Long-term variability of blood pressure and incidence of heart failure among individuals with Type 2 diabetes

Importance of anemia in heart failure over blood pressure variability

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of arteriosclerosis (vascular function) is important when treating heart failure (HF). Vascular dysfunction is associated with anemia through renal function and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Additionally, blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) caused by vascular dysfunction is also associated with HF prognosis. However, how anemia and BPV may affect HF prognosis is unclear.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and July 2018, 214 patients with HF were hospitalized. The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as an index of arteriosclerosis of these patients was measured. The patients were divided into the elevated and preserved CAVI groups. We investigated the factors related to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as cardiovascular death or rehospitalization within 1 year after discharge.

RESULTS

In the elevated CAVI group, significant differences in body mass index (BMI), BPV, left ventricular dimension, and hemoglobin levels were observed between patients with and without MACEs. In the preserved CAVI group, significant differences in BMI, diastolic/mean BP, and hemoglobin levels were observed between those with and without MACEs. The multivariate analysis showed an independent association between hemoglobin levels and MACE occurrence in both the elevated and preserved CAVI groups (elevated CAVI group: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.800, p = .045 [model 1], HR = 0.802, p = .035 [model 2]; preserved CAVI group: HR = 0.783, p = .049 [model 1], HR = 0.752, p = .023 [model 2], and HR = 0.754, p = .024 [model 3]).

CONCLUSIONS

Anemia was independently associated with HF prognosis with or without arteriosclerosis.

Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of epidemiological data on the association between long-term variability of blood pressure (BP) and incident atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of BP variability with incident AF in a large sample of adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We included participants who had ≥5 BP measurements in the first 24 months of action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes. The visit-to-visit variability of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was estimated using the coefficient of variation, SD, and variability independent of the mean. Incident AF was recorded using follow-up electrocardiograms. Modified Poisson regression was used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CI for AF.

RESULTS

A total of 8,399 participants were included (average age 62.6 ± 6.5 years, 38.8% women, 63.2% White). Over a median follow-up of 5 years, 155 developed AF. Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest quartile of BP variability was associated with an increased risk of AF (RR: 1.85 [95% CI: 1.13-3.03] and 1.63 [95% CI: 1.01-2.65] for coefficient of variation of SBP and DBP, respectively). Participants in the highest quartile of both SBP and DBP had a 2-fold higher risk of AF compared to those in the lowest 3 quartiles of both SBP and DBP (RR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.29-2.93).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of adults with type 2 diabetes, higher variability in SBP and DBP was independently associated with an increased risk of AF.

Blood Pressure Variability in Clinical Practice: Past, Present and the Future

Recent advances in wearable technology through convenient and cuffless systems will enable continuous, noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and heart rhythm on both longitudinal 24-hour measurement scales and high-frequency beat-to-beat BP variability and synchronous heart rate variability and changes in underlying heart rhythm. Clinically, BP variability is classified into 4 main types on the basis of the duration of monitoring time: very-short-term (beat to beat), short-term (within 24 hours), medium-term (within days), and long-term (over months and years). BP variability is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, cognitive decline, and mental illness. The diagnostic and therapeutic value of measuring and controlling BP variability may offer critical targets in addition to lowering mean BP in hypertensive populations.

The Effect of Blood Pressure Variability on Coronary Atherosclerosis Plaques

Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). The regulation of blood pressure plays a significant role in the development and prognosis of CHD. Blood pressure variability (BPV) refers to the degree of fluctuation of blood pressure over a period of time and is an important indicator of blood pressure stability. Blood pressure fluctuations are complex physiological phenomena, being affected by physiological and pharmacological effects and regulated by behavioral, environmental, hydrodynamic, and neural factors. According to the different time periods for measuring BPV, it can be divided into very short-term, short-term, mid-term, and long-term. Multiple cardiovascular disease animal models and clinical experiments have consistently indicated that abnormal BPV is closely related to coronary events and is a risk factor for CHD independently of average blood pressure. Thrombosis secondary to plaque rupture (PR) or plaque erosion can cause varying blood flow impairment, which is the main pathological basis of CHD. Plaque morphology and composition can influence the clinical outcome, treatment, and prognosis of patients with CHD. Research has shown that PR is more easily induced by hypertension. After adjusting for the traditional factors associated with plaque development, in recent years, some new discoveries have been made on the influence of abnormal BPV on the morphology and composition of coronary plaques and related mechanisms, including inflammation and hemodynamics. This article reviews the impact of BPV on coronary plaques and their related mechanisms, with a view to prevent the occurrence and development of CHD by controlling BPV and to provide new prevention and treatment strategies for the clinical treatment of abnormal blood pressure.

Variability of adiposity indices and incident heart failure among adults with type 2 diabetes

Background

It remains unclear how the variability of adiposity indices relates to incident HF. This study evaluated the associations of the variability in several adiposity indices with incident heart failure (HF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

We included 4073 participants from the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study. We assessed variability of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and body weight across four annual visits using three variability metrics, the variability independent of the mean (VIM), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraindividual standard deviation (SD). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to generate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incident HF.

Results

Over a median of 6.7 years, 120 participants developed incident HF. After adjusting for relevant confounders including baseline adiposity levels, the aHR for the highest (Q4) versus lowest quartile (Q1) of VIM of BMI was 3.61 (95% CI 1.91–6.80). The corresponding aHRs for CV and SD of BMI were 2.48 (95% CI 1.36–4.53) and 2.88 (1.52–5.46), respectively. Regarding WC variability, the equivalent aHRs were 1.90 (95% CI 1.11–3.26), 1.79 (95% CI 1.07–3.01), and 1.73 (1.01–2.95) for Q4 versus Q1 of VIM, CV and SD of WC, respectively.

Conclusions

In a large sample of adults with T2DM, a greater variability of adiposity indices was associated with higher risks of incident HF, independently of traditional risk factors and baseline adiposity levels.

Registration-URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00000620.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-021-01440-1.

Long-term variability of blood pressure and incidence of heart failure among individuals with Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Data on the association of long-term variability of blood pressure (BP) with incident heart failure (HF) in individuals with Type 2 diabetes are scarce. We evaluated this association in a large community-based sample of adults with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 4200 participants with Type 2 diabetes who had available BP measurements at four visits (baseline and 12, 24, and 36 months) in the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study were included. Variability of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) across the four visits was assessed using four metrics. Participants free of HF during the first 36 months were followed for HF events. Cox regression was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HF. Of the 4200 participants, the average age was 59 years [standard deviation (SD): 6.8]; 58.5% were women. Over a median follow-up of 6.7 years, 129 developed HF events. After adjusting for relevant confounders, the HR of incident HF for the highest vs. lowest quartile of SD of SBP was 1.77 (95% CI 1.01-3.09); the HR for the highest (vs. lowest) quartile of variability independent of the mean of SBP was 1.29 (95% CI 0.78-2.14). The adjusted HR for participants in the highest (compared with the lowest) quartile of SD of DBP was 1.61 (95% CI 1.01-2.59), and the adjusted HR for variability independent of the mean of DBP was 1.65 (95% CI 1.03-2.65).

CONCLUSIONS

A greater variability in SBP and DBP is independently associated with greater risk of incident HF in individuals with Type 2 diabetes.