High von Willebrand factor antigen levels and procoagulant imbalance may be involved in both increasing severity of cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis

Establish and validate an artificial neural networks model used for predicting portal vein thrombosis risk in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis patients

BACKGROUND

The portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can exacerbate portal hypertension and lead to complications, increasing the risk of mortality.

AIM

To evaluate the predictive capacity of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in quantifying the likelihood of developing PVT in individuals afflicted with hepatitis B-induced cirrhosis.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Beijing Ditan Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, including 986 hospitalized patients. Patients admitted between January 2011 and December 2014 were assigned to the training set (685 cases), while those hospitalized from January 2015 to December 2016 were divided into the validation cohort (301 cases). Independent risk factors for PVT were identified using COX univariate analysis and used to construct an ANN model. Model performance was evaluated through metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and concordance index.

RESULTS

In the training set, PVT occurred in 19.0% of patients within three years and 23.7% within five years. In the validation cohort, PVT developed in 16.7% of patients within three years and 24.0% within five years. The ANN model incorporated nine independent risk factors: Age, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal varices with bleeding, Child-Pugh classification, alanine aminotransferase levels, albumin levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet. The model achieved an AUC of 0.967 (95%CI: 0.960-0.974) at three years and 0.975 (95%CI: 0.955-0.992) at five years, significantly outperforming existing models such as model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh-Turcotte (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ANN model demonstrated effective stratification of patients into high- and low-risk groups for PVT development over three and five years. Validation in an independent cohort confirmed the model's predictive accuracy.

Nomogram model for identifying portal vein thrombosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Von Willebrand factor (vWF) plays a key role in hemostasis and is reported to be related to the outcome of advanced chronic liver disease. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between vWF and other potential variables and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices were admitted to our hospital between January 2020 and September 2022. Patients were prospectively recruited and divided into PVT and non-PVT groups. We collected clinical tests, biochemical tests, coagulation tests, and hemostatic protein profile data to explore the associated factors of PVT.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were enrolled including 60 patients with PVT and 68 patients without PVT. Plasma levels of vWF [odds ratio (OR) = 1.015, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.025, P = 0.005], D-dimer (OR = 1.967, 95% CI: 1.141-3.389, P = 0.015), and decreased portal vein velocity (PVV) (OR = 0.852, 95% CI: 0.769-0.944, P = 0.002) were the variables independently associated with the existence of PVT. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses for vWF, D-dimer, and PVV were 0.779, 0.848, and 0.832, respectively. A nomogram model was established involving the three parameters, and the AUC was 0.919 (95% CI: 0.869-0.969). In the internal validation using bootstrap, the AUC was 0.919 (95% CI: 0.868-0.970).

CONCLUSION

Higher vWF levels were related to PVT in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, indicating that vWF might serve as a relevant factor for PVT, and a nomogram containing vWF, D-dimer, and PVV could be an important tool for PVT identification in cirrhotic patients.

Effect of factor VIII and FVIII/PC ratio on portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, there is an ongoing debate regarding the ability to predict PVT development using markers of FVIII or FVIII/PC ratio. This study presents evidence-based medical findings on the influence of FVIII activity levels and FVIII/PC values in the formation of PVT in cirrhosis.

METHODS

The search for original studies on risk factors for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) associated with cirrhosis was conducted, which primarily focused on comparing circulating FVIII activity levels or FVIII/PC ratio in cirrhotic patients with and without PVT. The quality of evidence from each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included a total of 10 original studies. In total, 2250 cirrhotic patients were included, with 414 having PVT and 1836 without PVT. The pooled analysis using a random-effects model showed no significant difference in standardized mean difference (SMD) for FVIII activity levels in cirrhotic patients with or without PVT (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI=-0.46 to 0.70, P = 0.68), but there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 95.52%, P = 0.00). Meta-regression analysis indicated that differences in mean FVIII activity levels in the PVT group, the number of cases in the non-PVT group, and the study design methods partially contributed to the heterogeneity (P < 0.05). However, compared to the non-PVT group, the PVT group had higher FVIII/PC ratio with a statistically significant difference (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.63, P = 0.00), and there was no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 28.62%).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the FVIII/PC ratio not only reflects the severity of liver disease, but also can be used as one of the predictors of PVT development.

