Randomized trial comparing three different regimens of alpha-2a-interferon in chronic hepatitis C. The TriVeneto Viral Hepatitis Group

Comparison among Different Types, Dosages and Duration of Interferon Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis C

In an attempt to determine the best therapeutic protocol for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon (IFN), we reported our experience comparing the efficacy of IFN at the usual dose and duration, i.e. 3 million units (MU) three times weekly for 6 months, with the immediate and long-term effects of different types, dosages and duration of IFN therapy. 300 patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to five groups of 60 subjects each and treated as follows: group A - recombinant IFN alpha (rIFNalpha) 3MU three times weekly for 6 months; group B - rIFNalpha 6MU three times weekly for 6 months; group C - rIFNalpha 3MU 3 times weekly for 12 months; group D - lymphoblastoid IFN (L-IFN) 6MU three times weekly for 6 months; group E - L-IFN 3MU three times weekly for 12 months. The diagnosis of hepatitis was based on clinical, serological and histological data in all patients. A 'biochemical response' was defined as the normalisation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values, and a 'complete response' as the normalisation of ALT with disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA. A 'sustained response' was defined as the persistence of ALT normalisation and undetectable viraemia 2 years after the end of treatment. The five groups were homogeneous. The incidence of dropouts was 8%, and IFN treatment was interrupted for adverse effects in 11% of the patients. In group A, 55% of the patients showed a 'biochemical response' and 31% of the subjects demonstrated a 'complete response'. In group B, a 'biochemical response' was observed in 61% and a 'complete response' in 36% of the cases. In group C, 77% of the subjects showed a 'biochemical response', with a 'complete response' seen in 40%. In group D, we observed a 'biochemical response' in 55% of the patients and a 'complete response' in 33%. In group E, 79% of the subjects had a 'biochemical response', and a 'complete response' was seen in 38%. At the end of the treatment-free follow-up the percentage of patients with a sustained response was 24% in group A, 28% in group B, 35% in group C, 27% in group D and 33% in group E. Therefore, a longer period of IFN treatment seems to provide higher percentages of sustained response than the usual 6-month duration, independently of the type of IFN. Moreover, the patients treated with a higher dosage (6MU 3 times weekly) for 6 months showed a slightly better sustained response rate compared with the usual dose. In conclusion, even if the differences among the response rates in the five groups were not statistically significant, we recommend a 12-month regimen, possibly using higher dosages at least in the first 4 to 6 months of treatment.

High versus standard doses interferon-alpha in the treatment of naïve chronic hepatitis C patients in Taiwan: a 10-year cohort study

Background

Interferon-alpha monotherapy is effective in less than one-third patients with chronic hepatitis C. The dose-effect, tolerability and durability of interferon-alpha treatment and its long-term effect on the prevention of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in naïve Taiwanese patients with chronic hepatitis C have not been well investigated. We conducted the present cohort study treated with high and standard interferon-alpha to illustrate the issues.

Methods

We performed a long-term virologic and histological follow-up of 214 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with interferon-alpha, 3 million units (3-MU, n = 80) or 6-MU (n = 134) thrice weekly for 24 weeks, in Taiwan between 1992 and 2001.

Results

There was no difference in the incidence of discontinuation between 3-MU and 6-MU groups (4/80, 5.0% versus 10/134. 7.5%). The 6-MU group had similar incidence of adverse events with the 3-MU group, except that 6-MU group had significantly higher incidence of psychological manifestations, mainly presented as irritability. The rates of sustained virological response (SVR) were significantly higher in 6-MU regimen (37.1%) than in 3-MU regimen (23.7%, p < 0.05) in per protocol analysis. Based on multivariate analysis, baseline viral load was strongly associated with SVR, followed by hepatitis C virus genotype, interferon-alpha regimen, and liver fibrosis. A histological improvement in necroinflammatory activity, but not in fibrosis was observed in the follow-up biopsy performed 0.5–5.5 years (mean: 1.9 years, n = 51) after end-of-treatment. Among patients without SVR, there was more activity improvement in 6-MU group. The durability of SVR was 100% (18/18) and 97.8% (45/46) for 3-MU and 6-MU group, respectively, in a mean follow-up period of 6.81 years (5.25–9.18 years). For 163 baseline non-cirrhotic patients, 9 of 84 (10.7%) non-responders and 3 of 79 (3.8%) sustained responders progressed to cirrhosis during a mean follow-up period of 5.52 and 5.74 years, respectively (p = 0.067, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test). For all 200 patients, hepatocellular carcinoma was detected in 12 of 113 (10.6%) non-responders and one of 87 (1.1%) sustained responders during a mean follow-up period of 5.67 and 5.73 years, respectively (p < 0.01, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test).

