Determinants and outcome of repeat continuous electroencephalogram monitoring-A case-control study

Narrative Review of Neurologic Complications in Adults on ECMO: Prevalence, Risks, Outcomes, and Prevention Strategies

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a life-saving technique for patients with severe respiratory and cardiac diseases, is being increasingly utilized worldwide, particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic, and there has been a sharp increase in the implementation of ECMO. However, due to the presence of various complications, the survival rate of patients undergoing ECMO remains low. Among the complications, the neurologic morbidity significantly associated with venoarterial and venovenous ECMO has received increasing attention. Generally, failure to recognize neurologic injury in time is reportedly associated with poor outcomes in patients on ECMO. Currently, multimodal monitoring is increasingly utilized in patients with devastating neurologic injuries and has been advocated as an important approach for early diagnosis. Here, we highlight the prevalence and outcomes, risk factors, current monitoring technologies, prevention, and treatment of neurologic complications in adult patients on ECMO. We believe that an improved understanding of neurologic complications presumably offers promising therapeutic solutions to prevent and treat neurologic morbidity.

Does continuous electroencephalography influence therapeutic decisions in neurocritical care?

OBJECTIVES

In the neurocritical care unit (neuro-ICU), the impact of continuous EEG (cEEG) on therapeutic decisions and prognostication, including outcome prediction using the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), is poorly investigated. We studied to what extent cEEG contributes to treatment decisions, and how this relates to clinical outcome and the use of STESS in neurocritical care.

METHODS

We included patients admitted to the neuro-ICU or neurological step-down unit of a tertiary referral hospital between 05/2013 and 06/2015. Inclusion criteria were ≥20 h of cEEG monitoring and age ≥15 years. Exclusion criteria were primary epileptic and post-cardiac arrest encephalopathies.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria, 80 of which had status epilepticus, including 14 with super-refractory status. Median length of cEEG monitoring was 50 h (range 21-374 h). Mean STESS was lower in patients with favorable outcome 1 year after discharge (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) compared to patients with unfavorable outcome (mRS 3-6), albeit not statistically significant (mean STESS 2.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.09). STESS had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 42%, and a negative predictive value of 93% for outcome. cEEG results changed treatment decisions in 76 patients, including escalation of antiepileptic treatment in 65 and reduction in 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

Status Epilepticus Severity Score had a high negative predictive value but low sensitivity, suggesting that STESS should be used cautiously. Of note, cEEG results altered clinical decision-making in three of four patients, irrespective of the presence or absence of status epilepticus, confirming the clinical value of cEEG in neurocritical care.

Seizure Risk in Patients Undergoing 30-Day Readmission After Continuous EEG Monitoring

PURPOSE

The use of continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring has improved the understanding of the seizure risk during acute hospitalization. However, the immediate posthospitalization seizure risk in these patients remains unknown. Patients undergoing 30-day readmission after initial cEEG monitoring were analyzed to fill this knowledge gap.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained cEEG database (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2015) was used to identify adults who underwent a repeat cEEG during their 30-day readmission after cEEG during their index hospitalization (index cEEG). Various demographical, clinical, and cEEG variables were extracted including indication for cEEG: altered mental status and clinical seizure-like events.

RESULTS

A total of 57 of the 2,485 (2.3%) adults undergoing index cEEG during the study period had concerns for seizures and underwent repeat cEEG during a 30-day readmission. These patients were almost three times more likely to have suffered electrographic seizure on the index admission (odds ratio, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-5.15; P < 0.001) compared with non-readmitted patients. Seizure-like events led to the readmission of 40.4% patients. Close to one in five (19.3%) readmitted patients were found to have an electrographic seizure. Only variable predictive of seizure on readmission was seizure-like events (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-33.0; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A small percentage of patients have clinical presentation concerning for seizures with in 30 days after index cEEG. The risk of electrographic seizures in this patient population is higher than patients who have cEEG monitoring but do not undergo a 30-day readmission requiring repeat cEEG. Future research on early identification of patients at risk of 30-day readmission because of concerns for seizure is needed.