Update on SWI/SNF-related gynecologic mesenchymal neoplasms: SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma and SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms

The "Other" Uterine Mesenchymal Neoplasms: Recent Developments and Emerging Entities

Uterine mesenchymal neoplasms are a challenging group of tumors that often show overlapping morphologic features and immunohistochemical profiles. The increasing use of molecular testing in these tumors has enabled a better appreciation of their pathobiology, resulting in a wave of emerging neoplasms and improved characterization of ones previously considered exceptionally rare. Identification of specific molecular alterations has permitted targeted therapy options in tumors that were typically unresponsive to conventional therapies, as well as recognition that a subset can have a hereditary basis. This review will discuss the more "common" of the uncommon uterine mesenchymal neoplasms, including inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. This will be followed by an overview of emerging entities, including NTRK-rearranged uterine sarcoma, SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma, KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion uterine sarcoma, and MEIS1::NCOA2/1 fusion sarcoma.

[Diagnosis of uterine sarcomas and rare uterine mesenchymal tumours with malignant potential. Guidelines of the French Sarcoma Group and Rare Gynaecological Tumours]

The landscape of uterine sarcomas is becoming more complex with the description of new entities associated with recurrent driver molecular alterations. Uterine sarcomas, in analogy with soft tissue sarcomas, are distinguished into complex genomic and simple genomic sarcomas. Leiomyosarcomas and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas belong to complex genomic sarcomas group. Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, other rare tumors associated with fusion transcripts (such as NTRK, PDGFB, ALK, RET ROS1) and SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma are considered simple genomic sarcomas. The most common uterine sarcoma are first leiomyosarcoma and secondly endometrial stromal sarcomas. Three different histological subtypes of leiomyosarcoma (fusiform, myxoid, epithelioid) are identified, myxoid and epithelioid leiomyosarcoma being more aggressive than fusiform leiomyosarcoma. The distinction between low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is primarily morphological and immunohistochemical and the detection of fusion transcripts can help the diagnosis. Uterine PEComa is a rare tumor, which is distinguished into borderline and malignant, according to a risk assessment algorithm. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix is more common in children but can also occur in adult women. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix is almost always DICER1 mutated, unlike that of the vagina which is wild-type DICER1, and adenosarcoma which can be DICER1 mutated but with less frequency. Among the emerging entities, sarcomas associated with fusion transcripts involving the NTRK, ALK, PDGFB genes benefit from targeted therapy. The integration of molecular data with histology and clinical data allows better identification of uterine sarcomas in order to better treat them.

SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient Uterine Neoplasm With Hybrid Adenosarcoma and Carcinoma Features: Expanding the Molecular-morphologic Spectrum of SMARCA4-driven Gynecologic Malignancies

SMARCA4 gene encodes BRG1, a member of the SWItch/sucrose non-fermentable protein family involved in epigenetic transcriptional regulation of important cellular processes. In the uterine corpus, SMARCA4/BRG1 deficiency is associated with a novel class of undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, characterized by younger age onset, rhabdoid histology, focal phyllodiform architecture, high-risk pathologic findings, and dismal prognosis. Herein, we report a case of a 34-year-old Asian woman with a SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient uterine tumor fulfilling the clinicopathologic features of an undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. However, the tumor exhibited several unique features that have not been previously emphasized, including (1) conspicuous phyllodiform architecture recapitulating conventional adenosarcoma, (2) rhabdoid tumor cells forming cords and keratin-positive cohesive epithelial islands, and (3) cooccurrence with a spatially distinct and discrete endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia from the rest of the proliferation. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were diffusely positive for synaptophysin, whereas BRG1 was lost. Pertinent molecular findings included frameshift mutations in the SMARCA4 gene, mutations in histone modification and chromatin remodeling genes, including KMT2C, ARID1B, KAT6A, and NCOR1, and mutations in Wnt signaling involving APC and CTNNB1. Copy number gain in MDM2 and CDK4 were also identified. The tumor mutation burden was intermediate (6.8/MB) and it was microsatellite stable. On balance, our case exhibited morphologic and molecular features that overlap with (1) an undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, (2) an adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth, and (3) a mixed adenosarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma. These hybrid features further expand the molecular-morphologic spectrum of SMARCA4/BRG1-deficient uterine neoplasms.

SMARCA4 loss irrelevant for ARID1A mutated ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A case report

Clear cell carcinomas are rare and relatively chemo-insensitive ovarian cancers with a characteristic molecular pathogenesis. Alterations in ARID1A, a component of the multiprotein chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF, are likely early events in the development of ovarian clear cancers arising from atypical endometriosis. Insight into additional driver events and particularly mutations in the same chromatin remodeling complex is limited. Isolated loss of SMARCA4, encoding the ATPase of the SWI/SNF complex, characterizes other aggressive gynecologic cancers including small cell carcinomas of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (UDEC), and uterine sarcomas (SDUS). The ovarian clear cell carcinoma of a 48-year-old showed in the initial surgical specimen a subclonal loss of SMARCA4 in addition to an ARID1A mutation, i.e., two alterations in the SWI/SNF heterochromatin remodeling complex. We anticipated that the SMARCA4 loss would worsen the disease course in analogy to SCCOHT, UDEC, and SDUS. However, the disease did not accelerate. Instead, the recurrent disease showed restored SMARCA4 expression while retaining the ARID1A mutation. Combinatorial redundancy, diversity and sequence in the SWI/SNF complex assembly as well as DNA- and tissue-specificity may explain the observed irrelevance of SMARCA4 loss in the presented ARID1A mutated ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Uterine sarcomas and rare uterine mesenchymal tumors with malignant potential. Diagnostic guidelines of the French Sarcoma Group and the Rare Gynecological Tumors Group