Conclusion

We confirm the dose effect of interferon-alpha in chronic hepatitis C. Six-MU regimen had better efficacy than 3-MU regimen in virologic and histological responses. Both regimens had good tolerability and durability in Taiwan. Sustained response could reduce the incidence of cirrhotic change and hepatocarcinogenesis.

Is laparoscopy an advantage in the diagnosis of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection?

AIM: To evaluate the potential of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and outcome of interferon treatment in HCV-infected patients.

METHODS: In this retrospective study, diagnostic laparoscopy with laparoscopic liver biopsy was performed in 72 consecutive patients with chronic HCV infection. The presence or absence of cirrhosis was analyzed macroscopically by laparoscopy and microscopically by liver biopsy specimens. Clinical and laboratory data and outcome of interferon-alfa treatment were compared between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients.

RESULTS: Laparoscopically, cirrhosis was seen in 29.2% (21/72) and non-cirrhosis in 70.8% (51/72) of patients. Cirrhotic patients were significantly older with a significant longer duration of HCV infection than noncirrhotic patients. Laboratory parameters (AST, y-GT, y-globulin fraction) were measured significantly higher as well as significantly lower (prothrombin index, platelet count) in cirrhotic patients than in non-cirrhotic patients. Histologically, cirrhosis was confirmed in 11.1% (8/72) and non cirrhosis in 88.9% (64/72). Patients with macroscopically confirmed cirrhosis (n = 21) showed histologically cirrhosis in 38.1% (8/21) and histologically non-cirrhosis in 61.9% (13/21). In contrast, patients with macroscopically non-cirrhosis (n = 51) showed histologically non cirrhosis in all cases (51/51). Thirty-nine of 72 patients were treated with interferon-alfa, resulting in 35.9% (14/39) patients with sustained response and 64.1% (25/39) with non response. Non-responders showed significantly more macroscopically cirrhosis than sustained responders. In contrast, there were no significant histological differences between non-responders and sustained responders.

CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy is more accurate than liver biopsy in recognizing cirrhosis in patients with chronic HCV infection. Liver biopsy is the best way to assess inflammatory grade and fibrotic stage. The invasive marker for staging, prognosis and management, and treatment outcome of chronic HCV-infected patients need further research and clinical trials. Laparoscopy should be performed for recognition of cirrhosis if this parameter is found to be of prognostic and therapeutic relevance in patients with chronic HCV infection.

Normalization of markedly elevated alpha-fetoprotein in a virologic nonresponder with HCV-related cirrhosis

Measurement of serum AFP can be useful in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). AFP is a fetal protein that is not normally present in the serum of adults but is elevated in most patients with HCC. The diagnosis of HCC is generally made in patients with a mass lesion in a cirrhotic liver if the AFP is over 400 ng/ml. Unfortunately, AFP is elevated in other conditions such as nonseminomatous germ cell tumor, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, pregnancy, and hepatic metastasis. A high AFP cutoff value for HCC would increase the specificity of the test, but would decrease the sensitivity considerably. We report the case of a patient with HCV and cirrhosis with a markedly elevated AFP of 1257 ng/ml in whom no evidence of HCC could be found after a thorough radiologic and histologic evaluation. Despite a virologic nonresponse to IFN-alpha2b and ribavirin therapy, there was a complete normalization of AFP.

Human leukocyte interferon-alpha treatment for chronic HCV-related hepatitis in hemophilic patients previously intolerant to other interferons-alpha

Thirty patients affected by hemophilia A or B or von-Willebrand's disease and chronic posttransfusional active HCV hepatitis who developed major side effects during the course of a previous treatment with recombinant interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) were studied. In all patients IFN-alpha therapy had to be discontinued and those who achieved a primary serologic and viral response to HCV relapsed within a few months. After a washout period, patients were retreated with human leukocyte IFN-alpha, 6 MU thrice weekly for 12 months. In about 90% of patients, a primary response, with normal AST and GGT values and undetectable HCV-RNA, was achieved within the third month of treatment and for the entire duration of treatment none of the patients had to discontinue therapy because of severe adverse reactions. During posttherapy follow-up only one patient relapsed. The human leukocyte IFN-alpha regimen looks to be very effective and safe for carriers of inherited clotting disorders who developed major side effects with recombinant IFN-alpha therapy for HCV-related chronic hepatitis.

