Parotid gland stem cells: Mini yet mighty

Prediction of Radiation-Induced Parotid Gland-Related Xerostomia in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Regeneration-Weighted Dose

PURPOSE

Despite improvements to treatment, patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) still experience radiation-induced xerostomia due to salivary gland damage. The stem cells of the parotid gland (PG), concentrated in the gland's main ducts (stem cell rich [SCR] region), play a critical role in the PG's response to radiation. Treatment optimization requires a dose metric that properly accounts for the relative contributions of dose to this SCR region and the PG's remainder (non-SCR region) to the risk of xerostomia in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for xerostomia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment and toxicity data of 1013 prospectively followed patients with HNC treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) were used. The regeneration-weighted dose, enabling accounting for the hypothesized different effects of dose to the SCR and non-SCR region on the risk of xerostomia, was defined as Dreg PG = Dmean SCR region + r × Dmean non-SCR region, where Dreg is the regeneration-weighted dose, Dmean is the mean dose, and r is the weighting factor. Considering the different volumes of these regions, r > 3.6 in Dreg PG demonstrates an enhanced effect of the SCR region. The most predictive value of r was estimated in 102 patients of a previously published trial testing stem cell sparing RT. For each endpoint, Dreg PG, dose to other organs, and clinical factors were used to develop NTCP models using multivariable logistic regression analysis in 663 patients. The models were validated in 350 patients.

RESULTS

Dose to the contralateral PG was associated with daytime, eating-related, and physician-rated grade ≥2 xerostomia. Consequently, r was estimated and found to be smaller than 3.6 for most PG function-related endpoints. Therefore, the contribution of Dmean SCR region to the risk of xerostomia was larger than predicted by Dmean PG. Other frequently selected predictors were pretreatment xerostomia and Dmean oral cavity. The validation showed good discrimination and calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Tools for clinical implementation of stem cell sparing RT were developed: regeneration-weighted dose to the parotid gland that accounted for regional differences in radiosensitivity within the gland and NTCP models that included this new dose metric and other prognostic factors.

Parotid Gland Stem Cell Sparing Radiation Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy for head and neck cancer frequently leads to salivary gland damage and subsequent xerostomia. The radiation response of the parotid glands of rats, mice, and patients critically depends on dose to parotid gland stem cells, mainly located in the gland's main ducts (stem cell rich [SCR] region). Therefore, this double-blind randomized controlled trial aimed to test the hypothesis that parotid gland stem cell sparing radiation therapy preserves parotid gland function better than currently used whole parotid gland sparing radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with head and neck cancer (n = 102) treated with definitive radiation therapy were randomized between standard parotid-sparing and stem cell sparing (SCS) techniques. The primary endpoint was >75% reduction in parotid gland saliva production compared with pretreatment production (FLOW12M). Secondary endpoints were several aspects of xerostomia 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were assigned to the standard arm and 48 to the SCS arm. Only dose to the SCR regions (contralateral 16 and 11 Gy [P = .004] and ipsilateral 26 and 16 Gy [P = .001] in the standard and SCS arm, respectively) and pretreatment patient-rated daytime xerostomia (35% and 13% [P = .01] in the standard and SCS arm, respectively) differed significantly between the arms. In the SCS arm, 1 patient (2.8%) experienced FLOW12M compared with 2 (4.9%) in the standard arm (P = 1.00). However, a trend toward better relative parotid gland salivary function in favor of SCS radiation therapy was shown. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that mean contralateral SCR region dose was the strongest dosimetric predictor for moderate-to-severe patient-rated daytime xerostomia and grade ≥2 physician-rated xerostomia, the latter including reported alteration in diet.

CONCLUSIONS

No significantly better parotid function was observed in SCS radiation therapy. However, additional multivariable analysis showed that dose to the SCR region was more predictive of the development of parotid gland function-related xerostomia endpoints than dose to the entire parotid gland.

The Role of Patient- and Treatment-Related Factors and Early Functional Imaging in Late Radiation-Induced Xerostomia in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

In the present prospective study, we assessed the role of various Magnetic Resonance Imaging biomarkers combined with self-assessed xerostomia questionnaires and patient- and treatment-related factors, in predicting xerostomia at 12 months after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. We hypothesized that the integration of pre-treatment imaging biomarkers, which addresses the tissue heterogeneity and individual variations among patients, could improve the accuracy of conventional prediction models that are based only on dose information, ultimately providing a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying radiation induced salivary dysfunction. The implementation of multifactorial models, driven by machine learning algorithms, may improve prediction accuracy of radiation-induced toxicity and tailor individual treatment options for patients.

Abstract

The advent of quantitative imaging in personalized radiotherapy (RT) has offered the opportunity for a better understanding of individual variations in intrinsic radiosensitivity. We aimed to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers, patient-related factors, and treatment-related factors in predicting xerostomia 12 months after RT (XER₁₂) in patients affected by oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Patients with locally advanced OSCC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic-contrast enhanced MRI at baseline; DWI was repeated at the 10th fraction of RT. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scale was used to evaluate salivary gland toxicity. Xerostomia-related questionnaires (XQs) were administered weekly during and after RT. RTOG toxicity ≥ grade 2 at XER₁₂ was considered as endpoint to build prediction models. A Decision Tree classification learner was applied to build the prediction models following a five-fold cross-validation. Of the 89 patients enrolled, 63 were eligible for analysis. Thirty-six (57.1%) and 21 (33.3%) patients developed grade 1 and grade 2 XER₁₂, respectively. Including only baseline variables, the model based on DCE-MRI and V65 (%) (volume of both glands receiving doses ≥ 65 Gy) had a fair accuracy (77%, 95% CI: 66.5–85.4%). The model based on V65 (%) and XQ-Int_mid (integral of acute XQ scores from the start to the middle of RT) reached the best accuracy (81%, 95% CI: 71–88.7%). In conclusion, non-invasive biomarkers from DCE-MRI, in combination with dosimetric variables and self-assessed acute XQ scores during treatment may help predict grade 2 XER₁₂ with a fair to good accuracy.

Regional Responses in Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Damage

Normal tissue side effects remain a major concern in radiotherapy. The improved precision of radiation dose delivery of recent technological developments in radiotherapy has the potential to reduce the radiation dose to organ regions that contribute the most to the development of side effects. This review discusses the contribution of regional variation in radiation responses in several organs. In the brain, various regions were found to contribute to radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction. In the parotid gland, the region containing the major ducts was found to be critical in hyposalivation. The heart and lung were each found to exhibit regional responses while also mutually affecting each other's response to radiation. Sub-structures critical for the development of side effects were identified in the pancreas and bladder. The presence of these regional responses is based on a non-uniform distribution of target cells or sub-structures critical for organ function. These characteristics are common to most organs in the body and we therefore hypothesize that regional responses in radiation-induced normal tissue damage may be a shared occurrence. Further investigations will offer new opportunities to reduce normal tissue side effects of radiotherapy using modern and high-precision technologies.