The landscape of uterine sarcomas is becoming increasingly complex with the description of new entities associated with recurrent molecular alterations. Uterine sarcomas, as well as soft tissue sarcomas, can be distinguished into complex genomic sarcomas and simple genomic sarcomas. Leiomyosarcoma and pleomorphic type undifferentiated uterine sarcoma belong to the first group. Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, NTRK, COL1A1::PDGFB, ALK, RET, ROS1 associated sarcomas, and SMARCA4 deficient uterine sarcoma belong to the second group. Leiomyosarcoma is the most common uterine sarcoma followed by endometrial stromal sarcomas. Three different histologic subtypes of leiomyosarcomas are recognized with distinct diagnostic criteria and different clinical outcomes, the myxoid and epithelioid leiomyosarcomas being even more aggressive than the fusiform type. The distinction between low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is based first on morphology and immunohistochemistry. The detection of fusion transcripts helps in the diagnosis. Definitely recognized as a separate entity, uterine PEComa is a rare tumor whose diagnostic criteria are being recently defined. Uterine PEComa has a specific algorithm stratifying the tumors into uncertain malignant potential and malignant tumors. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the uterine cervix are not restricted to children but can also be observed in adult women and are almost always DICER1 mutated, unlike embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the vagina which are DICER1wild-type, and adenosarcoma which can be DICER1 mutated but with less frequency. As sarcomas associated with fusion transcripts involving the NTRK, ALK, COL1A1::PDGFB genes can benefit from targeted therapy, systematic detection are now relevant especially for patients with high risk of relapse or in recurrent setting. The integration of molecular data with dedicated expert pathology review for histology and clinical data allows better identification of uterine sarcomas in order to better treat them.

A Subset of SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient vulvar neoplasms express germ cell markers

AIMS

SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient vulvar neoplasms comprise a group of rare tumours that include epithelioid sarcoma (ES), myoepithelial carcinoma (MEC), the recently described myoepithelioma-like tumour of the vulvar region (MELTVR), and sarcomas that are difficult to classify. It has been suggested that so-called vulvar yolk sac tumours (YST) may represent morphologic variants of SMARCB1-deficient tumours; thus, we investigated the immunoreactivity of germ cell markers in SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms were stained with germ cell tumour markers (SALL4, glypican-3, OCT3/4, and AFP) and re-reviewed for morphologic features. The tumours occurred in adult females (median age 41 years) and included ES (n = 7), MELTVR (n = 2), and MEC (n = 1). All cases showed loss of SMARCB1 expression. Four cases (40%) were focally positive for SALL4 in areas with morphology of typical-appearing ES. One of these cases also showed focal staining for OCT3/4. One ES showed a transition from typical-appearing ES to YST-like morphology, with diffuse expression of SALL4 and glypican-3, and focal expression of AFP, in these latter areas. All other tested cases were negative for AFP.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals that SALL4, glypican-3, and OCT3/4 are positive in a subset of SMARCB1-deficient vulvar neoplasms, which may pose a diagnostic challenge and result in consideration of a germ cell tumour. We also highlight a case with transition from ES to YST-like morphology, lending further support that YSTs of the vulva are somatically derived SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms and do not represent true germ-cell neoplasia.

Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor of the Uterus: A Report of Molecularly Confirmed Case with EWSR1-WT1 Fusion

We report a case of a 49-year-old female with desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the uterus (DSRCT). Histologically, in some areas the tumor showed typical features with ample desmoplastic stroma, while in other areas the tumor cells diffusely infiltrated myometrium with only focal desmoplastic reaction. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells showed diffuse positivity for desmin, CD56, CD57, EMA and cyclin D1. Focal positivity was present for antibodies against cytokeratin AE1/3, BerEP4, NSE, IFITM1 and CD10. The WT-1 antibody (against the N-terminus) showed cytoplasmic positivity in some tumor cells, while the nuclei were negative. P53 expression was wild-type. The Ki-67 index (MIB1 antibody) was about 55%. Other markers examined including transgelin, myogenin, synaptophysin, chromogranin, h-caldesmon, PAX8, and CD117 were all negative. NGS analysis revealed a fusion transcript of the EWSR1 and WT1 genes. DSRCT of the uterus is a rare neoplasm, as only two cases have been reported so far. However, only one of these cases was examined molecularly with a confirmation of the characteristic EWSR1-WT1 fusion. We report a second case of molecularly confirmed DSRCT of the uterus and discuss its clinical features, differential diagnosis and the significance of molecular testing.

