Perforator-based propeller flaps for reconstruction of massive anterolateral thigh donor site wounds

Utilizing Perforator Propeller Flaps for Donor Site Closure: Harvesting Large Workhorse Flaps without Lingering Concerns

BACKGROUND

 Primary closure of donor sites following large flap harvest may not be feasible. The use of perforator propeller flap (PPF) in this setting is gaining popularity, successfully resurfacing the wound and lessening potential donor-site morbidity. In this study, we aimed to review our experience and outcomes using PPFs in donor-site coverage throughout the body.

METHODS

 A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent one or more PPFs surgery for donor site resurfacing between February 2009 and December 2021. Flap and defect characteristics were summarized. Postoperative complications and perioperative factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

 Fifty-five patients underwent donor-site reconstruction using 68 PPFs. Of the 55 primary donor sites, 44 were covered with a single PPF, 9 with two PPFs, and 2 with three PPFs. One flap experienced complete necrosis and four flaps experienced distal flap necrosis, leading to an overall complication rate of 9.1%. No risk factors were found to be statistically significantly associated with the complication. All secondary PPF donor sites were closed primarily. During the average follow-up period of 15.1 months, none of the patients developed contour deformities or functional impairments.

CONCLUSION

 The PPF technique can be safely and effectively used for donor-site closure with minimal complications. It greatly frees surgeons to harvest a large workhorse flap for demanding soft tissue defect reconstruction.

Free-style propeller ulnar artery perforator flaps for radial forearm flap donor site repair

INTRODUCTION

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is still one of the most used free flaps to repair soft tissue defects of the head and neck. Among its main drawbacks, it presents severe donor site complications. We report our experience about the use of free-style propeller ulnar artery perforator flaps (UAP) to repair RFFF donor site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2010 to June 2020, six patients who underwent immediate tongue reconstruction with RFFF after cancer excision, had the donor site at the forearm reconstructed with a free-style propeller UAP flap. The indication for a UAP flap was based on defect size and the presence of tendons or radial nerve exposure. Ulnar artery perforators were identified intra-operatively with a handheld Doppler. The UAP flaps were harvested and rotated to cover donor site defects. The patients' mean age was 59, ranging from 49 to 65 years old. The defects size ranged from 8-12 cm × 5-7 cm with a mean size of 10.5 × 6.7 cm.

RESULTS

The UAP flap harvested ranged from 8-11 cm × 5-7 cm with a mean size of 10.5 × 5.5 cm. The perforators, identified with a power Doppler, were located at the middle third of the forearm. Flaps' rotation varied from 90 to 160° with a mean rotation of 122°. Mean operating time was 60 min ranging from 40 to 75 min for UAP flap elevation. No flap necrosis or tendon exposure occurred. One case of wound dehiscence was reported. Two out of six patients suffered from tendon adhesions to the flap. UAP flap donor site was primarily closed in four out of six patients, whereas two cases required a split-thickness skin grafts. Mean donor site healing time was about 20 days (19.8 days) ranging from 14 to 30 days. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 31 months with a mean follow up time of 19 months (18.6 months). At 6 months follow-up only one patient experienced a functional limitation of wrist and finger joints extension of 20° which required tenolysis. At the end of the patient's follow up that is 22 months, the range of movement was within normal limits. In our casuistry neuropathic pain was absent.

CONCLUSIONS

RFF is still a paramount tool in reconstructive surgery but its donor site is still burdened by a high complication rate. Free-style UAP flaps can provide a local and safe solution.

Versatility of the lateral circumflex femoral artery sparing perforator-based anterolateral thigh flaps in loco-regional thigh reconstruction after skin cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma resection

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap represents a workhorse in reconstructive microsurgery but its use in a free style fashion as perforator-based flap has yet to be popularized. We describe our experience with lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) sparing perforator-based ALT flaps for thigh reconstruction after oncological resection in a case series of 24 consecutive patients.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients underwent thigh reconstruction with 25 perforator-based ALT flaps between 2014 and 2020. Defect etiology was related to skin cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma resection in 3, 7, and 14 cases respectively. Mean defect size was 15 × 8 cm. Six months postoperatively, patients were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale the aesthetic and functional outcomes of the reconstructive procedure.

RESULTS

Eight flaps were advanced in a V-Y fashion (33.3%), whether 16 flaps (66.7%) were rotated in a propeller fashion. The average flap size was 19 × 8 cm, while mean operative time was 197.2 min. Donor sites were always closed by primary intention. Minor complications were registered in 5 cases and managed conservatively. Overall patients' satisfaction was high, with mean aesthetic and functional ratings of 4.46 and 4.21 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LCFA sparing perforator-based ALT flaps proved to be a versatile and reproducible solution to address thigh reconstruction after oncological resection according to the different topographical sub-units involved.