The genetics of portal hypertension: Recent developments and the road ahead

Portal hypertension (PH), defined as a pathological increase in the portal vein pressure, has different aetiologies and causes. Intrahepatic PH is mostly secondary to the presence of underlying liver disease leading to cirrhosis, characterized by parenchymal changes with deregulated accumulation of extracellular matrix and vascular abnormalities; liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatic stellate cells are key players in PH progression, able to influence each other. However, PH may also develop independently of parenchymal damage, as occur in portosinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD), a group of clinical and histological entities characterized by portal vasculature dysfunctions. In this particular group of disorders, the pathophysiology of PH is still poorly understood. In the last years, several genetic studies, based on genome-wide association studies or whole-exome sequencing analysis, have highlighted the importance of genetic heritability in PH pathogenesis, both in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic cases. The common PNPLA3 p.I148M variant, one of the main determinants of the susceptibility to steatotic liver disease, has also been associated with decompensation in patients with PH. Genetic variations at loci influencing coagulation, mainly the ABO locus, may directly contribute to the pathogenesis of PH. Rare genetic variants have been associated with familiar cases of progressive PSVD. In this review, we summarize the recent knowledges on genetic variants predisposing to PH development, contributing to better understand the role of genetic factors in PH pathogenesis.

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Vascular Liver Diseases: Focus on Thrombosis

Vascular liver disorders (VLDs) comprise a wide spectrum of clinical-pathological entities that primarily affect the hepatic vascular system of both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. VLDs more frequently involve the portal and the hepatic veins, as well as liver sinusoids, resulting in an imbalance of liver homeostasis with serious consequences, such as the development of portal hypertension and liver fibrosis. Surprisingly, many VLDs are characterized by a prothrombotic phenotype. The molecular mechanisms that cause thrombosis in VLD are only partially explained by the alteration in the Virchow's triad (hypercoagulability, blood stasis, and endothelial damage) and nowadays their pathogenesis is incompletely described and understood. Studies about this topic have been hampered by the low incidence of VLDs in the general population and by the absence of suitable animal models. Recently, the role of coagulation imbalance in liver disease has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms linked to fibrogenesis, so a novel interest in vascular alterations of the liver has been renewed. This review provides a detailed analysis of the current knowledge of molecular mechanisms of VLD. We also focus on the promising role of anticoagulation as a strategy to prevent liver complications and to improve the outcome of these patients.

Portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: An updated overview

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent and severe complication in patients with cirrhosis; however, the pathophysiology of PVT needs to be better clarified. There are few significant predictive factors in clinical practice, and the impact of PVT on cirrhosis progression and its complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome, remains uncertain. In recent years, the understanding of the mechanisms of PVT has become more profound with the publication of related literature. Therefore, in this review, we aim to summarize the advanced progress in the epidemiology, hazards, risk factors, diagnosis and classification, and treatment of PVT to provide insight into clinical management.

Characterization of a prothrombotic phenotype using thrombin generation and thrombin activity in cirrhosis and portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) may develop a prothrombotic phenotype that seems to be more pronounced with more severe liver dysfunction. An imbalance of endogenous pro- and anticoagulants is not fully captured by routine coagulation assays.

METHODS

In a cohort of ACLD patients undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement, we assessed thrombin generation (TGA) using two commercially available assays (Technothrombin and Thrombinoscope) with and without addition of soluble thrombomodulin (TM), as well as thrombin activity, alongside a panel of coagulation parameters.

