1
|
Engebretsen KB, Taso M, Bjorland S, Jenssen HK, Skaara HE, Brox JI. A functional intervention within a cognitive approach to chronic cervical radiculopathy : Description of the non-surgical treatment arm in a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:629. [PMID: 39112984 PMCID: PMC11308144 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07743-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with cervical radiculopathy improve within the first months without treatment or with non-surgical treatment. A systematic review concluded that these patients improve, regardless of their intervention. Still, many patients are offered surgery, despite limited evidence regarding the indications for surgical treatments. The aim of this article is to describe the intervention that is going to be followed in the non-surgical treatment arm of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS The non-surgical intervention is a functional intervention within a cognitive approach founded on previous experiences, and current recommendations for best practice care of musculoskeletal pain and cervical radiculopathy. It is based on the biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical perspective, comprises an interdisciplinary approach (physicians, physiotherapy specialists), and includes brief intervention and graded activities. The intervention consists of 6 sessions over 12 weeks. The primary goals are first, to validate the patients´ symptoms and build a therapeutic alliance, second, to explore the understanding and promote alternatives, and third, to explore problems and opportunities based on patients´ symptoms and function. Motivational factors toward self-management are challenging. We will attempt shared decision-making in planning progress for the individual patient and emphasise learning of practical self-help strategies and encouragement to stay active (reinforcing the positive natural course). General physical activities such as walking will be promoted along with simple functional exercises for the neck- and shoulder region. We will also explore social activity, comorbidities, pain location, sleep, and work-related factors. The health providers will set individualised goals together with each patient. DISCUSSION The aim of the intervention is to describe a functional intervention within a cognitive approach for patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy. The effectiveness of the present program will be compared to surgery in a randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaia B Engebretsen
- Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Mirad Taso
- Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri Bjorland
- Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne K Jenssen
- Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Engberg Skaara
- Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jens Ivar Brox
- Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Majcen Rosker Z, Vodicar M, Kristjansson E. Video-oculographic measures of eye movement control in the smooth pursuit neck torsion test can classify idiopathic neck pain patients from healthy individuals: A datamining based diagnostic accuracy study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 61:102588. [PMID: 35667321 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic neck pain patients frequently experience oculomotor disfunctions with deficits in eye movement control between neutral and neck torsion position (SPNT test) being commonly investigated in clinical and research settings. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to determine accuracy of SPNT test in classifying idiopathic neck pain patients. DESIGN a datamining based diagnostic accuracy study. METHODS The study was conducted on a referred sample of 38 chronic neck pain patients from orthopaedic outpatient clinic and 40 healthy controls. Video-oculography was used to study gain and SPNTdiff during SPNT test under three target movement velocities and amplitudes and two different angles of neck torsion. A Naïve Bayesian predictive model was used to classify neck pain patients based on gain or SPNTdiff. RESULTS Gain during two target movement profiles at velocities of 30°s-1 and amplitudes of 30° and 40° under 45° of neck torsion presented with highest area under the curve (0.837), specificity (92%), sensitivity (94%), highest true positive and lowest false negative predicted value. Highest area under the curve (0.760), specificity (50%), sensitivity (71%), highest true positive and lowest false negative values were observed for SPNTdiff at velocities of 30°s-1 and amplitude of 30° applying 45° of neck torsion. CONCLUSION SPNT test provides useful diagnostic tool for classifying neck pain patients when using single or combination of two target movement profiles. Neck torsion of 45° as opposed to 30° should be used during SPNT test when investigating patients with neck pain disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miha Vodicar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lam KN, Heneghan NR, Mistry J, Ojoawo AO, Peolsson A, Verhagen AP, Tampin B, Thoomes E, Jull G, Scholten-Peeters GGM, Slater H, Moloney N, Hall T, Dedering Å, Rushton A, Falla D. Classification criteria for cervical radiculopathy: An international e-Delphi study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 61:102596. [PMID: 35671539 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Establishing a set of uniform classification criteria (CC) for cervical radiculopathy (CR) is required to aid future recruitment of homogenous populations to clinical trials. OBJECTIVES To establish expert informed consensus on CC for CR. DESIGN A pre-defined four round e-Delphi study in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies. METHODS Individuals with a background in physiotherapy who had authored two or more peer-reviewed publications on CR were invited to participate. The initial round asked opinions on CC for CR. Content analysis was performed on round one output and a list of discrete items were generated forming the round two survey. In rounds two to four, participants were asked to rate the level of importance of each item on a six-point Likert scale. Data were analysed descriptively using median, interquartile range and percentage agreement. Items reaching pre-defined consensus criteria were carried forward to the next round. Items remaining after the fourth round constituted expert consensus on CC for CR. RESULTS Twelve participants participated with one drop out. The final round identified one inclusion CC and 12 exclusion CC. The inclusion CC that remained achieved 82% agreement and was a cluster criterion consisting of radicular pain with arm pain worse than neck pain; paraesthesia or numbness and/or weakness and/or altered reflex; MRI confirmed nerve root compression compatible with clinical findings. CONCLUSIONS The CC identified can be used to inform eligibility criteria for future CR trials although caution should be practiced as consensus on measurement tools requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwun N Lam
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola R Heneghan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jai Mistry
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Adesola O Ojoawo
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria
| | - Anneli Peolsson
- Dep. Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Arianne P Verhagen
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brigitte Tampin
- Faculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrueck, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany; Department of Physiotherapy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia; Curtin Allied School of Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Erik Thoomes
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gwendolen Jull
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Australia; Department of Health, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Norrbotten County, Sweden
| | - Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin Allied School of Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Medicine, Health and Human Performance, Macquarie University, Australia; THRIVE Physiotherapy, Guernsey
| | - Toby Hall
- Curtin Allied School of Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Åsa Dedering
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alison Rushton
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, Canada
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|