Relative validation of a short questionnaire to assess the dietary habits of pregnant American Indian women

Exploring Self-Report Dietary Assessment Tools Validated for Indigenous Populations Globally: A Scoping Review

ISSUE ADDRESSED

Health promotion for Indigenous populations commonly centres around diet-mediated chronic diseases and is often evaluated with self-report (personal recall)-based tools. Accurate dietary assessment methods are crucial for the evaluation of these health promotion outcomes. Dietary assessment tools may require cultural, contextual and language adaptation, as well as validation within Indigenous populations to ensure efficacy and reliability. Due to the limited literature available for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, this review aimed to explore the range of self-report dietary assessment tools that have undergone validation or reliability testing for Indigenous adult populations globally and their adherence to gold-standard Indigenous research principles.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted as per the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) method. Seven electronic databases were searched with no date or language restrictions. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal with a validated Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research Quality Appraisal Tool (QAT) were undertaken by two reviewers, with a third reviewer engaged for resolving discrepancies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles describing 31 instances of validity and reliability testing on 28 unique self-report dietary assessment tools were included in the review. Studies were predominantly conducted in the USA (n = 13), followed by Australia (n = 4), Canada (n = 3) and Greenland (n = 3). The most common method of validation was relative validity (n = 23). Tools were primarily interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) validated against multiple 24-h dietary recalls. Tools commonly assessed energy, carbohydrate, fat and protein intake; however, they achieved varying strengths of correlation (r = 0-0.82). Tools were predominately paper-based; however, six studies validated a device-based tool; no web-browser app-based tools were validated in the included literature.

CONCLUSION

Interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaires are the most prevalent self-report dietary assessment method validated within Indigenous populations globally. Browser-based e-tools, which are portable and cost-effective, may hold promise for dietary assessment among Indigenous populations. The acceptability and validity of such tools for Indigenous population groups should be explored through future research. Tools validated to capture added sugar, sodium and food group intake may provide for more meaningful evaluation of health promotion programmes for Indigenous peoples.

SO WHAT

Tools that have been validated for use with Indigenous peoples are essential for supporting a reliable and accurate evaluation of health promotion activities. Validating dietary assessment tools to adequately capture the predominant outcome measures targeted in nutritional health promotion strategies within Indigenous populations may contribute a more meaningful evaluation of health promotion programmes for Indigenous peoples.

Validation and calibration of the Food Consumption Frequency Questionnaire for pregnant women

BACKGROUND

Few food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) have been validated for pregnant women, particularly those in small- and medium-sized cities in different regions of Brazil.

OBJECTIVES

To validate and calibrate a semiquantitative FFQ for pregnant women.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The study was validated with a sample of 50 pregnant women (≥ 18 years) enrolled in Brazilian prenatal services.

METHODS

An FFQ and a 24-hour recall were used to evaluate dietary intake. Dietary variables were tested for normality and log-converted when asymmetrical. Pearson's Correlation Coefficient was used to validate the questionnaire. Linear regression was applied to extract calibration factors. All variables underlying the consumption analysis were adjusted for energy.

RESULTS

The mean age of the pregnant women was 26 years ± 6.2 years; 58% were in their first trimester, and 30% were identified as overweight/obese. The Pearson correlation analysis results indicated that the FFQ overestimated energy and nutrient intake, whose coefficients ranged from -0.15 (monounsaturated fat) to 0.50 (carbohydrate). Adjusting for energy reduced the mean values of intake coefficients, which now ranged from -0.33 (sodium) to 0.96 (folate). The calibration analysis results indicated variation in the coefficients from -0.23 (sodium) to 1.00 (folate). Calibration produced satisfactory coefficients for the FFQ compared with the reference standard for energy, macronutrients, monounsaturated fat, cholesterol, vitamins B12/C, folate, sodium, iron, and calcium.

CONCLUSIONS

After validating and calibrating tests, we observed that the FFQ was adequately accurate for assessing the food consumption of the pregnant women in this study.

Reproducibility and Relative Validity of a Dietary Screener Adapted for Use among Pregnant Women in Dhulikhel, Nepal

OBJECTIVES

Here we examined the reproducibility and validity of a dietary screener which was translated and adapted to assess diet quality among pregnant Nepalese women.

METHODS

A pilot cohort of singleton pregnant women (N = 101; age 25.9 ± 4.1 years) was recruited from a tertiary, periurban hospital in Nepal. An adapted Nepali version of the PrimeScreen questionnaire, a brief 21-item dietary screener that assesses weekly consumption of 12 healthy and 9 unhealthy food groups, was administered twice, and a month apart, in both the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Up to four inconsecutive 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) were completed each trimester and utilized as the reference method for validation. For each trimester, data from multiple 24-HDRs were averaged across days, and items were grouped to match the classification and three weekly consumption categories (0-1, 2-3, or 4 + servings/week) of the 21 food groups represented on the PrimeScreen.

