Oral nicotinamide: The role in skin cancer chemoprevention

The incidence of skin cancer has gradually increased in the last years and exposition to ultraviolet radiation remains the main risk factor. We performed a comprehensive review on the role of nicotinamide (NAM) in the chemoprevention of skin cancers. NAM, a water-soluble form of vitamin B3, interferes with skin carcinogenesis as it regulates immunosuppressor genes such as p53 and sirtuins and restores intracellular level of NAD+, a co-enzyme essential for energy production. Efficacy and safety of NAM was evaluated in a Phase III double-blinded control-placebo study (ONTRAC), thus demonstrating that the incidence of actinic keratoses and non-melanoma skin cancers was lower in the nicotinamide group than in placebo group. Further studies showed the efficacy of NAM also in transplanted patients and among inhabitants living in arsenic contamination areas. Despite the quick response to NAM supplementation, its intake need to be carried on chronically as the efficacy seems to vanish rapidly.

Solid organ transplantation worsens the prognosis of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region-Comparison between solid organ transplant recipients and immunocompetent patients

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSCC-HN) appears to behave more aggressively in immunosuppressed patients. We aimed to investigate this hypothesis by comparing solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) with CSCC-HN to immunocompetent patients.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted for SOTR and immunocompetent patients who were treated for CSCC-HN.

RESULTS

A total of 177 SOTR and 157 immunocompetent patients with CSCC-HN were included. Lymph node metastases were more common in the SOTR group (9% vs 3%), and distant metastases occurred only in SOTR (3% of patients). SOTR had a higher rate of recurrences (19% vs 10%), which were mostly regional (7%) and distant (3%). The 2-year disease-specific survival of SOTR was lower (93% vs 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

SOTR with CSCC-HN has significantly worse outcomes compared to immunocompetent patients. Solid-organ transplantation should be regarded as a negative prognostic factor in patients with CSCC-HN.