Interferon for interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis of interferon therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C has documented its efficacy in achieving virologic clearance, and improving liver biochemistry and histology; however, since its publication additional trials have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response to interferon in interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. The effect of treatment dose and duration, and the response in patients with cirrhosis and those with normal aminotransferases was also investigated.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 1, 1999), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 1999), and reference lists were searched, and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing interferon with placebo, no treatment, or different regimens of interferon were selected. Abstracts were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was sustained disappearance of serum HCV RNA (virologic sustained response (SR)). Biochemical and end of treatment responses, liver histology, and adverse events were also recorded. Assessment of drug efficacy used the methods of Peto and Der Simonian and Laird.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-four trials enrolling 6545 patients were included. Compared with no treatment, interferon 3 MU thrice weekly for 12 months increased the probability of a virologic SR (Peto odds ratio (OR) 4.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53 to 13.85). At this dosage and duration of therapy, the rate of virologic SR was 17% (95% CI 10 to 28%) in interferon-treated patients versus 3% (95% CI 1 to 10%) in controls. A dose of 6 MU was more effective than 3 MU thrice weekly (OR for 12 months treatment, 2.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 4.45), as were durations of 12 months or greater versus six months (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.67). Adverse events were more common with higher doses and prolonged durations of treatment. Compared with no therapy, interferon increased the probability of histologic improvement (OR 9.22; 95% CI 5.69 to 14.94). The response to interferon in cirrhotic patients (virologic SR, 17%; 95% CI 11 to 26%) was similar to that in non-cirrhotic patients. However, interferon was no more effective than control in patients with normal aminotransferases.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Interferon is effective in achieving viral clearance and improving liver biochemistry and histology in interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Higher doses and prolonged durations are more effective, but associated with more frequent adverse events. Interferon is associated with similar benefits in patients with cirrhosis, but the efficacy in patients with normal aminotransferases is unproven.

Combination of “low-dose” ribavirin and interferon alfa-2a therapy followed by interferon alfa-2a monotherapy in chronic HCV-infected non-responders and relapsers after interferon alfa-2a monotherapy

AIM: To report on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of interferon alfa-2a combined with a “low dose” of ribavirin for relapsers and non-responders to alpha interferon monotherapy.

METHODS: Thirty four chronic hepatitis C virus infected non responders to interferon alfa-2a monotherapy (a course of at least 3 months treatment) and 13 relapsers to interferon alfa-2a monotherapy (a dose of 3 to 6 million units three times per week for at least 20 weeks but not more than 18 months) were treated with the same dose of interferon alfa-2a used before (3 to 6 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (10 mg/kg daily) for 6 months. In complete responders, interferon alfa-2a was administered for further 6 months at the same dose used before as monotherapy.

RESULTS: Seven (20.6%) of 34 non responders stopped the combined therapy due to adverse events, including two patients with histological and clinical Child A cirrhosis. In 17/27 (63%) non responders, the combined therapy was stopped after three months because of non response. Ten of the 27 non responders completed the 12 month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 28 months (16-37 months) after the treatment, 4/10 (15%) previous non responders still remained complete responders. All 13 previous relapsers completed the 12-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 22 months (9-36 months) after treatment, 6/13 (46%) the previous relapsers were still sustained complete responders.

CONCLUSION: Our treatment schedule of the combined therapy for 6 months of interferon alfa-2a with a low dose of ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) followed by 6 months of interferon alfa-2a monotherapy is able to induce a sustained complete response rate in 15% of non responders and 46% of relapsers with chronic hepatitis C virus related liver diseases comparable to those obtained with the standard doses of ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day. Randomized prospective controlled trials using lower total amounts of ribavirin in combination with interferon should be performed.

