortality: 4.8% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.015; all-cause mortality: 14.5% vs. 41.0%, P = 0.003, by a log-rank test). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, after adjusting for other potential confounding factors, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (pre-matched cohort: hazard ratio 0.467, P = 0.010; post-matched cohort: hazard ratio 0.370, P = 0.003) in HF patients with DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors may improve cardiac and all-cause mortality in hospitalized HF patients with DM.