Comparison of feasibility and results of frailty assessment methods prior to left ventricular assist device implantation

Pre-operative pectoralis muscle area index is associated with biomarkers of inflammation and endotoxemia and predicts clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pre-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pectoralis muscle assessment, an estimate of sarcopenia, has been associated with postoperative mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding, though its association with inflammation, endotoxemia, length-of-stay (LOS), and readmissions remains underexplored.

METHODS

This was a single-center cohort study of LVAD patients implanted 1/2015-10/2018. Preoperative pectoralis muscle area was measured on chest computed tomography (CT), adjusted for height squared to derive pectoralis muscle area index (PMI). Those with PMI in the lowest quintile were defined as low-PMI cohort; all others constituted the reference cohort. Biomarkers of inflammation (interleukin-6, adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor-α [TNFα]) and endotoxemia (soluble (s)CD14) were measured in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Of the 254 LVAD patients, 95 had a preoperative chest CT (median days pre-LVAD: 7 [IQR 3-13]), of whom 19 (20.0%) were in the low-PMI cohort and the remainder were in the reference cohort. Compared with the reference cohort, the low-PMI cohort had higher levels of sCD14 (2594 vs. 1850 ng/mL; p = 0.04) and TNFα (2.9 vs. 1.9 pg/mL; p = 0.03). In adjusted analyses, the low-PMI cohort had longer LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.56 [95% confidence interval 1.16-2.10], p = 0.004) and higher risk of 90-day and 1-year readmissions (subhazard ratio 5.48 [1.88-16.0], p = 0.002; hazard ratio 1.73 [1.02-2.94]; p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-LVAD PMI is associated with inflammation, endotoxemia, and increased LOS and readmissions.

Durable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation: what to expect along the way?

INTRODUCTION

The scarcity of donors coupled with the improvements in left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) technology has led to the use of LVAD as a bridge to transplantation (BTT).

AREAS COVERED

The authors provide an overview of the current status of LVAD BTT implantation with special focus ranging from patient selection and pre-implantation optimization to post-transplant outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

The United Network for Organ Sharing 2018 policy amendment resulted in a significant reduction in the number of LVADs used for BTT in the US. To overcome this issue, modifications in the US allocation policy to consider factors such as days on device support, age, and type of complications may be necessary to potentially increase implantation rates.

Artificial intelligence-based analysis of body composition predicts outcome in patients receiving long-term mechanical circulatory support

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a known cardiovascular risk factor and associated with higher postoperative complication rates in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In heart failure (HF), conflicting evidence in terms of survival has been reported, whereas sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis. An increasing number of HF patients require left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations. The postoperative mortality has improved in recent years but is still relatively high. The impact of body composition on outcome in this population remains unclear. The aim of this investigation was to examine the preoperative computed tomography (CT) body composition as a predictor of the postoperative outcome in advanced HF patients, who receive LVAD implantations.

METHODS

Preoperative CT scans of 137 patients who received LVADs between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed using an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered automated software tool based on a convolutional neural network, U-net, developed for image segmentation (Visage Version 7.1, Visage Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Assessment of body composition included visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue areas (VAT and SAT), psoas and total abdominal muscle areas and sarcopenia (defined by lumbar skeletal muscle indexes). The body composition parameters were correlated with postoperative major complication rates, survival and postoperative 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 58.21 ± 11.9 years; 122 (89.1%) were male. Most patients had severe HF requiring inotropes (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile I-III, 71.9%) secondary to coronary artery diseases or dilated cardiomyopathy (96.4%). Forty-four (32.1%) patients were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 ), 96 (70.1%) were sarcopene and 19 (13.9%) were sarcopene obese. Adipose tissue was associated with a significantly higher risk of postoperative infections (VAT 172.23 cm2 [54.96, 288.32 cm2 ] vs. 124.04 cm2 [56.57, 186.25 cm2 ], P = 0.022) and in-hospital mortality (VAT 168.11 cm2 [134.19, 285.27 cm2 ] vs. 135.42 cm2 [49.44, 227.91 cm2 ], P = 0.033; SAT 227.28 cm2 [139.38, 304.35 cm2 ] vs. 173.81 cm2 [97.65, 254.16 cm2 ], P = 0.009). Obese patients showed no improvement of 6MWD and QoL within 6 months postoperatively (obese: +0.94 ± 161.44 months, P = 0.982; non-obese: +166.90 ± 139.00 months, P < 0.000; obese: +0.088 ± 0.421, P = 0.376; non-obese: +0.199 ± 0.324, P = 0.002, respectively). Sarcopenia did not influence the postoperative outcome and survival within 1 year after LVAD implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative AI-based CT body composition identifies patients with poor outcome after LVAD implantation. Greater adipose tissue areas are associated with an increased risk for postoperative infections, in-hospital mortality and impaired 6MWD and QoL within 6 months postoperatively.