The Effect Of Long Term and High Dose Interferon Treatment In Chronic Hepatitis C

The results of 43 interferon treatments of 35 patients (23 male, 12 female) are reported. The duration of the treatment was 6-18 months, the dose of interferon was 3x3-5 MU weekly. Complete response (HCV RNA became negative) was found in 11, relapse was observed in 3 patients. Partial response (transaminase levels became normal, or less than twice normal value, but patients remained HCV RNA positive) occurred in 23 cases, relapse was obeserved in 16. The therapy had no effect in 9 cases. The higher dose and longer term interferon therapy resulted in a higher rate of response to the treatment and a reduction in the number of relapses.

Correlation of clinicopathologic features of resected hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C virus genotype

Clinicopathologic findings in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicating hepatitis C virus and outcomes after liver resection were compared between different viral genotypes. One hundred and forty-seven patients with both anti-hepatitis C virus antibody and hepatitis C virus RNA in their sera underwent curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in our department between 1991 and 1997. Of these patients, 115 were infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b (group 1), and 32 were infected with 2a or 2b (group 2). Clinicopathologic findings and outcomes after operation were compared between the two groups. Alanine aminotransferase activity was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. Genotypes did not differ concomitantly with histopathologic features of the carcinoma or adjacent hepatic tissue. Although the tumor-free survival rate did not differ significantly between the two groups, recurrence was not detected during the period beyond 3 years following operation in group 2, while recurrences arose during that period in 16 group 1 patients, most of whom continued to manifest active hepatitis. In 7 of these 16 patients, the recurrent tumors were histologically multicentric in origin. The cumulative survival rate was significantly lower in group 1 than 2. Multivariate analysis indicated that genotype 1b was an independent risk factor for short survival. Patients infected with genotype 1b may have a relatively high risk of ongoing hepatocarcinogenesis and more aggressive progression of associated liver dysfunction, resulting in a poorer outcome than with other genotypes.

[Characteristics of the hepatitis C virus and viral predictors of therapeutic response]

NATURAL HISTORY OF HEPATITIS C-INFECTION AND VIRAL CHARACTERISTICS: Hepatitis C-virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of non-A, non-B-hepatitis and, additionally, is associated with liver cirrhosis and hepato-cellular carcinoma. The high degree of chronificity of HCV-infection is reasonable due to antigenic variability of neutralizing epitopes leading to incomplete immunoresponse with subsequent virus persistence. Besides genetic variants of HCV within a virus population (quasispecies nature of HCV), different genotypes are classified being genetically and phenotypically distinct, and geographically restricted in part. Genotyping of HCV is not only important for phylogenetic and epidemiological studies, but also a predictive marker for pathogenesis and therapy. VIRAL PREDICTORS OF HCV THERAPY: In a meta-analysis of 18 therapeutical studies of chronical HCV infections, genotype 1 and high levels of viremia determined markedly the response to interferon therapy. In this context, clinical trials have proven the effect of a combined therapy with interferon and ribavirin. Especially patients with HCV genotype 1 or high levels of viremia had a real benefit from combined antiviral therapy in comparison to monotherapy with interferon. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE CONCEPTS: Besides recent concepts improving the therapeutical response to HCV infection, further effort is necessary to develop more successful strategies for eradication of hepatitis C virus. In this context, variations of interferon therapy should be evaluated (e.g. higher and daily doses, longer duration of interferon therapy, "retarded" interferon (PEG-IFN). In addition, new therapeutical concepts should be performed including a combination of interferon with other known antiviral agents (amantadine), a combination with immunomodulators (GM-CSF, thymosin alpha 1), the development of new antiviral agents (inhibitors of viral proteases, helicases and polymerases) and the exploration of anti-viral, molecular strategies (specific ribozymes, antisense oligonucleotides and DNA-vaccination). Nevertheless, the development of an effective vaccination should be the most important challenge for the future.

[Therapy of hepatitis C]

