Biatrial myopathy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Left Atrial Strain in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a significant portion of heart failure cases, but diagnosis is challenging due to its diverse presentation and the limitations of traditional echocardiographic parameters. Left atrial (LA) strain provides valuable insights into LA function and is increasingly used to evaluate cardiac function, including left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. LA strain, particularly reservoir strain, is considered a reliable indicator of LV diastolic function and can be used to grade diastolic function and estimate LV filling pressure. Unlike traditional LA measurements, LA strain offers detailed insights into LA function, conduit, and booster-pump phases, making it crucial for evaluating both structural and functional cardiac performance, especially in HFpEF. HFpEF diagnosis currently relies on a combination of echocardiographic parameters, clinical symptoms, and natriuretic peptide levels, encompassing various pathophysiological entities and complicating standardized management. Precise characterization of cardiac pathologies in HFpEF patients is essential. This review assesses global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial strain (LAS) as echocardiographic biomarkers for diagnosing and characterizing HFpEF. Strain imaging, particularly speckle tracking echocardiography, offers a refined assessment of myocardial deformation, providing detailed insights into left heart function beyond traditional measures. Normal ranges for GLS and LAS are discussed, acknowledging demographic and technical influences. Clinical studies confirm the prognostic value of GLS and LAS in HFpEF, especially for predicting cardiovascular outcomes and distinguishing HFpEF from other dyspnea causes. However, variability in strain measurements and false-negative risks necessitate cautious clinical interpretation. The HFA-PEFF scoring system includes these biomarkers but does not fully cover the HFpEF pathology spectrum. Combining GLS and LAS shows promise in defining HFpEF phenogroups, potentially guiding individualized treatments. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial strain (LAS) are central to non-invasive HFpEF diagnosis and stratification, with potential for more tailored therapies. Integration of these biomarkers into standard diagnostic practice requires an organized approach, and future guidelines should recommend their combined use for comprehensive HFpEF assessment.

"Form follows function": the developmental morphology of the cardiac atria

Although the heart atria have a lesser functional importance than the ventricles, atria play an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure and supraventricular arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation. In addition, knowledge of atrial morphology recently became more relevant as cardiac electrophysiology and interventional procedures in the atria gained an increasingly significant role in the clinical management of patients with heart disease. The atrial chambers are thin-walled, and several vessels enter at the level of the atria. The left and right atrium have different structures and shape. In general, both atrial chambers have the venous part, the appendage, and the vestibule; different aspects of each part allow us to distinguish morphologically between the left and right atrium. The human atrial conduction system consists of the sinus node and the atrioventricular node with no histologically specialized conduction pathways in the atrial chamber and an interatrial connection. The data show that the propagation of the impulse depends mainly on the myocardial architecture in the atria and the orientation of the myocytes plays a significant role in conduction. To complete the picture, it is also important to know how the atria develop and what is the embryonic origin of its different structures, as this may play a role in the development of some pathological conditions such as atrial fibrillation or certain types of congenital heart defects. Functional impairment of the atria can in some situations severely compromise heart pumping function, and conversely, can support it if other areas are damaged, balancing the blood flow to the body for some time. Key words Morphology of atrial chambers, Pectinate muscles, Atrial function.

Prevalence, Incidence, and Outcomes of Diastolic Dysfunction in Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation: Perhaps Not Really "Isolated"?

BACKGROUND

In the absence of left-sided cardiac/pulmonary disease, functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) is referred to as isolated or idiopathic. Relationships between left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (DD) and FTR remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, incidence, and outcome of DD in patients with idiopathic FTR.

METHODS

Adults without structural heart disease were identified. Severe DD was defined by ≥3 of 4 abnormal DD parameters (medial e', medial E/e', TR velocity, left atrial volume index) and ≥ moderate DD by ≥2. Propensity-score matching was performed (3:1) between each less-than-severe TR group and severe TR based on age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 30,428 patients, FTR was absent in 73%, mild in 22%, moderate in 4%, and severe in 0.4%. In the propensity-matched sample, severe DD was present in 2%, 6%, 9%, and 13% patients, and ≥ moderate DD in 11%, 18%, 28%, and 48%, respectively (P < 0.001). The probability of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using the H2FPEF score increased with increasing FTR (median 29.7%, 45.5%, 61.4%, and 88.7%, respectively), as did the prevalence of impaired left atrial strain <24% (35%, 48%, and 69% in mild, moderate, and severe TR). Incident severe and ≥ moderate DD developed more frequently with increasing FTR (HR: 8.45 [95% CI: 2.60-27.50] and HR: 2.82 [95% CI: 1.40-5.69], respectively for ≥ moderate vs no FTR) over a median of 3.0 years. Findings were confirmed in patients without lung disease or right ventricular enlargement. Over a median of 5.0 years, patients with ≥ moderate FTR and DD had the greatest risk of worse outcomes (multivariable P < 0.001). The association between TR and adverse outcomes was significantly diminished in the absence of DD.