Discrepancies in pathological diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare uterine malignancy that requires accurate pathological diagnosis for proper treatment. This study aimed to clarify the discrepancies in the pathological diagnosis of ESS and obtain practical clues to improve diagnostic accuracy. Between 2002 and 2015, 148 patients with low-grade ESS (LGESS), high-grade ESS (HGESS), undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES), or undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) diagnosed at 31 institutions were included. We performed immunohistochemistry, real-time polymerase chain reaction for JAZF1-SUZ12 and YWHAE-NUTM2A/B, and break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization for JAZF1, PHF1, and YWHAE. Central pathology review (CPR) was performed by six pathologists. After CPR, LGESS, HGESS, UES/UUS, and other diagnoses were confirmed in 72, 25, 16, and 31 cases, respectively. Diagnostic discrepancies were observed in 19.6% (18/92) of LGESS and 34% (18/53) of HGESS or UUS/UES. Adenosarcomas, endometrial carcinomas, carcinosarcomas, and leiomyosarcomas were common diagnostic pitfalls. JAZF1-SUZ12 transcript, PHF1 split signal, and YWHAE-NUTM2A/B transcript were mutually exclusively detected in 23 LGESS, 3 LGESS, and 1 LGESS plus 3 HGESS, respectively. JAZF1-SUZ12 and YWHAE-NUTM2A/B transcripts were detected only in cases with CPR diagnosis of LGESS or HGESS. The CPR diagnosis of LGESS, HGESS, and UUS was a significant prognosticator, and patients with LGESS depicted a favorable prognosis, while those with UUS showed the worst prognosis. Pathological diagnosis of ESS is often challenging and certain tumors should be carefully considered. The accurate pathological diagnosis with the aid of molecular testing is essential for prognostic prediction and treatment selection.

Vulvar Yolk Sac Tumors Are Somatically Derived SMARCB1 (INI-1)-Deficient Neoplasms

So-called primary yolk sac tumors of the vulva are very rare and often have an aggressive disease course. Their molecular features have not been previously characterized. There is also a well-documented group of SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient vulvar neoplasms, which includes proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma and myoepithelial carcinoma. Until now, "vulvar yolk sac tumors" and SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms were considered unrelated diseases. After reviewing an index case of a vulvar yolk sac tumor with loss of SMARCB1 by immunohistochemistry, we retrospectively identified 2 additional cases diagnosed as vulvar yolk sac tumors. Patient ages were 34, 32, and 25 years old, and 2 tumors were associated with a pregnancy. All 3 cases showed morphology typical of a yolk sac tumor, and by immunohistochemistry all were positive for SALL4, glypican-3, keratins, and lacked CD34 positivity. All tumors also demonstrated loss of SMARCB1 in tumor cells. Targeted molecular profiling was performed in 2 cases and identified 2 copy deletion of SMARCB1, without genomic alterations typically seen in gonadal yolk sac tumors. In the third case, isochromosome 12p was not identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. All 3 patients had either local recurrences or distant metastases, and 2 died of disease. One patient had progressive disease while receiving the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitor tazemetostat. Overall, these findings suggest that vulvar tumors with pure yolk sac-like morphology may represent morphologic variants of SMARCB1-deficient tumors and not veritable germ cell neoplasia. This potential reclassification may have both prognostic and treatment implications and warrants study of additional extragonadal yolk sac tumors.

Myxoepithelioid tumour with chordoid features: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and genetic study of 14 cases of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft-tissue neoplasm

AIMS

Complete loss of SMARCB1/INI1 in soft-tissue tumours such as malignant rhabdoid tumour, epithelioid sarcoma, myoepithelial tumour of soft tissue and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma is often associated with high-grade malignancy and poor prognosis. The diagnosis is sometimes challenging, owing to histological similarities, so careful differential diagnosis is required. Therefore, soft-tissue tumours with complete SMARCB1/INI1 loss could potentially include an unknown entity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 160 cases of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft-tissue tumour, and found 14 cases that were not classifiable into already existing categories and had common clinical and histological features. These involved two male and 12 female patients, ranging in age from 20 years to 61 years. The tumours were located in the the puboinguinal region (n = 13) and pelvic cavity (n = 1). Histologically, the tumours showed relatively uniform epithelioid to spindle-shaped cells with myxoid stroma. All tumours showed immunoreactivity for brachyury, epithelial membrane antigen, and progesterone receptor, and 12 of 14 cases did so for oestrogen receptor. Variable positive staining for α-smooth muscle actin, S100 and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was seen. NR4A3 and EWSR1 gene rearrangements were not detected in 13 and 11 examined cases, respectively. Clinical follow-up data for the 14 patients showed that 13 were alive without disease and one had been lost to follow-up; four patients developed local recurrence and/or metastases.

CONCLUSION

The designation 'myxoepithelioid tumour with choroid features' (METC) was proposed as a tumour with intermediate malignancy controllable with appropriate treatment, including the entity of myoepithelioma-like tumour of the vulvar region. METC represents a novel and independent subset that is histologically, biologically and clinically distinct from already existing SMARCB1/INI1-deficient soft-tissue tumours.