Optimal timing of echocardiography for heart failure inpatients in Japanese institutions: OPTIMAL Study

Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation From a Population-Based Chronic Heart Failure Registry in Japan - Insights From the KUNIUMI Registry Chronic Cohort

BACKGROUND

Although tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is no longer considered a negligible disease, its detailed status in real-world heart failure (HF) patients remains unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the KUNIUMI registry, we evaluated data for 1,646 consecutive HF patients. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality over a median follow-up period of 3.0 years (interquartile range 1.4-3.0 years). Of the 1,646 HF patients, 369 (22.4%) had moderate or greater TR; the mean (±SD) age of these patients was 82.0±8.5 years. Atrial functional TR was the most common etiology of TR in HF patients with moderate or greater TR (70.7%), and was more common in HF patients with severe than moderate TR (75.5% vs. 65.3%; P=0.032). The mortality rate was high in HF patients with severe and moderate TR (27.1% and 17.0%, respectively). During follow-up, 33.1% of HF patients with moderate TR progressed to severe TR, and showed unfavorable all-cause mortality compared with those with unchanged TR. Atrial functional TR was a more common etiology in HF patients with moderate TR and worsened TR than in those with unchanged TR (84.6% vs. 59.5%; P=0.004). Right atrial enlargement was independently correlated with worsened TR.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate or greater TR was prevalent in 22.4% of the real-world super-aged HF population. Even HF patients with moderate TR had poor outcomes, with right atrial remodeling a key factor for worsened TR.

Prognostic value of left atrial reverse remodelling in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure

AIMS

Left atrial (LA) volume index (LAVI) in chronic heart failure (HF) predicts cardiovascular outcomes. However, the association between LAVI reduction during acute decompensated HF (ADHF) and its prognostic potential is limited. We hypothesized that LA reverse remodelling (LARR) after ADHF therapy would be associated with better clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed clinical outcomes and the LAVI reduction rate of 363 out of 861 patients hospitalized for ADHF who underwent two-point echocardiography at admission and discharge between January 2015 and December 2019. The mean age was 74.3 ± 13.6 years, and the mean ejection fraction (EF) was 38.9 ± 15.2%. The follow-up echocardiogram was performed 13.0 [9.5, 20] days after admission. As the median LAVI reduction rate was 7.02%, the LARR was defined as an LAVI reduction rate >7%.

RESULTS

During the 34.0 ± 20.2 months of follow-up, 117 patients (32.2%) reached the primary endpoint defined as cardiovascular death and rehospitalization for ADHF. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with LARR had a better prognosis. Multivariate analysis indicated that LARR was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Similar findings were observed in the subgroup analyses of patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation and those with non-HF with reduced EF. Among patients who were brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) responders, defined as a relative reduction of >70% in BNP from admission to discharge, non-LARR was observed in 41.6%. BNP responders without LARR experienced worse prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

LARR in the early vulnerable phase after hospitalization for ADHF was associated with better long-term clinical outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of outpatient adherence to recommendations for monitoring of patients hospitalized for heart failure

AIMS

A set of indicators to assess the quality of care for patients hospitalized for heart failure was developed by an expert working group of the Italian Health Ministry. Because a better performance profile measured using these indicators does not necessarily translate to better outcomes, a study to validate these indicators through their relationship with measurable clinical outcomes and healthcare costs supported by the Italian National Health System was carried out.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Residents of four Italian regions (Lombardy, Marche, Lazio, and Sicily) who were newly hospitalized for heart failure (irrespective of stage and New York Heart Association class) during 2014-2015 entered in the cohort and followed up until 2019. Adherence to evidence-based recommendations [i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and echocardiograms (ECCs)] experienced during the first year after index discharge was assessed. Composite clinical outcomes (cardiovascular hospital admissions and all-cause mortality) and healthcare costs (hospitalizations, drugs, and outpatient services) were assessed during the follow-up. The restricted mean survival time at 5 years (denoted as the number of months free from clinical outcomes), the hazard of clinical outcomes (according to the Cox model), and average annual healthcare cost (expressed in euros per person-year) were compared between adherent and non-adherent patients. A non-parametric bootstrap method based on 1000 resamples was used to account for uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates. A total of 41 406 patients were included in this study (46.3% males, mean age 76.9 ± 9.4 years). Adherence to RAS inhibitors, beta-blockers, MRAs, and ECCs were 64%, 57%, 62%, and 20% among the cohort members, respectively. Compared with non-adherent patients, those who adhered to ECCs, RAS inhibitors, beta-blockers, and MRAs experienced (i) a delay in the composite outcome of 1.6, 1.9, 1.6, and 0.6 months and reduced risks of 9% (95% confidence interval, 2-14%), 11% (7-14%), 8% (5-11%), and 4% (-1-8%), respectively; and (ii) lower (€262, €92, and €571 per year for RAS inhibitors, beta-blockers, and MRAs, respectively) and higher costs (€511 per year for ECC). Adherence to RAS inhibitors, beta-blockers, and MRAs showed a delay in the composite outcome and a saving of costs in 98%, 84%, and 93% of the 1000 bootstrap replications, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Strict monitoring of patients with heart failure through regular clinical examinations and drug therapies should be considered the cornerstone of national guidelines and audits.