RESULTS

The cohort encompassed 37 patients (median age 55.3 years, mean HVPG 16 ± 5 mm Hg). In the TM-modified Thrombinoscope TGA, the endogenous thrombin generation potential (ETP) was significantly increased in Child-Pugh-Score (CPS) B/C patients (N = 23, 62 %) compared to CPS A patients (N = 14, 38 %) (ETP: 546 nM∗min (443-696) vs. 404 nM∗min (289-573), p = 0.028). Using the Technothrombin TGA without TM, patients with CPS B/C had decreased ETP compared to CPS A patients (ETP: 2792 ± 1336 nM∗min vs. 5040 ± 816 nM∗min, p < 0.001) and with addition of TM (final concentration: 5 nM; ETP: 2545 ± 1327 nM∗min vs. 4824 ± 929 nM∗min, p < 0.001). Thrombin activity levels were 0.6pM in median (0.2-1.6pM) and above the level of detectability (0.10pM) in 94.6 % of patients but were not correlated to severity of cirrhosis (CPS A 0.7pM vs CPS B/C 0.4pM, p = 0.377) nor to parameters of TGA.

CONCLUSION

Thrombin plasma levels are elevated in liver disease patients without apparent correlation to TGA or severity of cirrhosis. TGAs can be modified with TM to enable protein C-dependent anticoagulation, but result in differences with regard to severity of liver disease.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Cirrhosis: A Comprehensive Review

Portal vein thrombosis constitutes the most common thrombotic event in patients with cirrhosis, with increased rates in the setting of advanced liver disease. Despite being a well-known complication of cirrhosis, the contribution of portal vein thrombosis to hepatic decompensation and overall mortality is still a matter of debate. The incorporation of direct oral anticoagulants and new radiological techniques for portal vein recanalization have expanded our therapeutic arsenal. However, the lack of large prospective observational studies and randomized trials explain the heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of current guidelines. This article seeks to make a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

The portal vein in patients with cirrhosis is not an excessively inflammatory or hypercoagulable vascular bed, a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

A hypercoagulable state is not associated with development of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis, as we previously demonstrated. However, some groups demonstrated elevated levels of inflammatory markers and activation of hemostasis in the portal vein (PV) compared to posthepatic veins, but because the liver is involved in clearance of these markers, we hypothesize that interpretation of these data is not straightforward.

AIM

To determine whether the PV has particular proinflammatory/hypercoagulable characteristics by comparing plasma sampled in the PV, hepatic vein (HV), and the systemic circulation.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 51 cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, were taken from the PV, HV, and jugular vein (JV). Markers of inflammation (lipopolysaccharide, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances), neutrophil-extracellular-traps (cfDNA, MPO-DNA), endothelial damage (von Willebrand factor [VWF]), and hemostasis were determined and compared among the three vascular beds.

RESULTS

Markers of inflammation were slightly, but significantly higher in the PV than in the HV and systemic circulation. VWF and markers of hemostasis were modestly elevated in the PV. Levels of multiple markers were lower in the HV compared with the PV and systemic circulation. Higher model for end-stage liver disease score was associated with a more prothrombotic state in all three sample sites.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to published studies, we did not detect a clear proinflammatory or prothrombotic environment in the PV of cirrhotic patients. Many markers are lowest in the HV, indicating that the low levels of these markers in the HV, at least in part, reflect clearance of those markers in the liver.

ABO blood group does not influence Child-Pugh A cirrhosis outcome: An observational study from CIRRAL and ANRS CO12 CIRVIR cohorts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-O blood group promotes deep vein thrombosis and liver fibrosis in both general population and hepatitis C. We aimed to evaluate the influence of Non-O group on the outcome of Child-Pugh A cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

