Design of a digital-PCR assay to quantify fragmented human mitochondrial DNA

The relationship between sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA fragmentation, and copy number in normal and abnormal human ejaculates

BACKGROUND

While it is common to clinically evaluate sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation, less attention has been given to sperm mitochondrial DNA. Recently, a digital PCR assay has allowed accurate estimation of the proportion of fragmented mtDNA molecules and relative copy number.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the correlation of classical sperm parameters, average mtDNA copies per spermatozoon and the level of mtDNA fragmentation (SDF-mtDNA) to that of nuclear DNA fragmentation (SDF-nDNA), measured as the proportion of global, single-strand DNA (SDF-SSBs) and double-strand DNA breaks (SDF-DSBs). To determine whether the level of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA fragmentation and/or copy number can differentiate normozoospermic from non-normozoospermic samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ejaculates from 29 normozoospermic and 43 non-normozoospermic were evaluated. SDF was determined using the sperm chromatin dispersion assay. mtDNA copy number and SDF-mtDNA were analyzed using digital PCR assays.

RESULTS

Relative mtDNA copy increased as sperm concentration or motility decreased, or abnormal morphology increased. Unlike SDF-mtDNA, mtDNA copy number was not correlated with SDF-nDNA. SDF-mtDNA increased as the concentration or proportion of non-vital sperm increased; the higher the mtDNA copy number, the lower the level of fragmentation. Non-normozoospermic samples showed double the level of SDF-nDNA compared to normozoospermic (median 25.00 vs. 13.67). mtDNA copy number per spermatozoon was 3× higher in non-normozoospermic ejaculates (median 16.06 vs. 4.99). Although logistic regression revealed SDF-Global and mtDNA copy number as independent risk factors for non-normozoospermia, when SDF-Global and mtDNA copy number were combined, ROC curve analysis resulted in an even stronger discriminatory ability for predicting the probability of non-normozoospermia (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.94, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High-quality ejaculates show lower nuclear SDF and retain less mtDNA copies, with approximately half of them fragmented, so that the absolute number of non-fragmented mtDNA molecules per spermatozoon is extremely low.

Genome concentration, characterization, and integrity analysis of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors using droplet digital PCR

Precise, reproducible characterization of AAV is critical for comparing preclinical results between laboratories and determining a safe and effective clinical dose for gene therapy applications. In this study, we systematically evaluated numerous parameters to produce a simple and robust ddPCR protocol for AAV characterization. The protocol uses a low ionic strength buffer containing Pluronic-F68 and polyadenylic acid to dilute the AAV into the ddPCR concentration range and a 10-minute thermal capsid lysis prior to assembling ddPCR reactions containing MspI. A critical finding is that the buffer composition affected the ITR concentration of AAV but not the ITR concentration of a double stranded plasmid, which has implications when using a theoretical, stoichiometric conversion factor to obtain the titer based on the ITR concentration. Using this protocol, a more comprehensive analysis of an AAV vector formulation was demonstrated with multiple ddPCR assays distributed throughout the AAV vector genome. These assays amplify the ITR, regulatory elements, and eGFP transgene to provide a more confident estimate of the vector genome concentration and a high-resolution characterization of the vector genome identity. Additionally, we compared two methods of genome integrity analysis for three control sample types at eight different concentrations for each sample. The genome integrity was independent of sample concentration and the expected values were obtained when integrity was determined based on the excess number of positive droplets relative to the number of double positive droplets expected by chance co-encapsulation of two DNA targets. The genome integrity was highly variable and produced unexpected values when the double positive droplet percentage was used to calculate the genome integrity. A protocol using a one-minute thermal capsid lysis prior to assembling ddPCR reactions lacking a restriction enzyme used the non-ITR assays in a duplex ddPCR milepost experiment to determine the genome integrity using linkage analysis.