Importance of Optimized Guideline-Based Therapy for Preventing Rehospitalization of Chronic Heart Failure Patients - From the KUNIUMI Acute Cohort

Background: Because the effectiveness of strengthening guideline-based therapy (GBT) to prevent heart failure (HF) rehospitalization of chronic HF patients remains unclear, this study investigated the characteristics of HF patients in the Kobe University Heart Failure Registry in Awaji Medical Center (KUNIUMI) acute cohort. Methods and Results: We studied 254 rehospitalized HF patients from the KUNIUMI Registry. Optimized GBT was defined as a Class I or IIa recommendation for chronic HF based on the guidelines of the Japanese Circulation Society. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or first HF rehospitalization after discharge. Outcomes tended to be more favorable for patients who had rather than had not received optimized GBT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.19; P=0.27). Similarly, among New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV patients, outcomes tended to be more favorable for those who had rather than had not undergone optimized GBT (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.47-1.12; P=0.15). Importantly, outcomes were significantly more favorable among NYHA Class IV patients aged <79 years who had rather than had not undergone optimized GBT (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.14-0.82; P=0.02). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that optimized GBT was the only independent factor for the prediction of the primary endpoint. Conclusions: Optimized GBT can be expected to play an important role as the next move for chronic HF patients.

Optimal timing of echocardiography for heart failure inpatients in Japanese institutions: OPTIMAL Study

AIMS

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (HF) provided by the European Society of Cardiology state that echocardiography is recommended for the assessment of the myocardial structure and function of subjects with suspected HF including HF with reduced (HFrEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as class I of recommendation and level C of evidence. However, the impact of timing of echocardiography on survival for hospitalized HF patients or the prevalence of echocardiography during their stay has not yet been fully investigated. Therefore, we designed and conducted a prospective multicentre study, Optimal Timing of Echocardiography for Heart Failure Inpatients in Japanese Institutions (OPTIMAL) study, to investigate and evaluate the prevalence of echocardiography during the in-hospital stay of HF patients, and the impact of timing of echocardiography on their survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

OPTIMAL was based on a nationwide, prospective, multicentre registry at 10 institutions in Japan endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. A total of 601 patients hospitalized with HF were enrolled between August 2016 and July 2018 at the participating centres. Their mean age was 73.9 ± 13.0 years, left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.0% (26.0-50.0), and 256 patients (42.6%) were female. Admission echocardiography (admission echo) was categorized as either standard or point-of-care echocardiography performed within 3 days of admission, as was pre-discharge echocardiography (pre-discharge echo) within 3 days of discharge. The primary endpoint was defined as cardiovascular death over a median follow-up period of 18.9 months (9.3-26.5 months). Admission echo was performed for 476 patients (79.2%) and pre-discharge echo for 216 patients (35.9%). The primary endpoint of cardiovascular death occurred in 65 patients (10.8%). Kaplan-Meier curve findings indicated that survival of patients with pre-discharge echo was significantly better than that of patients without it (log-rank P < 0.001), and the same findings were obtained for patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF. However, survival of patients with and without admission echo was similar (log-rank P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

This OPTIMAL study prospectively showed the importance of pre-discharge echo for hospitalized HF patients. Careful attention is needed regarding the haemodynamic status of HF patients by administering pre-discharge echo to avoid HF re-hospitalization after discharge, and pre-discharge echo may provide additional information for deciding the appropriate discharge time. Our findings may thus offer a new insight into the management of hospitalized HF patients.