Interspecific Variation in Nematode Responses to Metals

Drivers of copper sensitivity in copepods: A meta-analysis of LC50s

Copper is both an essential trace element and a potent pesticide. The use of copper as an antifoulant has increased in the last decades in line with the expanding aquaculture and shipping industries. In aquatic environments, it also affects non-target taxa. One of which are copepods, which constitute the central link in the marine food web. Despite their ecological importance, there are no systematic reviews of the lethal concentration range and drivers of copper toxicity in this taxon. Here, we combined literature data from 31 peer-reviewed articles recording the Lethal Concentration 50 (LC50) for copper in copepods and the experiments' respective environmental, developmental, and taxonomic parameters. The LC50 is a traditional endpoint for toxicity testing used in standardized toxicity testing and many ecological studies. In total, we were able to extract 166 LC50 entries. The variability in the metadata allowed for a general analysis of the drivers of copper sensitivity in copepods. Using a generalized additive modeling approach, we find that temperature increases copper toxicity when above approximately 25℃. Counter to our expectations; salinity does not influence copper sensitivity across copepod species. Unsurprisingly, nauplii are more susceptible to copper exposure than adult copepods, and benthos-associated harpacticoids are less sensitive to copper than pelagic calanoids. Our final model can predict sensible specific-specific copper concentrations for future experiments, thus giving an informed analytical approach to range testing in future dose-response experiments. Our model can also potentially improve ecological risk assessment by accounting for environmental differences. The approach can be applied to other toxicants and taxa, which may reveal underlying patterns otherwise obscured by taxonomic and experimental variability.

Variation in copper sensitivity between laboratory and wild strains of Caenorhabditis elegans

Ecological risk assessments of chemicals are frequently based on laboratory toxicity data from a small number of model species that may be reared in labs for years or decades. These populations can undergo many processes in the lab including artificial selection, founder effect, and genetic drift, and may not adequately represent their wild counterparts, potentially undermining the goal of protecting natural populations. Here we measure variation in lethality to copper chloride among strains of an emerging model species in toxicology, Caenorhabditis elegans. We tested four wild strains from Chile, Germany, Kenya, and Madeira (Portugal) against several versions of the standard laboratory N2 strain from Bristol, UK used in molecular biology. The four wild strains were more sensitive than any of the N2 strains tested with copper. We also found that the standard N2 strain cultured in the laboratory for >1 year was less sensitive than a recently cultured N2 strain as well as a cataloged ancestral version of the N2 strain. These results suggest that toxicologists should be cognizant of performing toxicity testing with long-held animal cultures, and should perhaps use multiple strains as well as renew cultures periodically in the laboratory. This study also shows that multi-strain toxicity testing with nematodes is highly achievable and useful for understanding variation in intra- and interspecific chemical sensitivity.

Intra- and interspecific toxicity testing methods and data for nematodes exposed to metals

Twenty-four hour median lethal concentration (LC50) toxicity tests were performed with five species of nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans, Caenorhabditis briggsae, Pristionchus pacificus, Oscheius tipulae, and Oscheius myriophila) in response to copper chloride and zinc chloride. In addition, lethality tests were also performed with seven strains of C. elegans (N2 > 1 year in culture, N2 newly acquired, N2 ancestral, ED3053, JU258, JU1171, and MY1) exposed to copper chloride. Nominal chemical concentrations were validated and analyzed according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency method 6010 using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). This paper combines the datasets previously published separately by Heaton et al. (2020, 2022). The goal is to catalog all raw and analyzed toxicity data collected from both studies in a single consistent information source for use by the scientific community.

Extrapolating Acute Contact Bee Sensitivity to Insecticides Based on Body Weight Using a Phylogenetically Informed Interspecies Scaling Framework

Plant protection products, including insecticides, are important for global food production but can have adverse effects on nontarget organisms including bees. Historically, research investigating such effects has focused mainly on the honeybee (Apis mellifera), whereas less information is available for non-Apis bees. Consequently, a comprehensive hazard (sensitivity) assessment for the majority of bees is lacking, which in turn hinders accurate risk characterization and consequently bee protection. Interspecies sensitivity extrapolation based on body weight might be a way to improve the situation, but in the past such approaches often ignored the phylogenetic background of the species used, which in turn potentially reduces the robustness of such results. Published acute contact sensitivity data (median lethal dose per bee) of bees to insecticides, their body weight, and their phylogenetic background were used to build interspecies scaling models to predict bee sensitivity based on their weight. The results indicate that 1) bee body weight is a predictor of acute contact bee sensitivity to a range of insecticides, and 2) phylogeny (nonindependence of data points) needs to be considered in cross-species analysis, although it does not always confound the observed effects.  Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:2044-2052. © 2021 SETAC.