Bioimpedance Spectroscopy in Heart Transplantation: Posttransplant Changes in Body Composition and Effects in Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Bioimpedance spectroscopy yields measurements of fat-free mass, fat mass, phase angle, and other measures. Bioimpedance spectroscopy has been validated as a preoperative assessment tool in cardiac surgical studies, in which low phase angle predicted morbidity and mortality. No studies have evaluated bioimpedance spectroscopy following heart transplantation.

METHODS

We evaluated body composition, nutrition status (Subjective Global Assessment, body mass index, midarm muscle circumference, and triceps skinfolds), and functional status (handgrip strength and 6-min walk test) in 60 adults. Body composition measurements via a 256-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy device included fat and fat-free mass as well as phase angle calculated at 50 kHz. Testing was completed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo following heart transplantation. Mortality and hospital readmissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Phase angle and fat mass increased while fat-free mass decreased; grip strength and 6-min walk test improved after transplantation (all P <  0.001). Improvement in phase angle in the first month postoperatively was associated with reduced risk of readmission. Low perioperative and 1-mo phase angles were associated with prolonged posttransplant length of stay (median: 13 versus 10 d, P =  0.03), increased infection-related readmissions (40% versus 5%, P =  0.001), and increased 4-y mortality (30% versus 5%, P =  0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Phase angle, grip strength, and 6-min walk test distance improved after heart transplantation. Low phase angle appears to be associated with suboptimal outcomes and may be a feasible and affordable method to predict outcomes. Further research should ascertain whether preoperative phase angle can predict outcomes.

Acute Outflow Graft Occlusion-A Novel Predictable Complication of Lysis Therapy for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Assist Device Intra-Pump Thrombosis

Lysis therapy is an established treatment option for intra-pump thrombosis of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). In clinical routine, we observed repeated cases of acute outflow graft occlusions (OGO) associated with lysis therapy with need for urgent intervention. The aim of this investigation was to gain understanding of this observation. We screened data of 962 HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) patients. One hundred twenty (13.8%) had intra-pump thromboses; 58 were treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA). Mean age was 53.0 ± 11.1 years; 84.9% were male. In 13 (24.5%) patients, OGO occurred following rtPA-lysis. These patients showed an increase in left ventricular function (18.45% ± 12.62% to 27.73% ± 10.57%; p = 0.056), more frequent 1:1 aortic valve opening (OGO+: +36.4%; OGO-: +7.4%; p = 0.026), a decrease in LVAD pulsatility within 12 months prior intra-pump thrombosis (OGO+: -0.8 L/min [interquartile range {IQR}, -1.4 to -0.4 L/min]; OGO-: -0.3 L/min [IQR, -0.9 to 0.1 L/min]; p = 0.038) and lower HVAD flows at admission (OGO+: 6.7 L/min [IQR, 6.1-7.4 L/min]; OGO-: 8.3 L/min [IQR, 6.9-9.3 L/min]; p = 0.013), indicating a subclinical OGO prior intra-pump thrombosis. There were no differences in implantation techniques, blood parameters, and lysis strategy. Subclinical OGO represented a major risk factor for acute OGO following rtPA lysis therapy. We here propose an algorithm for risk stratification and dealing with patients presenting this first-described complication. Further research is required to confirm our results and decipher the underlying pathomechanism. http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/B97.

