Naphtho[1,2-b :5,6-b ′]dithiophene Building Blocks and their Complexation with Cyclobis(paraquat-p -phenylene)

Probing the Electrostatic Barrier of Tetrathiafulvalene Dications using a Tetra-stable Donor-Acceptor [2]Rotaxane

A tetra-stable donor-acceptor [2]rotaxane 1⋅4PF₆ has been synthesized. The dumbbell component is comprised of an oxyphenylene (OP), a tetrathiafulvalene (TTF), a monopyrrolo-TTF (MPTTF), and a hydroquinone (HQ) unit, which can act as recognition sites (stations) for the tetra-cationic cyclophane cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) (CBPQT⁴⁺ ). The TTF and the MPTTF stations are located in the middle of the dumbbell component and are connected by a triethylene glycol (TEG) chain in such a way that the pyrrole moiety of the MPTTF station points toward the TTF station, while the TTF and MPTTF stations are flanked by the OP and HQ stations on their left hand side and right hand side, respectively. The [2]rotaxane was characterized in solution by ¹ H NMR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The spectroscopic data revealed that the majority (77 %) of the tetra-stable [2]rotaxane 1⁴⁺ exist as the translational isomer 1⋅MPTTF⁴⁺ in which the CBPQT⁴⁺ ring encircles the MPTTF station. The electrochemical studies showed that CBPQT⁴⁺ in 1⋅MPTTF⁴⁺ undergoes ring translation as result of electrostatic repulsion from the oxidized MPTTF unit. Following tetra-oxidation of 1⋅MPTTF⁴⁺ , a high-energy state of 1⁸⁺ was obtained (i.e., 1⋅TEG⁸⁺ ) in which the CBPQT⁴⁺ ring was located on the TEG linker connecting the di-oxidized TTF²⁺ and MPTTF²⁺ units. ¹ H NMR spectroscopy carried out in CD₃ CN at 298 K on a chemically oxidized sample of 1⋅MPTTF⁴⁺ revealed that the metastable state 1⋅TEG⁸⁺ is only short-lived with a lifetime of a few minutes and it was found that 70 % of the positively charged CBPQT⁴⁺ ring moved from 1⋅TEG⁸⁺ to the HQ station, while 30 % moved to the much weaker OP station. These results clearly demonstrate that the CBPQT⁴⁺ ring can cross both an MPTTF²⁺ and a TTF²⁺ electrostatic barrier and that the free energy of activation required to cross MPTTF²⁺ is ca. 0.5 kcal mol^-1 smaller as compared to TTF²⁺ .