We used two prospective cohorts of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis due to either alcohol or viral hepatitis. Primary end point was the cumulated incidence of 'Decompensation' at 3 years, defined as the occurrence of ascites , hydrothorax, encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension, or bilirubin >45 μmol/L. Secondary end points were the cumulated incidences of (1) 'Disease Progression' including a « decompensation» or « the occurrence of one or more parameters » among: prothrombin time (PT) <45%, albumin <28 g/L, Child-Pugh worsening (B or C vs A or B, C vs B), hepatorenal syndrome, and hepato-pulmonary syndrome, (2) other events such as non-malignant portal vein thrombosis (nmPVT), and (3) overall survival.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 1789; 59.9% Non-O group; 40.1% group O) were followed during a median of 65.4 months. At 3 years cumulated incidence of Decompensation was 8.3% in Non-O group and 7.2% in group O (P = .27). Cumulated incidence of Disease Progression was 20.7% in Non-O group and 18.9% in group O (P = .26). Cumulated incidence of nmPVT was 2.7% in Non-O group and 2.8% in group O (P = .05). At 3 years overall survival was 92.4% in Non-O group and 93.4% in group O (P = 1).

CONCLUSION

Non-O group does not influence disease outcome in Child-Pugh A cirrhotic patients. Clinicals trial number NCT03342170.

Factor VIII/protein C ratio independently predicts liver-related events but does not indicate a hypercoagulable state in ACLD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It has been suggested that the ratio of procoagulant factor VIII to anticoagulant protein C (FVIII/PC) reflects the hemostatic equilibrium. Moreover, FVIII/PC predicted decompensation/death in a small study not accounting for portal hypertension severity. We investigated (i) the prognostic value of FVIII/PC (outcome-cohort) and (ii) whether FVIII/PC reflects the hypercoagulable state (assessed by thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation assay [TM-TGA]) or the risk of bleeding/thrombotic events in patients undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement during follow-up.

METHODS

(i) The outcome-cohort comprised 576 patients with evidence of advanced chronic liver disease (liver stiffness measurement ≥10 kPa and/or HVPG ≥6 mmHg). (ii) TM-TGA-cohort patients (n = 142) were recruited from the prospective VIenna CIrrhosis Study (VICIS: NCT03267615).

RESULTS

(i) FVIII/PC significantly increased across clinical stages (p <0.001) as well as HVPG (p <0.001) and MELD score (p <0.001) strata and remained independently associated with decompensation/liver-related death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11; p = 0.013), even after multivariable adjustment. It was also associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) development (adjusted hazard ratio 1.10; 95% CI 1.02-1.19; p = 0.015) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. (ii) FVIII/PC showed a weak positive correlation with endogenous thrombin potential (Spearman's ρ = 0.255; p = 0.002), but this association disappeared after adjusting for the severity of liver disease. FVIII/PC was not associated with the development of bleeding (p = 0.272) or thrombotic events (p = 0.269). However, FVIII/PC correlated with biomarkers of different pathophysiological mechanisms that promote liver disease progression.

CONCLUSION

FVIII/PC provides prognostic information regarding hepatic decompensation/death and ACLF, independently of established prognostic indicators. However, this is not evidence that hypercoagulability drives disease progression, as the correlation between FVIII/PC and thrombin generation is confounded by liver disease severity and FVIII/PC was not associated with thrombosis. Therefore, FVIII/PC does not reflect coagulation and results from previous studies on FVIII/PC require re-interpretation.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT03267615 (in part).

LAY SUMMARY

A balanced coagulation system is essential for preventing bleeding episodes and blood clot formation (thrombosis). Blood of patients with advanced liver disease may have increased coagulation potential, possibly promoting the worsening of liver disease via thrombosis in the blood vessels of the liver. The ratio between the results of 2 blood tests (procoagulant factor VIII to anticoagulant protein C) has been suggested to reflect these increases in coagulation potential. Our study demonstrates, on the one hand, that this ratio is a versatile predictor of the development of complications of cirrhosis, yet on the other hand, that it is unrelated to coagulation.

The Pathophysiology of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: Getting Deeper into Virchow's Triad

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication among patients with cirrhosis. However, its pathophysiology is not well established and there are currently very few predictive factors, none of which are actually useful, from a clinical perspective. The contribution of each of the vertices of Virchow’s triad, e.g., blood hypercoagulability, blood flow, and portal vein endothelial damage in the development of PVT is not clear. In this review, we aim to recapitulate the latest studies on the field of PVT development in order to understand its mechanisms and discuss some of the future directions in the study of this important complication of cirrhosis.

