A survey of stroke-related capabilities among a sample of US community emergency departments

Statewide availability of acute stroke treatment, services, and programs: A survey of North Carolina Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

We conducted a statewide assessment of the availability of stroke treatment, services, and programs in North Carolina (NC) hospitals. We also examined differences in stroke care capabilities between urban, suburban, and rural hospitals and trends over the past 2 decades.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to all 111 licensed hospitals in NC. Survey questions asked about stroke center certification status (i.e., standardized levels of stroke care capabilities), diagnostic testing, acute treatments and protocols, and post-acute management. Responses were collected from October 2020-April 2021. Select characteristics were compared to those from prior NC surveys in 1998, 2003, and 2008.

RESULTS

All 111 hospitals responded to the survey (100% response rate). Among 108 hospitals providing acute stroke care, 12 (11%) were Comprehensive Stroke Centers or Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers, which were all located in urban or suburban areas. While 38% of urban/suburban hospitals were non-certified, 48% of rural hospitals were non-certified. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and alteplase treatment were widely available (100%, 95%, and 99%, respectively). Endovascular thrombectomy was solely available in urban/suburban hospitals (29%). Of non-tertiary hospitals, 81% were using telestroke for treatment and transfer decisions. Compared to prior survey results, the availability of CT angiography (76% in 2008 to 95% in 2020-2021), alteplase treatment (69% in 2008 to 99% in 2020-2021), and acute stroke clinical pathways (47% in 2008 to 90% in 2020-2021) increased. However, having an in-house neurologist on staff dropped from approximately 55% in prior surveys to 21% in the current survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural NC hospitals were less likely to have advanced diagnostic imaging and treatment capabilities for acute stroke. Temporal trends in staffing with an in-house neurologist and use of telestroke services should be further examined.

Assessment of stroke knowledge and awareness among primary healthcare providers: A cross-sectional survey from the Kezhou quality improvement in acute stroke care project

Objective

Acute stroke care is a highly complex type of emergency medical service (EMS) involving patient-centered care in a highly unpredictable and stressful environment with the help of several busy providers. The ability of primary healthcare providers (PHPs) to identify stroke onset early and further manage referrals to higher-level hospitals becomes critical.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey about stroke knowledge and awareness among PHPs in China from September 2021 to December 2021. A total of 289 PHPs were divided into two groups, the stroke treatment window (STW) Aware group vs. the STW Unaware group according to their knowledge on the time window for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the predictors associated with knowledge of the time window for acute stroke management.

Results

Of 289 PHPs surveyed during the study period, 115 (39.7%) participants were aware of the time window for stroke management and were in the STW Aware group, while 174 (60.2%) were in the STW Unaware group. Forty percent of PHPs in the STW Aware group were familiar with the secondary stroke prevention goal of <140/90 mmHg, compared with 27.01% in the Unaware group (P < 0.05). PHPs were not sufficiently aware of loss of consciousness also a symptom of stroke in two groups (75.7 vs. 62.6%, P < 0.05). A higher proportion of PHPs in the STW Aware group believed that thrombolysis was an effective treatment for AIS (96.5 vs. 79.9%, P < 0.01). Endovascular therapy is indicated for AIS was perceived by a higher proportion of PHPs in the STW Aware group than that in the Unaware group (62.6 vs. 6.9%, P < 0.01). Eighty percent of PHPs in the STW Aware group reported attending training on stroke management compared with 58.1% in the Unaware group (P < 0.01). Logistic regression results showed that the predictors of stroke knowledge and awareness among PHPs included sex (OR: 2.3, 95% CI, 1.2–4.6), received training (OR: 2.9, 95% CI, 1.60–5.1), and times of training per year (OR: 0.70, 95% CI, 0.6–0.9).

Conclusions

PHPs present with a mild to moderate level of stroke management knowledge in northwest China. Strategies to help increase stroke knowledge and awareness among PHPs should be considered in order to help improve the stroke related health service system.