Somatic hypermutation and mismatch repair in non-B cells

The optimal pH of AID is skewed from that of its catalytic pocket by DNA-binding residues and surface charge

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is a member of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) family of cytidine deaminases. AID mutates immunoglobulin loci to initiate secondary antibody diversification. The APOBEC3 (A3) sub-branch mutates viral pathogens in the cytosol and acidic endosomal compartments. Accordingly, AID functions optimally near neutral pH, while most A3s are acid-adapted (optimal pH 5.5-6.5). To gain a structural understanding for this pH disparity, we constructed high-resolution maps of AID catalytic activity vs pH. We found AID's optimal pH was 7.3 but it retained most (>70%) of the activity at pH 8. Probing of ssDNA-binding residues near the catalytic pocket, key for bending ssDNA into the pocket (e.g R25) yielded mutants with altered pH preference, corroborating previous findings that the equivalent residue in APOBEC3G (H216) underlies its acidic pH preference. AID from bony fish exhibited more basic optimal pH (pH 7.5-8.1) and several R25-equivalent mutants altered pH preference. Comparison of pH optima across the AID/APOBEC3 family revealed an inverse correlation between positive surface charge and overall catalysis.  The paralogue with the most robust catalytic activity (APOBEC3A) has the lowest surface charge, most acidic pH preference, while the paralogue with the most lethargic catalytic rate (AID) has the most positive surface charge and highest optimal pH. We suggest one possible mechanism is through surface charge dictating an overall optimal pH that is different from the optimal pH of the catalytic pocket microenvironment. These findings illuminate an additional structural mechanism that regulates AID/APOBEC3 mutagenesis.

Structure-Based Design of First-Generation Small Molecule Inhibitors Targeting the Catalytic Pockets of AID, APOBEC3A, and APOBEC3B

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates antibody diversification by mutating immunoglobulin loci in B lymphocytes. AID and related APOBEC3 (A3) enzymes also induce genome-wide mutations and lesions implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. The most prevalent mutation signatures across diverse tumor genomes are attributable to the mistargeted mutagenic activities of AID/A3s. Thus, inhibiting AID/A3s has been suggested to be of therapeutic benefit. We previously used a computational-biochemical approach to gain insight into the structure of AID’s catalytic pocket, which resulted in the discovery of a novel type of regulatory catalytic pocket closure that regulates AID/A3s that we termed the “Schrodinger’s CATalytic pocket”. Our findings were subsequently confirmed by direct structural studies. Here, we describe our search for small molecules that target the catalytic pocket of AID. We identified small molecules that inhibit purified AID, AID in cell extracts, and endogenous AID of lymphoma cells. Analogue expansion yielded derivatives with improved potencies. These were found to also inhibit A3A and A3B, the two most tumorigenic siblings of AID. Two compounds exhibit low micromolar IC₅₀ inhibition of AID and A3A, exhibiting the strongest potency for A3A. Docking suggests key interactions between their warheads and residues lining the catalytic pockets of AID, A3A, and A3B and between the tails and DNA-interacting residues on the surface proximal to the catalytic pocket opening. Accordingly, mutants of these residues decreased inhibition potency. The chemistry and abundance of key stabilizing interactions between the small molecules and residues within and immediately outside the catalytic pockets are promising for therapeutic development.

Neuroimmune Interactions in the Gut and Their Significance for Intestinal Immunity

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have a complex, multifactorial pathophysiology with an unmet need for effective treatment. This calls for novel strategies to improve disease outcome and quality of life for patients. Increasing evidence suggests that autonomic nerves and neurotransmitters, as well as neuropeptides, modulate the intestinal immune system, and thereby regulate the intestinal inflammatory processes. Although the autonomic nervous system is classically divided in a sympathetic and parasympathetic branch, both play a pivotal role in the crosstalk with the immune system, with the enteric nervous system acting as a potential interface. Pilot clinical trials that employ vagus nerve stimulation to reduce inflammation are met with promising results. In this paper, we review current knowledge on the innervation of the gut, the potential of cholinergic and adrenergic systems to modulate intestinal immunity, and comment on ongoing developments in clinical trials.