The incidental focal liver lesion: photon, proton, or needle?

Spontaneous regression of a hepatoma with ring calcification

The authors report a 74-year-old man with chronic hepatitis C-related cirrhosis and end-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance haemodialysis who was diagnosed with hepatoma. The hepatoma spontaneously regressed with significantly decreased serum alpha-fetoprotein level without any treatment during the subsequent 4-year follow-up period. However, recurrent hepatomas over bilateral hepatic lobes were evident thereafter, and the patient died later due to hepatic failure. Hepatoma with ring calcification is extremely rare and considered poor differentiation with high risk for recurrence. Spontaneous regression of hepatoma is also rare, while spontaneous regression occurring in a hepatoma with ring calcification is never reported. The definite mechanisms causing spontaneous regression of hepatomas remain unclear, but an immune response toward hepatoma induced by alpha-fetoprotein might play an important role.

Indeterminate solid hepatic lesions identified on non-diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: assessment of the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the non-cirrhotic liver

OBJECTIVE

To assess the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterization of indeterminate solid hepatic lesions identified on non-diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Fifty-five solid hepatic lesions (1-4 cm in diameter) in 46 non-cirrhotic patients (26 female, 20 male; age±SD, 55±10 years) underwent CEUS after being detected on contrast-enhanced CT which was considered as non-diagnostic after on-site analysis. Two blinded independent readers assessed CT and CEUS scans and were asked to classify retrospectively each lesion as a malignant or benign based on reference diagnostic criteria for the different hepatic lesion histotypes. Diagnostic accuracy and confidence (area--Az--under ROC curve) were assessed by using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n=30 lesions), histology (n=7 lesions), or US follow-up (n=18 lesions) as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses included 29 hemangiomas, 3 focal nodular hyperplasias, 1 hepatocellular adenoma, and 22 metastases. The additional review of CEUS after CT images improved significantly (P<.05) the diagnostic accuracy (before vs after CEUS review=49% [20/55] vs 89% [49/55]--reader 1 and 43% [24/55] vs 92% [51/55]--reader 2) and confidence (Az, 95% Confidence Intervals before vs after CEUS review=.773 [.652-.895] vs .997 [.987-1]--reader 1 and .831 [.724-.938] vs .998 [.992-1]--reader 2).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS improved the characterization of indeterminate solid hepatic lesions identified on non-diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT by identifying some specific contrast enhancement patterns.

Review article: the evolving role of liver biopsy

Liver biopsy is traditionally the 'gold standard' for the evaluation of liver diseases. There are several situations in which its role is being challenged. In hepatitis C, liver biopsy helps assess prognosis and treatment candidacy. An important exception is genotype 2 or 3 because treatment is more likely to succeed and therapy is relatively short in duration. For hepatitis B, liver biopsy gives some prognostic information, but serologic tests and hepatic biochemical tests are the primary determinants of treatment candidacy. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease can be accurately diagnosed without a liver biopsy and, furthermore, there are no specific therapies available. The role of liver biopsy to assess methotrexate-associated hepatotoxicity remains controversial. Finally, patients with focal liver lesions usually do not require biopsy and, in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma, biopsy carries a risk of needle-track seeding. In short, the need for liver biopsy depends on the specific situation and should be performed when there is sufficient uncertainty about diagnosis, severity of disease, prognosis, and treatment decisions.

Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most commonly affects patients with underlying cirrhosis. Screening of cirrhotic patients can result in early detection of HCC. If the tumor is localized to the liver, the patient can be offered therapy. It is our belief that those patients with good liver function (Child-Pugh A/B or better) should be considered for surgical resection of one or two surgical segments of the liver. Otherwise, ablative measures, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryotherapy, or angiographic embolization should be offered to the patient. Alternatively, direct injection of alcohol or acetic acid can result in effective ablation of the lesion, with unclear effects on long-term outcome. Chemotherapy does not appear to impact survival, but it is our belief that combined protocols may offer superior outcomes to single therapeutic interventions. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can have excellent efficacy in a very select group of patients.

Liver transplantation for malignant disease

For many patients with malignant disease of the liver, liver transplantation offers the only opportunity for clinical cure or prolonged palliation. As a result of organ scarcity, patients are increasingly selected on the basis of tumour stage and with the predictable likelihood of prolonged survival in mind. Consequently, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 72% and 68% respectively have been described for patients transplanted with hepatocellular carcinoma for tumours measuring less than 5 cm in diameter or up to three in number. Moreover, many centres are developing adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapeutic protocols to minimize the risks of disease recurrence following transplantation for malignancy. In this chapter, we review the current knowledge in relation to transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic neuroendocrine tumours, secondary solid tumours and other rarer malignancies.