Occurrence of a non deleterious gene conversion event in the BRCA1 gene

5' Region Large Genomic Rearrangements in the BRCA1 Gene in French Families: Identification of a Tandem Triplication and Nine Distinct Deletions with Five Recurrent Breakpoints

Simple Summary

Large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 consisting of deletions/duplications of one or several exons are complex events, often occurring in the 5′ region. We characterized 10 events in 20 families: one large triplication classified as benign and nine large deletions classified as pathogenic. The breakpoint localization will certainly help to further understand the chromatin structure in regions sensitive to rearrangement.

Abstract

Background: Large genomic rearrangements (LGR) in BRCA1 consisting of deletions/duplications of one or several exons have been found throughout the gene with a large proportion occurring in the 5′ region from the promoter to exon 2. The aim of this study was to better characterize those LGR in French high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Methods: DNA from 20 families with one apparent duplication and nine deletions was analyzed with a dedicated comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array, high-resolution BRCA1 Genomic Morse Codes analysis and Sanger sequencing. Results: The apparent duplication was in fact a tandem triplication of exons 1 and 2 and part of intron 2 of BRCA1, fully characterized here for the first time. We calculated a causality score with the multifactorial model from data obtained from six families, classifying this variant as benign. Among the nine deletions detected in this region, eight have never been identified. The breakpoints fell in six recurrent regions and could confirm some specific conformation of the chromatin. Conclusions: Taken together, our results firmly establish that the BRCA1 5′ region is a frequent site of different LGRs and highlight the importance of the segmental duplication and Alu sequences, particularly the very high homologous region, in the mechanism of a recombination event. This also confirmed that those events are not systematically deleterious.

Molecular characterization of pathogenic OTOA gene conversions in hearing loss patients

Bi-allelic loss-of-function variants of OTOA are a well-known cause of moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Whereas non-allelic homologous recombination-mediated deletions of the gene are well known, gene conversions to pseudogene OTOAP1 have been reported in the literature but never fully described nor their pathogenicity assessed. Here, we report two unrelated patients with moderate hearing-loss, who were compound heterozygotes for a converted allele and a deletion of OTOA. The conversions were initially detected through sequencing depths anomalies at the OTOA locus after exome sequencing, then confirmed with long range polymerase chain reactions. Both conversions lead to loss-of-function by introducing a premature stop codon in exon 22 (p.Glu787*). Using genomic alignments and long read nanopore sequencing, we found that the two probands carry stretches of converted DNA of widely different lengths (at least 9 kbp and around 900 bp, respectively).

Genetic characteristics of polycistronic system‑mediated randomly‑inserted multi‑transgenes in miniature pigs and mice

Multi-transgenic technology is superior to single transgenic technology in biological and medical research. Multi-transgene insertion mediated by a polycistronic system is more effective for the integration of polygenes. The multi-transgene insertion patterns and manners of inheritance are not completely understood. Copy number quantification is one available approach for addressing this issue. The present study determined copy numbers in two multi-transgenic mice (K3 and L3) and two multi-transgenic miniature pigs (Z2 and Z3) using absolute quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. For the F0 generation, a given transgene was able to exhibit different copy number integration capacities in different individuals. For the F1 generation, the most notable characteristic was that the copy number proportions were different among pedigrees (P<0.05). The results of the present study demonstrated that transgenes within the same vector exhibited the same integration trend between the F0 and F1 generations. In conclusion, intraspecific consistency and intergenerational copy numbers were compared and the integration capacity of each specific transgene differed in multi-transgenic animals. In particular, the copy number of one transgene may not be used to represent other transgenes in polycistronic vector-mediated multi-transgenic organisms. Consequently, in multi-transgenic experimental animal disease model research or breeding, copy numbers provide an important reference. Therefore, each transgene in multi-transgenic animals must be separately screened to prevent large copy number differences, and inconsistent expression between transgenes and miscellaneous data, in subsequent research.