Emergency department provider in triage: assessing site-specific rationale, operational feasibility, and financial impact

Is boarding compromising our residents' education? A national survey of emergency medicine program directors

Background

Boarding patients in the emergency department (ED) potentially affects resident education. Program director (PD) perceptions of the impact of boarding on their trainees have not been previously described.

Methods

We surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of emergency medicine PDs using a mixed-methods approach to explore their perceptions of how boarding has affected their residents' training. Descriptive data were reported as percentages and differences were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. A framework model was used to qualitatively analyze free-text responses.

Results

A total of 170 responses were collected, for a response rate of 63%. Most respondents felt that boarding had at least some effect on resident education with 29%, 35%, 18%, and 12% noting "a little," "a moderate amount," "a lot," and "a great deal," respectively, and 5% noting "no effect at all." Respondents perceived a negative impact of boarding on resident education and training, with 80% reporting a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" effect, 18% feeling neutral, and 2% noting a "somewhat positive" effect. Most noted a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" effect on resident education in managing ED throughput (70%) and high patient volumes (66%). Fifty-four percent noted a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" impact on being involved in the initial workup of undifferentiated patients. Thirty-two percent saw a "somewhat" or "extremely positive" effect on learning the management of critically ill patients. Qualitative analysis of challenges, mitigation strategies, and resident feedback emphasized the lack of exposure to managing departmental patient flow, impact on bedside teaching, and need for flexibility in resident staffing.

Conclusions

Most PDs agree that boarding negatively affects resident education and identify several strategies to mitigate the impact. These findings can help inform future interventions to optimize resident learning in the complex educational landscape of high ED boarding.

The effect of having a physician in the triage area on the rate of patients leaving without being seen: A quality improvement initiative at King Fahad Specialist hospital

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of the presence of a physician in the triage area on the number of patients who leave without being seen (LWBS) and some of the factors affecting emergency department (ED) crowding.

METHODS

This was a pre-post study carried out at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. The 3-month study, consisting of 7826 patients, was split into pre-physician and post-physician periods. Variables compared across these periods were the number of LWBS patients, length of hospital stay, time to physician, and time to disposition decision. Statistical analysis was carried out using R version 4.3.0.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the presence of a triage physician significantly decreased the number of LWBS patients (p<0.001) and the time taken to encounter an ED physician (p<0.001). However, it did not have any significant impact on the length of hospital stay (p=0.5) or time to disposition decision (p=0.9).

CONCLUSION

The appointment of a triage physician has streamlined patient flow and decreased LWBS rates in the ED, demonstrating the need for more thorough research in this area.

Impact of Care Initiation Model on Emergency Department Orders and Operational Metrics: Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Emergency departments (ED) employ many strategies to address crowding and prolonged wait times. They include front-end Care Initiation and clinician-in-triage models that start the diagnostic and therapeutic process while the patient waits for a care space in the ED. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of a Care Initiation model on resource utilization and operational metrics in the ED.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of ED visits at our institution during October 2021. Baseline characteristics were compared with Chi-square and quantile regression. We used t-tests to calculate unadjusted difference in outcome measures, including number of laboratory tests ordered and average time patients spent in the waiting room and the ED treatment room, and the time from arrival until ED disposition. We performed propensity score analysis using matching and inverse probability weighting to quantify the direct impact of Care Initiation on outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were 2,407 ED patient encounters, 1,191 (49%) of whom arrived during the hours when Care Initiation was active. A total of 811 (68%) of these patients underwent Care Initiation, while the remainder proceeded directly to the main treatment area. Patients were more likely to undergo Care Initiation if they had lower acuity and lower risk of admission, and if the ED was busier as measured by the number of recent arrivals and percentage of occupied ED beds. After adjusting for patient-specific and department-level covariates, Care Initiation did not increase the number of diagnostic laboratory tests ordered. Care Initiation was associated with increased waiting room time by 1.8 hours and longer time from arrival until disposition by 1.3 hours, but with decreased time in the main treatment area by 0.6 hours, which represents a 15% reduction.

CONCLUSION

Care Initiation was associated with a 15% reduction in time spent in the main ED treatment area but longer waiting room time and longer time until ED disposition without significantly increasing the number of laboratory studies ordered. While previous studies produced similar results with Care Initiation models accessing all diagnostic modalities including imaging, our study demonstrates that a more limited Care Initiation model can still result in operational benefits for EDs.

Sociodemographic Disparities in Queue Jumping for Emergency Department Care

Importance

Emergency department (ED) triage models are intended to queue patients for treatment. In the absence of higher acuity, patients of the same acuity should room in order of arrival.

Objective

To characterize disparities in ED care access as unexplained queue jumps (UQJ), or instances in which acuity and first come, first served principles are violated.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective, cross-sectional study between July 2017 and February 2020. Participants were all ED patient arrivals at 2 EDs within a large Northeast health system. Data were analyzed from July to September 2022.

Exposure

UQJ was defined as a patient being placed in a treatment space ahead of a patient of higher acuity or of a same acuity patient who arrived earlier.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were odds of a UQJ and association with ED outcomes of hallway placement, leaving before treatment complete, escalation to higher level of care while awaiting inpatient bed placement, and 72-hour ED revisitation. Secondary analysis examined UQJs among high acuity ED arrivals. Regression models (zero-inflated Poisson and logistic regression) adjusted for patient demographics and ED operational variables at time of triage.

