Inequalities in heart failure care in a tax-financed universal healthcare system: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Educational status affects prognosis of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A post-hoc analysis from the WARCEF trial

AIMS

The influence of social determinants of health (SDOH) on the prognosis of Heart Failure and reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) is increasingly reported. We aim to evaluate the contribution of educational status on outcomes in patients with HFrEF.

METHODS

We used data from the WARCEF trial, which randomized HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm to receive Warfarin or Aspirin; educational status of patients enrolled was collected at baseline. We defined three levels of education: low, medium and high level, according to the highest qualification achieved or highest school grade attended. We analysed the impact of the educational status on the risk of the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH); components of the primary outcome were also analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

2295 patients were included in this analysis; of these, 992 (43.2%) had a low educational level, 947 (41.3%) had a medium education level and the remaining 356 (15.5%) showed a high educational level. Compared to patients with high educational level, those with low educational status showed a high risk of the primary composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.31, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.02-1.69); a non-statistically significant association was observed in those with medium educational level (aHR: 1.20, 95%CI: .93-1.55). Similar results were observed for all-cause death, while no statistically significant differences were observed for IS or ICH.

CONCLUSION

Compared to patients with high educational levels, those with low educational status had worse prognosis. SDOH should be considered in patients with HFrEF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00041938.

Association of neighbourhood-level material deprivation with adverse outcomes and processes of care among patients with heart failure in a single-payer healthcare system: A population-based cohort study

AIM

We studied the association between neighbourhood material deprivation, a metric estimating inability to attain basic material needs, with outcomes and processes of care among incident heart failure patients in a universal healthcare system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a population-based retrospective study (2007-2019), we examined the association of material deprivation with 1-year all-cause mortality, cause-specific hospitalization, and 90-day processes of care. Using cause-specific hazards regression, we quantified the relative rate of events after multiple covariate adjustment, stratifying by age ≤65 or ≥66 years. Among 395 763 patients (median age 76 [interquartile range 66-84] years, 47% women), there was significant interaction between age and deprivation quintile for mortality/hospitalization outcomes (p ≤ 0.001). Younger residents (age ≤65 years) of the most versus least deprived neighbourhoods had higher hazards of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.29]) and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.29 [95% CI 1.19-1.39]). Older individuals (≥66 years) in the most deprived neighbourhoods had significantly higher hazard of death (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.08-1.14]) and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.13 [95% CI 1.09-1.18]) compared to the least deprived. The magnitude of the association between deprivation and outcomes was amplified in the younger compared to the older age group. More deprived individuals in both age groups had a lower hazard of cardiology visits and advanced cardiac imaging (all p < 0.001), while the most deprived of younger ages were less likely to undergo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker implantation (p = 0.023), compared to the least deprived.

CONCLUSION

Patients with newly-diagnosed heart failure residing in the most deprived neighbourhoods had worse outcomes and reduced access to care than those less deprived.

Long-Term Medical Treatment and Adherence in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

The use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in treating advanced heart failure has increased. However, data regarding medical treatment and adherence following LVAD implantation is sparse, particularly whether socioeconomic factors (cohabitation status, educational level, employment status, and income) and multimorbidity influence these aspects, which are known to impact adherence in heart failure patients. We performed a nationwide cohort study of 119 patients with LVAD implanted between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018, who were discharged alive with LVAD therapy. We linked individual-level data from clinical LVAD databases, the Scandiatransplant Database, and Danish medical and administrative registers. Medical treatment 90-day pre-LVAD and 720-day post-LVAD were assessed using descriptive statistics in 90-day intervals. Medication adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) was assessed 181- to 720-day post-LVAD. The proportions of patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (88.7%), beta-blockers (67.0%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (62.9%), warfarin (87.6%), and aspirin (55.7%) within 90-day post-LVAD were higher than pre-LVAD and were stable during follow-up. Medication adherence ranged from 86.7% (aspirin) to 97.8% (warfarin). Socioeconomic factors and multimorbidity did not influence medical medication use and adherence. Among LVAD patients, medical treatment and adherence are at high levels, regardless of socioeconomic background and multimorbidity.

