Boceprevir

Deciphering the molecular and cellular atlas of immune cells in septic patients with different bacterial infections

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by abnormal immune responses to various, predominantly bacterial, infections. Different bacterial infections lead to substantial variation in disease manifestation and therapeutic strategies. However, the underlying cellular heterogeneity and mechanisms involved remain poorly understood.

METHODS

Multiple bulk transcriptome datasets from septic patients with 12 types of bacterial infections were integrated to identify signature genes for each infection. Signature genes were mapped onto an integrated large single-cell RNA (scRNA) dataset from septic patients, to identify subsets of cells associated with different sepsis types, and multiple omics datasets were combined to reveal the underlying molecular mechanisms. In addition, an scRNA dataset and spatial transcriptome data were used to identify signaling pathways in sepsis-related cells. Finally, molecular screening, optimization, and de novo design were conducted to identify potential targeted drugs and compounds.

RESULTS

We elucidated the cellular heterogeneity among septic patients with different bacterial infections. In Escherichia coli (E. coli) sepsis, 19 signature genes involved in epigenetic regulation and metabolism were identified, of which DRAM1 was demonstrated to promote autophagy and glycolysis in response to E. coli infection. DRAM1 upregulation was confirmed in an independent sepsis cohort. Further, we showed that DRAM1 could maintain survival of a pro-inflammatory monocyte subset, C10_ULK1, which induces systemic inflammation by interacting with other cell subsets via resistin and integrin signaling pathways in blood and kidney tissue, respectively. Finally, retapamulin was identified and optimized as a potential drug for treatment of E. coli sepsis targeting the signature gene, DRAM1, and inhibiting E. coli protein synthesis. Several other targeted drugs were also identified in other types of sepsis, including nystatin targeting C1QA in Neisseria sepsis and dalfopristin targeting CTSD in Streptococcus viridans sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the cellular heterogeneity and underlying mechanisms in septic patients with various bacterial infections, providing insights to inform development of stratified targeted therapies for sepsis.

In vitro assessment of drug-drug interaction potential of boceprevir associated with drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters

The inhibitory effect of boceprevir (BOC), an inhibitor of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 3 protease was evaluated in vitro against a panel of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. BOC, a known substrate for cytochrome P450 (P450) CYP3A and aldo-ketoreductases, was a reversible time-dependent inhibitor (k(inact) = 0.12 minute(-1), K(I) = 6.1 µM) of CYP3A4/5 but not an inhibitor of other major P450s, nor of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases 1A1 and 2B7. BOC showed weak to no inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), P-glycoprotein (Pgp), or multidrug resistance protein 2. It was a moderate inhibitor of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and 1B3, with an IC(50) of 18 and 4.9 µM, respectively. In human hepatocytes, BOC inhibited CYP3A-mediated metabolism of midazolam, OATP1B-mediated hepatic uptake of pitavastatin, and both the uptake and metabolism of atorvastatin. The inhibitory potency of BOC was lower than known inhibitors of CYP3A (ketoconazole), OATP1B (rifampin), or both (telaprevir). BOC was a substrate for Pgp and BCRP but not for OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP2B1, organic cation transporter, or sodium/taurocholate cotransporting peptide. Overall, our data suggest that BOC has the potential to cause pharmacokinetic interactions via inhibition of CYP3A and CYP3A/OATP1B interplay, with the interaction magnitude lower than those observed with known potent inhibitors. Conversely, pharmacokinetic interactions of BOC, either as a perpetrator or victim, via other major P450s and transporters tested are less likely to be of clinical significance. The results from clinical drug-drug interaction studies conducted thus far are generally supportive of these conclusions.

Boceprevir: a protease inhibitor for the treatment of hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Boceprevir is a protease inhibitor indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin for treatment-naive patients and those who previously failed to improve with interferon and ribavirin treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the mechanism of action, pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of boceprevir.

METHODS

Relevant information was identified through a search of PubMed (1990-July 2012), EMBASE (1990-July 2012), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2012), and Google Scholar using the key words boceprevir, SCH 503034, non-structural protein 3 (NS3) serine protease inhibitor, and direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA). Additional information was obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration's Web site, review of the reference lists of identified articles, and posters and abstracts from scientific meetings.

RESULTS

Clinical efficacy of boceprevir was assessed in 2 Phase III trials, Serine Protease Inhibitor Therapy-2 (SPRINT-2) for treatment-naive patients and Retreatment with HCV Serine Protease Inhibitor Boceprevir and PegIntron/Rebetol 2 (RESPOND-2) for treatment-experienced patients. In SPRINT-2, patients were randomized to receive peginterferon + ribavirin (PR) or peginterferon + ribavirin + boceprevir (PRB); duration of boceprevir therapy varied from 24, 32, to 44 weeks on the basis of HCV RNA results. The primary endpoint was achievement of sustained virologic response (SVR; lower limit of detection, 9.3 IU/mL). The addition of boceprevir was shown to be superior, with overall SVR rates ranging from 63% to 66% compared with 38% with PR (P < 0.001). Results of SVR in SPRINT-2 were also reorganized to monitor SVRs in black and non-black patients. Treatment-experienced patients were assessed in RESPOND-2; however, null responders were excluded. Patients were again randomized to PR or PRB; duration of boceprevir therapy varied from 32 to 44 weeks on the basis of HCV RNA results. SVR was significantly higher in patients receiving boceprevir (59%-66% vs 21% with PR; P < 0.001). This benefit was seen in both previous nonresponders (SVR, 40%-52% vs 7% with PR), as well as previous relapsers (SVR, 69%-75% vs 29% with PR). Importantly, SVR could be attained with a shortened course of therapy in almost one half of all treated patients in SPRINT-2 (44%) and RESPOND-2 (46%).

CONCLUSIONS

Boceprevir was well tolerated in clinical trials and a welcomed addition to our HCV armamentarium.

Practical management of boceprevir and immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is the most important complication in HCV liver transplant patients. Boceprevir with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) enabled improvement in sustained virological response rates of patients with genotype 1 HCV. Boceprevir interacts with immunosuppressive therapy (IT) by inhibiting the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme. Our aim was to study interactions and assess the safety of boceprevir in the context of HCV recurrence. Boceprevir (800 mg three times a day) initiated after a 4-week lead-in phase was associated with cyclosporine (three patients), tacrolimus (two patients), and everolimus (one patient) in five liver transplant patients with genotype 1 HCV infection who experienced HCV recurrence. The mean follow-up period after HCV therapy was 14.8 ± 3.1 weeks. Estimated oral clearances of IT decreased on average by 50%, requiring reduced dosing regimens. Anemia occurred in all patients, with a mean fall in hemoglobin levels between baseline and week 12 of 3.12 ± 2.27 g/dl. All patients required administration of β-erythropoietin (n = 5), three needed ribavirin dose reduction, and one needed a blood transfusion. A virological response was observed in all patients (mean HCV viral load [HVL] decrease at week 12, 6.64 ± 0.35 log(10) IU/ml). These preliminary results in liver transplant patients with HCV recurrence demonstrate the feasibility and safety of coadministration of boceprevir and IT.