How to select a patient for LVAD

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation leads to improvement in symptoms and survival in patients with advanced heart failure. An important factor in improving outcomes post-LVAD implantation is optimal preoperative patient selection and optimization. In this review, we highlight the latest on the evaluation of patients with advanced heart failure for LVAD candidacy, including discussion of patient selection, implantation timing, laboratory and other testing considerations, and the importance of psychosocial evaluation. Such thorough evaluation by multidisciplinary team can serve to improve the outcomes of a complex group of patients with advanced heart failure being evaluated for LVAD.

Cardiotoxicity, Cardioprotection, and Prognosis in Survivors of Anticancer Treatment Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Unmet Needs

BACKGROUND

Anticancer treatments are improving the prognosis of patients fighting cancer. However, anticancer treatments may also increase the cardiovascular (CV) risk by increasing metabolic disorders. Atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis related to anticancer treatments may lead to ischemic heart disease (IHD), while direct cardiac toxicity may induce non-ischemic heart disease. Moreover, valvular heart disease (VHD), aortic syndromes (AoS), and advanced heart failure (HF) associated with CV risk factors and preclinical CV disease as well as with chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction may also occur in survivors of anti-carcer treatments.

METHODS

Public electronic libraries have been searched systematically looking at cardiotoxicity, cardioprotection, CV risk and disease, and prognosis after cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments.

RESULTS

CV risk factors and disease may not be infrequent among survivors of anticancer treatments. As cardiotoxicity of established anticancer treatments has been investigated and is frequently irreversible, cardiotoxicity associated with novel treatments appears to be more frequently reversible, but also potentially synergic. Small reports suggest that drugs preventing HF in the general population may be effective also among survivors of anticancer treatments, so that CV risk factors and disease, and chronic inflammation, may lead to indication to cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments. There is a lack of substantial data on whether current risk scores are efficient to predict prognosis after cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments, and to guide tailored decision-making. IHD is the most common condition requiring cardiac surgery among survivors of anticancer treatments. Primary VHD is mostly related to a history of radiation therapy. No specific reports exist on AoS in survivors of anticancer treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear whether interventions to dominate cancer- and anticancer treatment-related metabolic syndromes, chronic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, leading to IHD, nonIHD, VHD, HF, and AoS, are as effective in survivors of anticancer treatments as in the general population. When CV diseases require cardiac surgery, survivors of anticancer treatments may be a population at specifically elevated risk, rather than affected by a specific risk factor.

Muscle strength, aerobic capacity, and exercise tolerance are impaired in left ventricular assist devices recipients: A pilot study

Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly being used as a therapy for advanced heart failure, both as a bridge to heart transplant and, given the rapid advances in the LVAD’s functionality and safety, and constant lack in availability of donor organs, as long-term destination therapy. With the diffusion of such therapy, it is crucial to assess patients’ muscle strength, aerobic capacity and exercise tolerance, to improve their functional capacity.

Methods: 38 LVAD recipients (33 men and five women) were included. Exercise testing including a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), handgrip, isometric and isokinetic strength testing of knee and ankle flexion/extension, and Romberg balance test in three conditions (eyes open, eyes closed, double task). Given the small and heterogeneous final sample size, a mostly descriptive statistical approach was chosen.

Results: 12 participants were classified as “Obese” (BMI>29.9). The most common comorbidities were type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Only 12 participants were able to successfully complete all the assessments. CPET and isokinetic strength trials were the least tolerated tests, and the handgrip test the best tolerated. Mean VO₂ peak was 12.38 ± 3.43 ml/kg/min, with 15 participants below 50% of predicted VO₂ max, of which 6 below 30% VO₂max. Mean handgrip strength was 30.05 ± 10.61 Kg; 25 participants were below the 25° percentile of their population’s normative reference values for handgrip strength, 10 of which were below the 5° percentile. Issues with the management of the external pack of the LVAD and its influence on the test limited the validity of the balance tests data, therefore, no solid conclusions could be drawn from them. VO₂ peak did not correlate with handgrip strength or with any of the lower limb strength measures.

Conclusion: LVAD recipients show greatly reduced functional capacity and tolerance to exercise and exercise testing, with low overall strength levels. As strength variables appear to be independent from VO₂ peak, different lower limbs strength tests should be explored to find a tolerable alternative in this population, which is subjected to muscle wasting due to old age, reduced tissue perfusion, side effects from the pharmacological therapies, and prolonged periods of bedrest.