The challenge of forgetting: Neurobiological mechanisms of auditory directed forgetting

Prefrontal cortex-mediated inhibition supports face recognition

Inhibitory processes are thought to be important for memory function. A recent behavioral study that employed a face recognition paradigm reported that participants made fewer "old" responses to highly similar faces than less similar faces, providing evidence that memory for faces may rely on related-item inhibition. However, these results could also be explained by a non-inhibitory recall-to-reject process. The current study sought to use fMRI connectivity analysis to distinguish between these hypotheses. Although both hypotheses predict correct rejection of highly similar faces will produce activity in the prefrontal cortex, the inhibition hypothesis predicts negative connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and regions associated with memory retrieval and face processing, whereas the recall-to-reject hypothesis predicts positive connectivity between these regions. During the study phase, participants were presented with male and female faces. During the test phase, they viewed old faces, related face morphs (20-80% similar to old faces), and new faces, and made "old"-"new" judgements. Correct rejection of highly similar face morphs was associated with increased activity in the right lateral prefrontal cortex and negative connectivity between this region and regions associated with face processing and memory retrieval. These results indicate that prefrontal cortex-mediated memory inhibition supports face recognition.

A functional near-infrared spectroscopy investigation of item-method directed forgetting

Whether directed forgetting is passive or active remains debated. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), blood-oxygen level-dependent responses of intentional forgetting were investigated in the item-method directed forgetting (DF) paradigm. During the study phase, each word was followed by a random remembering or forgetting cue indicating whether the word is to be remembered (TBR) or to be forgotten (TBF). A recognition test was used in the test phase and four cue-response conditions were obtained: remembering/forgetting cues associated with the subsequently remembered (TBR-r/TBF-r) or forgotten (TBR-f/TBF-f) words. Data from 16 healthy adult participants showed a DF effect. The fNIRS data revealed that, during the 5-9 s time window, the oxygenate hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) levels were higher during intentional forgetting compared to intentional remembering in the left inferior frontal (TBF-f vs. TBR-f) and right superior frontal gyrus (TBF-r vs. TBR-r), indicating more frontal inhibition involved during intentional forgetting. During the 9-11 s time window, the oxy-Hb level in the frontal and parietal gyrus was higher for forgetting than remembering cues, indicating that the TBF words might be automatically encoded. In sum, the TBF words might receive inhibition control triggered by forgetting cues and then be automatically encoded with the increase of the post-cue interval.

Obliviate! Reviewing Neural Fundamentals of Intentional Forgetting from a Meta-Analytic Perspective

Intentional forgetting (IF) is an important adaptive mechanism necessary for correct memory functioning, optimal psychological wellbeing, and appropriate daily performance. Due to its complexity, the neuropsychological processes that give birth to successful intentional forgetting are not yet clearly known. In this study, we used two different meta-analytic algorithms, Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) & Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to quantitatively assess the neural correlates of IF and to evaluate the degree of compatibility between the proposed neurobiological models and the existing brain imaging data. We found that IF involves the interaction of two networks, the main “core regions” consisting of a primarily right-lateralized frontal-parietal circuit that is activated irrespective of the paradigm used and sample characteristics and a second less constrained “supportive network” that involves frontal-hippocampal interactions when IF takes place. Additionally, our results support the validity of the inhibitory or thought suppression hypothesis. The presence of a neural signature of IF that is stable regardless of experimental paradigms is a promising finding that may open new venues for the development of effective clinical interventions.

Forgetting positive social feedback is difficult: ERP evidence in a directed forgetting paradigm

Voluntary forgetting of unwanted memories is an adaptive cognitive function. However, it remains unknown how voluntary forgetting of unwanted social feedback may influence subsequent memories and evaluations, and what the underlying neurocognitive processes are. Here, we presented participants with peer photos together with feedback indicating social acceptance or rejection, followed by "remember" or "forget" instructive cues, while electroencephalograms were recorded during the experiment. We examined the Directed Forgetting (DF) effect in a recognition memory test, and tested participants' explicit and implicit attitudes toward the peers using a social evaluation task and an affect misattribution procedure (AMP). Both the memory test and the AMP were examined immediately and 3 days after the DF task so to estimate both the instant and the long-term effects of memory control. Behaviorally, immediate memory test showed smaller DF effect for positive than negative social feedback, which suggests that forgetting positive social feedback was more difficult than forgetting negative social feedback. Regarding the ERP results, although participants showed comparable frontal N2 amplitudes (reflecting inhibitory control efforts) following the instruction of forgetting positive and negative social feedback, positive feedback elicited larger late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes than negative feedback during initial encoding phase, suggesting an encoding bias for positive self-relevant information. Intriguingly, voluntary efforts to forget negative social feedback enhanced people's explicit and implicit evaluations toward the feedback senders. These findings provide new evidence for the adaptive function of memory control, which broadens the influence of voluntary forgetting in the context of social interaction and social evaluation.

Wakefulness impairs selective consolidation of relevant trauma-associated memories resulting in more frequent intrusions

Recent studies show that sleep reduces intrusive memories after analog trauma. This effect is assumed to be caused by sleep's impact on memory consolidation. However, the underlying processes of this phenomenon have not been uncovered. Thus, the current study investigates the hypothesis that sleep reduces intrusive memories by supporting the selective consolidation of relevant memories. Seventy-five participants were exposed to traumatic picture stories before nocturnal sleep or wakefulness during daytime. Memory for relevant and irrelevant trauma-associated stimuli was assessed prior to and after the retention period. Consistent with the hypothesis, results demonstrate reduced memory loss for relevant as opposed to irrelevant trauma-associated stimuli after sleep but not after wakefulness. Moreover, an incremental retention benefit for relevant trauma-associated stimuli was negatively correlated with the number of intrusive trauma memories after wakefulness. These results suggest that lack of sleep impairs selective gating of relevant trauma-associated memories, thereby enhancing intrusion development after trauma.

Motivated forgetting increases the recall time of learnt items: Behavioral and event related potential evidence

We investigated modulation of the recall time in a motivated forgetting (MF) paradigm and the neural manifestation of it through event related potential (ERP) analysis. We studied whether compared to failed attempts in suppression, partial success can potentiate control mechanisms and this might manifest, neurally as modulation of ERP components related to conscious recollection, and behaviorally as delayed recall of learnt items. We employed a modified version of the Think\No-Think paradigm with dominant number of No-Think words (cued to forget). We defined a forgetting index as FI = Final Recall Time-Initial Recall Time. The MF trials were separated into three conditions according to their corresponding FI; Forget, Delayed Recall, and Recall conditions. The findings revealed significant late ERP effects in terms of a late parietal positivity (LPP), modulated by the item condition, that appeared to reflect the consequence of conscious suppression on actual retrieval of stored memory. Over the same topographic location, FI was negatively correlated with the LPP amplitude, demonstrating the consequence of inhibition processing during MF in modulating the recall time. The negative correlation between LPP and FI provides evidence that increased recall time due to MF is also related to reduced activity, probably in the hippocampal-parietal network, corresponding to recollection of suppressed memories.