Mechanical pinprick pain in patients with unilateral spatial neglect: The influence of space representation on the perception of nociceptive stimuli

Modulation of the Somatosensory Blink Reflex in the Peripersonal Space Is Defective in Episodic Migraine

OBJECTIVE

In migraine, there is an altered behavior of patients during the attack and an altered connectivity in the cortical structures modulating and encoding the sensation and pain. Thus, we hypothesized that the extent of the peripersonal space (PPS) and the responses in the PPS may change during a migraine attack. For this reason, we analyzed the modulation of somatosensory blink reflex (SBR) in the PPS during episodic migraine.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional assessment of modulation of SBR in patients with migraine.

SETTING

Headache outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS

We included 22 patients with episodic migraine, of whom 13 individuals were in the interictal period and nine were experiencing a headache episode. We also included 14 healthy individuals. The three groups were similar in age and gender.

METHODS

SBR was recorded when the participants were sitting with their forearm in the extrapersonal space and also when their hands were in the PPS surrounding the face. Latency, amplitude, and area under the curve (AUC) were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The amplitude and AUC of the SBR were significantly higher in patients during the attack compared with healthy subjects. The magnitude of the SBR was increased in the PPS in healthy subjects, whereas the increase was not significant in patients during the attack or in the interictal period.

CONCLUSIONS

We think that the modulation in the PPS is defective in patients with migraine both during the acute attack and in the interictal phase, suggesting diminished top-down modulation of the SBR.

Unimodal and crossmodal extinction of nociceptive stimuli in healthy volunteers

Nociception, the physiological mechanisms specifically processing information about noxious and potentially painful stimuli, has the double function to warn about potential body damages (interoception) and about the cause of such potential damages (exteroception). The exteroceptive function is thought to rely on multisensory integration between somatic and extra-somatic stimuli, provided that extra-somatic stimuli occur near the stimulated body area. To corroborate this hypothesis, we succeeded to show in healthy volunteers that the perception of nociceptive stimuli applied on one hand can be extinguished, as compared to single presentation, by the simultaneous application of nociceptive stimuli on the opposite hand, as well as by the presentation of visual stimuli near the opposite hand. On the contrary, visual stimuli presented near the same stimulated hand facilitated the perception of nociceptive stimuli. This nociceptive extinction phenomenon indicates that the perception of noxious events does not merely rely on the specific activation of the nociceptive system, but also depends on other sensory experiences about the body and the space around it.