CONCLUSIONS

Diastolic dysfunction, increased heart failure with preserved ejection fraction probability, and impaired left atrial strain are commonly present in patients with idiopathic FTR, suggesting that the latter may not be truly isolated. Patients with FTR without DD or heart failure are at increased risk of incident DD. Patients with FTR and DD display worse outcomes.

Staging Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction by Assessing Cardiac Chamber Involvement

The management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains largely unresolved due to our limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the pathology and the challenges in accurately phenotyping this heterogeneous syndrome. A paradigm shift is required to personalise care and unify our approaches to HFpEF patients for future clinical trials. Accordingly, we propose a staging classification for HFpEF based on the identification of the involved cardiac chambers by echocardiography.

Imaging and mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a state-of-the-art review

Understanding of the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has advanced rapidly over the past two decades. Currently, HFpEF is recognized as a heterogeneous syndrome, and there is a growing movement towards developing personalized treatments based on phenotype-guided strategies. Left ventricular dysfunction is a fundamental pathophysiological abnormality in HFpEF; however, recent evidence also highlights significant roles for the atria, right ventricle, pericardium, and extracardiac contributors. Imaging plays a central role in characterizing these complex and highly integrated domains of pathophysiology. This review focuses on established evidence, recent insights, and the challenges that need to be addressed concerning the pathophysiology of HFpEF, with a focus on imaging-based evaluations and opportunities for further research.

Moderate/severe biatrial dilation predicts adverse events after ablation in atrial fibrillation with heart failure

AIMS

To retrospectively compare the long-term outcomes following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) and reduced/mildly reduced EF (HFr-mrEF) patients, and to identify novel predictors of adverse clinical events.

METHODS

In total, 1402 AF patients with HF who underwent successful ablation were consecutively enrolled. Adverse clinical events including all-cause death, HF hospitalization, and stroke were followed up. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between clinical factors and events. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative incidences of these events. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to test the ability of these predictors.

RESULTS

During a follow-up period of 42 ± 15 months, 265 (18.9%) patients experienced adverse clinical events after ablation. The cumulative incidence of adverse clinical events was significantly higher in HFr-mrEF than in HFpEF (25.4% vs. 15.7%, P < 0.001), the similar tendency was observed on all-cause death (10.5% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.011) and HF hospitalization (17.2% vs. 10.1%, P < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, non-paroxysmal AF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.922, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.130-3.268, P = 0.016], LAD ≥ 45 mm (HR 2.197, 95% CI 1.206-4.003, P < 0.001), LVEF (HR 0.959, 95% CI 0.946-0.981, P < 0.001), and RAD ≥ 45 mm (HR 2.044, 95% CI 1.362-3.238, P < 0.001) remained the independent predictors for developing adverse clinical events. A predictive model performed with non-paroxysmal AF, LAD ≥ 45 mm and RAD ≥ 45 mm yielded an area under curve of 0.728 (95% CI 0.696-0.760, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AF patients with HFpEF had better long-term outcomes than those with HFr-mrEF, and moderate/severe biatrial dilation could predict adverse clinical events following catheter ablation in AF and HF patients.

Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Important risk factors for the development of HFpEF are similar to risk factors for the progression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and both conditions frequently coexist and thus is a distinct phenotype or a marker for advanced HF. Many patients with severe, symptomatic atrial secondary TR have been enrolled in current transcatheter device trials, and may represent patients at an advanced stage of HFpEF. Management of HFpEF thus may affect the pathophysiology of TR, and the physiologic changes that occur following transcatheter treatment of TR, may also impact symptoms and outcomes in patients with HFpEF. This review discusses these issues and suggests possible management strategies for these patients.