Systemic inflammation as a risk factor for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: a prospective longitudinal study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Various risk factors for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) development in patients with cirrhosis have been identified, but the role of systemic inflammatory reaction is unknown. The study aims to assess the association between markers of systemic inflammation and PVT in cirrhosis.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and October 2015, 107 outpatients with cirrhosis and no PVT were recruited, and followed till February 2017. White blood cell count, serum concentrations of high-sensitive C-reactive protein, ferritin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated at baseline and every 3 or 6 months till PVT diagnosis or end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Median age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and follow-up period of the studied population was 55 years (IQR 46-62 years), 9.6 points (IQR 7.5-12 points) and 19 months (12-24 months), respectively. PVT developed in 10.3% of the patients. Lymphocyte count below 1.2 ´ 109/L [hazard ratio, 6.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-28.2; P = 0.022], IL-6 above 5.5 pg/mL (hazard ratio, 5.64; 95% CI, 1.21-26.33; P  = 0.028) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04-2.04; P = 0.028) were associated with a higher risk of PVT development. IL-6 and lymphopenia remained associated with subsequent PVT development after adjustment for nonselective beta-blockers, spleen size, portosystemic collaterals, oesophageal varices (grade ≥2) and ascites, but also with alcohol as the cause for cirrhosis and MELD ≥13.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cirrhosis, markers of systemic inflammation IL-6 and lymphopenia are predictive of PVT independently of markers of portal hypertension. These results draw our attention on a factor so far overlooked in the pathogenesis of PVT.

von Willebrand factor to protein C ratio-related thrombogenicity with systemic inflammation is predictive of graft dysfunction after liver transplantation: Retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is known to be a prototype of graft failure and ultimately influences long-term graft failure or death. We hypothesized that pretransplant thrombogenicity evaluated by procoagulant and anticoagulant, von Willebrand factor (vWF), factor Ⅷ (FⅧ), protein C (PC) and their imbalance ratio of vWF-to-PC (vWFPCR) and FVIII-to-PC (FⅧPCR), is associated with EAD and 90-day graft failure after living-related liver transplantation (LDLT) and contributes to further exacerbation of graft dysfunction when coexists with systemic inflammation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 1199 prospectively registered LDLT patients, 698 with measurements of each thrombogenicity parameters were analyzed. Risk factors for EAD development were searched and subsequent best cut-offs was calculated according to the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. When comparing the outcome, multivariable regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of the propensity score were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EAD was 10.7% (n = 75/698) after LDLT. Of parameters, vWFPCR had highest predictivity potential of EAD with the best cut-off of 8.06. The relationship between vWFPCR≥8.06 showed significant association with EAD development (OR [95%CI], 2.55[1.28-5.09], P = 0.008) and 90-day graft failure (HR [95%CI], 2.24 [1-4.98], P = 0.043) after IPTW-adjustment. Furthermore, risk of EAD increased proportionally with increasing C-reactive protein as a continuous metric of systemic inflammation, and more steeply in those with higher thrombogenicity (i.e., higher vWFPCR). Adding vWFPCR to MELD score improved EAD risk prediction by 21.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant thrombogenicity assessed by imbalance of pro- and anticoagulant, was significantly associated with EAD and 90-day graft failure after LDLT and this association was worsened by systemic inflammation.

The impact of ABO blood type on the prevalence of portal vein thrombosis in patients with advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-O blood type (BT) is a risk factor for thromboses, which has been attributed to its effects on von Willebrand factor (VWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) levels. Although high VWF/FVIII may be risk factors for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD), the impact of BT on PVT is unknown. We aimed to assess (I) whether non-O-BT is a risk factor for PVT and (II) whether non-O-BT impacts VWF/factor VIII in patients with ACLD.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis comprising two cohorts: (I) "US" including all adult liver transplantations in the US in the MELD era and (II) "Vienna" comprising patients with a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥6 mmHg.

