A 79-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation and new onset of heart failure

Left Atrial Thrombus-Are All Atria and Appendages Equal?

Although the left atrial appendage (LAA) seems useless, it has several critical functions that are not fully known yet, such as the causes for being the main origin of cardioembolic stroke. Difficulties arise due to the extreme range of LAA morphologic variability, making the definition of normality challenging and hampering the stratification of thrombotic risk. Furthermore, obtaining quantitative metrics of its anatomy and function from patient data is not straightforward. A multimodality imaging approach, using advanced computational tools for their analysis, allows a complete characterization of the LAA to individualize medical decisions related to left atrial thrombosis patients.

Patients With Larger Left Atrial Appendage Orifice Presented Worse Prognosis Contributed by Acute Heart Failure After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) could prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, LAAC may impair the compliance of the left atrium and result in poor prognosis. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the prognosis of LAAC among patients with different sizes of LAA orifice.

Methods and Results

Three hundred two consecutive patients who underwent successful LAAC were included and divided into 4 groups based on LAA orifice size that was measured using transesophageal echocardiography. Clinical outcomes including thromboembolic events, major cardiocerebrovascular adverse events, and acute heart failure (AHF) were compared among 4 quartile groups and between propensity‐score matched groups of large and small LAAs. Through follow‐up of 39.6±8.4 months, survival of thromboembolic events was similar. Survival of major cardiocerebrovascular adverse events was significantly lower in the group with the largest LAA orifice (log‐rank P <0.001), including a higher incidence of AHF with New York Heart Association class III to IV (21.4%, log‐rank P =0.009). A large LAA orifice (by cutoff) could predict major cardiocerebrovascular adverse events (hazard ratio, 3.749 [95% CI, 2.074–6.779]) in most patients, except for subgroups of those aged <65 years, with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and/or with failed rhythm/rate control. Further compared with a propensity‐score matched small‐LAA group, the large‐LAA orifice group still presented worse survival of AHF with New York Heart Association class III to IV (log‐rank P =0.010).

Conclusions

Patients with a larger LAA orifice presented a worse prognosis after LAAC, including a higher incidence of AHF. A large LAA orifice could predict a post‐LAAC AHF event in most patients, except for young patients, patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and/or with failed rhythm/rate control.

Registration

URL: clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04185142.

Left Atrial Thrombus-Are All Atria and Appendages Equal?

Although the left atrial appendage (LAA) seems useless, it has several critical functions that are not fully known yet, such as the causes for being the main origin of cardioembolic stroke. Difficulties arise due to the extreme range of LAA morphologic variability, making the definition of normality challenging and hampering the stratification of thrombotic risk. Furthermore, obtaining quantitative metrics of its anatomy and function from patient data is not straightforward. A multimodality imaging approach, using advanced computational tools for their analysis, allows a complete characterization of the LAA to individualize medical decisions related to left atrial thrombosis patients.

Predictors of Subsequent Heart Failure After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) plays an important role in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, LAAO may interact unfavorably with left atrial (LA) compliance and reservoir function and thus increase the risk of heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of subsequent HF after successful LAAO.Methods and Results:A total of 98 patients (mean age 70±9 years, 68% male) who had undergone LAAO were included. The primary endpoint was unexpected HF admission after LAAO. During a mean period of 36±26 months, 16 of the 98 patients (16%) experienced hospital HF admission. In multivariate analysis, higher E/e' (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.20, P=0.014), higher left ventricular mass index (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P=0.023), history of HF (HR 4.78, 95% CI 1.55-14.7, P=0.006), and lower LA strain (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.93, P=0.003) were independently associated with hospital HF admission. Patients with LAAO had a significantly higher incidence of subsequent HF than the control group after propensity score matching (P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

LAAO increases the occurrence of HF, and it is not uncommon after successful LAAO. A previous history of HF, left ventricular mass index, E/e', and abnormal LA strain are independently associated with the development of HF. These parameters should be considered before attempting LAAO.

Morphology of the Left Atrial Appendage: Introduction of a New Simplified Shape-Based Classification System

BACKGROUND

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a heart structure with known prothrombogenic and pro-arrhythmogenic properties.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the specific anatomy of the LAA and to create a simple classification system based on the shape of its body.

METHOD AND RESULTS

This study investigated 200 randomly selected autopsied human hearts (25.0% females, 46.6±19.1 years old). Three (3) types of LAAs were distinguished: the cauliflower type (no bend, limited overall length, compact structure [36.5%]); the chicken wing type (substantial bend in the dominant lobe [37.5%]), and the arrowhead type (no bend, one dominant lobe of substantial length [26.0%]). Additional accessory lobes were present in 55.5% of all LAAs. Significant variations between category types were noted in LAA length (chicken wing: 35.7±9.8 mm, arrowhead: 30.8±10.1 mm, cauliflower: 22.3±9.6 mm [p<0.001]) and in the thickness of pectinate muscles located within the LAA apex (arrowhead: 1.2±0.7 mm; cauliflower: 1.1±0.6 mm; chicken wing: 0.9±0.6 mm [p<0.001]). Left atrial appendage volume and orifice size were not affected by the type of LAA shape. The age of the donor was positively correlated with LAA volume (r=0.29, p=0.005), body length (r=0.26, p=0.012), and area of the orifice (r=0.36, p<0.001). Donors with an oval LAA orifice were significantly older than those with round orifices (50.2±16.6 vs 43.7±20.4 years [p=0.014]) and had significantly heavier hearts (458.2±104.8 vs 409.6±114.1g [p=0.002]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study delivered a new simple classification system of the LAA based on its body shape. An increase in age and heart weight was associated with LAA enlargement and a more oval-shaped orifice. Results of current study may help to estimate the different thrombogenic properties associated with each LAA type and be an assistance during planning and performing interventions on LAA.

A 79-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation and new onset of heart failure

As an alternative to oral anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an increasingly performed procedure to prevent arterial embolism in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. Besides procedure‐related complications, residual leaks, device‐related thrombus formation, and dislocation of the LAA occluder have been observed during follow‐up. Heart failure as a consequence of interventional LAA closure has not been reported so far. This case report describes a 79‐year‐old lady with permanent non‐valvular atrial fibrillation presenting with New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure. Symptoms had started immediately after attempted LAA closure 11 months before. Transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated two devices in the LAA, a large peri‐device leak, a mobile LAA thrombus, a right atrial appendage thrombus, and shunting via a patent foramen ovale. Under a maximally tolerated dose of heart failure medication and edoxaban, the patient remains without bleeding or embolism in New York Heart Association Class II. Because of its unique anatomical and endocrine properties, the LAA plays an important role in situations of pressure and volume overload. Interventional LAA closure interacts unfavourably with left atrial compliance and reservoir function. Atrial and brain natriuretic peptide secretion is known to be significantly reduced after LAA closure. Both mechanisms may result in the development of heart failure. Attempted LAA closure—instead of being the solution—may create new serious problems. Development of heart failure should be assessed, and a systematic search for late leaks after LAA closure should be performed in trials investigating safety and efficacy of this intervention.