RESULTS

Gwet's agreement coefficients (AC1) were used to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of the adapted PrimeScreen against the 24-HDRs in both the 2nd and 3rd trimester. AC1 indicated good to excellent (≥ 0.6) reproducibility for the majority (85%) of food groups across trimesters. There was moderate to excellent validity (AC1 ≥ 0.4) for all food groups except for fruits and vegetables in the 2nd trimester, and green leafy vegetables and eggs in both the 2nd and 3rd trimesters.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified PrimeScreen questionnaire appears to be a reasonably valid and reliable instrument for assessing the dietary intake of most food groups among pregnant women in Nepal.

Identification of Measurement Needs to Prevent Childhood Obesity in High-Risk Populations and Environments

INTRODUCTION

Children at highest obesity risk include those from certain racial/ethnic groups, from low-income families, with disabilities, or living in high-risk communities. However, a 2013 review of the National Collaborative for Childhood Obesity Research Measures Registry identified few measures focused on children at highest obesity risk. The objective is to (1) identify individual and environmental measures of diet and physical activity added to the Measures Registry since 2013 used among high-risk populations or settings and (2) describe methods for their development, adaptation, or validation.

METHODS

Investigators screened references in the Measures Registry from January 2013 to September 2017 (n=351) and abstracted information about individual and environmental measures developed for, adapted for, or applied to high-risk populations or settings, including measure type, study population, adaptation and validation methods, and psychometric properties.

RESULTS

A total of 38 measures met inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 assessed individual dietary (n=25) or physical activity (n=13) behaviors, and 11 assessed the food (n=8) or physical activity (n=7) environment. Of those, 17 measures were developed for, 9 were applied to (i.e., developed in a general population and used without modification), and 12 were adapted (i.e., modified) for high-risk populations. Few measures were used in certain racial/ethnic groups (i.e., American Indian/Alaska Native, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and Asian), children with disabilities, and rural (versus urban) communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2013, a total of 38 measures were added to the Measures Registry that were used in high-risk populations. However, many of the previously identified gaps in population coverage remain. Rigorous, community-engaged methodologic research may help researchers better adapt and validate measures for high-risk populations.

Diet Quality of Pregnant American Indian Women in the Northern Plains

INTRODUCTION

We examined diet quality and intake of pregnancy-specific micronutrients among pregnant American Indian women in the Northern Plains.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of nutrition data from the Prenatal Alcohol and SIDS and Stillbirth (PASS) Network Safe Passage Study and the PASS Diet Screener study (N = 170). Diet intake, including dietary supplementation, was assessed by using three 24-hour recalls conducted on randomly selected, nonconsecutive days. Diet intake data were averaged across the participant's recalls and scored for 2 dietary indices: the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI-2010) and the Alternate Healthy Eating Index for Pregnancy (AHEI-P). We also assessed nutrient adequacy with Dietary Reference Intakes for pregnancy.

RESULTS

On average, participants were aged 26.9 (standard deviation [SD], 5.5) years with a pre-pregnancy body mass index of 29.8 (SD, 7.5) kg/m2. Mean AHEI-P and HEI-2010 scores (52.0 [SD, 9.0] and 49.2 [SD, 11.1], respectively) indicated inadequate adherence to dietary recommendations. Micronutrient intake for vitamins D and K, choline, calcium, and potassium were lower than recommended, and sodium intake was higher than recommended.

CONCLUSION

Our findings that pregnant American Indian women are not adhering to dietary recommendations is consistent with studies in other US populations. Identifying opportunities to partner with American Indian communities is necessary to ensure effective and sustainable interventions to promote access to and consumption of foods and beverages that support the adherence to recommended dietary guidelines during pregnancy.

Relative validation of a short questionnaire to assess the dietary habits of pregnant American Indian women

The objective of this study was to compare a short dietary screener developed to assess diet quality with interviewer‐administered telephone 24‐hour dietary recalls in a population of pregnant Northern Plains (NP) American Indian women. Participants were recruited from NP clinical sites of the Prenatal Alcohol and SIDS and Stillbirth (PASS) Network, as part of a large, prospective, multidisciplinary study. Prenatal PASS participants who enrolled prior to 24 weeks gestation were eligible to participate. Repeated 24‐hour dietary recalls were collected using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software and a short dietary screener was administered intended to capture usual dietary intake during pregnancy. The available recalls were averaged across days for analysis. Items were grouped from the recalls to match the food group data estimates for the screener (e.g., total vegetables, total fruit, total dairy, total and whole grains). Deattenuated Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the two data sources after correcting for the within‐person variation in the 24‐hour recall data. A total of 164 eligible women completed the screener and at least two 24‐hour dietary recalls and were included in the analyses. Pearson deattenuated correlation coefficients between the diet screener and the dietary recalls for the majority of food groups were 0.40 or higher. This short diet screener to assess usual diet appears to be a valid instrument for use in evaluating diet quality among pregnant American Indian women.