Social determinants of health and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

We examined the associations between family income and educational attainment with incident atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular (CV) death among patients with newly-diagnosed heart failure (HF).

METHODS

In a nationwide Danish registry of HF patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2018, we established a cohort for each outcome. When examining AF, MI and stroke, respectively, patients with a history of these outcomes at diagnosis of HF were excluded. We used cause-specific proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios for tertile groups of family income and three levels of educational attainment.

RESULTS

Among 27,947 AF-free patients, we found no association between income or education and incident AF. Among 27,309 MI-free patients, we found that lower income (hazard ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.11-1.48] and 1.11 [0.96-1.28] for lower and medium vs. higher income) and education (1.23 [1.04-1.45] and 1.15 [0.97-1.36] for lower and medium vs. higher education) were associated with MI. Among 36,801 stroke-free patients, lower income was associated with stroke (1.38 [1.23-1.56] and 1.27 [1.12-1.44] for lower and medium vs. higher income) but not education. Lower income (1.56 [1.46-1.67] and 1.32 [1.23-1.42] for lower and medium vs. higher income) and education (1.20 [1.11-1.29] and 1.07 [0.99-1.15] for lower and medium vs. higher education) were associated with CV death.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with newly-diagnosed HF, lower family income was associated with higher rates of acute MI, stroke and cardiovascular death. Lower educational attainment was associated with higher rates of acute MI and cardiovascular death. There was no evidence of associations between income and education with incident AF.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Mortality and Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The ARIC Study

Background

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). The contribution of individual and neighborhood SES to the prognosis and quality of care for HF with reduced ejection fraction is not clear yet has important implications.

Methods and Results

We examined 728 participants of the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study (mean age, 78.2 years; 34% Black participants; 46% women) hospitalized with HF with reduced ejection fraction (ejection fraction <50%) between 2005 and 2018. We assessed associations between education, income, and area deprivation index with mortality and HF readmission using multivariable Cox models. We also evaluated the use of guideline‐directed medical therapy (optimal: ≥3 of ß‐blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers; acceptable: at least 2) at discharge. During a median follow‐up of 3.2 years, 58.7% were readmitted with HF, and 74.0% died. Low income was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.14–2.04]) and readmission (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.04–2.03]). Similarly, low education was associated with mortality (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.01–1.59]) and readmission (HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.24–2.12]). The highest versus lowest area deprivation index quartile was associated with readmission (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.11–2.58]) but not necessarily with mortality. The prevalence of optimal guideline‐directed medical therapy and acceptable guideline‐directed medical therapy was 5.5% and 54.4%, respectively, but did not significantly differ by SES.

Conclusions

Among patients hospitalized with HF with reduced ejection fraction, low SES was independently associated with mortality and HF readmission. A targeted secondary prevention approach that focuses intensive efforts on patients with low SES will be necessary to improve outcomes of those with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

Social Inequalities in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathies

Heart failure (HF) has various characteristics, such as etiology, clinical course, and clinical characteristics. Several studies reported the clinical findings of the characteristics of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. There have been issues with genetic, biochemical, or pathophysiological problems. Some studies have been conducted on non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and social factors, for instance, racial disparities in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) or the social setting of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, there have been insufficient materials to consider the relationship between social factors and clinical course in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. There were various methodologies in therapeutic interventions, such as pharmacological, surgical, or rehabilitational, and educational issues. However, interventions that could be closely associated with social inequality have not been sufficiently elucidated. We will summarize the effects of social equality, which could have a large impact on the development and progression of HF in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.