RESULTS

(I) The "US cohort" included 84 947 patients (non-O: 55.43%). The prevalence of PVT at the time of listing (4.37% vs 4.56%; P = .1762) and at liver transplantation (9.56% vs 9.33%; P = .2546) was similar in patients with O- and non-O-BT. (II) 411 patients were included in the "Vienna cohort" (non-O: 64%). Mean HVPG was 18(9) mmHg and 90% had an HVPG ≥10 mmHg. Patients with non-O-BT had slightly increased VWF levels (318(164)% vs 309(176)%; P = .048; increase of 23.8%-23.9% in adjusted analyses), but this difference was driven by patients with less advanced disease. However, non-O-BT explained only 1% of the variation in VWF and had no effect on FVIII.

CONCLUSIONS

Although non-O-BT impacts VWF in patients with early stage ACLD, its contribution to VWF variation is considerably smaller than in the general population. Moreover, non-O-BT had no impact on FVIII. These findings may explain the absence of an association between non-O-BT and PVT in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Primary Hemostasis in Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis: What Did We Learn over the Past Decade?

Changes in primary hemostasis have been described in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis and are still subject to ongoing debate. Thrombocytopenia is common and multifactorial. Numerous studies also reported platelet dysfunction. In spite of these changes, primary hemostasis seems to be balanced. Patients with CLD and cirrhosis can suffer from both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Variceal bleeding is the major hemorrhagic complication and is mainly determined by high portal pressure. Non portal hypertension-related bleeding due to hemostatic failure is uncommon. Thrombocytopenia can complicate management of invasive procedures in CLD patients. Recently, oral thrombopoietin agonists have been approved to raise platelets before invasive procedures. In this review we aim to bundle literature, published over the past decade, discussing primary hemostasis in CLD and cirrhosis including (1) platelet count and the role of thrombopoietin (TPO) agonists, (2) platelet function tests and markers of platelet activation, (3) von Willebrand factor and (4) global hemostasis tests.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic challenges

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in cirrhosis and its prevalence increases with disease severity. Several factors are involved in the development and progression of PVT. The challenge for the management of PVT is the precise evaluation of the bleeding risk as opposed to life-threatening extension of thrombosis. Nevertheless, the impact on the progression and outcome of liver disease is unclear. A critical evaluation of the available data discloses that treating PVT in cirrhotics is safe and effective. However, there are open issues, such as which anticoagulant could represent a safer therapeutic option, and when and for how long this treatment should be administered to cirrhotic patients with PVT.

The disseminated intravascular coagulation score is a novel predictor for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The development of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhotic patients has not been fully elucidated. The disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score, which is based on readily available and relatively inexpensive coagulation parameters, including platelet count, fibrin-related markers, prothrombin time and fibrinogen, has not been reported regarding PVT development in cirrhotic patients to date. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the DIC score in predicting PVT development in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 109 cirrhotic patients with hepatitis B were included. Clinical data, laboratory tests and imaging were collected from the patients at baseline and every three months after enrollment. All patients were followed until the study endpoint (either occurrence of PVT or 12months after baseline). We measured routine laboratory parameters and conducted imaging examinations in cirrhotic patients and evaluated the prognostic value of the DIC score as a novel predictor for PVT in patients with cirrhosis. We also compared the effectiveness of the DIC score with other common coagulation and hemodynamic parameters.

RESULTS

Among the 109 patients, 14 (12.8%) developed PVT. At the study endpoint, significant increases in D-dimer, Child-Pugh score and DIC score (all P<0.001) and significantly reduced portal flow velocity (P<0.001) were noted in the PVT group. Among the selected factors, the DIC score had the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.845), followed by the Child-Pugh score (0.778), D-dimer (0.732), and portal vein velocity (0.709).

CONCLUSION

Among the selected factors, the DIC score showed non-significantly higher diagnostic performance in predicting the PVT development in cirrhotic patients compared with other factors. A validation cohort of the study is needed in the near future.