Comparison of preadministered and coadministered lidocaine for treating pain and distress associated with intranasal midazolam administration in children: A randomized clinical trial

Intervention Bundle for Optimization of Procedural Sedation for Newborns Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Single-Center Quality Improvement Project in Qatar

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a common procedure in tertiary care neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). MRIs aid in detailing structural anatomy and are increasingly utilized for prognostication. Keeping babies calm and motion-free in the MRI suite is challenging, and various approaches have been adopted to obtain the best image quality. We share our experience of intervention bundle for procedural sedation with the novel use of buccal midazolam in our NICU for babies undergoing MRI.

Methods

This single-center quality improvement project comprised two epochs. Epoch 1 from April 2018 to December 2020 provided baseline data regarding sedation use and helped identify causes for suboptimal images and the adverse event rate. Following the implementation of an interventional bundle comprising specific midazolam dose recommendations tailored to background risk factors and streamlining the procedural sedation process, similar comparative data were collected in epoch 2 (May 2021 to December 2022) after a washout period.

Results

Of 424 patients, 238 and 108 had MRI done under either procedural sedation protocol or feed and wrap technique in epoch 1 and 2, respectively. After excluding babies whose MRIs were performed under sedative infusions, 30 (13%) babies had adverse events in epoch 1, while only 8 (7%) events occurred in epoch 2. There was also a 37% improvement in the documentation of procedural sedation between the two epochs.

Conclusion

Procedural sedation with buccal midazolam under neonatologist supervision is safe, efficient, and effective in babies undergoing MRI in this single-center study. More extensive studies may be warranted to assess the suitability of this sedation modality for broader use.

Optimal Dose of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Laceration Repair in Children: A Phase II Dose-Ranging Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal sedative dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine for children undergoing laceration repair.

METHODS

This dose-ranging study employing the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method enrolled children aged 0 to 10 years with a single laceration (<5 cm), requiring single-layer closure, who received topical anesthetic. Children were administered 1, 2, 3, or 4 mcg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome was the proportion with adequate sedation (Pediatric Sedation State Scale score of 2 or 3 for ≥90% of the time from sterile preparation to tying of the last suture). Secondary outcomes included the Observational Scale of Behavior Distress-Revised (range: 0 [no distress] to 23.5 [maximal distress]), postprocedure length of stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We enrolled 55 children (35/55 [64%] males; median [interquartile range {IQR}] age 4 [2, 6] years). At 1, 2, 3, and 4 mcg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine, respectively, the proportion of participants "adequately" sedated was 1/3 (33%), 2/9 (22%), 13/21 (62%), and 12/21 (57%); the posterior mean (95% equitailed credible intervals) for the probability of adequate sedation was 0.38 (0.04, 0.82), 0.25 (0.05, 0.54), 0.61 (0.41, 0.80), and 0.57 (0.36, 0.76); the median (IQR) Observational Scale of Behavior Distress-Revised scores during suturing was 2.7 (0.3, 3), 0 (0, 3.8), 0.6 (0, 5), and 0 (0, 3.7); the median (IQR) postprocedure length of stay was 67 (60, 78), 76 (60, 100), 89 (76, 109), and 113 (76, 150) minutes. There was 1 adverse event, a decrease in oxygen saturation at 4 mcg/kg, which resolved with head repositioning.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations, such as our limited sample size and subjectivity in Pediatric Sedation State Scale scoring, sedation efficacy for 3 and 4 mcg/kg were similarly based on equitailed credible intervals suggesting either could be considered optimal.

XyloFUNS: Xylocaine to freeze during unpleasant nasopharyngeal swabs in children-a randomized controlled trial

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of intranasal vaporized lidocaine in reducing pain for children undergoing a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab in the Emergency Department (ED).

Study Design

A randomized blinded clinical trial was conducted in a paediatric ED. Both participants and the researcher evaluating the primary outcome were blinded. Children aged 6 to 17 years old requiring a NP swab were eligible. Participants were randomly allocated to receive intranasal lidocaine or a sham treatment prior to their NP swab. The primary outcome measure was pain during the swab as assessed by the visual analog scale. Secondary outcome measures were pain using the verbal numeric rating scale, fear using the children fear scale, and adverse effects of the intervention.

Results

Eighty-eight participants were enrolled-45 in the lidocaine group and 43 controls. The mean visual analog scale scores for pain were 46 mm in the lidocaine group and 53 mm in the control group (mean difference 7 mm; 95% CI: -5 to 19 mm). No serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Intranasal lidocaine administered prior to NP swabs in the ED failed to show an improvement in pain scores for school-aged children and youth.

Intranasal Midazolam With Lidocaine for Sedation in Pediatric Myringotomy and Tube Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Aims: Intranasal midazolam (INM) sedation for children has been associated with side effects. This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed whether the addition of lidocaine to INM (INM+L) affected efficacy or discharge time among pediatric patients undergoing elective bilateral myringotomy and tube placement (BMT).

Methods: This trial enrolled children aged between 18 months to seven years undergoing BMT, physical status class 1 or 2, in a single academic medical center. Interventions were placebo (intranasal saline), INM only (0.2mg/kg of INM concentration 5mg/ml), and INM+L (0.2mg/kg INM with addition of lidocaine 4% based on 25% of midazolam volume). Outcomes included post-anesthesia care unit times, observed behavioral distress (OBD) visual analog scale (VAS) (by nurse and parent), and sedation scores by certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) and registered nurse (RN).

Results: Forty-two subjects were included, 14 in each group, with 52% female, 41% physical status 2, and an average age of 2.7 years. Post-anesthesia care unit times averaged 36.5 minutes (range 15-132 minutes), with no delay in discharge with INM or INM+L versus placebo (p=0.88). Verbal complaints were highest among INM+L at the time of administration (p=0.01). RN-scored OBD at one minute post administration differed significantly across the three groups (p=0.01). Parental OBD scores did not differ across treatment groups. Agitation was greatest at time of induction of anesthesia in the placebo group (p=0.01).

Conclusions: The addition of licodaine to INM does not adversely influence time to discharge and does not reduce side effects, improve efficacy, or change duration of action of INM.

Intranasal ketorolac versus intravenous ketorolac for treatment of migraine headaches in children: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous ketorolac is commonly used for treating migraine headaches in children. However, the prerequisite placement of an intravenous line can be technically challenging, time-consuming, and associated with pain and distress. Intranasal ketorolac may be an effective alternative that is needle-free and easier to administer. We aimed to determine whether intranasal ketorolac is non-inferior to intravenous ketorolac for reducing pain in children with migraine headaches.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized double-blind non-inferiority clinical trial. Children aged 8-17 years with migraine headaches, moderate to severe pain, and requiring parenteral analgesics received intranasal ketorolac (1 mg/kg) or intravenous ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg). Primary outcome was reduction in pain at 60 min after administration measured using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (scored 0-10). Non-inferiority margin was 2/10. Secondary outcomes included time to onset of clinically meaningful decrease in pain; ancillary emergency department outcomes (e.g. receipt of rescue medications, headache relief, headache freedom, percentage improvement); 24-h follow-up outcomes; functional disability; and adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine children were enrolled. We analyzed 27 children who received intranasal ketorolac and 29 who received intravenous ketorolac. The difference in mean pain reduction at 60 min between groups was 0.2 (95% CI -0.9, 1.3), with the upper limit of the 95% CI being less than the non-inferiority margin. There were no statistical differences between groups for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intranasal ketorolac was non-inferior to intravenous ketorolac for reducing migraine headache pain in the emergency department.