The purpose of this review is an update of the therapy of hepatitis C especially with Interferon-alpha. From the large number of publications on this topic the established facts were worked out. Taking these facts as a base guidelines for the therapy in practical use were defined. In addition the aspects of therapeutic strategies of chronic hepatitis C which until now can not definitely be judged are discussed. In the relatively few patients in whom hepatitis C is diagnosed already in the acute phase, Interferon-alpha-treatment (3 x 3 million units 3 times a week) for 3 to 4 months increases the percentage of patients in whom HCV-RNA in the serum is eliminated. In patients with chronic hepatitis C, after decision finding for treatment, a standard scheme is recommended which consists of a monotherapy with recombinant Interferon-alpha. The dosage of Interferon-alpha is in the first 12 to 16 weeks 5 up to 6 million units given 3 times a week. For the further therapy 3 million units 3 times a week seems to be appropriate. The recommended duration of Interferon-alpha-therapy is 12 months. A long-term benefit of about 20% can be achieved in unselected groups of patients when judged on the permanent normalisation of serum transaminases and elimination of HCV-RNA in the serum. Important factors which may influence the probability of a sustained response, like HCV genotype, virus titer in serum, duration of the disease, high hepatic iron content and the presence of cirrhosis, are discussed. Up to now there exist no reliable guidelines in the case of a "no change" situation and for patients with a flare-up of inflammatory activity during or after therapy. Combination therapy of Interferon-alpha with other drugs like analogous of nucleotides (for example ribavarin), non steroidal antirheumatic drugs and ursodesoxycholic acid (UDCA) have still to be evaluated in controlled clinical trials.

A practical guide to the use of interferons in the management of hepatitis virus infections

The recommended interferon dosage for patients with chronic hepatitis and typical hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is 10 MU 3 times weekly for 4 to 6 months; with such a regimen sustained alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalisation, liver histology improvement, clearance of HBV DNA and seroconversion from hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to anti-HBe are obtained in about 40% of treated patients. Patients with elevated disease activity (high ALT values, active chronic hepatitis, low HBV DNA levels) tend to respond better to therapy; Oriental patients and immunocompromised patients are not ideal candidates for interferon. Patients with chronic hepatitis B and the HBeAg-negative variant should be given intermediate dosages (6 to 9 MU thrice weekly) of interferon for prolonged periods (12 months); however, even with this approach, the relapse rate is high (> 60%) during the follow-up. In chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, therapy with 9 to 10 MU of interferon 3 times weekly for 12 months induces a transient remission in disease (ALT normalisation, HDV RNA clearance) in more than 50% of treated patients, but a sustained response is found in less than 20% of patients. In such disease, baseline predictive factors of long term response are still unknown. In chronic hepatitis C, treatment with 3 to 5 MU of interferon given 3 times weekly for 6 to 12 months induces a sustained remission in no more than 30% of treated patients. Probable predictive factors of long term response are: low viraemia, genotype other than 1, absence of cirrhosis, low intrahepatic iron content, low nucleotide diversity of the envelope 2 gene of the hepatitis C virus. Prolonged (> 12 months) therapeutic courses seem to enhance the sustained response rate; in nonresponders/relapsers, combined therapy (interferon plus indomethacin, interferon plus ketoprofen, interferon plus ribavirin) is promising but randomised controlled trials are needed in order to establish the real efficacy and safety of such therapeutic regimens.

A rational approach to the management of hepatitis C infection

Images

Interferon-alpha-2a. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of viral hepatitis

Interferon-alpha-2a is a recombinant interferon with antiviral, antitumour and immunomodulatory properties. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the drug offers therapeutic benefit in patients with some forms of chronic viral hepatitis. Remission, as measured by clearance of viral DNA and hepatitis B 'e' antigen (HBeAg), and normalisation of serum alanine aminotransferase levels, is observed in approximately 30 to 45% of patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving interferon-alpha-2a (2.5 to 18MU administered 3 times/week); about 5 to 15% of untreated controls remit spontaneously every year. Complete recovery [with loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)] is usually noted in < 20% of treated individuals. Similar response rates have been reported in the relatively small number of children evaluated to date. Although numerous studies have shown that interferon-alpha-2a (at various dosages) induces biochemical amelioration of chronic hepatitis C in approximately 50 to 75% of patients, relapse is common. Thus, long term remission may only be observed in about 15 to 30% of treated patients. On the other hand, this disorder remits spontaneously in only a few patients. The role of interferon-alpha-2a in the treatment of chronic hepatitis D remains unclear. Although preliminary data suggest it may be beneficial, cessation of therapy is generally followed by relapse. As with other types of interferons, most patients receiving interferon-alpha-2a experience an 'influenza-like' syndrome, which tends to diminish with continuing therapy. Other effects such as fatigue, lethargy, anorexia and weight loss are usually dose-limiting. Serum neutralising antibodies develop in approximately 10 to 20% of treated patients. Thus, although response rates are less than optimal, interferon-alpha-2a is a drug of first choice amongst the limited therapeutic options available for the management of well-compensated chronic viral hepatitis B or C.