Variability in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in Patients with Heart Failure According to Gender and Socioeconomic Status

Background: Despite considerable evidence concerning heart failure (HF) risk factors, there is scarce information about the effect and degree of control regarding socioeconomic and gender inequalities. Methods: Cohort study including HF patients >40 years of age attended in 53 primary health care centers in Barcelona (Spain). Socioeconomic status (SES) was determined by an aggregated deprivation index (MEDEA) according to the neighborhood of residence. Logistic multivariable regression was performed to analyze differences in cardiovascular risk factor control, stratifying by SES and sex. Results: A total of 8235 HF patients were included. Mean age was 78.1 (standard deviation 10.2) years, and 56.0% were women. The most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors were hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Blood pressure was the worst controlled factor in both genders with the lowest SES (odds ratio [OR] 0.56 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.71) and (OR 0.52, 0.46-0.71), respectively. In women, a social gradient was observed for glycemic and body mass index control, which were worse in the most unfavorable socioeconomic position (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.77), and (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32-0.64), respectively. Men presented worse control of blood pressure (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.71) and smoking habit (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.90) in the most deprived socioeconomic bracket. Conclusions: Patients with HF in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic levels presented the worst degree of control for cardiovascular risk factors, and this negative effect was stronger in women.

Outcomes in patients with chronic leg wounds in Denmark: A nationwide register-based cohort study

This study aimed to investigate incidence and predictors of wound healing, relapse, major amputation, and/or death among patients with chronic leg wounds who were referred to specialist treatment at hospital for their condition. A nationwide register-based cohort study design was applied with 5 years of follow-up. All patients with diagnoses of chronic leg wounds in Denmark between 2007 and 2012 were included (n = 8394). Clinical, social, and demographic individual-level linked data from several Danish national registries were retrieved. Incidence rate per 1000 person-years (PY) was calculated. Predictors were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Incidence rates of having a healed wound was 236 per 1000 PY. For relapse, the incidence rate was 75 per 1000 PY, for amputation 16 per 1000 PY, and for death 100 per 1000 PY. Diabetes, peripheral arteria disease, or other comorbidities were associated with decreased chance of wound healing and increased risk of relapse, major amputation, and death. Regional differences in all four outcomes were detected. Basic or vocational education independently predicted risk of amputation and death. This study provides epidemiological data that may help identify patients at particular risk of poor outcomes. It also elucidates social inequality in outcomes.

Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Associated Factors Among Older Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome at Hospital Discharge in Beijing, China

Purpose

Medication therapy is crucial in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) contributes to poor outcomes in older patients, making it a major public health concern. However, few studies are available on PIMs use in older Chinese CCS patients. To investigate the frequency of prescribed PIMs at discharge and explore risk factors in older adults with CCS.

Patients and Methods

The cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in China over three months, from 1st October to 31st December, 2019. CCS patients aged over 60 years who were discharged alive were recruited. Information on demographics and medications at discharge was collected. Clinical data including diagnoses, frailty status, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) were evaluated in each patient. PIMs were identified using the 2019 Beers criteria. Binary logistic regression was performed to recognize variables related to PIMs.

Results

A total of 447 eligible patients with 2947 medications were included. The prevalence of PIMs use was 38%. Medications to be avoided, to be used with caution, and with drug–drug interactions were 38.4%, 48.9% and 12.7% of the PIMs, respectively. Medications with drug–disease/syndrome interactions and those adjusted for kidney function were not identified. The common PIMs were diuretics (37.1%), benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics (15.2%), glimepiride (13.1%), and co-prescription of potassium-sparing diuretics and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (9.7%). Individuals with frailty syndrome, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities, atrial fibrillation, psychiatric disorders and greater NYHA class severity were more likely to receive PIMs.

Conclusion

Prescription of PIMs was a common burden in older adults. A CCS multidisciplinary team is needed to control PIMs, especially in vulnerable older patients.

Self-care perception and behaviour in patients with heart failure: A qualitative and quantitative study

Background and objective

Self‐care strategies in heart failure (HF) are effective for disease management, yet adherence in many patients is inadequate. Reasons are presumably multifactorial but remain insufficiently investigated; thus, we aimed to analyse self‐care adherence and associated factors in outpatients with HF.