Results

Of 314 763 included study visits, 170 391 (54.1%) were female, the mean (SD) age was 50.46 (20.5) years, 132 813 (42.2%) patients were non-Hispanic White, 106 401 (33.8%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 66 465 (21.1%) were Hispanic or Latino. Overall, 90 698 (28.8%) patients experienced a queue jump, and 78 127 (24.8%) and 44 551 (14.2%) patients were passed over by a patient of the same acuity or lower acuity, respectively. A total of 52 959 (16.8%) and 23 897 (7.6%) patients received care ahead of a patient of the same acuity or higher acuity, respectively. Patient demographics including Medicaid insurance (incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14), Black non-Hispanic race (IRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07), Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (IRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08), and Spanish as primary language (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10) were independent social factors associated with being passed over. The odds of a patient receiving care ahead of others were lower for ED visits by Medicare insured (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96), Medicaid insured (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85), Black non-Hispanic (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97), and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.91). Patients who were passed over by someone of the same triage severity level had higher odds of hallway bed placement (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) and leaving before disposition (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of ED patients in triage, there were consistent disparities among marginalized populations being more likely to experience a UQJ, hallway placement, and leaving without receiving treatment despite being assigned the same triage acuity as others. EDs should seek to standardize triage processes to mitigate conscious and unconscious biases that may be associated with timely access to emergency care.

Causal Association of Physician-in-Triage with Improved Pediatric Sepsis Care: A Single-Center, Emergency Department Experience

Approximately 75,000 children are hospitalized for sepsis yearly in the United States, with 5%-20% mortality estimates. Outcomes are closely related to the timeliness of sepsis recognition and antibiotic administration.

Methods

A multidisciplinary sepsis task force formed in the Spring of 2020 aimed to assess and improve pediatric sepsis care in the pediatric emergency department (ED). The electronic medical record identified pediatric sepsis patients from September 2015 to July 2021. Data for time to sepsis recognition and antibiotic delivery were analyzed using statistical process control charts (X̄-S charts). We identified special cause variation, and Bradford-Hill Criteria guided multidisciplinary discussions to identify the most probable cause.

Results

In the fall of 2018, the average time from ED arrival to blood culture orders decreased by 1.1 hours, and the time from arrival to antibiotic administration decreased by 1.5 hours. After qualitative review, the task force hypothesized that initiation of attending-level pediatric physician-in-triage (P-PIT) as a part of ED triage was temporally associated with the observed improved sepsis care. P-PIT reduced the average time to the first provider exam by 14 minutes and introduced a process for physician evaluation before ED room assignment.

Conclusions

Timely assessment by an attending-level physician improves time to sepsis recognition and antibiotic delivery in children who present to the ED with sepsis. Implementing a P-PIT program with early attending-level physician evaluation is a potential strategy for other institutions.

The multicenter impacts of an emergency physician lead on departmental flow and provider experiences

INTRODUCTION

Emergency department (ED) flow impacts patient safety, quality of care and ED provider satisfaction. Throughput interventions have been shown to improve flow, yet few studies have reported the impact of ED physician leadership roles on patient flow and provider experiences. The study objective was to evaluate the impacts of the emergency physician lead role on ED flow metrics and provider experiences.

METHODS

Quantitative data about patient flow metrics were collected from ED information systems in two tertiary hospital EDs and analyzed to compare ED length of stay, EMS hallway length of stay, physician initial assessment time, 72-h readmission and left without being seen rates three months before and following emergency physician lead role implementation. ED flow metrics for adult patients at each site were analyzed independently using descriptive and inferential statistics, t tests and multivariable regression analysis. Qualitative data were collected via surveys from ED providers (physicians, nurses, and EMS) about their experiences working with the emergency physician leads and analyzed for themes about emergency physician leads impact.

RESULTS

The number of ED visits was relatively stable pre-post at the Peter Lougheed Centre (Lougheed) but increased pre-post at the Foothills Medical Centre (Foothills). Post-intervention at Lougheed median ED length of stay decreased by 18 min (p < 0.001) and at Foothills ED length of stay increased by 8 min (p < 0.001). EMS length of stay at Lougheed decreased by 20 min (p < 0.001), and at Foothills length of stay increased by 17 min (p < 0.001). Themes in provider feedback were that emergency physician leads (1) facilitated patient flow, (2) impacted provider workload, and (3) supported patient flow and safety with early assessments, treatments and investigations.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the emergency physician lead impacted ED flow metrics variably at different sites, but important learnings from provider experiences can guide future emergency physician lead implementation.

Effectiveness of a Mobile App in Reducing Therapeutic Turnaround Time and Facilitating Communication between Caregivers in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

For maintaining collaboration and coordination among emergency department (ED) caregivers, it is essential to effectively share patient-centered information. Indirect activities on patients, such as searching for laboratory results and sharing information with scattered colleagues, waste resources to the detriment of patients and staff. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the initial efficacy of a mobile app to facilitate rapid mobile access to central laboratory results and remote interprofessional communication. A total of 10 ED residents and registered nurses were randomized regarding the use of the app versus conventional methods during semi-simulated scenarios in a pediatric ED (PED). The primary outcome was the elapsed time in minutes in each group from the availability of laboratory results to their consideration by participants. The secondary outcome was the elapsed time to find a colleague upon request. Time to consider laboratory results was significantly reduced from 23 min (IQR 10.5–49.0) to 1 min (IQR 0–5.0) with the use of the app compared to conventional methods (92.2% reduction in mean times, p = 0.0079). Time to find a colleague was reduced from 24 min to 1 min (i.e., 93.0% reduction). Dedicated mobile apps have the potential to improve information sharing and remote communication in emergency care.