Methods and results

To measure self‐care levels and explore barriers and facilitators to self‐care adherence in patients with HF, quantitative study using the European Self‐Care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS‐9) (n = 80; NYHA II–III, mean age 72 ± 10 years, 58% male) and qualitative study using semi‐structured interviews (n = 32; NYHA II–III, mean age 73 ± 11, 63% male) were conducted. We detected lowest adherence to regular exercise (39%) and contacts with healthcare provider in case of worsening symptoms (47%), whereas adherence was highest for regular medication taking (94%). Using the EHFScBS‐9 standardized cut‐off score ≤ 70, 51% of patients reported inadequate self‐care. Binary logistic regression analysis showed significant influence of education (OR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.103–0.959) and perceived control (OR = 1.236, 95% CI: 1.043–1.465) on self‐care adequacy. According to the situation‐specific theory of HF self‐care, most commonly reported factors affecting the process of self‐care were knowledge about HF self‐care behaviours (84%), experience with healthcare professionals (84%), beliefs about their expertise (69%) and habits related to medication taking (72%). Among values, working responsibilities (53%) and maintenance of traditions (31%) appeared as the most prevalent socially based values affecting motivation for self‐care. Situational characteristics related to the person (self‐confidence, 53%; adaptive coping strategies, 88%), problem (burdensome breathing difficulties, 56%; co‐morbidities, 81%) and environment (practical support from family/caregivers, 59%; financial difficulties, 50%) were also commonly reported.

Conclusions

Various factors, including health‐related beliefs, habits and socially based values, need to be taken into account when planning self‐care interventions in patients with HF. A patient tailored approach should be based on adequate patient evaluation, taking into consideration the particular personal and social context.

Inequalities in heart failure care in a tax-financed universal healthcare system: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Aims

Data on socioeconomic‐related differences in heart failure (HF) care are sparse. Inequality in care may potentially contribute to a poor clinical outcome. We examined socioeconomic‐related differences in quality of HF care among patients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF).

Methods and results

We conducted a nationwide population‐based cohort study among patients with HFrEF (EF ≤40%) registered from January 2008 to October 2015 in the Danish Heart Failure Registry, a nationwide registry of patients with a first‐time primary HF diagnosis. Associations between individual‐level socioeconomic factors (cohabitation status, education, and family income) and the quality of HF care defined by six guideline‐recommended process performance measures [New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, treatment with angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta‐blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, exercise training, and patient education] were assessed using multiple imputation and multivariable logistic regression controlling for potential confounders. Among 17 122 HFrEF patients included, 15 290 patients had data on all six process performance measures. Living alone was associated with lower odds of NYHA classification [adjusted OR (aOR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–0.90], prescription of ACEI/ARB (aOR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68–0.88) and beta‐blockers (aOR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76–0.93), referral to exercise training (aOR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.69–0.81), and patient education (aOR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.67–0.80). Compared with high‐level education, low‐level education was associated with lower odds of NYHA classification (aOR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79–1.11), treatment with ACEI/ARB (aOR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81–1.20) and beta‐blockers (aOR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79–1.09), referral to exercise training (aOR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65–0.82), and patient education (aOR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75–0.98). An income in the lowest tertile was associated with lower odds of NYHA classification (aOR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58–0.79), prescription of ACEI/ARB (aOR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67–0.95) and beta‐blockers (aOR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86–1.01), referral to exercise training (aOR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.53–0.64), and patient education (aOR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59–0.74) compared with an income in the highest tertile. Overall, no systematic differences were seen when the analyses were stratified by sex and age groups.

Conclusions

Living alone, low‐level education, and income in the lowest tertile were associated with reduced use of recommended processes of HF care among Danish HFrEF patients with a first‐time primary HF diagnosis. Efforts are warranted to ensure guideline‐recommended HF care to all HFrEF patients, irrespective of socioeconomic background.